Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:46:41.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Capacity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Julie Chalmers
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Peter A. Singer
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
A. M. Viens
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Ms. C is a 22-year-old woman with unstable insulin-dependent diabetes who has suffered an intrauterine death at 36 weeks of gestation. She is refusing medical induction of labor, which has been recommended to avoid the risk of potentially life-threatening sepsis. She insists that the birth must be “natural” and becomes extremely distressed when attempts are made to discuss this further. In the past, she has had repeated admissions to hospital as a result of poor diabetic control and, consequently, is well known to staff. Although the current clinical state is stable, the medical team have become extremely anxious about the possible consequences of her refusal of treatment and they have requested an assessment of capacity. Ms. C refuses to discuss her decision and turns her back to the interviewer. A further attempt to discuss this is met with a similar response.

What is capacity?

Capacity is a complex construct that refers to the presence of a particular set of “functional abilities” that a person needs to possess in order to make a specific decision (Grisso and Applebaum, 1998). These abilities include being able to understand the relevant information needed to make the decision and to appreciate the relatively foreseeable consequences of the various options available. In the medical setting, the key decision to be made is whether to give or withhold consent to investigation or treatment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchanan, A. E. and Brock, D. W. (1989). Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charland, L. C. (1998), Appreciation and emotion: theoretical reflections on the MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 8: 359–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Etchells, E., Darzins, P., Silberfeld, M., et al. (1999). Assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment. J Gen Intern Med 14: 27–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillon, R. (1986). Philosophical Medical Ethics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarPubMed
Grisso, A. and Applebaum, P. S. (1995a). Comparison of standards for assessing patients' capacities to make treatment decisions. Am J Psychiatry 152: 1033–7.Google Scholar
Grisso, A. and Applebaum, P. S. (1995b). The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study III. Abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatments. Law Hum Behav 19: 149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisso, A. and Applebaum, P. S. (1998). Assessing Competence to Consent to Medical Treatment, A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gunn, M. (1994). The meaning of incapacity. Med Law Rev 2: 8–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hope, T., Savulescu, J., and Henrick, J. (2003). Medical Ethics and the Law, The Core Curriculum. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Kopelman, L. M. (1990). On the evaluative nature of competency and capacity judgements. Int J Law Psychiatry 13: 309–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law Commission (1995). Law Commission Report 231: Mental Incapacity. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1982). Making Healthcare Decisions. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Raymont, V., Bingley, W., Buchanan, A., et al. (2004). Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross sectional study. Lancet 364: 1421–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Re T (Adult Refusal of Treatment) [1992] 4 All ER 649.
Roth, L. H., Meisel, A., and Lidz, C. W. (1977). Tests of competency to consent to treatment. Am J Psychiatry 134: 279–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospitals (1914) 211 NY 125.
St George's Healthcare NHS Trust v. S [1998] 3 All ER 673.
Wong, J. G., Clare, I. C. H., Gunn, M. J., and Holland, A. J. (1999). Capacity to make healthcare decisions: its importance in clinical practice. Psychol Med 29: 437–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, J. G., Clare, I. C. H., Holland, A. J., Watson, P. C., and Gunn, M. (2000). The capacity of people with a “mental disability” to make a healthcare decision. Psychol Med 30: 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Capacity
  • Edited by Peter A. Singer, University of Toronto, A. M. Viens, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics
  • Online publication: 30 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545566.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Capacity
  • Edited by Peter A. Singer, University of Toronto, A. M. Viens, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics
  • Online publication: 30 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545566.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Capacity
  • Edited by Peter A. Singer, University of Toronto, A. M. Viens, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics
  • Online publication: 30 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545566.004
Available formats
×