Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-30T04:27:30.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Whither convergence: legal, regulatory and trade opportunism in telecommunications

from PART IV - Towards convergence?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2010

Damien Geradin
Affiliation:
Université de Liège, Belgium
David Luff
Affiliation:
Dal & Veldekens, Brussels
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Technological and marketplace convergence supports the development of an integrated information communications and entertainment (ICE) marketplace. Yet, for various ICE market segments to function without trade barriers and competitive distortions, the legal, regulatory and trade policy regimes involved must adapt to changed circumstances. Of key importance is the need to assess whether to change basic definitions and assumptions that worked in a pre-convergent environment, but which provide opportunities for regulatory arbitrage, i.e. opportunities to tilt the competitive playing field to one's advantage by exploiting differences in classifications and qualifying for a status with less regulatory obligations and comparatively fewer market access opportunities for competitors.

Many workable, semantic dichotomies break down in the convergent ICE environment, because technological innovations promote greater service flexibility and markets become more penetrable absent countervailing regulations and trade policies. For example, ventures operating in a digital environment can easily bridge pre-existing legal and regulatory distinctions between content creator and conduit. Similarly, many types of Internet venture use digitisation to eliminate pre-existing regulatory dichotomies between basic and value-added services and between different trade policies and market access commitments made for goods versus services.

Convergence challenges many baseline assumptions legislators, regulators, jurists and trade policy-makers have made about ICE. Information services typically qualify for little, if any, regulatory oversight based on assumptions that they enhance and add value to regulated basic telecommunications.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×