Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:24:54.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychological Follow-up Study of Twins from Birth to Five Years*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

W. De Coster ,
J. Lerou ,
C. Dutoit ,
M. De Zutter ,
R. Derom ,
M. Thiery  and
A. Vandierendonck
W. De Coster*
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and of Obstetrics, University of Ghent, Belgium
J. Lerou
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and of Obstetrics, University of Ghent, Belgium
C. Dutoit
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and of Obstetrics, University of Ghent, Belgium
M. De Zutter
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and of Obstetrics, University of Ghent, Belgium
R. Derom
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and of Obstetrics, University of Ghent, Belgium
M. Thiery
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and of Obstetrics, University of Ghent, Belgium
A. Vandierendonck
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and of Obstetrics, University of Ghent, Belgium
*
Department of Developmental Psychology, Ghent University, 4 Aan de Bccht, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Classical psychological twin studies have yielded in part equivocal and sometimes contradictory results. Besides the complexity of the problem, the delicate character of the diagnosis, and the rudimentary tools which were used, several other factors are underlying this situation: (1) insufficient systematization of the set-up and the careless design of the investigations; (2) lack of follow-up studies; (3) uncertain diagnosis of zygosity; in MZ twins no attention to the age of the ovum at the time of cleavage; (4) lack of consideration for antenatal and perinatal influences; (5) no attention to the typical circumstances linked to the twin situation. All this makes it difficult to balance nature against nurture on the basis of comparison between MZ twins, DZ twins, and singletons. Interactions may also appear between the effect of twinning and other factors such as the socioeconomic circumstances. A new investigation was therefore started where, besides the twins, a group of matched control singletons was constituted. The follow-up study is now completed up to the age of 5 years in 13 MZ and 20 DZ twin pairs (+ controls, that is to say, 99 children).

The children were observed and subjected to psychological tests at the age of 6 months and of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years.

Type
6. Twin Studies in Human Genetics
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 198 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1976

Footnotes

*

List of abbreviations and symbols. DQ: developmental quotient (Bühler-Hetzer Entwikkelungstest); BH and BH scale: Bühler-Hetzer developmental scale; LIPS: Leiter International Performance Scale; IQ: level of intelligence; MZ: monozygotic twin; DZ: dizygotic twin; DZ = :DZ of same sex; DZ ≠ :DZ of different sex; TW: twin; WPD: within-pair differences; SENS: sensory development; MOTOR: motor development; SOC: social adaptation; LE: learning; MATER: handling of materials; INT: intelligence; and LANG: language.

References

REFERENCES

Bene, E., Anthony, J. Manual for the Family Relations Test. An Objective Technique for Exploring Emotional Attitudes in Children. Windsor: Nat. Found. Educat. Research in England and Wales.Google Scholar
Bracken, H. von. 1936. Ueber die Sonderart der subjektiven Welt von Zwillingen. Arch. Ges. Psychol., 97: 97–105.Google Scholar
Carpenter, T.R., Busse, T.V. 1960. Development of self-concept in Negro and Welfare children. Child Dev., 40: 935–939.Google Scholar
Cassel, R.N. 1962. The Child Behavior Rating Scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Coan, R.W., Cattell, R.B. 1966. Early School Personality Questionnaire. Champaign, Ill.: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
Decoster, W. 1974. Psychomotor evolution of children born after elective induction of labor with prostaglanding F2α [In Dutch]. T. Geneesk., 30: 968–970.Google Scholar
Engel, M., Raine, W.J.A. 1963. A method for the measurement of the selfconcept of children in the third grade. J. Genet. Psychol., 102: 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knops, L. 1967. Handleiding bij de Analytische Intelligentietest (Guide-book to the Analytic Intelligence Test): Leuven: Leuvense Universitaire Uitgaven.Google Scholar
Koch, H.L. 1966. Twins and Twin Relation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Koppitz, E.M. 1971. Psychological Evaluation of Children's Human Figure Drawings. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Leonard, M.J. 1959. Problems in identification and ego devlopment in twins. Psychoanal. Stud. Child. 16: 300–331.Google Scholar
Mönks, F.J., Rost, H., Coffie, N.H. 1971. Nijmeegse Schoolbekwaamheidstest. (The Nijmegen School Capability Test). Nijmegen: Berkhout.Google Scholar
Newman, M.H. 1940. The question of mirror-imaging in human one-egg twins. Hum. Biol., 12: 21–34.Google Scholar
Sarason, J.B. (ed.) 1960. Anxiety in Elementary School Children. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, J.G. (ed.) 1968. Progress in Human Behavior Genetics. Recent Reports on Genetic Syndromes, Twin Studies, and Statistical Advances. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Zazzo, R. 1960. Les Jumeaux, le Couple et la Personne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar