Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:05:40.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Is contact with nature important for healthy child development? State of the evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2009

Christopher Spencer
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Mark Blades
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

We know that children need nature … or do we? There are certainly many reasons to think that nature plays an important role in child development. For many of us, intuition emphatically asserts that nature is good for children. We hold intuitions such as, ‘every kid needs a dog’, ‘children need a nice yard to play in’, and ‘children need “fresh air”’. Beyond these intuitions, there are also well-reasoned theoretical arguments as to why humans in general – and therefore children – might have an inborn need for contact with nature (e.g., S. Kaplan, 1995; Wilson, 1984). And there is a growing body of qualitative research consistent with this idea (Bardill, 1997; Hart, 1979; R. Moore, 1989; R. C. Moore, 1986; Nabhan, 1994; Sebba, 1991; Sobel, 1993; Titman, 1994). But what do we really know about the value of nature in promoting child development? What systematic evidence is there for or against this possibility? Is children's need for nature established fact, yet-to-be-substantiated folk theory, or simply myth?

The question of nature's role in healthy child development is increasingly urgent. A consistent concern among the researchers studying children and nature is that children's access to nature is rapidly diminishing (e.g., Kahn, 2002; Kellert, 2002; Pyle, 2002; Rivkin, 2000). Not only may there be less nature for children to access, but children's access of what remains may be increasingly sporadic.

Type
Chapter
Information
Children and their Environments
Learning, Using and Designing Spaces
, pp. 124 - 140
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, C. (1987). Exposure of preschool children to companion animals: Impact on role-taking skills. (unpublished PhD dissertation), Oregon State University.Google Scholar
Bandoroff, S. and Scherer, D. G. (1994). Wilderness family therapy: an innovative treatment approach for problem youth. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 3(2), 175–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardill, N. and Hutchinson, S. (1997). Animal-assisted therapy with hospitalized adolescents. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 10(1), 17–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basile, C. G. (2000). Environmental education as a catalyst for transfer of learning in young children. Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1), 21–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behar, L. and Stephens, D. (1978). Wilderness camping: an evaluation of a residential treatment program for emotionally disturbed children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 48(4), 644–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Covert, A. M., Whiren, A. P., Keith, J., and Nelson, C. (1985). Pets, early adolescents, and families. In Sussman, M. B. (ed.), Pets and the Family (pp. 95–108). New York, NY: The Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Davis, J. (1999). No time to be a kid. Illinois Issues, 25.Google Scholar
Dismuke, R. P. (1984). Rehabilitative horseback riding for children with language disorders. In Anderson, R. K., Hart, B. L., and Hart, L. A. (eds.), The Pet Connection: Its Influence on Our Health and Quality of Life, Minneapolis: CENSHARE, University of Minnesota, 131–40.Google Scholar
Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F. E. and Sullivan, W. C. (1998). Growing up in the inner city: green spaces as places to grow. Environment and Behavior, 30, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F. E. and Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Coping with ADD: the surprising connection to green play settings. Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 54–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F. E. and Sullivan, W. C. (2002). Views of nature and self-discipline: evidence from inner city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaster, S. (1991). Urban children's access to their neighborhood: changes over three generations. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grahn, P., Martensson, F., Lindblad, B., Nilsson, P. and Ekma, A. (1997). Outdoors at daycare. City and Country, 145.Google Scholar
Guttman, G. (1984). The pet: a tutor to social skills. Journal of the Delta Society, 1(1), 37–38.Google Scholar
Hansen, K. M., Messinger, C. J., Baun, M. M. and Megel, M. (1999). Companion animals alleviating distress in children. Anthrozoos, 12(3), 142–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, R. (1979). Children's Experience of Place. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Hergovich, A., Monshi, B., Semmler, G. and Zieglmayer, V. (2002). The effects of the presence of a dog in the classroom. Anthrozoos, 15(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, M., Adams, J. and Whitelegg, J. (1990). One False Move: A Study of Children's Independent Mobility. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Howie, T. R. (1974). Indoor or outdoor education?Journal of Environmental Education, 6(2), 32–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. H. (2002). Children's affiliations with nature: structure, development, and the problem of environmental generational amnesia. In , P. H. Kahn and Kellert, S. R.(eds.), Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations (pp. 93–116). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. (1977). Summer Outdoor Programs: Their Participants and Their Effects. (No. General Technical Report NE-30); USDA Forest Service.
Kaplan, R. (1984). Wilderness perception and psychological benefits: an analysis of a continuing program. Leisure Sciences, 6, 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. R. and Talbot, J. F. (1983). Psychological benefits of wilderness experience. In Altman, I. and Wohlwill, J. F. (eds.), Behavior and the Natural Environment (pp. 163–204). New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katcher, A. H. W. and Gregory G. (2000). The centaur's lessons: therapeutic education through care of animals and nature study. In Fine, A. (ed.), Handbook on Animal-assisted Therapy: Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice. San Diego: Academic Press, 153–77.Google Scholar
Kellert, S. R. (2002). Experiencing nature: affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. In Kahn, P. H. and Kellert, S. R. (eds.), Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations (pp. 117–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kellert, S. R. and Derr, V. (1998). A National Study of Outdoor Wilderness Experience. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Kidd, A. H. and Kidd, R. M. (1987). Reactions of infants and toddlers to live and toy animals. Psychological Reports, 61, 455–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkby, M. (1989). Nature as refuge in children's environments. Children's Environments Quarterly, 6, 1–12.Google Scholar
Kuo, F. E. and Faber Taylor, A. (2004). A potential natural treatment for AD/ HD? Evidence from a national study. American Journal of Public Health, 94(9), 1580–6.CrossRef
Lieberman, G. and Hoody, L. (1998). Closing the achievement gap: using the environment as an integrating context. Paper presented at the State Environment and Education Round Table.
Limond, J. A., Bradshaw, J. W. S. and Cormack, K. F. M. (1997). Behavior of children with learning disabilities interacting with a therapy dog. Anthrozoos, 19, 84–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melson, G. F., Peet, S. and Sparks, C. (1991). Children's attachment to their pets: links to socio-emotional development. Children's Environments Quarterly, 8, 55–65.Google Scholar
Moore, R. (1989). Plants as play props. Children's Environment Quarterly, 6(1), 3–6.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. (1986). Childhood's Domain: Play and Place in Child Development. Dover, NH: Croom Helm Ltd.Google Scholar
Nabhan, G. P. and Trimble, S. (1994). The Geography of Childhood: Why Children Need Wild Places. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Nathanson, D. E. and Faria, S. (1993). Cognitive improvement of children in water with and without dolphins. Anthrozoos, 6(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poresky, R. H. (1990). The young children's empathy measure: reliability, validity, and effects of companion animal bonding. Psychological Reports, 66, 931–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poresky, R. H. (1996). Companion animals and other factors affecting young childrens' development. Anthrozoos, 9(4), 159–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poresky, R. H., Hendrix, C., Mosier, J. E. and Samuelson, M. L. (2001). Childrens' pets and adults' self-concepts. The Journal of Psychology, 122 (5), 463–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyle, R. M. (2002). Eden in a vacant lot: special places, species, and kids in the neighborhood of life. In Kahn, P. H. and Kellert, S. R. (eds.), Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations (pp. 305–28). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ratanapojnard, S. (2001). Community oriented biodiversity environmental education: its effects on knowledge, values, and behavior among rural fifth- and sixth-grade students in northeastern Thailand. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University.Google Scholar
Redefer, L. G., J. (1989). Brief report: pet-facilitated therapy with autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19, 461–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricard, M. A., L. (1992). The reaction of 9 to 10 month-old infants to an unfamiliar animal. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivkin, M. (2000). Outdoor experiences for young children. ERIC Digest, EDO RC-00-7(ERIC Clearing House on Rural Education and Small Schools).
Rosenfeld, A. and Wise, N. (2001). The Over-scheduled Child: Avoiding the Hyperparenting Trap. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
Rost, D. H. and Hartmann, A. (1994). Children and their pets. Anthrozoos, 7 (4), 242–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebba, R. (1991). The landscapes of childhood: the reflections of childhood's environment in adult memories and in children's attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 23, 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, D. (1993). Children's Special Places: Exploring the Role of Forts, Dens, and Bush Houses in Middle Childhood. Tucson, AZ: Zephr Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, C. and Woolley, H. (2000). Children and the city: a summary of recent environmental psychology research. Child: Care, Health, and Development, 26(3), 181–98.Google ScholarPubMed
Titman, W. (1994). Special Places, Special People: The Hidden Curriculum of School Grounds. Surrey, UK:WWF UK/Learning Through Landscapes.Google Scholar
Triebenbacher, S. L. (1998). Pets as transitional objects: their role in children's emotional development. Psychological Reports, 82, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valentine, G. and McKendrick, J. (1997). Children's outdoor play: exploring parental concerns about children's safety and the changing nature of childhood. Geoforum, 28, 219–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidovic, V. V., Stetic, V. V. and Bratko, D. (1999). Pet ownership, type of pet and socio-emotional development of school children. Anthrozoos, 12(4), 211–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, N. (2000). At-home with nature: effects of ‘greenness’ on children's cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, N. and Evans, G. (2003). Nearby nature: a buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 311–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×