Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:17:07.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A legal field in action: the case of divorce arrangements in Israel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2008

Daphna Hacker
Daphna Hacker
Affiliation:
Lecturer at the Buchman Law Faculty and the NCJW Women and Gender Studies Program, Tel Aviv University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper suggests a theoretical and methodological framework that integrates Bourdieu’s conception of the juridical field with Mnookin and Kornhauser’s claim of the centrality of the action occurring in the shadow of the law. This framework is constructed based on a study of the Israeli legal field governing divorce that included the analysis of 360 divorce files and in-depth interviews with more than 40 divorcees and legal and therapeutic professionals. The study allows a rare exploration of a legal field in action, including the main positions within the field and the power relations between them, as well as the field’s boundaries and game rules. The findings illustrate the importance of Bourdieu’s fields theory if and when opened up to the informal dimensions of law and demonstrate the potential of the suggested framework to the sociological understanding of law in action.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 1 - 33
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almagor, Moshe (1999) ‘Parental Evaluation in Court Custody Decisions: The Rule of the Clinical Psychologists’, Psychology 8(1): 34–49 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Altheide, David L. and Johnson, John M. (1998) ‘Criteria for Assessing Interpretive Validity in Qualitative Research’ in Norman, K. Denzin and Yvonna, S. Lincoln (eds) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 283–312.Google Scholar
Amato, Paul and Keith, Bruce (1991) ‘Paternal Divorce and the Well-Being of Children: A Meta-Analysis’, Psychological Bulletin 110: 26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastard, Beniot and Cardia-voneche, Laura (1995) ‘Inter-Professional Tensions in the Divorce Process in France’, International Journal of Law and the Family 9(3): 275–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Connie J. A. and Sales, Bruce D. (2000) ‘A Critical Reappraisal of Divorce Mediation Research and Policy’, Psychology, Public Policy and Law 6: 989–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, William N. (1994) ‘Joint Custody: The Option of Choice’, Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 21(3/4): 115–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogoch, Brina and Halperin-kaddari, Ruth (2007) ‘The Voice is the Voice of Mediation but the Arms are the Arms of the Law: The Professional Practice of Divorce in Israel’, Hapraklit 49(2): 293–332.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1987) ‘The Force of Law: Towards a Sociology of the Juridical Field’, Hastings Law Journal 38: 814–53.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1988) Homo Academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (2005) [1984] Questions in Sociology. Tel Aviv: Resling [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre and Wacquant, Loïc J. D. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bowermaster, Janet M. (2002) ‘Legal Presumptions and the Role of Mental Health Professionals in Child Custody Proceedings’, Duquesne University Law Review 40: 265–311.Google Scholar
Cain, Maureen (1979) ‘The General Practice Lawyer and the Client: Towards a Radical Conception’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law 7: 331–54.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, Ralph and Rhode, Deborah (1976) ‘The Unauthorized Practice of Law and Pro Se Divorce: An Empirical Analysis’, Yale Law Journal 86: 104–184.Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonin (2007) ‘Constitutionalism without Constitution: Transnational Elites between Political Mobilization and Legal Expertise in the Making of a Constitution for Europe (1940s–1960s)’, Law & Social Inquiry 32(1): 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Orna and Segal-engelchin, Dorit (2000) ‘Suzi and Mr. S.: Gender Role Stereotyping in Social Workers’ Court Reports in Custody and Access Cases’, Smith College Studies in Social Work 70: 475–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Orna and Shnit, Dan (2001) ‘Social Workers’ Recommendations on the Non-Custodial Father’s Visitation Rights with His Preschool Children’, International Social Work 44(3): 311–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutch, Orna (1998). Mediation the Arising Giant. Tel Aviv: The Israel Bar Publishing House [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves (1986) ‘From Mediation to Pure Law: Practice and Scholarly Representation within the Legal Sphere’, International Journal of Sociology of Law, 14: 89–107.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, B. G. (1996) Dealing in Virtue. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dingwall, Robert (1988) ‘Empowerment or Enforcement? Some Questions about Power and Control in Divorce Mediation’ in Robert, Dingwall and John, Eekelaar (eds) Divorce Mediation and the Legal Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 150–67.Google Scholar
Dunnigan, Alana (2003) ‘Restoring Power to the Powerless: The Need to Reform California’s Mandatory Mediation for Victims of Domestic Violence’, University of San Francisco Law Review 37: 1031–64.Google Scholar
Eekelaar, John, Maclean, Mavis and Beinart, Sarah (2000) Family Lawyers: The Divorce Work of Solicitors. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Eldar, Dorit (1998) ‘The Family Courts Assistance Units’ in Giefman, Yehoshoa (ed.) Family Law in Israel in the Family Court Era (vol. II). Tel Aviv: Ramot, 1134–41 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Emery, Robert E. and Wyer, Mellisa M. (1987). Divorce Mediation. American Psychologist 42(2): 472–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erlanger, Howard, Chambliss, Elizabeth and Melli, Merygold (1987) ‘Participation and Flexibility in Informal Processes: Cautions from the Divorce Context’, Law & Society Review 21(4): 585–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia and Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, A. Martha (1988) ‘Dominant Discourse, Professional Language, and Legal Change in Child Custody Decision-making’, Harvard Law Review 101: 727–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. Colin, Gordon. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Michael (1984) ‘Questioning the Delegalization Movement in Family Law: Do We Really Want Family Court?’ in Eekelaar, John M. and Katz, Sanford N. (eds) The Resolution of Family Conflict. Toronto: Butterworth, 7–25.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. and Percival, Robert (1976) ‘A Tale of Two Courts: Litigation in Alameda and San Benito Counties’, Law & Society Review 10: 267–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frishtic, Mordechay and Adad, Moshe (2001) ‘Considerations that Guide the Rabbinical Courts in Determining Custody over Children’, Megamot 41(1–2): 45–70 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1974) ‘Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change’, Law & Society Review 9: 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1983) ‘Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don’t Know (and Think We Know) about Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society’, University of California Los Angeles Law Review 31: 4–71.Google Scholar
García villegas, Mauricio (2006) ‘On Pierre Bourdieu’s Legal Thought’ in Cotterrell, Roger (ed.) Law in Social Theory. England: Ashgate, 57–71.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Gofna-pinto, Tal (1996) ‘Custody and Visitation of Children after Divorce – Recommendations in the Social Worker Report, the Judicial Decisions, the Execution by the Family and the Non-Custodial Parent-Child Contact.’ Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Tel Aviv University [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Griffiths, John (1986) ‘What Do Dutch Lawyers Actually Do in Divorce Cases?’ Law & Society Review 20: 135–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grillo, Trina (1991) ‘The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women’, Yale Law Journal 100: 1545–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Daphna (2005) ‘Motherhood, Fatherhood and Law: Child Custody in Israel’, Social and Legal Studies 14(3): 409–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Daphna (2006) ‘Children’s Exclusion from Divorce Procedures’, Hamishpat 22: 63–72 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Hagan, John and Levi, Ron (2005) ‘Crimes of War and the Force of Law’, Social Forces 83(4): 1499–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Ellen (1995) The Romance of American Psychology Political Culture in the Age of Experts. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Mavis E., Bridges, Margaret and Insabella, Glendessa M. (1998) ‘What Matters? What Does Not? Five Perspectives on the Association between Marital Transition and Children’s Adjustment’, American Psychologist 53: 167–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingleby, Richard (1992) Solicitors and Divorce. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Irving, Howard H. and Benjamin, Michael (1995) Family Mediation Contemporary Issues. California: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Herbert (1992) ‘The Elusive Shadow of the Law’, Law & Society Review 26: 565–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Adrian L. (1992) ‘An Open or Shut Case? Law as an Autopoietic System’, Journal of Law and Society 19(2): 271–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Adrian L. (1995) ‘Social Work in Divorce: Welfare, Mediation and Justice’, International Journal of Law and the Family 9: 256–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, Christopher A. (1986) ‘The Role of Mental Health Professionals in Child Custody Resolutions’, Hofstra Law Review 15: 115–38.Google Scholar
Jenkin, Richard (1992) Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Pamela J. and Kroll-smith, Steve (eds) (1996) Witnessing for Sociology: Sociologists in Court. Westport, Connecticut: Praegen.Google Scholar
King, Michael (1991) ‘Child Welfare within Law: The Emergence of a Hybrid Discourse’, Journal of Law and Society 18(3): 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaff, Ramsay L. (1982) ‘The Tender Years Doctrine: A Defense’, California Law Review 70: 335–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kressel, Kenneth, Hochberg, Allan and Meth, Theodore S. (1983) ‘A Provisional Typology of Lawyer Attitudes towards Divorce Practice’, Law and Human behavior 7(1): 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunin, Carla C., Ebbesen, Ebbe B. and Konecni, Vladimir J. (1992) ‘An Archival Study of Decision-Making in Child Custody Disputes’, Journal of Clinical Psychology 48(4): 564–73.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lempert, Richard (2001) ‘The Economic Analysis of Evidence Law: Common Sense on Stilts’, Virginia Law Review 87: 1619–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Robert (1986) ‘Custody Investigations in Divorce Cases’, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 4: 713–97.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (2004) Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccoby, Elenor E. and Mnookin, Robert H. (1992). Dividing the Child: Social and Legal Dilemmas of Custody. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael R. and Dezalay, Yves (2002). ‘The Power of the Legal Field: Pierre Bourdieu and the Law’ in Reza, Banakar and Max, Travers (eds) An Introduction to Law and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 189–204.Google Scholar
Mather, Lynn and Yngvesson, Babara (1980-81) ‘Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes’, Law & Society Review 15(3–4): 775–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H. and Kornhauser, Lewis (1979) ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce’, Yale Law Journal 88: 950–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murch, Mervyn (1977) ‘The Role of Solicitors in Divorce Proceedings’, Modern Law Review 40: 625–38 & 41: 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Linda (1999) ‘Demeaning, Demoralizing, and Disenfranchising Divorced Dads: A Review of the Literature’, Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 31(3/4): 129–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan-haley, Jacqueline M. (2002) ‘Lawyers, Non-Lawyers and Mediation: Rethinking the Professional Monopoly from a Problem-Solving Perspective’, Harvard Negotiation Law Review 7: 235–97.Google Scholar
Patton, Michael Q. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation. California: Sage.Google Scholar
Pearson, Jessica and Thoennes, Nancy (1988) ‘Divorce Mediation Research Results’ in Jay, Folberg and Ann, Milne (eds) Divorce Mediation Theory and Practice. New York: The Guilford Press, 429–52.Google Scholar
Raitt, Fiona E. and Zeedyk, Susan (2000) The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law: Women and Syndrome Evidence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Relis, Tamara (2002) ‘Civil Litigation from Litigants’ Perspectives: What We Know and What We Don’t Know about the Litigation Experience of Individual Litigants’, Studies in Law, Politics and Society 25: 151–212.Google Scholar
Riskin, Leonard (2003) ‘Decision-making in Mediation: The New Old Grid and the New New Grid System’, Notre Dame Law Review 79: 1–53.Google Scholar
Robinson, Margaret (1991) Family Transformation through Divorce and Remarriage. London: Tavistock/Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosen-zvi, Ariel (1990) Israeli Family Law: The Sacred and the Secular. Tel Aviv: Papyrus [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Sagi, Abraham and Dvir, Rachel (1993) ‘Value Biases of Social Workers in Custody Disputes’, Children and Youth Services Review 15: 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin and Felstiner, William L. F. (1995) ‘Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, Donald A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Shava, Menashe (2003) Jurisdiction in Family Law. Jerusalem: Grafit Press [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Shifman, Pinhas (1989) Family Law in Israel (vol. II). Jerusalem: Botahon Press [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Stamps, Leighton E., Kunen, Seth and Rock-faucheux, Anita (1997) ‘Judges’ Beliefs Dealing with Children Custody Decisions’, Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 28(1/2): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Anselm and Corbin, Juliet (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher (2004) ‘History in the American Juridical Field: Narrative, Justification, and Explanation’, Yale Journal of Law & Humanities 16: 323–89.Google Scholar
Umbreit, Mark S. (1998) Restorative Justice through Victim–Offender Mediation: A Multi-Site Assessment’, Western Criminology Review 1(1) [online] http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v1n1/umbreit.html.Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana (2006) ‘The Sociology of Law as a “Means against Struggle Itself”’, Social & Legal Studies 15(4): 591–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van krieken, Robert (2004) ‘The Socio-Legal Construction of the ‘Best Interests of the Child’: Law’s Autonomy, Sociology and Family Law.’ Paper presented at the 8th Int. Interdisciplinary Colloquium on Current Legal Issues: Law and Society, University College, London, 13–14 September, 2004.Google Scholar
Walker, Janet (1991) ‘Family Conciliation: From Research to Practice’ in Mackie, Karl J. (ed.) A Handbook of Dispute Resolution: ADR in Action. London: Routledge and Sweet & Maxwell, 134–45.Google Scholar
Webb, Jennifer, Schirato, Tony and Danaher, Geoff (2002) Understanding Bourdieu. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaidel, Susan (1998) ‘Divorce Mediation’, Shihut 3(1): 53–57 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Zaidel, Susan (2001) The Guide to Mediation and Divorce Arrangements. Haifa: Haskamot [Hebrew].Google Scholar