Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T15:25:43.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Just Debate Declines: Consolidation in South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Denise M. Walsh
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

“Instead of empowerment, we have a sophisticated process of disempowerment.”

Vivienne Taylor, CGE Commissioner, 1999

“An unthinking, uncritical, kowtowing party-line toeing is fatal to a vibrant democracy.”

Archbishop Desmond Tutu, 2004

INTRODUCTION

Feminists have widely celebrated South African successes. In 1994, more than 19 million South Africans went to the ballot box and ended an apartheid regime that also was deeply conservative on women's rights. The Government of National Unity, which was committed to non-racism and non-sexism, took its place. That new government brought 111 diverse women into parliament. A core group of talented women MPs working with an array of women's organizations in civil society helped pass a remarkable series of laws that included a gender equality clause in the final constitution, the right to abortion, domestic violence legislation, affirmative action programs that targeted black women, a new maintenance act, and customary marriage reform. State support for gender justice on the scale that occurred in South Africa is quite rare in democratizing states. Instead, outcomes tend to be moderate as in Latin America, or limited as in Central and Eastern Europe. Although South Africa was an exception to this trend, its exceptionalism did not last. At the beginning of the twenty-first century these advances stopped. Why?

As discussed in Chapter 3, gender scholars have offered a number of explanations for this outcome. Scholars of South African gender politics point to weaknesses among women's organizing as well as problems with the electoral system.

Type
Chapter
Information
Women’s Rights in Democratizing States
Just Debate and Gender Justice in the Public Sphere
, pp. 185 - 216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×