Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T05:27:45.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PART 2 - Security in the formal and public domain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Simon Marginson
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Chris Nyland
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Erlenawati Sawir
Affiliation:
Central Queensland University
Helen Forbes-Mewett
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION TO PART 2: THE FORMAL AND PUBLIC DOMAIN

The formal and public domain of international student security in Australia is constituted by the ESOS Act, which defines in a particular way the relationship between nation-state, institutional providers and the student consumer. It is also shaped by the conditions governing student visas; and affected by higher education policy and funding, and processes of accreditation and quality assurance (not discussed in detail here).

The branch of government with specific policy responsibility is Australian Education International (AEI), located in the federal Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). AEI promotes the industry, though individual institutions also carry out their own marketing. It administers the ESOS Act and its website is the main official source of information. For the most part AEI relates to students indirectly via educational providers. The National Code of Practice for Registration Authorities and Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students is addressed to providers, not students. Government at a distance means state authority is curiously diffuse. On most matters the students have little recourse to direct demands, confrontation or even questions of government. As much as possible questions of standards and quality are transferred down to their dealings with providers. This is consistent with the principles of subsidiary (devolution to the level closest to the actual service) and academic autonomy, but there is no mechanism of appeal beyond the provider. Nor in most areas are there solid standards by which AEI can be held to account.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×