Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:06:08.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparative study of star formation efficiencies in nearby molecular cloud complexes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Yasuo Fukui  and
Akira Mizuno
Yasuo Fukui
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysics, Nagoya University
Akira Mizuno
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysics, Nagoya University

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present new observational data of 13CO J=1−0 emission in nearby molecular cloud complexes in Taurus, Ophiuchus, and Orion, and compare star formation efficiencies in the three regions. The 13CO data have been obtained with the 4m millimeter telescope at Nagoya equipped with a SIS receiver having receiver temperature of 23 K in double side band. The molecular distribution is often characterized by highly filamentary, continuous distribution, rather than well defined clumps. Active star formation is taking place almost exclusively in the densest regions in the molecular distributions. The filamentary distributions often show velocity gradients perpendicular to their elongation, suggesting that they are spinning around their major axes. Roles of photoionization and the spinning motion on formation of stars and clouds are discussed as a step toward understanding the mechanism regulating star formation efficiencies.

Type
Star Formation
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 147: Fragmentation of Molecular Clouds and Star Formation , 1991 , pp. 275 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1991 

References

Bally, J. 1989, in Low Mass Star Formation and Pre-Main Sequence Objects, ed. Reipurth, B., (European Southern Observatory, Garching bei München), p. 1.Google Scholar
Bally, J., Langer, W. D., Stark, A. A., and Wilson, R. W. 1987, Astrophys. J. Letters), 312, L45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chromey, F. R., Elmegreen, B. G., and Elmegreen, D. M. 1989, Astron. J., 98, 2203.Google Scholar
Cohen, M., Emerson, J. P., and Beichman, C. A. 1989, Astrophys. J., 339, 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Y. 1989, in Low Mass Star Formation and Pre-Main Sequence Objects, ed. Reipurth, B., (European Southern Observatory, Garching bei München), p. 95.Google Scholar
Fukui, Y., Iwata, T., Mizuno, A., Bally, J., and Lane, P. A. 1990a, in Protostars and Planets III, (in press).Google Scholar
Fukui, Y., Iwata, T., Takaba, H., Mizuno, A., Ogawa, H., Kawabata, K., and Sugitani, K. 1989, Nature, 342, 161.Google Scholar
Fukui, Y., Minoshima, Y., Uchida, Y., Mizuno, A., Iwata, T., Ogawa, H., and Takaba, H. 1990b, (submitted to Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan).Google Scholar
Fukui, Y., Sugitani, K., Takaba, H., Iwata, T., Mizuno, A., Ogawa, H., and Kawabata, K. 1986, Astrophys. J. (Letters), 311, L85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, A. A., Bastien, P., Myers, P. C., and Ménard, F. 1990, Astrophys. J., 359, 363.Google Scholar
Herbig, G. H., and Bell, K. R. 1988, University of California, Lick Observatory Bulletin No.1111.Google Scholar
IRAS Catalogs and Atlases, Explanatory Suppl. 1984, eds. Beichman, C. A., Neugebauer, G., Habing, H. J., Clegg, P. E., and Chester, T. J., (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.).Google Scholar
Levereault, R. M. 1988, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 67, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loren, R. B. 1989a, Astrophys. J., 338, 902.Google Scholar
Loren, R. B. 1989b, Astrophys. J., 338, 925.Google Scholar
Maddalena, R. J., Morris, M., Moscowitz, J., and Thaddeus, P. 1986, Astrophys. J., 303, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, C. F. 1989, Astrophys. J., 345, 782.Google Scholar
Mizuno, A., Fukui, Y., Iwata, T., Nozawa, S., and Takano, T. 1990a, Astrophys. J., 355, 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozawa, S., Mizuno, A., Teshima, Y., Ogawa, H., and Fukui, Y. 1990, (submitted to Astrophys. J. Suppl.).Google Scholar
Ogawa, H., Mizuno, A., Hoko, H., Ishikawa, H., and Fukui, Y. 1990, Int. J. of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 11, 717.Google Scholar
Pudritz, R. E., and Norman, C. A. 1986, Astrophys. J., 301, 571.Google Scholar
Shu, F. H., Adams, F. C., and Lizano, S. 1987, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 25, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahler, S. W., Shu, F. H., and Taam, R. E. 1980, Astrophys. J., 241, 637.Google Scholar
Strom, K. M., Newton, G., Strom, S. E., Seaman, R. L., Carrasco, L., Cruz-Gonzalez, I., Serrano, A., and Grasdalen, G. L. 1989, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 71, 183.Google Scholar
Uchida, Y. 1989, in Low Mass Star Formation and Pre-Main Sequence Objects, ed. Reipurth, B., (European Southern Observatory, Garching bei München), p. 141.Google Scholar
Uchida, Y., and Shibata, K. 1985, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 37, 515.Google Scholar
Uchida, Y., Fukui, Y., Minoshima, Y., Mizuno, A., Iwata, T., and Takaba, H. 1990b, (submitted to Nature).Google Scholar
Uchida, Y., Mizuno, A., Nozawa, S., and Fukui, Y. 1990a, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 42, 69.Google Scholar
Wilking, B. A., Lada, C. J., and Young, E. T. 1989, Astrophys. J., 340, 823.Google Scholar