Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T00:55:05.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - The personality of escape

from Part III - Related behaviors and other factors influencing escape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

William E. Cooper, Jr
Affiliation:
Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis
Daniel T. Blumstein
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Escaping From Predators
An Integrative View of Escape Decisions
, pp. 385 - 404
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, A. M. (2005). Behavioral differences between individuals and populations of threespined stickleback. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18, 464473.Google Scholar
Bell, A. M. (2007). Future directions in behavioural syndromes research. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 274, 755761.Google Scholar
Bell, A. M. (2009). Approaching the genomics of risk-taking behavior. Advances in Genetics, 68, 83104.Google Scholar
Bell, A. M. & Sih, A. (2007). Exposure to predation generates personality in threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ecology Letters, 10, 828834.Google Scholar
Bell, A. M., Hankison, S. J. & Laskowski, K. L. (2009). The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Animal Behaviour, 77, 771783.Google Scholar
Biro, P. A. & Stamps, J. A. (2008). Are animal personality traits linked to life-history productivity? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 361368.Google Scholar
Blumstein, D. T. & Pelletier, D. (2005). Yellow-bellied marmot hiding time is sensitive to variation in costs. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83, 363367.Google Scholar
Boissy, A. (1995). Fear and fearfulness in animals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 70, 165191.Google Scholar
Briffa, M. & Greenaway, J. (2011). High in situ repeatability of behaviour indicates animal personality in the beadlet anemone Actinia equina (Cnidaria). PLoS ONE, 6(7), e21963.Google Scholar
Briffa, M., Rundle, S. D. & Fryer, A. (2008). Comparing the strength of behavioural plasticity and consistency across situations: Animal personalities in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 275, 13051311.Google Scholar
Carere, C. & Maestipieri, D. (eds.) (2013). Animal Personalities. Behavior, Physiology and Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carrete, M. & Tella, J. L. (2010). Individual consistency in flight initiation distances in burrowing owls: A new hypothesis on disturbance induced habitat selection. Biology Letters, 6, 167170.Google Scholar
Carter, A. J., Goldizen, A. W. & Tromp, S. A. (2010). Agamas exhibit behavioral syndromes: bolder males bask and feed more but may suffer higher predation. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 655661.Google Scholar
Carter, A. J., Heinsohn, R., Goldizen, A. W. & Biro, P. A. (2012a). Boldness, trappability and sampling bias in wild lizards. Animal Behaviour, 83, 10511058.Google Scholar
Carter, A., Goldizen, A. & Heinsohn, R. (2012b). Personality and plasticity: Temporal behavioural reaction norms in a lizard, the Namibian rock agama. Animal Behaviour, 84, 471477.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Shyness and boldness in pumpkinseed sunfish: individual differences are context-specific. Animal Behaviour, 56, 927936.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. (2009). Variation in escape behavior among individuals of the striped plateau lizard Sceloporus virgatus may reflect differences in boldness. Journal of Herpetology, 43, 495502.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. (2011). Risk, escape from ambush, and hiding time in the lizard Sceloporus virgatus. Herpetologica, 68, 505513.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. & Frederick, W. G. (2007a). Optimal flight initiation distance. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 244, 5967Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. & Frederick, W. G. (2007b). Optimal time to emerge from refuge. Biological Journal of The Linnean Society, 91, 375382.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. & Wilson, D. S. (2010). Longer hiding time in refuge implies greater assessed risk after capture and autotomy in striped plateau lizards (Sceloporus virgatus). Herpetologica, 66, 425431.Google Scholar
Cresswell, W., Quinn, J. L., Whittingham, M. J. & Butler, S. (2003). Good foragers can also be good at detecting predators. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 270, 10691076.Google Scholar
Dall, S. R. X., Houston, A. I. & McNamara, J. M. (2004). The behavioural ecology of personality: Consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecology Letters, 7, 734739.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, N. J. & Dochtermann, N. A. (2013). Quantifying individual variation in behaviour: mixed effect modelling approaches. Journal of Animal Ecology, 82, 3954.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, N. J. & Wolf, M. (2010) A review of recent models for adaptive personality differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 365, 39473958.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, N. J., Thomas, D. K., Wright, J. et al. (2007). Behavioural syndromes differ predictably between twelve populations of three-spined stickleback. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 11281138.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, N. J., Kazem, A. J. M., Réale, D. & Wright, J. (2010). Behavioural reaction norms: Animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25, 8189.Google Scholar
Garamszegi, L. Z. & Herczeg, G. (2012). Behavioural syndromes, syndrome deviation and the within- and between-individual components of phenotypic correlations: When reality does not meet statistics. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66, 16511658.Google Scholar
Groothuis, T. G. G. & Carere, C. (2005). Avian personalities: characterization and epigenesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 137150.Google Scholar
Hedrick, A. V. & Kortet, R. (2006). Hiding behaviour in two cricket populations that differ in predation pressure. Animal Behaviour, 72, 11111118.Google Scholar
Hedrick, A. V. & Kortet, R. (2012). Sex differences in the repeatability of boldness over metamorphosis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66, 407412.Google Scholar
Hemmi, J. & Merkle, T. (2009). High stimulus specificity characterizes anti-predator habituation under natural conditions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 276, 43814388.Google Scholar
Hensley, N. M., Cook, T. C., Lang, M., Petelle, M. B. & Blumstein, D. T. (2012). Personality and habitat segregation in giant sea anemones (Condylactis gigantea). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 426–427, 14.Google Scholar
Huntingford, F. A. (1976). The relationship between anti-predator behaviour and aggression among conspecifics in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Animal Behaviour, 24, 245260.Google Scholar
Ibáñez, A., Marzal, A., López, P. & Martín, J. (2013). Boldness and body size of male Spanish terrapins affect their responses to chemical cues of familiar and unfamiliar males. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67, 541548.Google Scholar
Jones, K. A. & Godin, J.-G. J. (2010). Are fast explorers slow reactors? Linking personality type and anti-predator behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 277, 625632.Google Scholar
Jones, K. A., Krebs, J. R. & Whittingham, M. J. (2009). Heavier birds react faster to predators: Individual differences in the detection of stalking and ambush predators. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63, 13191329.Google Scholar
Koolhaas, J. M., Korte, S. M., De Boer, S. F. et al. (1999). Coping styles in animals: Current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 23, 925935.Google Scholar
Krams, I., Kivleniece, I., Kuusik, A. et al. (2014). High repeatability of anti-predator responses and resting metabolic rate in a beetle. Journal of Insect Behavior, 27, 5766.Google Scholar
Krause, J. & Godin, J.-G. J. (1996). Influence of prey foraging posture on flight behavior and predation risk: Predators take advantage of unwary prey. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 264271.Google Scholar
Lindström, K. M., Van de Veen, I. T., Lagault, B. A. & Lundström, J. O. (2003). Activity and predator escape performance of common greenfinches Carduelis chloris infected with sindbis virus. Ardea, 91, 103111.Google Scholar
López, P., Hawlena, D., Polo, V., Amo, L. & Martín, J. (2005). Sources of interindividual shy–bold variations in antipredatory behaviour of male Iberian rock-lizards. Animal Behaviour, 69, 19.Google Scholar
Lord, A., Waas, J. R., Innes, J. & Whittingham, M. J. (2001). Effects of human approaches to nests of northern New Zealand dotterels. Biological Conservation, 98, 233240.Google Scholar
Luttbeg, B. & Sih, A. (2010). Risk, resources and state-dependent adaptive behavioural syndromes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 365, 39773990.Google Scholar
Magle, S., Zhu, J. & Crooks, K. R. (2005). Behavioral responses to repeated human intrusion by black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Journal of Mammalogy, 86, 524530.Google Scholar
Mathot, K. J., van den Hout, P. J., Piersma, T. et al. (2011). Disentangling the roles of frequency- vs. state-dependence in generating individual differences in behavioural plasticity. Ecology Letters, 14, 12541262.Google Scholar
Martín, J., de Neve, L., Fargallo, J. A., Polo, V. & Soler, M. (2006). Health-dependent vulnerability to predation affects escape responses of unguarded chinstrap penguin chicks. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 60, 778784.Google Scholar
McElreath, R., Luttbeg, B., Fogarty, S. P., Brodin, T. & Sih, A. (2007). Communication arising: Evolution of animal personalities. Nature, 450, e5e6.Google Scholar
Niemelä, P. T., Vainikka, A., Hedrick, A. V. & Kortet, R. (2012a). Integrating behaviour with life history: Boldness of the field cricket, Gryllus integer, during ontogeny. Functional Ecology, 26, 450456.Google Scholar
Niemelä, P. T., DiRienzo, N. & Hedrick, A. V. (2012b). Predator-induced changes in the boldness of naïve field crickets, Gryllus integer, depends on behavioural type. Animal Behaviour, 84, 129135.Google Scholar
Nussey, D. H., Wilson, A. J. & Brommer, J. E. (2007). The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 831844.Google Scholar
Quinn, J. L. & Cresswell, W. (2005a). Escape response delays in wintering redshank, Tringa totanus, flocks: Perceptual limits and economic decisions. Animal Behaviour, 69, 12851292.Google Scholar
Quinn, J. L. & Cresswell, W. (2005b) Personality, anti-predation behaviour and behavioural plasticity in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Behaviour, 142, 13771402.Google Scholar
Réale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., McDougall, P. T. & Dingemanse, N. J. (2007). Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biological Reviews, 82, 291318.Google Scholar
Riechert, S. E. & Hedrick, A. V. (1993). A test for correlations among fitness-linked behavioural traits in the spider Agelenopsis aperta (Araneae, Agelinidae). Animal Behaviour, 46, 669675.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Prieto, I., Martín, J. & Fernández-Juricic, E. (2010). Habituation to low risk predators improves body condition in lizards. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64, 19371945.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Prieto, I., Martín, J. & Fernández-Juricic, E. (2011). Individual variation in behavioural plasticity: Direct and indirect effects of boldness, exploration and sociability on habituation to predators in lizards. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 278, 266273.Google Scholar
Runyan, A. & Blumstein, D. T. (2004). Do individual differences influence flight initiation distance? Journal of Wildlife Management, 68, 11241129.Google Scholar
Seltmann, M. W., Ost, M., Jaatinen, K. et al. (2012). Stress responsiveness, age and body condition interactively affect flight initiation distance in breeding female eiders. Animal Behaviour, 84, 889896.Google Scholar
Sih, A. & Bell, A. M. (2008). Insights from behavioral syndromes for behavioral ecology. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 38, 277281.Google Scholar
Sih, A., Kats, L. B. & Maurer, E. E. (2003). Behavioural correlations across situations and the evolution of antipredator behaviour in a sunfish–salamander system. Animal Behaviour, 65, 2944.Google Scholar
Sih, A., Bell, A. & Johnson, J. C. (2004a). Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 372378.Google Scholar
Sih, A., Bell, A. M., Johnson, J. C. & Ziemba, R. E. (2004b). Behavioral syndromes: An integrative overview. Quarterly Review of Biology, 79, 241277.Google Scholar
Sinn, D. L., Gosling, S. D. & Moltschaniwskyj, N. A. (2008). Development of shy/bold behaviour in squid: Context-specific phenotypes associated with developmental plasticity. Animal Behaviour, 75, 433442.Google Scholar
Smith, B. R. & Blumstein, D. T. (2008). Fitness consequences of personality: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 448455.Google Scholar
Stamps, J. A. (2007). Growth-mortality tradeoffs and “personality traits” in animals. Ecology Letters, 10, 355363.Google Scholar
Stapley, J. & Keogh, J. S. (2004). Exploratory and antipredator behaviours differ between territorial and nonterritorial male lizards. Animal Behaviour, 68, 841846.Google Scholar
Tulley, J. J. & Huntingford, F. A. (1988). Additional information on the relationship between intra-specific aggression and antipredator behaviour in the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. Ethology, 78, 219222.Google Scholar
Van Oers, K., De Jong, G., Drent, P. J. & Van Noordwijk, A. J. (2004a). Genetic correlations of avian personality traits: Correlated response to artificial selection. Behavior Genetics, 34, 611619.Google Scholar
Van Oers, K., Drent, P. J., De Goede, P. & Van Noordwijk, A. J. (2004b). Realized heritability and repeatability of risk-taking behaviour in relation to avian personalities. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 271, 6573.Google Scholar
Watanabe, N. M., Stahlman, W. D., Blaisdell, A. P. et al. (2012). Quantifying personality: Different measures, different inferences. Behavioral Processes, 91, 133140.Google Scholar
Wechsler, B. (1995). Coping and coping strategies: A behavioural view. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 43, 123134.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (1998). Adaptive individual differences within single populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 353, 199205.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., van Doorn, G. S., Leimar, O. & Weissing, F. J. (2007). Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities. Nature, 447, 581584.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., van Doorn, G. S. & Weissing, F. J. (2008). Evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 1582515830Google Scholar
Wolf, M., van Doorn, G. S., Leimar, O. & Weissing, F. J. (2013). The evolution of animal personalities. In Carere, C. & Maestipieri, D. (eds.) Animal Personalities. Behavior, Physiology and Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 252275.Google Scholar
Ydenberg, R. C. & Dill, L. M. (1986). The economics of fleeing from predators. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 16, 229249.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×