Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:39:01.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Realizability of second-moment closure via stochastic analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

P. A. Durbin
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-3030, USA
C. G. Speziale
Affiliation:
Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA

Abstract

It is shown that realizability of second-moment turbulence closure models can be established by finding a Langevin equation for which they are exact. All closure models currently in use can be derived formally from the type of Langevin equation described herein. Under certain circumstances a coefficient in that formalism becomes imaginary. The regime in which models are realizable is, at least, that for which the coefficient is real. The present method does not imply unrealizable solutions when the coefficient is imaginary, but it does guarantee realizability when the coefficient is real; hence, this method provides sufficient, but not necessary, conditions for realizability. Illustrative computations of homogeneous shear flow are presented. It is explained how models can be modified to guarantee realizability in extreme non-equilibrium situations without altering their behaviour in the near-equilibrium regime for which they were formulated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, L. 1974 Stochastic Differential Equations. John Wiley and Sons.
Durbin, P. A. 1983a Asymptotic behavior of the Langevin equation in a non-homogeneous medium. Presented at 6th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Applied Math. Soc., Toronto.
Durbin, P. A. 1983b Stochastic differential equations and turbulent dispersion. NASA RP-1103.
Fung, J. C. H., Hunt, J. C. R., Malik, N. A. & Perkins, R. J. 1992 Kinematic simulation of homogeneous turbulence by unsteady random Fourier modes. J. Fluid Mech. 236, 281.Google Scholar
Haworth, D. C. & Pope, S. B. 1986 A generalized Langevin model for turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 30, 1026.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1961 Dynamics of nonlinear stochastic systems. J. Math. Phys. 2, 124.Google Scholar
Launder, B. E. 1989 Second-moment closure: present ⃛ and future. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 10, 282.Google Scholar
Launder, B. E., Reece, G. J. & Rodi, W. 1975 Progress in the development of a Reynolds stress turbulence closure. J. Fluid Mech. 68, 537.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. 1978 Computational modeling of turbulent flows. Adv. Appl. Mech. 18, 126.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. 1977 Statistical theories of turbulence. In Fluid Dynamics, Les Houches. Gordon and Breach.
Pope, S. B. 1985 PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 11, 119.Google Scholar
Pope, S. B. 1994 On the relationship between stochastic Lagrangian models of turbulence and second-moment closures. Phys. Fluids 6, 973.Google Scholar
Schumann, U. 1977 Realizability of Reynolds stress turbulence models. Phys. Fluids 20, 721.Google Scholar
Speziale, C. G., Abid, R. & Durbin, P. A. 1993 New results on the realizability of Reynolds stress turbulence closures. ICASE Rep. No. 93–76.
Speziale, C. G., Sarkar, S. & Gatski, T. B. 1991 Modelling the pressure-strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 245.Google Scholar