Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:14:16.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Information width: a way for the second law to increase complexity

from Part III - Biological complexity, evolution, and information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

By
David H. Wolpert
Edited by
Charles H. Lineweaver ,
Paul C. W. Davies  and
Michael Ruse
Charles H. Lineweaver
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Paul C. W. Davies
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Michael Ruse
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access

Summary

RISING COMPLEXITY, NATURAL SELECTION, AND THERMODYNAMICS

It seems that many systems both increase their complexity if initialized in a low complexity state, and then reliably and robustly maintain high (but finite) complexity once it is attained. Some of the most prominent examples are the many biological systems undergoing natural selection that seem to start with low complexity and then increase their complexity (Krakauer, 2011; Carroll, 2001; McShea, 1991; Smith, 1970). Such systems are typically modeled as localized individuals that reproduce in an error-prone process, with their offspring weeded out in competitions with other individuals that select for higher complexity. In this natural selection process the individuals in a line of biological descent increase their complexity in time.

Some have argued from these examples that natural selection is a necessary condition for complexity to increase. The idea is that for a particular lineage to have a large fitness advantage over its competitors, it must become increasingly “complex”. However, we should not confuse the properties of an example of a phenomenon with the phenomenon itself: complexity increase is not synonymous with adaptionist natural selection. Indeed, one can engineer by hand models of systems undergoing natural selection where the competition selects for low complexity of the individuals in a line of descent, not high complexity. One can even engineer models where the competition ends up weeding out all the individuals, so that the natural selection causes all the lines of descent to die – in which case the complexity of the system has been driven to its minimal value. So natural selection, by itself, need not cause complexity to increase.

Type
Chapter
Information
Complexity and the Arrow of Time , pp. 246 - 276
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M., Dogic, Z., Keller, S., & Fraden, S. (1998). Entropically driven microphase transitions in mixtures of colloidal rods and spheres. Nature, 393, 349–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asakura, S. & Oosawa, F. (1958). J. Polym. Sci., 33, 183.CrossRef
Brillouin, L. (1953). Negentropy principle of information. Journal of Applied Physics, 24, 1152–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brillouin, L. (1962). Science and Information Theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. (2001). Chance and necessity: the evolution of morphological complexity and diversity. Nature, 409, 1102–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cover, T. & Thomas, J. (1991). Elements of Information Theory. New York: Wiley-Interscience.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, J. C., Matteo, J. A., Dinsmore, A. D., & Yodh, A. G. (1999). Entropie attraction and repulsion in binary colloids probed with a line optical tweezer. Physical Review Letters, 82, 4352–4355. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Götzelmann, B., Evans, R., & Dietrich, S. (1998). Depletion forces in fluids. Phys. Rev. E, 57, 6785–6800. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandy, W. T., J. (2008). Entropy and the Time Evolution of Macroscopic Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M. W., Luke, J., Archibald, J. M., Keeling, P. J., & Doolittle, W. F. (2010). Irremediable complexity?Science, 330(6006), 920–921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grinstein, G. & Linsker, R. (2007). Comments on a derivation and application of the ‘maximum entropy production’ principle. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 40, 971720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosse, I., Bernaola-Galvan, P., Carpena, P., Roman-Roldan, R., Oliver, J., & Stanley, H. E. (2002). Analysis of symbolic sequences using the Jensen–Shannon divergence measure. Phys. Rev. E, 65, 041905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, M. (1994). What is negentropy?Modern Trends in BioThermoKinetics, 3, 50–61.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. A. (1995). At Home in the Universe: the Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krakauer, D. (2011). Darwinian demons, evolutionary complexity, and information maximization. Chaos. 21, 037110, .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebon, G., Jou, D., & Casas-Vazquez, J. (2008). Understanding Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics: Foundations, Applications, Frontiers. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, D. (2003). Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahulikar, S. & Herwig, H. (2009). Exact thermodynamic principles for dynamic order existence and evolution in chaos. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 41, 1939–1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenduzzo, D., Finan, K., & Cook, P. (2006). The depletion attraction: an underappreciated force driving cellular organization. Journal of Cell Biology, 5, 681–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martyushev, L. & Seleznev, V. (2006). Maximum entropy production principle in physics, chemistry and biology. Physics Reports, 426, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McShea, D. (1991). Complexity and evolution: what everybody knows. Biology and Philosophy, 6, 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morowitz, H. (1968). Energy Flow in Biology. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Morowitz, H. & Smith, E. (2007). Energy flow and the organization of life. Complexity, 13, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onsager, L. (1931a). Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes: 1. Physical Review, 37, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onsager, L. (1931b). Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes: 2. Physical Review, 38, 2265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, G. (1979). Climate and thermodynamic systems of maximum dissipation. Nature, 279, 5714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrott, L. (2010). Measuring ecological complexity. Ecological Indicators, 10(6), 1069–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigogine, I. (1945). Moderation et transformations irreversibles des systemes ouverts. Bulletin de la Classe des Sciences, Académie Royale de Belgique, 31, 600–606.Google Scholar
Proulx, R. & Parrott, L. (2008). Measures of structural complexity in digital images for monitoring the ecological signature of an old-growth forest ecosystem. Ecological Indicators, 8(3), 270–284.CrossRef
Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is Life?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, E. (2008a). Thermodynamics of natural selection i: Energy flow and the limits on organization. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 252(2), 185–197.Google Scholar
Smith, E. (2008b). Thermodynamics of natural selection ii: Chemical carnot cycles. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 252(2), 198–212.
Smith, E. (2008c). Thermodynamics of natural selection iii: Landauer's principle in computation and chemistry. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 252(2), 213–220.
Smith, J. M. (1970). Time in the evolutionary process. Studium Generale, 23, 266–272.Google ScholarPubMed
Stanley, M. H. R., Amaral, L. A. N., Buldyrev, S. Y. et al. (1996). Scaling behaviour in the growth of companies. Nature, 379, 804–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verma, R., Crocker, J. C., Lubensky, T. C., & Yodh, A. G. (1998). Entropie colloidal interactions in concentrated dna solutions. Physics Review Letters, 81, 4004–4007, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, D. (2012). How to salvage Shannon entropy as a complexity measure. Submitted.
Wolpert, D. H. & Macready, W. (2000). Self-dissimilarity: an empirically observable measure of complexity. In Bar-Yam, Y (ed.), Unifying Themes in Complex Systems. New York: Perseus Books, pp. 626–643.
Wolpert, D. H. & Macready, W. (2004). Self-dissimilarity as a high dimensional complexity measure. In Bar-Yam, Y (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Complex Systems. New York: Perseus Books.
Wolpert, D. H. & Macready, W. (2007). Using self-dissimilarity to quantify complexity. Complexity, 12, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×