Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:08:50.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Journal of Agricultural Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2009

P. HUHTANEN
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skogsmansgränd, Umeå S-90183, Sweden
A. N. HRISTOV
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy and Animal Science, State College, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letter to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Dhanoa et al. (Reference Dhanoa, Lopez, Sanderson and France2009) described an elegant and novel approach to estimate effective rumen degradability (E) assuming zero-order kinetics, which would increase the capacity to process samples using the in situ nylon bag method. The degradation and passage kinetic model for estimating E was basically the same as the original Ørskov & McDonald (Reference Ørskov and McDonald1979) model. Although the described method is mathematically sound, the authors ignored two erroneous assumptions of the basic kinetic model. First, the model assumes that the ‘wash fraction’ is instantly degraded. Part of the immediately ‘degraded’ fraction can be physical loss of small particles from the bags. Although the effect of particle loss may be corrected mathematically, the assumption of infinite degradation rate for the truly soluble fraction is not correct. There is ample experimental evidence based on different in vitro and in vivo techniques (Chen et al. Reference Chen, Sniffen and Russel1987; Hristov & Broderick Reference Hristov and Broderick1996; Peltekova & Broderick Reference Peltekova and Broderick1996; Choi et al. Reference Choi, Ahvenjärvi, Vanhatalo, Toivonen and Huhtanen2002; Volden et al. Reference Volden, Mydland and Olaisen2002; Ahvenjärvi et al. Reference Ahvenjärvi, Vanhatalo, Huhtanen and Hristov2007; Reynal et al. Reference Reynal, Ipharraguerre, Lineiro, Brito, Broderick and Clark2007) demonstrating that a quantitatively significant proportion of soluble non-ammonia N escapes from the rumen in the liquid phase. Another false assumption is the first-order one-compartment passage model. Marker kinetic studies based on duodenal sampling have clearly demonstrated that passage kinetics of ruminal digesta are not well described by a single exponential model (for references see Huhtanen et al. Reference Huhtanen, Ahvenjärvi, Weisbjerg, Norgaard, Sejrsen, Hvelplund and Nielsen2006), not even for concentrate feeds. These two false model assumptions would exaggerate differences in ruminal protein degradability between feeds. The insignificant effects of increasing rumen undegraded protein (RUP) supply on milk production (Ipharraguerre & Clark Reference Ipharraguerre and Clark2005) support this statement. In a recent meta-analysis (Huhtanen & Hristov Reference Huhtanen and Hristov2009) based on 1800 treatment means, ruminal protein degradability only marginally improved predictions of milk protein yield or milk N efficiency when used as a third independent variable in regression models with energy and crude protein intake. The experimental evidence strongly suggests that RUP is overvalued in current protein feeding systems, at least partly because of the above mentioned two false assumptions of the Ørskov & McDonald (Reference Ørskov and McDonald1979) model. Unless more correct models are used to derive E from kinetic parameters, simplified in situ procedures are of little value in feed evaluation despite increased labour effectiveness.

References

REFERENCES

Ahvenjärvi, S., Vanhatalo, A., Huhtanen, P. & Hristov, A. (2007) Ruminal metabolism of 15N labeled ammonium-N and grass silage soluble non-ammonia N. Journal of Dairy Science 90 (Supplement 1), 232.Google Scholar
Chen, G., Sniffen, C. J. & Russel, J. B. (1987). Concentration and estimated flow of peptides from the rumen of dairy cattle: effect of protein quantity, protein solubility and feeding frequency. Journal of Dairy Science 70, 983992.Google Scholar
Choi, C. W., Ahvenjärvi, S., Vanhatalo, A., Toivonen, V. & Huhtanen, P. (2002). Quantitation of the flow of soluble non-ammonia nitrogen entering the omasal canal of dairy cows fed grass silage based diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 96, 203220.Google Scholar
Dhanoa, M. S., Lopez, S., Sanderson, R. & France, J. (2009). Simplified estimation of forage degradability in the rumen assuming zero-order degradation kinetics, Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 147, 225240.Google Scholar
Hristov, A. N. & Broderick, G. A. (1996). Synthesis of microbial protein in ruminally cannulated cows fed alfalfa silage, alfalfa hay, or corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 16271637.Google Scholar
Huhtanen, P. & Hristov, A. (2009). A meta-analysis of the effects of dietary protein concentration and degradability on milk protein yield and milk N efficiency in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 32223232.Google Scholar
Huhtanen, P., Ahvenjärvi, S., Weisbjerg, M. & Norgaard, P. (2006). Digestion and passage of fibre in ruminant. In Ruminant Physiology (Eds Sejrsen, K., Hvelplund, T. & Nielsen, M. O.), pp. 83135. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Ipharraguerre, I. R. & Clark, J. H. (2005). Impacts of the source and amount of crude protein on the intestinal supply of nitrogen fractions and performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88 (E. Supplement), E22E37.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & McDonald, I. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rates of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 449503.Google Scholar
Peltekova, V. D. & Broderick, G.A (1996). In vitro ruminal degradation and synthesis of protein on fractions extracted from alfalfa hay and silage. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 612619.Google Scholar
Reynal, S. M., Ipharraguerre, I. R., Lineiro, M., Brito, A. F., Broderick, G. A. & Clark, J. H. (2007). Omasal flow of soluble proteins, peptides, and free amino acids in dairy cows fed diets supplemented with proteins of varying ruminal degradabilities. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 18871903.Google Scholar
Volden, H., Mydland, L. T. & Olaisen, V. (2002). Apparent ruminal degradation and rumen escape of soluble nitrogen fractions in grass and grass silage administered intraruminally to lactating dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 80, 27042716.Google Scholar