Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:37:56.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

690. An investigation of fourteen herds producing substandard milks in the East of Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

R. A. Edwards
R. A. Edwards
Affiliation:
Edinburgh and East of Scotland College of Agriculture, George Square, Edinburgh 8
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Four hundred and sixteen individual cow samples of milk from fourteen herds were analysed for fat, total solids, crude protein, lactose and chloride.

2. Wherever possible information concerning feeding, incidence of mastitis, age of cow, stage of lactation and successful service dates was collected.

3. The milk samples were divided into normal (with 8·50% S.N.F. or over) and substandard (with less than 8·50% S.N.F.) groups.

4. The difference in S.N.F. content between the normal and substandard groups was due almost equally to a drop in lactose and protein, but with the latter playing the major part. Thus, although inadequate feeding was probably a major factor in lowering the S.N.F. in this population the fact that the lactose content was so often low was taken as indicating that mastitis was also important.

5. Breed, age of cow and stage of lactation all affected the incidence of low S.N.F. milks.

6. On average the substandard milks showed a reduced fat content as well as a lowered S.N.F. level.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 1958 , pp. 9 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Rowland, S. J. (1947). Proc. XIth Ing. Congr. Pure & Appl. Chem., p. 251.Google Scholar
(2)Provan, A. L. & Jenkins, D. I. (1949). J. Soc. Dairy Tech. 2, 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Provan, A. L. (1950). J. Brit. Dairy Fmrs' Ass. 54, 38.Google Scholar
(4)Rowland, S. J. (1951). N.A.A.S. quart. Rev. no. 14, 47.Google Scholar
(5)Provan, A. L. (1955). J. Soc. Dairy Tech. 8, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Tocher, J. F. (1925). Variations in the Composition of Milk. London: H.M.S.O. 12.Google Scholar
(7)Report of the Working Party on Quality Milk Production (1953). London: H.M.S.O. 7.Google Scholar
(8)Chalmers, C. H. (1956). J. Soc. Dairy Tech. 9, 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Hinton, C. L. & Macara, T. (1927). Analyst, 52, 668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Gorbach, G. & Schäfer, P. (1952). Z. LebensmittUntersuch. 95, 168.Google Scholar
(11)Davies, W. L. (1932). Analyst, 57, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Holmes, W., Waite, R., MacLusky, D. S. & Watson, J. N. (1956). J. Dairy Res. 23, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Rowland, S. J. (1942). j. Soc. chem. Ind., Lond., 61, 252.Google Scholar
(14)Waite, R., White, J. C. D. & Robertson, Alan (1956). J. Dairy Res. 23, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Ling, E. R. (1956). Textbook of Dairy Chemistry, vol. 1, 3rd ed., 113. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
(16)Sjollema, B. (1950). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 5, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar