Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:10:39.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The normative origins of democracy in the European Union: toward a transformationalist theory of democratization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2010

Frank Schimmelfennig
Frank Schimmelfennig*
Affiliation:
Center for Comparative and International Studies, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
*
* E-mail: schimmelfennig@eup.gess.ethz.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Institutional democratization has made considerable progress in the history of the European Union (EU). Mainstream theories of democratization, however, fail to capture this process because they are wedded to the nation-state context. This paper therefore proposes a transformationalist theory of democratization beyond the state. EU democratization results from the conflict about the redistribution of political competences between institutional actors in a multilevel system, in which liberal democracy is the shared norm of legitimate authority. To the extent that institutional actors, who push for further integration in order to increase efficiency, undermine existing democratic institutions at the national level, their competitors can put into question the legitimacy of integration by invoking the shared liberal democratic community norms and shame them into making democratic concessions. The normative origins of democracy in the EU are illustrated in case studies on democratic membership conditionality, legislative rights of the European Parliament, and the institutionalization of human rights in the EU.

Keywords

democracydemocratizationEuropean Union
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , July 2010 , pp. 211 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D.Robinson, J.A. (2006), Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1991), Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, 2nd edn, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S. (2005), Restructuring Europe. Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Structuring Between the Nation State and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkelbach, W. 1962. ‘Rapport fait au nom de la commission politique sur les aspects politiques et institutionnels de l’adhésion ou de l’association à la Communauté’. Assemblée Parlementaire Européenne, Documents de Séance, 1961–1962, Document 122, 15 Janvier.Google Scholar
Bohman, J. (2007), Democracy Across Borders. From Demos to Demoi, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C. (2003), Democracy and Redistribution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, L.-E. (2001), ‘Nationalism and bounded integration: what it would take to create a European Demos’, European Journal of International Relations 7(2): 139–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. (1989), Democracy and its Critics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1994), ‘A democratic dilemma’, Political Science Quarterly 109(1): 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. (1999), ‘Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic’s view’, in I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordon (eds), Democracy’s Edges, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vreese, C.H. (2007), ‘The EU as a public sphere’, Living Reviews in European Governance 2(3). Retrieved 23 April 2010 from http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2007-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delhey, J. (2007), ‘Do enlargements make the European Union less cohesive? An analysis of trust between EU Nationalities’, Journal of Common Market Studies 45(2): 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, A. (2007), ‘The community deficit’, Journal of Common Market Studies 45(1): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, S. (2007), Compound Democracies. Why the United States and Europe are Becoming Similar, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, H.Héritier, A. (2007), ‘Codecision and institutional change’, West European Politics 30(2): 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, N. (2008), Euroclash. The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D.Perraton, J. (1999), Global Transformations, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hix, S. (2002), ‘Constitutional agenda-setting through discretion in rule interpretation: why the European Parliament won at Amsterdam’, British Journal of Political Science 32(2): 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L.Marks, G. (2009), ‘A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L., Marks, G.Wilson, C.J. (2002), ‘Does left/right structure party competition on European Integration?’, Comparative Political Studies 35(8): 965–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrelmann, A.DeBardeleben, J. (2009), ‘Democratic dilemmas in EU multilevel governance: untangling the Gordian knot’, European Political Science Review 1(2): 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imig, D. (2002), ‘Contestation in the streets: European protest and the emerging European Polity’, Comparative Political Studies 35(8): 914–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imig, D.Tarrow, S. (2001), ‘Studying contention in an emerging polity’, in D. Imig and S. Tarrow (eds), Contentious Europeans. Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Jensen, T. (2009), ‘The democratic deficit of the European Union’, Living Reviews in Democracy 1(2). Retrieved 23 April 2010 from http://democracy.livingreviews.org/index.php/lrd/article/view/lrd-2009-2Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S.Frey, T. (2006), ‘Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: six European countries compared’, European Journal of Political Research 45(6): 921–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (1999), ‘Citizenship in an era of globalization: a comment on held’, in I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordón (eds), Democracy’s Edges, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S.M. (1959), ‘Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy’, American Political Science Review 53(1): 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (1998), ‘Europe’s “Democratic Deficit”: the question of standards’, European Law Journal 4(1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (2005), Dilemmas of European Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, G. (1992), ‘Rational sources of Chaos in democratic transition’, in G. Marks and L. Diamond (eds), Reexamining Democracy. Essays in Honor of Seymour Martin Lipset, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 47–69.Google Scholar
JrMoore, B. (1966), Social Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. 1994. ‘Why the European Union strengthens the state: domestic politics and international cooperation. CES Working Paper 52, Harvard University: Center for European Studies.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. (1998), The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P.C.Whitehead, L. (eds) (1986), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1992), ‘The games of transition’, in S. Mainwaring, G. O’Donnell and J. S. Valenzuela (eds), Issues in Democratic Consolidation. The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, pp. 105–172.Google Scholar
Rittberger, B. (2005), Building Europe’s Parliament. Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation-State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittberger, B. (2006), ‘ “No integration without representation!” European integration, parliamentary democracy, and two forgotten communities’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(8): 1211–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittberger, B. (2010), ‘Democracy and EU governance’, in M. Egan, N. Nugent, W. Paterson (eds), Studying the European Union: Current and Future Agendas, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 134–167.Google Scholar
Rittberger, B.Schimmelfennig, F. (2006), ‘Explaining the constitutionalization of the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(8): 1148–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F. (2001), ‘The community trap: liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the eastern enlargement of the European Union’, International Organization 55(1): 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F. (2006), ‘Competition and community. Constitutional courts, Rhetorical Action, and the constitutionalization of human rights in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(8): 1247–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruyt, H. (1996), The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stacey, J.Rittberger, B. (2003), ‘Dynamics of formal and informal change in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy 10(6): 858–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D.C. (2006), ‘Constitutionalization through enlargement: the contested origins of the EU’s democratic identity’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(8): 1190–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C. (1985), ‘War making and state making as organized crime’, in P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol (eds), Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C. (2007), Democratization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (1992), ‘Jenseits der Staatlichkeit. Über die Folgen der ungleichzeitigen Denationalisierung’, Leviathan 20(4): 490–513.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (1998), Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaats. Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar