No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Why Islamic ‘Traditionalists’ and ‘Rationalists’ both ought to accept Rational Objectivism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 October 2016
Abstract
Islamic ‘Traditionalists’ and ‘Rationalists’ have much in common. They agree that the Qur'an is divine revelation and acknowledge the authority of the Sunna, accept the value of logical reasoning and argumentation, recognizing the validity of basic logical principles and laws, and affirm that basic empirical and historical facts ought to be taken into consideration when interpreting the Qur'an. They disagree in that Rationalists accept but Traditionalists deny that human reason can discern objective moral truths independent of divine revelation. I present an argument for Rationalism that makes use of premises that are equally acceptable to Traditionalists and Rationalists alike.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016
References
Abrahamov, Binyamin (1998) Islamic Theology: Traditionalism and Rationalism (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter (2005) ‘Al-Kindi and the reception of Greek philosophy’, in Adamson, Peter & Taylor, Richard C. (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 32–51.Google Scholar
Alanen, Lilli (1991) ‘Descartes, conceivability, and logical modality’, in Horowitz, Ted (ed.) Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield), 65–84.Google Scholar
Alanen, Lilli (2006) ‘Omnipotence, Modality, and Conceivability’, in Broughton, Janet & Carriero, John (ed.) A Companion to Descartes (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing), 353–371.Google Scholar
Al-'Izz, Ibn Abī (1421 AH/2000) Commentary on The Creed of at-Tahāwī by Ibn Abī Al-'Izz, ‘Abdul-Haqq Ansari, Muhammad (tr.) (Riyadh: Institute of Islamic and Arabic Sciences in America).Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2004) The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Fakhry, Majid (1983) A History of Islamic Philosophy, 2nd edn (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Fakhry, Majid (1997) A Short Introduction to Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Mysticism (London: Oneworld Publications).Google Scholar
H̱ammād, Aẖmad Zakī Mansūr (1987) ‘Abū H̱amid Al-Ghāzalī’s juristic doctrine in Al-Mustasfā Min ‘Ilm Al-Usūl with a translation of volume one of Al-Mustasfā Min ‘Ilm Al-Usūl’, II, PhD dissertation (Chicago: University of Chicago).Google Scholar
The Holy Qur'an: English Translation of the Meanings and Commentary
(1413 AH/1993) edited by The Presidency of Islamic Research, IFTA, Two Holy Mosques King Fahd Complex.Google Scholar
Hourani, George (2007) Reason and Tradition in Islamic Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hume, David (1976) A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Khalidi, Muhammad Ali (ed.) (2005) Medieval Islamic Philosophical Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Leaman, Oliver (2009) An Introduction to Classical Islamic Philosophy, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Martin, Richard, Woodward, Mark, & Atmaja, Dwi (1997) Defenders of Reason in Islam: Mu'tazilism from Medieval School to Modern Symbol (Oxford: Oneworld).Google Scholar
McGinnis, Jon & Reisman, David C. (2007) Classical Arabic Philosophy: An Anthology of Sources (Indianapolis: Hackett).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1993) ‘Proof of an External World,’ in Baldwin, Thomas (ed.) G. E. Moore: Selected Writings (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Pavlin, James (1996) ‘Sunni kalām and theological controversies,’ in Nasr, Seyyed Hossein & Leaman, Oliver (ed.) Routledge History of World Philosophies, I, History of Islamic Philosophy (London: Routledge), 105–118.Google Scholar