Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:02:05.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Happens When Digital Information Systems Are Brought Into Health and Social Care? Comparing Approaches to Social Policy in England and Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2014

Susan Baines ,
Penelope Hill  and
Karin Garrety
Susan Baines
Affiliation:
The Centre for Enterprise, Manchester Metropolitan University E-mail: s.baines@mmu.ac.uk
Penelope Hill
Affiliation:
Mortimore Hill Associates, Churcham, Gloucestershire E-mail: p.hill@mortimorehill.co.uk
Karin Garrety
Affiliation:
School of Management and Marketing, University of Wollongong E-mail: karin@uow.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This review article offers a brief comparative overview of approaches to the application of public sector information systems in England and Australia, with particular reference to health and social care. Since the 1990s, reforms to the public sector in both countries have looked to information and communication technologies (ICTs) from the private sector as the key to modern, citizen-centred services. These efforts have been conducted in the wider context of New Public Management, with the emphasis on the marketisation of government services, reducing the size of the state, and improvements in efficiency. Both countries are typically seen as being at, or near, the forefront of the digital transformation of public services (United Nations, 2012; McLoughlin and Wilson, 2013). Moreover, there is a shared history of experimentation, most recently in the shaping of the information agendas around records and personalisation.

Type
Themed Section on Hiding in plain sight or Disappearing in the rear view mirror?: Whatever happened to the revolution in information for Health and Social Care – Learning from England and Australia
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 569 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Accenture (2003) E-government Leadership: Engaging the Customer, http://nstore.accenture.com/acn_com/PDF/Engaging_the_Customer.pdf.Google Scholar
Australian Government Information Management Office (2006) e-Government Strategy, Responsive Government: A New Service Agenda, Parkes, ACT: AGIMO, http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/2006-e-government-strategy/docs/e-gov_strategy.pdf.Google Scholar
Ames, N. (1999) ‘Social work recording: a new look at an old issue’, Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 2, 227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aulich, C. and Hein, J. (2005) ‘Whole-of-government approaches to outsourcing and market testing by the Commonwealth government’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64, 3, 35–45.Google Scholar
Brennan, S. (2007) ‘The biggest computer programme in the world ever: how it's going’, Journal of Information Technology, 22, 3, 202–11.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office (1999) Modernising Government, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office (2005) Transformational Government: Enabled by Technology, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Coiera, E. W. (2007) ‘Lessons from the NHS National Programme for IT’, The Medical Journal of Australia, 186, 1, 3–4.Google Scholar
Cornford, J., Wessels, B., Richardson, R., Gillespie, A., McLoughlin, I., Kohannejad, J., Belt, V. and Martin, M. (2003) Local e-Government: Process Evaluation of the Implementation of Electronic Local Government in England, London: ODPM.Google Scholar
Cross, M. (2007) ‘Benefits of a £12bn programme are “unclear” MPs say’, British Medical Journal, 334, 815.Google Scholar
Cross, M. (2011) ‘Government announces end of NHS IT programme – for second time’, British Medical Journal, 343, d6125.Google Scholar
Dearne, K. (2006a) ‘“Changed vision” on health e-records’, The Australian, 17 January.Google Scholar
Dearne, K. (2006b) ‘Health smartcard fizzles’, The Australian, 30 May.Google Scholar
Dearne, K. (2007) ‘Canberra to cancel access card’, The Australian, 27 November, http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,22823422–15306,00.html.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills (2003) Every Child Matters, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2001) National Service Framework for Older People, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2010) Liberating the NHS: An Information Revolution, A consultation on proposals, London: Department of Health, http://www.ico.org.uk/about_us/consultations/~/media/documents/consultation_responses/Liberating_the_NHS_An_Information_Revolution_Consultation.ashx.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2011) Liberating the NHS: An Information Revolution, A summary of consultation responses, London: Department of Health, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/216664/dh_129580.pdf.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2012) The Power of Information: Putting All of Us in Control of the Health and Care Information We Need, London: Department of Health, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/giving-people-control-of-the-health-and-care-information-they-need.Google Scholar
Ferguson, I. (2006) ‘An ID card by any other name?’, ZDNet, 27 April, http://www.zdnet.com/an-id-card-by-any-other-name-1139253868.Google Scholar
Fujitsu Consulting and Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing (2004) The HealthConnect Implementation Approach Version 1.0, Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.Google Scholar
Gans, D., Kralewski, J., Hammons, T. and Dowd, B. (2005) ‘Medical groups’ adoption of electronic health records and information systems’, Health Affairs, 24, 5, 1323–33.Google Scholar
Garrety, K., McLoughlin, I., Wilson, R., Zelle, G. and Martin, M. (forthcoming) ‘National electronic health records and the digital disruption of moral orders’, Social Science and Medicine.Google Scholar
Gillingham, P. (2011) ‘Computer-based information systems and human service organisations: emerging problems and future possibilities’, Australian Social Work, 64, 3, 299–312.Google Scholar
Government 2.0 Taskforce (2009) Engage: Getting on with Government 2.0, Report of the Government 2.0 Taskforce, Parkes, ACT: AGIMO, http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/gov20taskforcereport/doc/Government20TaskforceReport.pdf.Google Scholar
Grant, J. (2002) ‘The National Office for the Information Economy: promoting government service delivery using new technologies’, Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, 104, 50–2.Google Scholar
Grattan, M. (2006) ‘Smartcard chief resigns’, The Age, 9 May, http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/smartcard-chief-resigns/2006/05/08/1146940479804.html.Google Scholar
Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Rouncefield, M. and Slack, R. (2003) ‘Making a case in medical work: implications for the electronic medical record’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 12, 3, 241–66.Google Scholar
Haux, R., Ammenwerth, E., Herzog, W. and Knaup, P. (2002) ‘Health care in the information society: a prognosis for the year 2013’, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 66, 1–3, 3–21.Google Scholar
Hendy, J., Reeves, B. C., Fulop, N., Hutchings, A. and Masseria, C. (2005) ‘Information in practice: challenges to implementing the national programme for information technology (NPfIT)’, British Medical Journal, 331.Google Scholar
House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts (2013) The Dismantled National Program for IT in the NHS, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ludwick, D. and Doucette, J. (2009) ‘Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries’, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78, 1, 22–31.Google Scholar
McCoy, H. V. and Vila, C. K. (2002) ‘Tech knowledge: introducing computers for coordinated care’, Health and Social Work, 27, 1, 71–4.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, I. and Wilson, R. (2013) Digital Government at Work, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
National Office of the Internet Economy (2002) Better Services, Better Government, Canberra: NOIE.Google Scholar
NHS Executive (1998) Information for Health: An Information Strategy for the Modern NHS 1998–2005: A National Strategy for Local Implementation, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Productivity Commission (2010) Contribution of the Not-For-Profit Sector, Canberra: Productivity Commission.Google Scholar
Rossi, S. (2007) ‘Labor to dump billion dollar Access card if it wins federal election’, CIO, 16 October, http://www.cio.com.au/article/197344/labor_dump_billion_dollar_access_card_it_wins_federal_election?eid=-601.Google Scholar
Ruppert, E. (2012) ‘The governmental topologies of database devices’, Theory Culture Society, 29, 4/5, 116–36.Google Scholar
Smith, R. F. I. (2009) Organizing for E-government: In Search of Effective ICT Governance in Australia, Melbourne: Monash University.Google Scholar
Social Care Information Policy Unit (2001) Information for Social Care, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Social Care Information Policy Unit (2003) Defining the Electronic Social Care Record, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Steyaert, J. and Gould, N. (1999) ‘Social services, social work, and information management: some European perspectives’, European Journal of Social Work, 2, 2, 165–75.Google Scholar
Tregeagle, S. and Darcy, M. (2008) ‘Child welfare and information and communication technology: today's challenge’, British Journal of Social Work, 38, 8, 1481–98.Google Scholar
United Nations (2012) E-government Survey 2012: E-government for the People, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Wilson, R., Baines, S., Cornford, J. and Martin, M. (2007) ‘Trying to do a jigsaw without the picture on the box: understanding the challenges of care integration in the context of single assessment for older people in England’, International Journal of Integrated Care, 7, http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/URN%3ANBN%3ANL%3AUI%3A10–1–100428/371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R., Martin, M., Walsh, S. and Richter, P. (2011) ‘Re-mixing the digital economies of care in the voluntary and community sector (VCS): governing identity and information sharing in the mixed economy of care for children and young people’, Social Policy and Society, 10, 3, 379–91.Google Scholar