Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:24:03.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Accreted Globular Clusters in external galaxies: Why adaptive dynamics is not the solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2020

Sophia Lilleengen
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching b. München, Germany email: sophialilleengen@gmail.com Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 226, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Wilma Trick
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Insitut für Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, 85748 Garching b. München, Germany
Glenn van de Ven
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching b. München, Germany email: sophialilleengen@gmail.com Department of Astrophysics, University of Vienna, Türkenschanzenstrasse 17, 1180 Wien, Austria
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many astrophysical and galaxy-scale cosmological problems require a well determined gravitational potential which is often modeled by observers under strong assumptions. Globular clusters (GCs) surrounding galaxies can be used as dynamical tracers of the luminous and dark matter distribution at large (kpc) scales. A natural assumption for modeling the gravitational potential is that GCs accreted in the same dwarf galaxy merger event move at the present time on similar orbits in the host galaxy and should therefore have similar actions. We investigate this idea in one realistic Milky Way like galaxy of the cosmological N-body simulation suite Auriga. We show how the actions of accreted stellar particles in the simulation evolve and that minimizing the standard deviation of GCs in action space, however, cannot constrain the true potential. This approach known as ‘adaptive dynamics’ does therefore not work for accreted GCs.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Binney, J. 2005, ESA Special Publication, 576, 89Google Scholar
Binney, J. & Tremaine, S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition. 10.1515/9781400828722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovy, J. & Rix, H.-W. 2013, ApJ, 779, 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovy, J. 2015, ApJS, 216, 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grand, R. J. J., Gómez, F. A., Marinacci, F., Pakmor, R., Springel, V., Campbell, D. J. R., Frenk, C. S., Jenkins, A., & White, S. D. M. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 179Google Scholar
Sanders, J. L. & Binney, J. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 2107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, R. E., Helmi, A., & Hogg, D. W. 2015, ApJ, 801, 98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, R. E., Hartke, J., & Helmi, A. 2017, ApJ, 836, 23410.3847/1538-4357/aa5eb4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springel, V. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, T., Boruah, S. S., & Afshordi, N. 2019, preprint (arXiv:1908.02336)Google Scholar