Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:30:53.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CHAPTER XXII - BABYLONIA, c. 2120–1800 B.C.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
C. J. Gadd
Edited by
I. E. S. Edwards ,
C. J. Gadd  and
N. G. L. Hammond
Get access

Summary

THE THIRD DYNASTY OF UR

The ancient kingship of Sumer, so gloriously regained by Utukhegal with his expulsion of the Gutians, was his for a very brief space, his reign lasting for not much more than seven years, coming to an abrupt end, and his city of Uruk therewith losing the sovereignty. During these years and for some three decades longer the great impulse of national sentiment and strength which had thrown off the enemy seemed to have exhausted itself in that one exertion. Of Utu-khegal himself nothing more was preserved by the historical memory of his country than his one heroic act and a story about his fate. But the hazard of modern discovery has been kinder; at Ur and in its neighbourhood inscriptions have been found which show the sovereign concerning himself with the affairs of that city, and thereby they explain the origin of the Third Dynasty of Ur which was to supplant Uruk—by conquest, according to the king-list's unvarying phrase, but nothing is known of a war. In the first of these inscriptions occurs the name of Ur-Nammu, not yet king but only deputy over the city for Utū-khegal, on whose behalf he undertook to restore a part of the great temple at Ur, a work of which so much remains to this day.

The Third Dynasty of Ur began therefore with the appointment of its first member by the preceding king, who doubtless selected one of his principal adherents, perhaps not a native of the place he was given to rule. Another inscription, upon modest little clay cones from unknown sites,4 is of Utu-khegal himself. These cones are dedicated to the deities Ningirsu and Nanshe, the owners of Lagash, and relate that Utu-khegal fixed the boundary of their possessions 'to the man of Ur'.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Ancient History
, pp. 595 - 643
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, W. F. ‘A Third Revision of the Early Chronology of Western Asia.’ In Bull. Annual of the American Schools of Oriental Research 88 (1942) ff.Google Scholar
Andrae, W. Die archaischen Ischtar-Tempel in Assur (Wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 39). Leipzig, 1922.Google Scholar
Andrae, W. Das wiedererstandene Assur. Leipzig, 1938.Google Scholar
Awad, Gurgis . ‘Bibliography relating to Excavations in Iraq.’ In Sumer, 8 (1952) ff.Google Scholar
Aynard, J.-M. ‘Les clous d'argile du Musée du Louvre.’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 54 (1960) ff.Google Scholar
Barnett, R. D. ‘Xenophon and the Wall of Media.’ In Journal of Hellenic Studies 83 (1963) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, T. Die Ostkanaanäer. Leipzig, 1926.Google Scholar
Böhl, F. M. Th. ‘Die Tochter des Königs Nabonid.’ In Symbolae … Paulo Koschaker dedicatae (Leiden, 1939) ff.Google Scholar
Buccellati, G. The Amorites of the Ur III Period. Naples, 1966.Google Scholar
Cameron, G. G. History of Early Iran. Chicago, 1936.Google Scholar
Castellino, G. ‘Ur-Nammu; Three Religious Texts.’ In (i) Zeitschrifte für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 52 (1957) ff., (ii) Zeitschrift fär Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 53 (1959) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çiğ, M., Kizilyay, H. and Falkenstein, A. ‘Neue Rechts- und Gerichtsurkunden der Ur III-Zeit.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 53 (1959) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Civil, M. ‘Un nouveau synchronisme Mari-IIIe Dynastie d'Ur.’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 56 (1962).Google Scholar
Civil, M. ‘New Sumerian law-fragments.’ In Studies in Honor of Benno Landsberger (A.S. 16) ff.
Contenau, G. Manuel d'Archéologie orientale, I–IV. Paris, 1927–47.Google Scholar
Crawford, V. E. Sumerian Economic Texts from the First Dynasty of Isin (Babylonian inscriptions in the collection of J. B. Nies, Yale University IX). New Haven, 1954.Google Scholar
Cuneiform Texts from Babylonian Tablets in the British Museum. Cuneiform Texts … in the British Museum. London, 1896–.
Curtis, J. B. and Hallo, W. W. ‘Money and Merchants in Ur III.’ In Hebrew Union College Annual 30 (1959) ff.Google Scholar
Dávid, A. ‘La balance d'inventaire d'un dépôt de laine. …’ In Acta Orientalia Acad. Sc. Hungaricae, 2 (1952) ff.Google Scholar
David, M. Die Adoption im altbabylonischen Recht. Leipzig, 1927.Google Scholar
Dijk, J. J. A. . ‘Textes divers du Musée de Baghdad, III.’ In Sumer, 15 (1959) ff.Google Scholar
Dijk, J. J. A. . Review of Schmökel, H. , Geschichte des alten Vorderasiens. In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 55 (1963) ff.Google Scholar
Dijk, J. . ‘Une insurrection générale au pays de Larša avant I'avènement de Nūradad.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 19 (1965) ff.Google Scholar
Dossin, G. ‘Inscriptions de fondation provenant de Mari.’ In Syria, 21 (1940) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dossin, G. ‘Un “panthéon” d'Ur III à Mari.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d'Archéogie orientale 61 (1967) ff.Google Scholar
Driver, G. R. and Miles, J. C. The Babylonian Laws, I. Oxford, 1952.Google Scholar
Ebeling, E., Meissner, B. and Weidner, E. F. (eds.). Reallexikon der Assyriologie. Berlin and Leipzig, 1932–.Google Scholar
Ebeling, E., B., Meissner und E. F., Weidner Die Inschriften der altassyrischen Könige. Leipzig, 1926.Google Scholar
Edmonds, C. J. Kurds, Turks, and Arabs. London, 1957.Google Scholar
Edzard, D. O. Die ‘zweite Zwischenzeit’ Babyloniens. Wiesbaden, 1957.Google Scholar
Edzard, D. O. ‘Neue Inschriften zur Geschichte von Ur III unter Šūsuen.’ In Archiv für Orientforschung. 19 (1959–60) ff.Google Scholar
Fadhil, Ali . ‘Two collections of Sumerian letters.’ In Archiv Orientálni. 35 (1965) ff.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, A. und Soden, W. Sumerische und akkadische Hymnen und Gebete. Zürich–Stuttgart, 1953.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, A. ‘Ein sumerischer “Gottesbrief”.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 44 (1938) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenstein, A. ‘Der “Sohn des Tafelhauses”.’ In Die Welt des Orients 1 (1947–52) ff.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, A. ‘Die Ibbīsîn Klage,’ In Die Welt des Orients 1 (1947–52) ff.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, A. ‘Ibbīsîn–Išbi'erra.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 49 (1950) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenstein, A. ‘Sumerische religiöse Texte : 3. Ein Šulgi-Lied.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie and vorderasiatische Archäologie 50 (1952) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenstein, A. ‘Ein Lied auf Šulgi.’ In Iraq, 22 (1960) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenstein, A. Die neusumerischen Gerichtsurkunden, I–III. Munich, 1956, 1957.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, A. ‘Zu den Inschriftfunden der Grabung in Uruk-Warka 1960–1961.’ In Baghdader Mitteilungen, 2 (1963) ff.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, A. ‘Eine Inschrift Waradsîns aus Babylon.’ In Baghdader Mitteil. 3 (1964) ff.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, A. ‘Fluch über Akkade.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 57 (1965) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figulla, H. H. ‘Accounts concerning Allocation of Provisions for Offerings in the Ningal-temple at Ur.’ In Iraq, 15 (1953) ff.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, J. J. ‘Subartu and Subarians.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 9 (1955) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, J. J. ‘Ammisaduqa's Edict and the Babylonian “law-codes”.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 15 (1961) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, J. J. ‘Some new misharum material and its implications.’ In Studies … Landsberger ff.
Finkelstein, J. J. ‘Sex offenses in Sumerian Laws.’ In Journal of the American Oriental Society 86 (1966) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, J. J. ‘The genealogy of the Ḫammurapi Dynasty.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 20 (1966) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, T. ‘Chronological List of Ur III Economic Texts from Drehem.’ In Manchester Cuneiform Studies. 5 (1955) ff.Google Scholar
Fish, T. ‘The Cult of Dungi during the Third Dynasty of Ur.’ In Bull. Ryl. Libr. 11 (1927) ff.Google Scholar
Fish, T. ‘The Contemporary Cult of Kings of the Third Dynasty of Ur.’ In Bulletin of the John Rylands Library (Manchester). 12 (1928) ff.Google Scholar
Fish, T. ‘Some Aspects of Kingship in the Sumerian City and Kingdom of Ur.’ In Bull. Ryl. Libr. 34 (1951) ff.Google Scholar
Fish, T. ‘Food of the Gods in Ancient Sumer.’ In Bulletin of the John Rylands Library (Manchester). 27 (1942–3) ff.Google Scholar
Fish, T. ‘More gá-dub-ba texts.’ In Manchester Cuneiform Studies 1 (1951) ff.Google Scholar
Fish, T. ‘The Smith at Lagash.’ In Manchester Cuneiform Studies 1 (1951) ff.Google Scholar
Fish, T. ‘New kuš-texts.’ In Manchester Cuneiform Studies 1 (1951) ff.Google Scholar
Fish, T. ‘Texts from Umma about Reeds.’ In Manchester Cuneiform Studies 3 (1953) ff.Google Scholar
Fish, T. ‘Seasonal Labour according to guruš Texts from Umma.’ In Manchester Cuneiform Studies 4 (1954) ff.Google Scholar
Fish, T. ‘Umma Texts concerning KUŠ.’ In M.S.6. 6 (1956) ff.Google Scholar
Fish, T. ‘Lagash Texts concerning KUŠ.’ In Manchester Cuneiform Studies 6 (1956) ff.Google Scholar
Fish, T. ‘Drehem Texts concerning KUŠ.’ In Manchester Cuneiform Studies 6 (1956) ff.Google Scholar
Frank, C. Kultlieder aus dem Ischtar-Tammuz Kreis. Leipzig, 1939.Google Scholar
Frankfort, H. Cylinder Seals. London, 1939.Google Scholar
Frankfort, H. The Art and Architecture of the Ancient Orient. Harmondsworth, 1954.Google Scholar
Frankfort, H., Lloyd, Seton and Jacobsen, T. The Gimilsin Temple and the Palace of the Rulers at Tell Asmar (Oriental Institute Publications XLIII). Chicago, 1940.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. J. and Legrain, L. Royal Inscriptions (Ur Excavations: Texts I). London and Philadelphia, 1928.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. J. ‘Clay Cones of Utu-Ḫegal, King of Erech.’ In Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 1926 ff.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. J. ‘The Second Lamentation for Ur.’ In Hebrew and Semitic Studies presented to Godfrey Rolles Driver (Oxford, 1962) ff.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. J. Ideas of Divine Rule in the Ancient East. London, 1948.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. J. ‘Early Sumerian Sculpture.’ In British Museum Quarterly. 1 (1926) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadd, C. J. ‘En-an-e-du.’ In Iraq, 13 (1951) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadd, C. J. and S. N., Kramer Literary and religious texts, I, II (Ur Excavations: Texts VI). London and Philadelphia, 1963, 1966.Google Scholar
Garelli, P. (ed.). Gilgameš et sa légende. Paris, 1960.Google Scholar
Garelli, P. Les Assyriens en Cappadoce. Paris, 1963.Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J. Glossary of Old Akkadian. Chicago, 1957.Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J. Old Akkadian Writing and Grammar. Ed. 2. Chicago, 1961.Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J. Hurrians and Subarians (Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 22). Chicago, 1944.Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J. ‘New Light on Hurrians and Subarians.’ In Studi orientalistici in onore di Giorgio Levi della Vida, 1 (Rome, 1956) ff.Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J. ‘The Early History of the West Semitic Peoples.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 15 (1961) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelb, I. J. ‘The Philadelphia Onion-archive.’ In Studies … Landsberger ff.
Goetze, A. ‘Historical Allusions in Old-Babylonian Omen-Texts.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 1 (1947) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, A. ‘Hulibar of Duddul.’ In Journal of Near Eastern Studies 12 (1953). ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, A. ‘Four Ur Dynasty Tablets.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 7 (1953) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, A. ‘The Chronology of Šulgi again.’ In Iraq, 22 (1960) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, A. ‘Šakkanakkus of the Ur III Empire.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 17 (1963) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, A. Review of Jones, T. B. , and Snyder, J. W. , Sumerian Economic Texts from the Third Ur Dynastyz. In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 17 (1963) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, A. ‘Umma Texts concerning Reed Mats.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 2 (1948) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, A. ‘A Drehem Text dealing with Leather Objects.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 9 (1955) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, A. ‘Mesopotamian Laws and the Historian.’ In Journal of the American Oriental Society 69 (1949) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, A. ‘Sin-idinnam of Larsa.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 4 (1950) ff.Google Scholar
Goetze, A. The Laws of Eshnunna (Ann. Annual of the American Schools of Oriental Research XXXI). New Haven, 1956.Google Scholar
Gurney, O. R. and S. N., Kramer ‘Two fragments of Sumerian laws.’ In Studies … Landsberger ff.
Guterbock, H. G. ‘Die historische Tradition und ihre literarische Gestaltung bei Babyloniern und Hethitern bis 1200.’ Erster Teil in Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 42 (1934) ff.; zweiter Teil in Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 44 (1938) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallo, W. W. ‘Zāriqum.’ In Journal of Near Eastern Studies 15 (1956) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallo, W. W. Early Mesopotamian Royal Titles. New Haven, 1957.Google Scholar
Hallo, W. W. ‘The Royal Inscriptions of Ur : a Typology.’ In Hebrew Union College Annual 33 (1962) ff.Google Scholar
Hallo, W. W. ‘Contributions to Neo-Sumerian.’ In Hebrew Union College Annual 29 (1958) ff.Google Scholar
Hallo, W. W. ‘Royal Inscriptions of the Early Old Babylonian Period : a Bibliography.’ In Bibliotheca Orientalis. 18 (1961) ff.Google Scholar
Hallo, W. W. ‘Royal hymns and Mesopotamian Unity.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 17 (1963) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrouda, B. ‘Waššukanni, Urkiš, Šubat-Enlil.’ In Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 90 (1958) ff.Google Scholar
Huffmon, H. B. Amorite personal names in the Mari texts. Baltimore, 1965.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T. The Sumerian King-list (Assyriological Studies, no. II). Chicago, 1939.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T. ‘The Reign of Ibbī-Suen.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 7 (1953) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, T. ‘The Waters of Ur.’ In Iraq, 22 (1960) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jean, C.-F. ‘LÉlam sous la Dynastie d'Ur.’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 19 (1922) ff.Google Scholar
Jestin, R. ‘Textes économiques de Mari (IIIe dynastie d'Ur).’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 46 (1952) ff.Google Scholar
Jones, T. B. and J. W., Snyder Sumerian Economic Texts from the Third Ur Dynasty. Minneapolis, 1961.Google Scholar
Jones, T. B. ‘Bookkeeping in Ancient Sumer.’ In Archaeology, 9 (1956) ff.Google Scholar
Jordan, J., Lenzen, H. and others. ‘Vorläufige Berichte über die … in Uruk-Warka … Ausgrabungen’. In Abhandlungen der Preussischen (Bayerischen, etc.) Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phil.-hist. Klasse, 1930–40, and in Abhandlungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft. Berlin, 1956–.Google Scholar
Keiser, C. E. Patesis of the Ur Dynasty (Yale Oriental Studies IV, 2). New Haven, 1919.Google Scholar
Kilmer, A. D. ‘The strings of musical instruments; their names, numbers, and significance.’ In Studies … Landsberger ff.
King, L. W. History of Babylon. London, 1915.Google Scholar
King, L. W. Chronicles concerning Old Babylonian Kings. London, 1907.Google Scholar
Klíma, J. ‘Au sujet de nouveaux textes Iégislatifs de la Babylonie ancienne.’ In Archiv Orientálni. 35 (1967) ff.Google Scholar
Korošec, V. Novi fragmenti Sumerskega Prava iz Ura (German summary ff.). Ljubljana, 1966.Google Scholar
Kramer, S. N. The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character. Chicago, 1963.Google Scholar
Kramer, S. N. Lamentation over the Destruction of Ur (Assyriological Studies, 12). Chicago, 1940.Google Scholar
Kramer, S. N. ‘The Death of Gilgamesh.’ In Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 94 (1944) ff.Google Scholar
Kramer, S. N. ‘Ur-Nammu Law-code.’ In Orientalia n.s. 23 (1954) ff.Google Scholar
Kramer, S. N. ‘Literary texts, Part II.’ In Iraq 25 (1963) ff.Google Scholar
Kramer, S. N. and I., Bernhardt Sumerische literarische Texte aus Nippur, Band II. Berlin, 1967.Google Scholar
Kraus, F. R. ‘Altmesopotamische Tonnaegel mit Keilinschriften.’ In Halil Edhem hâttra kitabt, Cilt ff. Ankara, 1947.Google Scholar
Kraus, F. R. ‘Zur Chronologie der Könige Ur-Nammu und Sulgi.’ In Orientalia n.s. 20 (1951) ff.Google Scholar
Kraus, F. R. ‘Provinzen des neusumerischen Reiches von Ur.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 51 (1955) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, F. R. ‘Altbabylonische Quellensammlungen zur altmesopotamische Geschichte.’ In Archiv für Orientforschung 20 (1963) ff.Google Scholar
Kraus, F. R. ‘Le rôle des Temples depuis la troisième Dynastie d'Ur jusqu'à la première Dynastie de Babylone.’ In Cahiers d'Histoire mondiale, 1 (1954) ff.Google Scholar
Kraus, F. R. Ein Edikt des Königs Ammi-saduqa von Babylon. Leiden, 1958.Google Scholar
Kraus, F. R. ‘Di-til-la, sumerische Prozess-protokolle und Verwandtes aus der Zeit der III Dynastie von Ur.’ In Bibliotheca Orientalis. 15 (1958) ff.Google Scholar
Kraus, F. R. ‘Nippur und Isin nach altbabylonischen Rechtsurkunden.’ [Journal of Cuneiform Studies 3 (1951).]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, F. R. ‘Zur Liste der älteren Kōnige von Babylonien.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 50 (1952) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, F. R. ‘Ein Edikt des Konigs Samsu-iluna von Babylon.’ In Studies … Landsberger ff.
Kupper, J.-R. ‘Un gouvernement provincial dans le royaume de Mari.’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 41 (1947) ff.Google Scholar
Kupper, J.-R. Les Nomades en Mesopotamie au temps des rois de Mari. Paris, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupper, J.-R. ‘L'Iconographie du dieu Amurru.’ In Mém. de I'Acad. roy. de Belgique, Classe des Lettres, 55, 1 (1961).Google Scholar
Lambert, M. ‘La naissance de la bureaucratie.’ In Revue historique. 224 (1960) ff.Google Scholar
Lambert, M. ‘Le premier triomphe de la bureaucratie.’ In Revue historique. 225 (1961) ff.Google Scholar
Lambert, M. ‘Les finances de Lagash sous la IIIe dynastie d'Ur.’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 56 (1962) ff.Google Scholar
Lambert, M. Review of Jones, T. B. , and Snyder, J. W. Sumerian Economic Texts from the Third Ur Dynasty. In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 56 (1962) ff.Google Scholar
Landsberger, B. Die Serie ana ittišu (Materialien zum Sumerischen Lexikon I). Rome, 1937.Google Scholar
Landsberger, B. ‘Über die Völker Vorderasiens im dritten Jahrtausend.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 35 (1924) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langdon, S. H. Die neubabylonischen Königsinschriften. Leipzig, 1912.Google Scholar
Langdon, S. H. ‘Three New Hymns in the Cults of Deified Kings.’ In Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology 40 (1918) ff. ff.Google Scholar
Langdon, S. H. ‘The Sumerian Law-code compared with the Code of Hammurabi.’ In Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. 1920 ff.Google Scholar
Læssøe, J. ‘The Shemshara Tablets.’ In Arkaeol. Kunsthist. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 4, no. 3 (1959).Google Scholar
Læssøe, J. ‘The Second Shemshara Archive.’ In Sumer, 16 (1960) ff.Google Scholar
Læssøe, J. ‘IM. 62100: a letter from Tell Shemshāra.’ In Studies … Landsberger ff.
Læssøe, J. Det forste Assyriske Imperium et Aspekt. Copenhagen, 1966.Google Scholar
Le, Strange G. The Lands of the Eastern Caliphate. Cambridge, 1905.Google Scholar
Legrain, L. Business Documents of the Third Dynasty of Ur (Ur Excavations: Texts III). London and Philadelphia, 1947.Google Scholar
Legrain, L. ‘Quelques tablettes d'Ur.’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 30 (1933) ff.Google Scholar
Lewy, H. ‘The Babylonian Background of the Kay-Kâûs Legend.’ In Analecta Orientalia 17 (1949) ff.Google Scholar
Lewy, J. ‘Amurritica.’ In Hebrew Union College Annual 32 (1961) ff.Google Scholar
Liere, W. J. . ‘Urkiš, centre religieux hurrite, retrouvé dans la Haute Jezireh syrienne.’ In Annales archéogiques de Syrie 7 (1957) ff.Google Scholar
Limet, H. Le travail du métal au pays de Sumer au temps de la IIIe Dynastie d'Ur. Paris, 1960.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Seton and Fuad, Safar . ‘Excavations at Eridu : Preliminary Reports.’ In Sumer, 3 (1947), 4 (1948), 6 (1950).Google Scholar
Mallowan, M. E. L. ‘Excavations at Brak and Chagar Bazar.’ In Iraq, 9 (1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matouš, L. ‘Purchase of Landed Property in Ur by BalmunamḪe.’ In Charisteria Orientalia (Ioanni Rypka … volumen sacrum) ff.
Matouš, L. Zur Chronologie der Geschichte von Larsa bis zum Einfall der Elamiter.' In Archiv Orientálni 20 (1952) ff.Google Scholar
Mercer, S. A. B. Sumero-Babylonian Year-formulae. London, 1946.Google Scholar
Munn-Rankin, J. M. ‘Diplomacy in Western Asia in the early second millennium, B.C.’ In Iraq 18 (1956) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassouhi, E. ‘Statue d'un dieu de Mari.’ In Archiv für Orientforschung 3 (1926) ff.Google Scholar
North, R. ‘Status of the Warka Excavation.’ In Orientalia. n.s. 26 (1957) ff.Google Scholar
Nougayrol, J. ‘Note sur la place des “présages historiques” dans l'extispicine babylonienne.’ In École Pratique des Hautes Études, annuaire 1944–5 ff.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, A. L. ‘The Seafaring Merchants of Ur.’ In Journal of the American Oriental Society 74 (1954) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, A. L. ‘“Siege-documents” from Nippur.’ In Iraq, 17 (1955) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, A. L. Catalogue of the Cuneiform Tablets of the Wilberforce Eames Collection in the New York Public Library: Tablets of the Time of the Third Dynasty of Ur. New Haven, 1948.Google Scholar
Parrot, A. Archéologic mésopotamienne, 1, 11. Paris, 1946, 1953.Google Scholar
Parrot, A. and Nougayrol, J. ‘Un document de fondation hurrite.’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 42 (1948) ff.Google Scholar
Parrot, A. Tello: vingt campagnes de fouilles. Paris, 1948.Google Scholar
Parrot, A. Mari: documentation photographique. Neuchâtel and Paris, 1953.Google Scholar
Parrot, A. Mission archéologique de Mari, 11, 3: Le Palais, documents et monuments. Paris, 1959.Google Scholar
Pritchard, J. B. (ed.). Ancient Near-Eastern Texts relating to the Old Testament. Ed. 2. Princeton, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, J. B. The Ancient Near East in Pictures. Princeton, 1954.Google Scholar
Renger, J. ‘Untersuchungen zum Priestertum in der altbabylonischen Zeit.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 58 (1967) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Römer, W. H. Ph. ‘Studien zu altbabylonischen hymnisch-epischen Texte (3).’ In Die Welt des Orients 4 (1967) ff.Google Scholar
Rutten, M. ‘Trente-deux modèles de foies … de Tell-Hariri (Mari).’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 35 (1938) ff.Google Scholar
Salonen, A. Die Wasserfahrzeuge in Babylonien. Helsinki, 1939.Google Scholar
Salonen, A. Die Möbel des alten Mesopotamien. Helsinki, 1963.Google Scholar
San Nicolò, M. ‘Rechtsgeschichtliches zum Gesetz des Bilalama von Ešnunna.’ In Orientalia. n.s. 18 (1949) ff.Google Scholar
Sauren, H. ‘Der Feldzug UtuḪengals gegen Tirigan und das Siedlungsgebiet der Gutäer.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d'Archéogie orientale 61 (1967) ff.Google Scholar
Schaumberger, J. ‘Die Mondfinsternisse der Dritten Dynastie von Ur.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 49 (1950) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaumberger, J. ‘Astronomische Untersuchung der “historischen” Mondfinsternisse in Enûma Anu Enlil.’ In Archiv für Orientforschung 17 (1954–6) ff.Google Scholar
Schmidtke, E. Der Aufbau der babylonischen Chronologie. Münster, 1952.Google Scholar
Schneider, N. Die Zeitbestimmungen der Wirtschaftsurkunden von Ur III (Analecta Orientalia 13). Rome, 1936.Google Scholar
Schneider, N. ‘Die arad-zu-, dumu-ni-, und in-na-ba Siegel von Ur III.’ In Orientalia. n.s. 5 (1936) ff.Google Scholar
Schneider, N. ‘Ein deifizierter Patesi zur Zeit der 3. Dynastie von Ur.’ In Orientalia. n.s. 9 (1940) ff.Google Scholar
Schneider, N. ‘Der dub-sar als Verwaltungsbeamter im Reiche von Sumer und Akkad zur Zeit der 3. Dynastie von Ur.’ In Orientalia n.s. 15 (1946) ff.Google Scholar
Schneider, N. ‘Die ensi-Siegel der Vertragsurkunden der Dynastie von Ur III.’ In Orientalia n.s. 15 (1946) ff.Google Scholar
Schneider, N. ‘Der sangu als Verwaltungsbehörde und Opfergabenspender im Reiche der dritten Dynastic von Ur.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 1 (1947) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, N. ‘Göttertempel im Ur III-Reich.’ In Orientalia n.s. 19 (1950) ff.Google Scholar
Schneider, N. ‘Die Lohnbücher der Mühle von Sagdana.’ In Archiv für Orientforschung 3 (1926) f.Google Scholar
Schneider, N. ‘Der Viehbestand des é-gal in Lagaš.’ In Archiv für Orientforschung 4 (1927) ff.Google Scholar
Schneider, N. ‘Die Urkundenbehälter (pisan-dub-ba) von Ur III und ihre archivalische Systematik.’ In Actes du XXe Congrés international des Orientalistes (Louvain, 1940) ff.Google Scholar
Sjöberg, Åke W. ‘Ein syllabisch geschriebener Urnammu-Text.’ In Orientalia Suecana, 10 (1961) ff.Google Scholar
Sjöberg, Åke . Der Mondgott Nanna-Suen in der sumerischen Überlieferung. I. Teil: Texte. Uppsala, 1960.Google Scholar
Smith, S. Early History of Assyria. London, 1928.Google Scholar
Sollberger, E. ‘New Lists of the Kings of Ur and Isin.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 8 (1954) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollberger, E. ‘Sur la chronologie des rois d'Ur et quelques problèmes connexes.’ In Archiv für Orientforschung 17 (1954–6) ff.Google Scholar
Sollberger, E. ‘Byblos sous les rois d'Ur.’ In Archiv für Orientforschung 19 (1959–60) ff.Google Scholar
Sollberger, E. ‘The Tummal Inscription.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 16 (1962) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollberger, E. ‘Remarks on Ibbi-Sin's Reign.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 7 (1953) f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollberger, E. Royal Inscriptions, II (Ur Excavations: Texts VIII). London and Philadelphia 1965.Google Scholar
Sollberger, E. Texts from Cuneiform Sources, I: The Business and Administrative Correspondence under the Kings of Ur. New York, 1966.Google Scholar
Speiser, E. A. ‘Hurrians and Subarians.’ In Journal of the American Oriental Society 68 (1948) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spycket, A. Les statues de culte dans les textes mésopotamiens des origines à la première dynastie de Babylone. Paris, 1968.Google Scholar
Steele, F. R. ‘The Code of Lipit-Ishtar.’ In American Journal of Archaeology 52 (1948) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, F. J. Votive and Historical Texts from Babylonia and Assyria (Yale Oriental Studies IX). New Haven, 1937.Google Scholar
Strommenger, E. ‘Das Menschenbild in der altmesopotamischen Rundplastik von Mesilim bis Hammurapi.’ In Baghdader Mitteilungen, 1 (1960) ff.Google Scholar
Strommenger, E. and M., Hirmer Fünf Jahrtausende Mesopotamien. Munich, 1962.Google Scholar
Szlechter, E. ‘Le code d'Ur-Nammu.’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 49 (1955) ff.Google Scholar
The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. The Assyrian Dictionary. Chicago, 1956–.
Thomas, D. Winton (ed.). Archaeology and Old Testament Study. Oxford, 1967.Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, F. Die sumerischen und akkadischen Königsinschriften. Leipzig, 1907.Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, F. ‘Inscriptions votives de Mari.’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 34 (1937) ff.Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, F. ‘Tablette de Samarra.’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 9 (1912) ff.Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, F. ‘Ašduni-erim roi de Kis.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 8 (1911) ff.Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, F. ‘La chronologie de la Dynastie de Larsa.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 15 (1918) ff.Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, F. ‘Une inscription de Kudur-Mabuk.’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 9 (1912) ff.Google Scholar
Unger, E. Babylon, die heilige Stadt. Berlin and Leipzig, 1931.Google Scholar
Ungnad, A. Subartu. Berlin and Leipzig, 1936.Google Scholar
Van Buren, E. D. Foundation Figurines and Offerings. Berlin, 1931.Google Scholar
Weidner, E. F. ‘Historisches Material in der babylonischen Omina-Literatur.’ In M.A.O.G. 4 (1928) ff.Google Scholar
Weidner, E. F. ‘Simurrum und Zaban.’ In Archiv für Orientforschung 15 (1945–51) ff.Google Scholar
Weidner, E. F. ‘Ilušumas Zug nach Babylonien.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 43 (1936) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, D. J. The Vassal-treaties of Esarhaddon. [Iraq, 20 (1958), part I.]Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L. ‘Excavations at Ur of the Chaldees.’ Preliminary Reports in Antiquaries Journal 3 (1923)–14 (1934).Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L. The Ziggurat and its Surroundings (Ur Excavations v). London and Philadelphia, 1939.Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L. Excavations at Ur: a Record of Twelve Years' Work. London, 1954.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×