Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:06:21.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

51 - Bladder cancer

from Part 3.1 - Molecular pathology: carcinomas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Robert S. Svatek
Affiliation:
Department of Urology, the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Colin P. Dinney
Affiliation:
Department of Urology,he University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Edward P. Gelmann
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Charles L. Sawyers
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Frank J. Rauscher, III
Affiliation:
The Wistar Institute Cancer Centre, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In the United States, more than 90% of bladder cancers are diagnosed as transitional cell carcinomas. These tumors have been designated urothelial-cell carcinoma (UCC) by a consensus panel of World Health Organization and International Society of Urological Pathology pathologists (1). The remaining 10% of bladder cancers include urothelial carcinomas with variant histology (squamous/glandular differentiation, small-cell carcinoma, sarcomatoid carcinoma, and micro-papillary carcinoma) or non-urothelial carcinomas (squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma; 2–4). Squamous-cell carcinoma of the bladder accounts for 3–7% of bladder cancers in the United States, but as many as 75% in Egypt, where it is largely associated with chronic infections caused by Schistosoma haematobium (5). Adenocarcinoma of the bladder accounts for 2% of primary bladder cancers and is further classified by its origin (bladder, urachus, or metastatic; 5). The diverse array of histologic patterns and subtypes are clinically important, as they each carry a different degree of risk for locally advanced disease and metastasis. However, the oncogenic pathways involved in bladder cancer have been largely defined in UCC, and the scope of this chapter is limited to a description of the molecular biology of this subtype.

The majority of patients (70–80%) with UCC present with non-invasive tumors that are confined to the bladder mucosa. Following resection, disease recurrence rates for these tumors are high (≥60%). A small percentage of patients with non-invasive tumors have disease that ultimately progresses to a higher stage, and up to 20% of these patients have disease recurrence that is higher grade and/or invasive. At presentation, approximately 20–30% of patients with UCC are diagnosed with invasive disease. Although many of these patients appear to have no evidence of metastasis at presentation, approximately 50% of those treated with local therapy will ultimately have a relapse with metastatic disease. The prognosis for patients with metastatic disease is dismal, with few surviving more than two years. Understanding the molecular alterations that contribute to the pathogenesis of bladder cancers is essential for the development of novel therapies targeting the pathways implicated in this disease to improve survival rates for these patients.

Type
Chapter
Information
Molecular Oncology
Causes of Cancer and Targets for Treatment
, pp. 584 - 590
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Epstein, JI, Amin, MB, Reuter, VR, Mostofi, FK.Bladder Consensus Conference Committee. The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. American Journal of Surgical Pathology 1998;22:1435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantor, AF, Hartge, P, Hoover, RN, Fraumeni, JF Epidemiological characteristics of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the bladder. Cancer Research 1988;48:3853–5.
Black, PC, Brown, GA, Dinney, CP. The impact of variant histology on the outcome of bladder cancer treated with curative intent. Urologic Oncology 2009;27:3–7.CrossRef
Martin, JE, Jenkins, BJ, Zuk, RJ, Blandy, JP, Baithun, SI. Clinical importance of squamous metaplasia in invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1989;42:250–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messing, E. Campbell-Walsh Urology, 9th edn. St. Louis: W.B. Saunders; 2007.
Sandberg, AA, Berger, CS, Haddad, FS, Kerr, D, Hecht, F. Chromosome change in transitional cell carcinoma of ureter. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 1986;19:335–40.CrossRef
Knowles, MA. Molecular pathogenesis of bladder cancer. International Journal of Clinical Oncology/Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology 2008;13:287–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cordon-Cardo, C.Mutations of cell cycle regulators: biological and clinical implications for human neoplasia. American Journal of Pathology 1995;147:545–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Knudson, AG Retinoblastoma: a prototypic hereditary neoplasm. Seminars on Oncology 1978;5:57–60.
Loda, M, Cukor, B, Tam, SW, et al. Increased proteasome-dependent degradation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 in aggressive colorectal carcinomas. Nature Medicine 1997;3:231–4.CrossRef
Mitra, AP, Datar, RH, Cote, RJ.Molecular pathways in invasive bladder cancer: new insights into mechanisms, progression, and target identification. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2006;24:5552–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cote, RJ, Dunn, MD, Chatterjee, SJ, et al. Elevated and absent pRb expression is associated with bladder cancer progression and has cooperative effects with p53. Cancer Research 1998;58:1090–4.
Cairns, P, Proctor, AJ, Knowles, MA. Loss of heterozygosity at the RB locus is frequent and correlates with muscle invasion in bladder carcinoma. Oncogene 1991;6:2305–9.
Cote, RJ, Chatterjee, SJ. Molecular determinants of outcome in bladder cancer. The Cancer Journal from Scientific American 1999;5:2–15.
Grossman, HB, Liebert, M, Antelo, M, et al. p53 and RB expression predict progression in T1 bladder cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 1998;4:829–34.
Miyamoto, H, Shuin, T, Torigoe, S, Iwasaki, Y, Kubota, Y.Retinoblastoma gene mutations in primary human bladder cancer. British Journal of Cancer 1995;71:831–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedrich, MG, Blind, C, Milde-Langosch, K, et al. Frequent p16/MTS1 inactivation in early stages of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is not associated with tumor recurrence. European Urology 2001;40:518–24.CrossRef
Reznikoff, CA, Belair, CD, Yeager, TR, et al. A molecular genetic model of human bladder cancer pathogenesis. Seminars on Oncology 1996;23:571–84.
Spruck, CH, 3rd, Ohneseit, PF, Gonzalez-Zulueta, M, et al. Two molecular pathways to transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Cancer Research 1994;54:784–8.
Tsutsumi, M, Tsai, YC, Gonzalgo, ML, Nichols, PW, Jones, PA. Early acquisition of homozygous deletions of p16/p19 during squamous cell carcinogenesis and genetic mosaicism in bladder cancer. Oncogene 1998;17:3021–7.CrossRef
Gonzalez-Zulueta, M, Bender, CM, Yang, AS, et al. Methylation of the 5’ CpG island of the p16/CDKN2 tumor suppressor gene in normal and transformed human tissues correlates with gene silencing. Cancer Research 1995;55:4531–5.
Simon, R, Struckmann, K, Schraml, P, et al. Amplification pattern of 12q13-q15 genes (MDM2, CDK4, GLI) in urinary bladder cancer. Oncogene 2002;21:2476–83.CrossRef
Shariat, SF, Tokunaga, H, Zhou, J, et al. p53, p21, pRB, and p16 expression predict clinical outcome in cystectomy with bladder cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2004;22:1014–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shariat, SF, Ashfaq, R, Sagalowsky, AI, Lotan, Y.Predictive value of cell cycle biomarkers in nonmuscle invasive bladder transitional cell carcinoma. Journal of Urology 2007;177:481–7; discussion 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esrig, D, Elmajian, D, Groshen, S, et al. Accumulation of nuclear p53 and tumor progression in bladder cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 1994;331:1259–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, JP, Ginsberg, DA, Grossfeld, GD, et al. Effect of p21WAF1/CIP1 expression on tumor progression in bladder cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1998;90:1072–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cote, RJ, Esrig, D, Groshen, S, Jones, PA, Skinner, DG. p53 and treatment of bladder cancer. Nature 1997;385:123–5.CrossRef
Hawkins, DS, Demers, GW, Galloway, DA. Inactivation of p53 enhances sensitivity to multiple chemotherapeutic agents. Cancer Research 1996;56:892–8.
Mitra, AP, Birkhahn, M, Cote, RJ.p53 and retinoblastoma pathways in bladder cancer. World Journal of Urology 2007;25:563–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stadler, WM, Lerner, SP, Groshen, S, et al. Randomized trial of p53 targeted adjuvant therapy for patients with organ confined node negative urothelial bladder cancer. Presented at the 2009 ASCO meeting, Orlando; 2009.
Svatek, RS, Herman, MP, Lotan, Y, et al. Soluble Fas–a promising novel urinary marker for the detection of recurrent superficial bladder cancer. Cancer 2006;106:1701–7.CrossRef
Yamana, K, Bilim, V, Hara, N, et al. Prognostic impact of FAS/CD95/APO-1 in urothelial cancers: decreased expression of Fas is associated with disease progression. British Journal of Cancer 2005;93:544–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ong, F, Moonen, LM, Gallee, MP, et al. Prognostic factors in transitional cell cancer of the bladder: an emerging role for Bcl-2 and p53. Radiotherapy and Oncology 2001;61:169–75.CrossRef
Hussain, SA, Ganesan, R, Hiller, L, et al. BCL2 expression predicts survival in patients receiving synchronous chemoradiotherapy in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Oncology Reports 2003;10:571–6.
Gonzalez-Campora, R, Davalos-Casanova, G, Beato-Moreno, A, et al. BCL-2, TP53 and BAX protein expression in superficial urothelial bladder carcinoma. Cancer Letters 2007;250:292–9.CrossRef
Korkolopoulou, P, Lazaris, A, Konstantinidou, AE, et al. Differential expression of bcl-2 family proteins in bladder carcinomas. Relationship with apoptotic rate and survival. European Urology 2002;41:274–83.
Karam, JA, Lotan, Y, Karakiewicz, PI, et al. Use of combined apoptosis biomarkers for prediction of bladder cancer recurrence and mortality after radical cystectomy. Lancet Oncology 2007;8:128–36.CrossRef
Messing, EM, Hanson, P, Ulrich, P, Erturk, E.Epidermal growth factor–interactions with normal and malignant urothelium: in vivo and in situ studies. Journal of Urology 1987;138:1329–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neal, DE, Sharples, L, Smith, K, et al. The epidermal growth factor receptor and the prognosis of bladder cancer. Cancer 1990;65:1619–25.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRef
Lipponen, P, Eskelinen, M.Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in bladder cancer as related to established prognostic factors, oncoprotein (c-erbB-2, p53) expression and long-term prognosis. British Journal of Cancer 1994;69:1120–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, C, Klasmeyer, K, Bojar, H, et al. Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor isoforms and epidermal growth factor receptor/ERBB1 expression in bladder cancer and their relation to clinical outcome. Cancer 2007;109:2016–24.CrossRef
Kruger, S, Weitsch, G, Buttner, H, et al. Overexpression of c-erbB-2 oncoprotein in muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: relationship with gene amplification, clinicopathological parameters and prognostic outcome. International Journal of Oncology 2002;21:981–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Ye, DW, Zheng, JF, Qian, SX, Ma, YJ. Correlation between the expression of oncogenes ras and c-erbB-2 and the biological behavior of bladder tumors. Urologic Research 1993;21:39–43.CrossRef
Kruger, S, Weitsch, G, Buttner, H, et al. HER2 overexpression in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: prognostic implications. International Journal of Cancer 2002;102:514–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, DE, Williams, LT. Structural and functional diversity in the FGF receptor multigene family. Advances in Cancer Research 1993;60:1–41.
Cappellen, D, De Oliveira, C, Ricol, D, et al. Frequent activating mutations of FGFR3 in human bladder and cervix carcinomas. Nature Genetics 1999;23:18–20.CrossRef
Sibley, K, Cuthbert-Heavens, D, Knowles, MA. Loss of heterozygosity at 4p16.3 and mutation of FGFR3 in transitional cell carcinoma. Oncogene 2001;20:686–91.CrossRef
Bakkar, AA, Wallerand, H, Radvanyi, F, et al. FGFR3 and TP53 gene mutations define two distinct pathways in urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. Cancer Research 2003;63:8108–12.
van Rhijn, BW, van der Kwast, TH, Vis, AN, et al. FGFR3 and P53 characterize alternative genetic pathways in the pathogenesis of urothelial cell carcinoma. Cancer Research 2004;64:1911–14.CrossRef
Dickinson, AJ, Fox, SB, Persad, RA, et al. Quantification of angiogenesis as an independent predictor of prognosis in invasive bladder carcinomas. British Journal of Urology 1994;74:762–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chodak, GW, Haudenschild, C, Gittes, RF, Folkman, J. Angiogenic activity as a marker of neoplastic and preneoplastic lesions of the human bladder. Annals of Surgery 1980;192:762–71.CrossRef
Crew, JP. Vascular endothelial growth factor: an important angiogenic mediator in bladder cancer. European Urology 1999;35:2–8.CrossRef
Xia, G, Kumar, SR, Hawes, D, et al. Expression and significance of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in bladder cancer. Journal of Urology 2006;175:1245–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitra, AP, Almal, AA, George, B, et al. The use of genetic programming in the analysis of quantitative gene expression profiles for identification of nodal status in bladder cancer. BMC Cancer 2006;6:159.CrossRef
Mitra, AP, Pagliarulo, V, Yang, D, et al. Generation of a concise gene panel for outcome prediction in urinary bladder cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009;27:3929–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svatek, RS, Shah, JB, Choi, W, et al. The transcriptional repressor, Zeb-1, regulates epithelial to mesenchymal transition in bladder cancer. Presented at The Society of Urologic Oncology Meeting, Washington DC; 2008.
Adam, L, Zhong, M, Choi, W, et al. miR-200 expression regulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in bladder cancer cells and reverses resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. Clinical Cancer Research 2009;15:5060–72.CrossRef
Peinado, H, Olmeda, D, Cano, A.Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: an alliance against the epithelial phenotype? Nature Reviews Cancer. 2007;7():415–28.
Egeblad, M, Werb, Z. New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nature Reviews 2002;2:161–74.
Sternlicht, MD, Werb, Z. How matrix metalloproteinases regulate cell behavior. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 2001;17:463–516.CrossRef
Shiomi, T, Okada, Y. MT1-MMP and MMP-7 in invasion and metastasis of human cancers. Cancer Metastasis Reviews 2003;22:145–52.CrossRef
Vasala, K, Paakko, P, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, T. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 immunoreactive protein as a prognostic marker in bladder cancer. Urology 2003;62:952–7.CrossRef
Vasala, K, Paakko, P, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, T. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) immunoreactive protein in urinary bladder cancer: a marker of favorable prognosis. Anticancer Research 2008;28:1757–61.
Wallard, MJ, Pennington, CJ, Veerakumarasivam, A, et al. Comprehensive profiling and localisation of the matrix metalloproteinases in urothelial carcinoma. British Journal of Cancer 2006;94:569–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kader, AK, Liu, J, Shao, L, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase polymorphisms are associated with bladder cancer invasiveness. Clinical Cancer Research 2007;13:2614–20.CrossRef
Garcia del, Muro X, Torregrosa, A, Munoz, J, et al. Prognostic value of the expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin in bladder cancer. European Journal of Cancer 2000;36:357–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popov, Z, Gil-Diez de Medina, S, Lefrere-Belda, MA, et al. Low E-cadherin expression in bladder cancer at the transcriptional and protein level provides prognostic information. British Journal of Cancer 2000;83:209–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kin, M, Torimura, T, Ueno, T, et al. Angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 suppresses the progression of experimentally-induced hepatocellular carcinoma in rats. International Journal of Oncology 2000;16:375–82.Google ScholarPubMed
O’Reilly, MS, Holmgren, L, Shing, Y, et al. Angiostatin: a novel angiogenesis inhibitor that mediates the suppression of metastases by a Lewis lung carcinoma. Cell 1994;79:315–28.CrossRef
Beecken, WD, Fernandez, A, Joussen, AM, et al. Effect of antiangiogenic therapy on slowly growing, poorly vascularized tumors in mice. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001;93:382–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, PC, Brown, GA, Inamoto, T, et al. Sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor requires E-cadherin expression in urothelial carcinoma cells. Clinical Cancer Research 2008;14:1478–86.CrossRef
Shrader, M, Pino, MS, Brown, G, et al. Molecular correlates of gefitinib responsiveness in human bladder cancer cells. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2007;6:277–85.CrossRef
Lynch, TJ, Bell, DW, Sordella, R, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. New England Journal of Medicine 2004;350:2129–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez-Soler, R, Chachoua, A, Hammond, LA, et al. Determinants of tumor response and survival with erlotinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2004;22:3238–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagliaro, LC, Keyhani, A, Liu, B, et al. Adenoviral p53 gene transfer in human bladder cancer cell lines: cytotoxicity and synergy with cisplatin. Urologic Oncology 2003;21:456–62.CrossRef
Pagliaro, LC, Keyhani, A, Williams, D, et al. Repeated intravesical instillations of an adenoviral vector in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer: a Phase I study of p53 gene therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2003;21:2247–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×