Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T22:01:13.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Mechanotransduction through Local Autocrine Signaling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Nikola Kojic
Affiliation:
Harvard-MIT Division of Health Science and Technology
Daniel J. Tschumperlin
Affiliation:
Harvard School of Public Health
Mohammad R. K. Mofrad
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Roger D. Kamm
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

Introduction

While mechanotransduction within the cytoskeleton, cell membrane, and cell-matrix interface are well known, multicellular tissue organization provides an additional opportunity for mechanotransduction in the extracellular space through local autocrine signaling. In many tissues and organs, cells are organized into relatively dense structures separated by narrow interstitial spaces. The interstitial fluid in these spaces facilitates nutrient and waste transport, and provides a conduit for the exchange of autocrine and paracrine signals. When mechanical loads are applied to tissues, the resulting pressure gradients can locally redistribute interstitial fluid, altering the geometry of the interstitial spaces separating cells. These changes in interstitial geometry, in the presence of a constitutively active autocrine signaling environment, provide a means for coupling mechanical loading to changes in local ligand concentration and receptor activation. In this chapter we discuss these behaviors using the example of airway epithelial cells, which exhibit constitutive autocrine signaling localized to an interstitial space that deforms under physiological levels of loading. We highlight evidence demonstrating that changes in autocrine ligand concentration arising from the deformation of the local interstitial geometry are sufficient to drive alterations in receptor activation. We then use a computational modeling approach to explore the unique characteristics of this mechanical signaling system, and discuss its broader implications.

Mechanical Stress–Induced Signaling in Bronchial Epithelium

The mechanical environment shapes the development and function of the lung’s airways from the first stages of airway morphogenesis in utero (Tschumperlin and Drazen, 2006). In the adult lung the mechanical environment is defined by a unique balance of surface, tissue, and muscle forces, but the underlying load-bearing structure is similar to many organs of the body: an epithelium-lined structure surrounded by extracellular matrix, vasculature, and mesenchymal cells (e.g., smooth muscle). In diseases such as asthma, activation of the airway smooth muscle wrapped around airways abruptly narrows the airway lumen (Figure 14.1; Plate 16) and profoundly changes the stress state within the tissue of the airway wall (Wiggs et al., 1997). Because mechanical stress–induced remodeling is well known in many tissues, and tissue remodeling is frequently observed in asthmatic airways (Bousquet et al., 2000), two related question arise: Are the cells of the airway wall responsive to the mechanical stresses that accompany smooth muscle shortening (bronchoconstriction), and if so, how do the cells sense changes in their mechanical environment?

Type
Chapter
Information
Cellular Mechanotransduction
Diverse Perspectives from Molecules to Tissues
, pp. 339 - 359
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, GR. 2002. Invited Review: Autocrine/paracrine IGF-I and skeletal muscle adaptation. J Appl Physiol 93(3):1159–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexandrakis, G, Brown, EB, Tong, RT, McKee, TD, Campbell, RB, Boucher, Y, Jain, RK. 2004. Two-photon fluorescence correlation microscopy reveals the two-phase nature of transport in tumors. Nat Med 10(2):203–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aukland, K, Reed, RK. 1993. Interstitial-lymphatic mechanisms in the control of extracellular fluid volume. Physiol Rev 73(1):1–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bousquet, J, Jeffery, PK, Busse, WW, Johnson, M, Vignola, AM. 2000. Asthma. From bronchoconstriction to airways inflammation and remodeling. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161(5):1720–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chu, EK, Foley, JS, Cheng, J, Patel, AS, Drazen, JM, Tschumperlin, DJ. 2005. Bronchial epithelial compression regulates epidermal growth factor receptor family ligand expression in an autocrine manner. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 32(5):373–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correa-Meyer, E, Pesce, L, Guerrero, C, Sznajder, JI. 2002. Cyclic stretch activates ERK1/2 via G proteins and EGFR in alveolar epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 282(5):L883–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, PJ, Coffey, RJ. 1994. Basolateral targeting and efficient consumption of transforming growth factor-alpha when expressed in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J Biol Chem 269(24):16878–89.Google ScholarPubMed
DeWitt, AE, Dong, JY, Wiley, HS, Lauffenburger, DA. 2001. Quantitative analysis of the EGF receptor autocrine system reveals cryptic regulation of cell response by ligand capture. J Cell Sci 114(Pt 12):2301–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Dong, J, Opresko, LK, Dempsey, PJ, Lauffenburger, DA, Coffey, RJ, Wiley, HS. 1999. Metalloprotease-mediated ligand release regulates autocrine signaling through the epidermal growth factor receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(11):6235–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dowd, CJ, Cooney, CL, Nugent, MA. 1999. Heparan sulfate mediates bFGF transport through basement membrane by diffusion with rapid reversible binding. J Biol Chem 274(8):5236–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fish, JE, Peters, SP. 1999. Airway remodeling and persistent airway obstruction in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 104(3 Pt 1):509–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, M, Gurdon, JB. 2002. Regulatory principles of developmental signaling. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 18:515–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gudi, SR, Clark, CB, Frangos, JA. 1996. Fluid flow rapidly activates G proteins in human endothelial cells. Involvement of G proteins in mechanochemical signal transduction. Circ Res 79(4):834–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, RC, Chung, E, Coffey, RJ. 2003. EGF receptor ligands. Exp Cell Res 284(1):2–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heasley, LE. 2001. Autocrine and paracrine signaling through neuropeptide receptors in human cancer. Oncogene 20(13):1563–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofer, AM, Gerbino, A, Caroppo, R, Curci, S. 2004. The extracellular calcium-sensing receptor and cell-cell signaling in epithelia. Cell Calcium 35(3):297–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janowska-Wieczorek, A, Majka, M, Ratajczak, J, Ratajczak, MZ. 2001. Autocrine/paracrine mechanisms in human hematopoiesis. Stem Cells 19(2):99–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, KH, Buehler, C, So, PTC. 1999. High-speed, two-photon scanning microscope. Appl Opt 38:6004–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kojic, N, Kojic, M, Tschumperlin, DJ. 2006a. Computational modeling of extracellular mechanotransduction. Biophys J 90(11):4261–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kojic, N, Tian, D, Drazen, JM, Tschumperlin, DJ. 2006b. Evidence for constitutive activity of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) autocrine loop in human bronchial epithelial cells (abstract). Proc Am Thoracic Soc 3:A819.Google Scholar
Kovbasnjuk, ON, Bungay, PM, Spring, KR. 2000. Diffusion of small solutes in the lateral intercellular spaces of MDCK cell epithelium grown on permeable supports. J Membr Biol 175(1):9–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lauffenburger, DA, Oehrtman, GT, Walker, L, Wiley, HS. 1998. Real-time quantitative measurement of autocrine ligand binding indicates that autocrine loops are spatially localized. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(26):15368–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maly, IV, Lee, RT, Lauffenburger, DA. 2004. A model for mechanotransduction in cardiac muscle: Effects of extracellular matrix deformation on autocrine signaling. Ann Biomed Eng 32(10):1319–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manabe, I, Shindo, T, Nagai, R. 2002. Gene expression in fibroblasts and fibrosis: Involvement in cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res 91(12):1103–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, UB, Cardone, MH, Sinskey, AJ, MacBeath, G, Sorger, PK. 2003. Profiling receptor tyrosine kinase activation by using Ab microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(16):9330–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez-Vilar, J, Sheehan, JK, Randell, SH. 2003. Making More MUCS. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 28(3):267–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prenzel, N, Zwick, E, Daub, H, Leserer, M, Abraham, R, Wallasch, C, Ullrich, A. 1999. EGF receptor transactivation by G-protein-coupled receptors requires metalloproteinase cleavage of proHB-EGF. Nature 402(6764):884–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raab, G, Klagsbrun, M. 1997. Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1333:F179–F199.Google ScholarPubMed
Resat, H, Ewald, JA, Dixon, DA, Wiley, HS. 2003. An integrated model of epidermal growth factor receptor trafficking and signal transduction. Biophys J 85(2):730–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ressler, B, Lee, RT, Randell, SH, Drazen, JM, Kamm, RD. 2000. Molecular responses of rat tracheal epithelial cells to transmembrane pressure. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 278(6):L1264–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sasagawa, S, Ozaki, Y, Fujita, K, Kuroda, S. 2005. Prediction and validation of the distinct dynamics of transient and sustained ERK activation. Nat Cell Biol 7(4):365–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, AB, Harris, RC. 2005. Autocrine, paracrine and juxtacrine signaling by EGFR ligands. Cell Signal 17(10):1183–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
So, PT, Dong, CY, Masters, BR, Berland, KM. 2000. Two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2:399–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spring, KR, Hope, A. 1978. Size and shape of the lateral intercellular spaces in a living epithelium. Science 200(4337):54–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swartz, MA, Tschumperlin, DJ, Kamm, RD, Drazen, JM. 2001. Mechanical stress is communicated between different cell types to elicit matrix remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(11):6180–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timbs, MM, Spring, KR. 1996. Hydraulic properties of MDCK cell epithelium. J Membr Biol 153(1):1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ting, AY, Kain, KH, Klemke, RL, Tsien, RY. 2001. Genetically encoded fluorescent reporters of protein tyrosine kinase activities in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(26):15003–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschumperlin, DJ, Dai, G, Maly, IV, Kikuchi, T, Laiho, LH, McVittie, AK, Haley, KJ, Lilly, CM, So, PT, Lauffenburger, DA, et al. 2004. Mechanotransduction through growth-factor shedding into the extracellular space. Nature 429(6987):83–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschumperlin, DJ, Drazen, JM. 2006. Chronic effects of mechanical force on airways. Annu Rev Physiol 68:563–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschumperlin, DJ, Shively, JD, Kikuchi, T, Drazen, JM. 2003. Mechanical stress triggers selective release of fibrotic mediators from bronchial epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 28(2):142–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschumperlin, DJ, Shively, JD, Swartz, MA, Silverman, ES, Haley, KJ, Raab, G, Drazen, JM. 2002. Bronchial epithelial compression regulates MAP kinase signaling and HB-EGF-like growth factor expression. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 282(5):L904–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Botvinick, EL, Zhao, Y, Berns, MW, Usami, S, Tsien, RY, Chien, S. 2005. Visualizing the mechanical activation of Src. Nature 434(7036):1040–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggs, BR, Hrousis, CA, Drazen, JM, Kamm, RD. 1997. On the mechanism of mucosal folding in normal and asthmatic airways. J Appl Physiol 83(6):1814–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiley, HS, Shvartsman, SY, Lauffenburger, DA. 2003. Computational modeling of the EGF-receptor system: A paradigm for systems biology. Trends Cell Biol 13(1):43–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xia, P, Bungay, PM, Gibson, CC, Kovbasnjuk, ON, Spring, KR. 1998. Diffusion coefficients in the lateral intercellular spaces of Madin-Darby canine kidney cell epithelium determined with caged compounds. Biophys J 74(6):3302–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshioka, J, Prince, RN, Huang, H, Perkins, SB, Cruz, FU, MacGillivray, C, Lauffenburger, DA, Lee, RT. 2005. Cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and degradation of connexin43 through spatially restricted autocrine/paracrine heparin-binding EGF. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(30):10622–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×