Book contents
- Biological Invasions and Animal Behaviour
- Biological Invasions and Animal Behaviour
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Behaviour and the Invasion Process
- Part II Behavioural Interactions Between Invaders and Native Species
- 8 Invasive Plants as Novel Food Resources, the Pollinators’ Perspective
- 9 In the Light of Introduction: Importance of Introduced Populations for the Study of Brood Parasite–Host Coevolution
- 10 Flight Behaviour of an Introduced Parasite Affects its Galápagos Island Hosts: Philornis downsi and Darwin's Finches
- 11 Eat or be Eaten: Invasion and Predation in Aquatic Ecosystems
- 12 Evolutionary Novelty and the Behaviour of Introduced Predators
- Part III Case Studies
- Index
- References
8 - Invasive Plants as Novel Food Resources, the Pollinators’ Perspective
from Part II - Behavioural Interactions Between Invaders and Native Species
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2016
Book contents
- Biological Invasions and Animal Behaviour
- Biological Invasions and Animal Behaviour
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Behaviour and the Invasion Process
- Part II Behavioural Interactions Between Invaders and Native Species
- 8 Invasive Plants as Novel Food Resources, the Pollinators’ Perspective
- 9 In the Light of Introduction: Importance of Introduced Populations for the Study of Brood Parasite–Host Coevolution
- 10 Flight Behaviour of an Introduced Parasite Affects its Galápagos Island Hosts: Philornis downsi and Darwin's Finches
- 11 Eat or be Eaten: Invasion and Predation in Aquatic Ecosystems
- 12 Evolutionary Novelty and the Behaviour of Introduced Predators
- Part III Case Studies
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Biological Invasions and Animal Behaviour , pp. 119 - 132Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Adler, L.S. and Irwin, R.E. (2005). Ecological costs and benefits of defenses in nectar. Ecology, 86(11), 2968–2978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, M., Padrón, B., Bartomeus, I. and Traveset, A. (2014). Consequences of plant invasions on compartmentalization and species’ roles in plant–pollinator networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1788), 20140773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartomeus, I. (2013). Understanding linkage rules in plant–pollinator networks by using hierarchical models that incorporate pollinator detectability and plant traits. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e69200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartomeus, I. and Winfree, R. (2013). Pollinator declines: reconciling scales and implications for ecosystem services. F1000Research, 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartomeus, I., Vilà, M. and Santamaría, L. (2008). Contrasting effects of invasive plants in plant–pollinator networks. Oecologia, 155(4), 761–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartomeus, I., Ascher, J.S., Gibbs, J., et al. (2013). Historical changes in north-eastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110(12), 4656–4660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bascompte, J. and Jordano, P. (2007). Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 567–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezemer, T.M., Harvey, J.A. and Cronin, J.T. (2014). Response of native insect communities to invasive plants. Annual Review of Entomology, 59, 119–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjerknes, A.L., Totland, Ø., Hegland, S.J. and Nielsen, A. (2007). Do alien plant invasions really affect pollination success in native plant species? Biological Conservation, 138(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blüthgen, N. (2010). Why network analysis is often disconnected from community ecology: a critique and an ecologist's guide. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11(3), 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosi, B.J. and Briggs, H.M. (2013). Single pollinator species losses reduce floral fidelity and plant reproductive function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(32), 13044–13048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byers, C.R., Steinhorst, R.K. and Krausman, P.R. (1984). Clarification of a technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 1050–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cariveau, D.P. and Norton, A.P. (2009). Spatially contingent interactions between an exotic and native plant mediated through flower visitors. Oikos, 118(1), 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnicer, J., Abrams, P.A. and Jordano, P. (2008). Switching behavior, coexistence and diversification: comparing empirical community-wide evidence with theoretical predictions. Ecology Letters, 11, 802–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalheiro, L.G., Barbosa, E.R.M. and Memmott, J. (2008). Pollinator networks, alien species and the conservation of rare plants: Trinia glauca as a case study. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45(5), 1419–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalheiro, L.G., Biesmeijer, J.C., Benadi, G., et al. (2014). The potential for indirect effects between co‐flowering plants via shared pollinators depends on resource abundance, accessibility and relatedness. Ecology Letters, 17(11), 1389–1399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chittka, L. and Niven, J. (2009). Are bigger brains better? Current Biology, 19(21), R995–R1008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chittka, L. Gumbert, A. and Kunze, J. (1997). Foraging dynamics of bumblebees: correlates of movements within and between plant species. Behavioral Ecology, 8(3), 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrobock, T., Winiger, P., Fischer, M. and van Kleunen, M. (2013). The cobblers stick to their lasts: pollinators prefer native over alien plant species in a multi-species experiment. Biological Invasions, 15(11), 2577–2588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, S.A., Bee, J., Dasmahapatra, K., et al. (2001). Native or exotic? Double or single? Evaluating plants for pollinator-friendly gardens. Annals of Botany, 87(2), 219–232.Google ScholarPubMed
Crone, E.E. (2013). Responses of social and solitary bees to pulsed floral resources. The American Naturalist, 182(4), 465–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietzsch, A.C., Stanley, D.A. and Stout, J.C. (2011). Relative abundance of an invasive alien plant affects native pollination processes. Oecologia, 167(2), 469–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dukas, R. and Real, A.L. (1993). Learning constraints and floral choice behaviour in bumblebees. Animal Behaviour, 46, 637–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, J. and Thomson, J.D. (2009). Pollinator experience, neophobia and the evolution of flowering time. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1658), 935–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fründ, J., Linsenmair, K.E. and Blüthgen, N. (2010). Pollinator diversity and specialization in relation to flower diversity. Oikos, 119(10), 1581–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, M.R., Richardson, D.M. and Pauw, A. (2012). Can floral traits predict an invasive plant's impact on native plant–pollinator communities? Journal of Ecology, 100(5), 1216–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Varo, J.P., Biesmeijer, J.C., Bommarco, R., et al. (2013). Combined effects of global change pressures on animal-mediated pollination. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28(9), 524–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gumbert, A. (2000). Color choices by bumblebees (Bombus terrestris): innate preferences and generalization after learning. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48(1), 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heleno, R.H., Ceia, R.S., Ramos, J.A. and Memmott, J. (2009). Effects of alien plants on insect abundance and biomass: a food‐web approach. Conservation Biology, 23(2), 410–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrmann, F., Westphal, C., Moritz, R.F. and Steffan-Dewenter, I. (2007). Genetic diversity and mass resources promote colony size and forager densities of a social bee (Bombus pascuorum) in agricultural landscapes. Molecular Ecology, 16(6), 1167–1178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobbs, R.J. (ed.). (2000). Invasive Species in a Changing World. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Inouye, D.W. (1978). Resource partitioning in bumblebees: experimental studies of foraging behavior. Ecology, 59(4), 672–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivlev, V.S. (1964). Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobsson, A. and Padrón, B. (2014). Does the invasive Lupinus polyphyllus increase pollinator visitation to a native herb through effects on pollinator population sizes? Oecologia, 174(1), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, L.K. and Hubell, P. (1975). Contrasting foraging strategies and coexistence of two bee species on a single resource. Ecology, 56(6), 1398–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser‐Bunbury, C.N., Muff, S., Memmott, J., Müller, C.B. and Caflisch, A. (2010). The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions: a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour. Ecology Letters, 13(4), 442–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevan, P.G. and Menzel, R. (2012). The plight of pollination and the interface of neurobiology, ecology and food security. The Environmentalist, 32(3), 300–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleijn, D. and Raemakers, I. (2008). A retrospective analysis of pollen host plant use by stable and declining bumblebee species. Ecology, 89(7), 1811–1823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, A.M., Vaissiere, B.E., Cane, J.H., et al. (2007). Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1608), 303–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopezaraiza-Mikel, M.E., Hayes, R.B., Whalley, M.R. and Memmott, J. (2007). The impact of an alien plant on a native plant–pollinator network: an experimental approach. Ecology Letters, 10(7), 539–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montero-Castaño, A. (2014). Interacciones entre polinizadores y la planta exótica Hedysarum coronarium a distintas escalas espaciales. PhD thesis. Madrid, Spain: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
Montero‐Castaño, A. and Vilà, M. (2012). Impact of landscape alteration and invasions on pollinators: a meta‐analysis. Journal of Ecology, 100(4), 884–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, C.L. and Traveset, A. (2009). A meta‐analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co‐flowering native plants. Ecology Letters, 12(7), 716–728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales, C.L., Arbetman, M.P., Cameron, S.A. and Aizen, M.A. (2013). Rapid ecological replacement of a native bumblebee by invasive species. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(10), 529–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moroń, D., Lenda, M., Skórka, P., et al. (2009). Wild pollinator communities are negatively affected by invasion of alien goldenrods in grassland landscapes. Biological Conservation, 142(7), 1322–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, A.A. and Cavieres, L.A. (2008). The presence of a showy invasive plant disrupts pollinator service and reproductive output in native alpine species only at high densities. Journal of Ecology, 96(3), 459–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neu, C.W., Byers, C.R. and Peek, J.M. (1974). A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 38, 541–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nienhuis, C.M., Dietzsch, A.C. and Stout, J.C. (2009). The impacts of an invasive alien plant and its removal on native bees. Apidologie, 40(4), 450–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ollerton, J., Winfree, R. and Tarrant, S. (2011). How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos, 120(3), 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padrón, B., Traveset, A., Biedenweg, T., et al. (2009). Impact of alien plant invaders on pollination networks in two archipelagos. PLoS ONE, 4(7), e6275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palladini, J.D. and Maron, J.L. (2014). Reproduction and survival of a solitary bee along native and exotic floral resource gradients. Oecologia, 176(3), 789–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, I.M. (1997). Pollinator limitation of Cytisus scoparius (Scotch broom), an invasive exotic shrub. Ecology, 78(5), 1457–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearse, I.S., Harris, D.J., Karban, R. and Sih, A. (2013). Predicting novel herbivore–plant interactions. Oikos, 122(11), 1554–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, S.G., Biesmeijer, J.C., Kremen, C., et al. (2010). Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25(6), 345–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyšek, P., Richardson, D.M., Rejmánek, M., et al. (2004). Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon, 53(1), 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffell, J.A., Alarcón, R., Abrell, L., et al. (2008). Behavioral consequences of innate preferences and olfactory learning in hawkmoth–flower interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105(9), 3404–3409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roulston, T.H. and Cane, J.H. (2000). Pollen nutritional content and digestibility for animals. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 222(1–4), 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roulston, T.A.H. and Goodell, K. (2011). The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations. Annual Review of Entomology, 56, 293–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedivy, C., Müller, A. and Dorn, S. (2011). Closely related pollen generalist bees differ in their ability to develop on the same pollen diet: evidence for physiological adaptations to digest pollen. Functional Ecology, 25(3), 718–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stang, M., Klinkhamer, P.G., Waser, N.M., Stang, I. and van der Meijden, E. (2009). Size-specific interaction patterns and size matching in a plant–pollinator interaction web. Annals of Botany, 103(9), 1459–1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffan-Dewenter, I. and Schiele, S. (2008). Do resources or natural enemies drive bee population dynamics in fragmented habitats. Ecology, 89(5), 1375–1387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stelzer, R.J., Chittka, L., Carlton, M. and Ings, T.C. (2010). Winter active bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) achieve high foraging rates in urban Britain. PLoS ONE, 5(3), e9559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stouffer, D.B., Cirtwill, A.R. and Bascompte, J. (2014). How exotic plants integrate into pollination networks. Journal of Ecology, 102(6), 1442–1450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stout, J.C. and Morales, C.L. (2009). Ecological impacts of invasive alien species on bees. Apidologie, 40(3), 388–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tepedino, V.J., Bradley, B.A. and Griswold, T.L. (2008). Might flowers of invasive plants increase native bee carrying capacity? Intimations from Capitol Reef National Park, Utah. Natural Areas Journal, 28(1), 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thébault, E. and Fontaine, C. (2010). Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science, 329(5993), 853–856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R.M., Brose, U., Dunne, J.A., et al. (2012). Food webs: reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27(12), 689–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traveset, A. and Richardson, D.M. (2006). Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21(4), 208–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdovinos, F.S., Ramos‐Jiliberto, R., Flores, J.D., Espinoza, C. and López, G. (2009). Structure and dynamics of pollination networks: the role of alien plants. Oikos, 118(8), 1190–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdovinos, F.S., Ramos‐Jiliberto, R., Garay‐Narváez, L., Urbani, P. and Dunne, J.A. (2010). Consequences of adaptive behaviour for the structure and dynamics of food webs. Ecology Letters, 13(12), 1546–1559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilà, M., Bartomeus, I., Dietzsch, A.C., et al. (2009). Invasive plant integration into native plant–pollinator networks across Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1674), 3887–3893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilà, M., Espinar, J.L., Hejda, M., et al. (2011). Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta‐analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 14(7), 702–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waser, N.M., Chittka, L., Price, M.V., Williams, N.M. and Ollerton, J. (1996). Generalization in pollination systems and why it matters. Ecology, 77(4), 1043–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, S.M., Fisher, S.E. and Hille Ris Lambers, J. (2014). Neighborhood‐contingent indirect interactions between native and exotic plants: multiple shared pollinators mediate reproductive success during invasions. Oikos, 123(4), 433–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, C., Steffan‐Dewenter, I. and Tscharntke, T. (2003). Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale. Ecology Letters, 6(11), 961–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, N.M. and Kremen, C. (2007). Resource distributions among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape. Ecological Applications, 17(3), 910–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, N.M., Cariveau, D., Winfree, R. and Kremen, C. (2011). Bees in disturbed habitats use, but do not prefer, alien plants. Basic and Applied Ecology, 12(4), 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfree, R., Bartomeus, I. and Cariveau, D.P. (2011). Native pollinators in anthropogenic habitats. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 42(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9
- Cited by