Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:56:19.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Climate change policy viewed from the USA and the role of intensity targets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Bernd Hansjürgens
Affiliation:
Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

With the very emphatic withdrawal of the Bush Administration from the Kyoto Protocol, it might appear that there is no US policy on climate change. This view is reinforced by the 2002 Valentine's Day announcement from the Bush Administration that the cornerstone of its climate policy was to set a goal to reduce the greenhouse gas intensity of the US economy by 18 percent over the coming decade; never mind that this was roughly the rate at which the economy had been “de-carbonizing” over the previous decade.

But politicians come and go. This is particularly true in the case of climate change. It was President Bush's father who participated in the setting up of the treaty underlying the Kyoto Protocol, the Framework Convention on Climate Change, and no doubt climate policy will outlive the current President Bush. Furthermore, there is other positive activity on climate change in the United States, though relatively modest. There are federal government programs, mostly in research and development, as well as activities by state governments, private parties, and non-governmental organizations.

In this chapter we provide a review of the assorted actions that are being taken in the United States to deal with the climate change problem. The review is by no means comprehensive – just indicative of the types of activities that are under way. In addition, we consider some of the remaining problems that are not addressed by Kyoto, problems which must be addressed regardless of whether Kyoto becomes effective.

Type
Chapter
Information
Emissions Trading for Climate Policy
US and European Perspectives
, pp. 96 - 113
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Framework Convention on Climate Change “Online searchable database of greenhouse gas inventory data” (http://ghg.unfccc.int/).
Jones, B., Monash, N., Bubenick, D., and Vaurio, K. 2002. Survey and Evaluation of State-Level Activities and Programs Related to Climate Change. Prepared for Natural Resources Defense Council. Boston: M. J. Bradley & Associates.Google Scholar
Kopp, R. J., Morgenstern, R. D., and Pizer, W. 1997. Something for Everyone: A Climate Policy that Both Environmentalists and Industry Can Live With. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
McKibbon, W. J., and Wilcoxen, P. J. 1997. A Better Way to Slow Global Climate Change. Brookings Institution Policy Brief 17, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences 1992. Automobile Fuel Economy: How Far Can We Go? Washington, DC: National Research Council.
National Academy of Sciences2002. Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
NESCAUM (Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management) (http://www.nescaum.org/).
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) 2004. National Accounts of OECD Countries, Main Aggregates, vol. I, 1991–2002. Paris (http://www.oecd.org/document/28//document/39/0,2340,en_2649_34245_1914151_1_1_1_1,00.html).
Rabe, B. G. 2002. Greenhouse & Statehouse: The Evolving State Government Role in Climate Change. Washington, DC: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. J., and Spence, M. 1976. “Effluent charges and licenses under uncertainty,” Journal of Public Economics 5: 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, D. G. 2001a. “Piety at Kyoto didn't cool the planet,” New York Times (March 23).
Victor, D. G. 2001b. Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Control Global Warming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×