Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T08:57:50.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Civic amnesia and legal memory: to remember and forget in the lawcourts

from PART III - TIME, MEMORY, REPRODUCTION: LAW'S PAST AND FUTURE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2010

Victoria Wohl
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

There is a temporality particular to each type of rhetoric: to deliberative oratory the future, since it gives advice, pro or con, concerning what will happen; to forensic oratory the past, since both prosecution and defense always speak about events that have happened; and to epideictic oratory the present, since all speakers issue praise or blame according to existing conditions, though they often also recall the past and anticipate the future.

Aristotle Rhetoric 1358b13–20

What if banning memory had no other consequences than to accentuate a hyperbolized, though fixed, memory?

Loraux 2002: 261

ATHENS' AMNESTY AND LAW'S ALĒTHEIA

Forensic oratory, as Aristotle notes, is oriented toward the past. The law can try only events that have already happened. The speaker of Isocrates 20 bemoans this limitation. It would be best, he says, if criminals bore some mark (sēmeion) that enabled us to punish them before they committed their crime, “inasmuch as it is better to find a means of averting future problems than to punish those that have already occurred” (12). As it is, one should consider it a windfall when a criminal does come before the court, and punish him before he does something worse (12–14). Inherently retrospective, dikē is associated in Greek thought with memory. Zeus “does not overlook (or “forget,” lēthei) that sort of justice that a city holds in it,” says Hesiod (Erga 268–69). The avenging spirit of the murder victim, a demonic agent of justice, is called the alastōr, literally the “unforgetting one.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Law's Cosmos
Juridical Discourse in Athenian Forensic Oratory
, pp. 201 - 242
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×