Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T14:50:21.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Terrible Iterations”: Reading Tess without Consent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2020

Extract

In the fall of 2017, a year into the current U.S. administration, a month into the #MeToo movement, I reread Adorno's 1962 essay “Commitment,” on the creation and consumption of art in an authoritarian world. I reread it at the same time that I became brave enough, and angry enough, to teach Tess of the D'Urbervilles (1891) for the first time in my fifteen-year career. Adorno says that Sartre's question, “‘Is there any meaning in life when men exist who beat people until the bones break in their bodies?’ is also the question whether any art now has the right to exist” in the wake of atrocities like the Holocaust. Adorno ultimately resolves the question in the affirmative, but only at the end of an essay otherwise dedicated to the difficulties of producing literature that resists a consumerist regime. For Adorno, committed literature (that is, progressive, instrumentalized, messaged) all too often assimilates itself to the brutalities against which it protests, while autonomous literature (that is, art that exists for itself) runs the risk of degenerating into a “fetish . . . an apoliticism that is in fact deeply political” (177). In returning to both Tess and Adorno after a longish absence, I wondered whether, in spite of Adorno's overtly modernist leanings, we might nevertheless consider that certain Victorian novels manifest his concept of tensed oscillation between commitment and autonomy. Adorno suggests that certain nonrealist art forms (one of his examples is Picasso's Guernica) neither “do” nor attempt to compel others to “do” anything instrumental, and yet such works simultaneously both illuminate and (precisely in their turning away from action) condemn systemic brutalities. We need not entirely agree with Adorno's reading of Guernica specifically, nor his fetish-treatment of modernist art broadly, to entertain the idea that—even in their realist projects—certain Victorian novels also “negate empirical reality, [and] by merely existing endlessly reiterat[e systemic] guilt” (190). I'll return to this question more directly later in the essay; for now, let it lurk in the corners of my discussion of Tess.

Type
Special Cluster: Commitment
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adorno, Theodor. “Commitment.” In Aesthetics and Politics, edited by Taylor, Ronald, 177–95. London: Verso, 1977.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Voyage of the Beagle. 1839. London: Penguin, 1989.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Shibboleth: For Paul Celan.” In Acts of Literature, edited by Attridge, Derek, 370413. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Dickerson, Vanessa. Dark Victorians. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Dimock, Wai Chee. “A Theory of Resonance.” PMLA 112, no. 5 (1997): 1060–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felski, Rita. “Context Stinks!New Literary History 42, no. 4 (2011): 573–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilroy, Paul. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Glendening, John. The Evolutionary Imagination in Late-Victorian Novels: An Entangled Bank. Burlington: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Hack, Daniel. Reaping Something New: African American Transformations of Victorian Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Thomas. Tess of the D'Urbervilles. 1891. Edited by Riquelme, John Paul. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Thomas. Edited by Dolan, Tim. New York: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar
Hardy, Thomas. Edited by Grindel, Juliet et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Hardy, Thomas. Edited by Maier, Sarah. Orchard Park: Broadview, 2007.Google Scholar
Hensley, Nathan K., and Steer, Philip, eds. Ecological Form: System and Aesthetics in the Age of Empire. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Hooker, Deborah. “The Woman in the Race: Racing and Re-Racing Thomas Hardy's ‘Pure Woman’ in Tess of the D'Urbervilles.Nineteenth-Century Gender Studies 7, no. 1 (2011), www.ncgsjournal.com.Google Scholar
Lemos, Brunilda Reichmann. “Angel Clare in Curitiba.” Notes and Queries 29 (1982): 326–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, George. “Hardy and Darwin: An Enchanting Hardy?” In A Companion to Thomas Hardy, edited by Wilson, Keith, 3653. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Mallett, Phillip. “Hardy, Darwin, and the Origin of Species.” In Thomas Hardy in Context, edited by Mallett, Phillip, 316–27. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunokawa, Jeff. “Tess, Tourism, and the Spectacle of the Woman.” In Rewriting the Victorians: Theory, History, and the Politics of Gender, edited by Shires, Linda M., 7086. New York: Routledge, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Norman. “Hardy and Brazil.” Notes and Queries 30 (1983): 319–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Angelique. “Hardy and the Place of Culture.” In A Companion to Thomas Hardy, edited by Wilson, Keith, 5470. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. Modern Painters. London: Routledge, 1856.Google Scholar
Spampinato, Erin. “Rereading Rape in the Critical Canon.differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Stewart, Garrett. “‘Driven Well Home to the Reader's Heart’: Tess's Implicated Audience.” In Tess of the D'Urbervilles, edited by Riquelme, John Paul, 537–51. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Walkowitz, Rebecca. “Unimaginable Largeness: Kazuo Ishiguro, Translation, and the New World Literature.” NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction 40, no. 3 (2007): 216–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar