Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:42:13.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: detection, management and significance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2009

Anthony Feinstein
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

With the recognition that cognitive impairment affects approximately 40% of patients with MS, new challenges have presented themselves. Among them is a need to detect cognitive abnormalities accurately in a time-efficient, cost-effective way. Almost one in two patients with cognitive dysfunction will be missed during the routine neurological examination, indicating that neurological impairment is not a reliable predictor of deficits (Peyser et al., 1980). While there is no alternative to neuropsychological testing in this regard, the procedure is time consuming, expensive and may not be readily available in many centers.

This has prompted a search for a brief, reliable and easy to score method for eliciting deficits that may also lend itself to repeat testing for documenting cognitive change over time. As a result, the efficacy of existing cognitive screening procedures, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; Folstein et al., 1975), have been assessed in patients with MS, while efforts at developing new measures specifically targeting this population continue. This chapter will critically review progress to date. A discussion on treatment options for the compromised patient will follow and the chapter will conclude with a brief overview of studies that reveal the real-world challenges faced by cognitively impaired MS patients.

When discussing the possibility of cognitive decline with MS patients, considerable tact is required. Many patients are young and may still be working. Many are in the process of coming to terms either with the diagnosis of MS and the loss of some neurological function.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auperle, RL, Beatty, WW, Shelton, F, Gontkovsky, ST. (2002) Three screening batteries to detect cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 8, 382–389.Google Scholar
Barak, Y, Lavie, M, Achiron, A. (2002) Screening for early cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis patients using the clock drawing test. Journal of Clinical Neurosciences, 9, 629–632.Google Scholar
Basso, MR, Beason-Hazen, S, Lynn, J, Rammohan, K, Bornstein, RA. (1996) Screening for cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology, 53, 980–984.Google Scholar
Beatty, WW, Goodkin, . (1990) Screening for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. An evaluation of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Archives of Neurology, 47, 297–301.Google Scholar
Beatty, WW, Paul, RH, Wilbanks, SL, et al. (1995) Identifying multiple sclerosis patients with mild or global cognitive impairments using the Screening Examination for Cognitive Impairment (SEFCI). Neurology, 45, 718–723.Google Scholar
Benedict, RHB (2005) Integrating cognitive function screening and assessment into the routine care of multiple sclerosis patients. (2005) CNS Spectrums, 10, 384–391.Google Scholar
Benedict, RHB, Fischer, JS, Archibald, CJ, et al. (2002) Minimal neuropsychological assessment of MS patients: a consensus approach. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 381–397.Google Scholar
Benedict, RHB, Munschauer, F, Linn, R, et al. (2003) Screening for multiple sclerosis cognitive impairment using a self-adminsitered 15-item questionnaire. Multiple Sclerosis, 9, 95–101.Google Scholar
Benedict, RHB, Cox, D, Thompson, LL, et al. (2004) Reliable screening for neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 10, 675–678.Google Scholar
Bennett, T, Dittmar, C, Raubach, S. (1991) Multiple Sclerosis: cognitive deficits and rehabilitation strategies. Cognitive Rehabilitation, 9, 18–23.Google Scholar
Bever, CT, Grattan, L, Panitch, HS, Johnson, KP. (1995) A brief repeatable battery of neuropsychological tests for multiple sclerosis: a preliminary serial study. Multiple Sclerosis, 1, 165–169.Google Scholar
Bever, CT, Andersen, PA, Leslie, J, et al. (1996) Treatment with oral 3,4 diaminopyridine improves leg strength in multiple sclerosis patients: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Neurology, 47, 1457–1462.Google Scholar
Boringa, JB, Lazeron, RHC, Reuling, IEW, et al. (2001) The Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests: normative values allow application in multiple sclerosis practice. Multiple Sclerosis, 7, 263–267.Google Scholar
Cohen, RA, Fisher, M. (1989) Amantadine treatment of fatigue associated with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology, 46, 676–680.Google Scholar
Dent, A, Lincoln, NB. (2000) Screening for memory impairment in multiple sclerosis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 311–315.Google Scholar
DePaulo, JR, Folstein, MF. (1978) Psychiatric disturbance in neurological patients: detection, recognition, and hospital course. Annals of Neurology, 4, 225–228.Google Scholar
Feinstein, A, Youl, B, Ron, M. (1992) Acute optic neuritis. A cognitive and magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain, 115, 1403–1415.Google Scholar
Foley, FW, Dince, WM, Bedell, JR, et al. (1994) Psychoremediation of communication skills for cognitively impaired persons with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurological Rehabilitation, 8, 165–176.Google Scholar
Folstein, MF, Folstein, SE, McHugh, PR. (1975) Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.Google Scholar
Franklin, GM, Heaton, RK, Nelson, LM, Filley, CM, Seibert, C. (1988) Correlation of neuropsychological and MRI findings in chronic–progressive multiple sclerosis. Neurology, 38, 1826–1829.Google Scholar
Franklin GM, Nelson LM, Heaton RK, Filley CM. (1990) Clinical perspectives in the identification of cognitive impairment. In Neurobehavioral Aspects of Multiple Sclerosis, ed. Rao, SM. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 161–174.
Geisler, MW, Sliwinski, M, Coyle, PK, et al. (1996) The effects of amantadine and pemoline on cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology, 53, 185–188.Google Scholar
Grafman J. (1984) Memory assessment and remediation. In Behavioral Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Traumatically Brain Damaged, ed. Edelstein, BA, Couture, ET. New York: Plenum Press, pp 151–189.
Greene, YM, Tariot, PN, Wishart, H, et al. (2000) A 12-week open trial of donepezil hydrochloride in patients with multiple sclerosis and associated cognitive impairment. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 20, 350–356.Google Scholar
Heaton RK, Thompson LL, Nelson LM, Filley CM, Franklin GM. (1990) Brief and intermediate length screening of neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. In Neurobehavioral Aspects of Multiple Sclerosis, ed. Rao, SM. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 149–160.
Hohol, MJ, Guttmann, CRG, Orav, J, et al. (1997) Serial neuropsychological assessment and magnetic resonance imaging analysis in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology, 54, 1018–1025.Google Scholar
Huber, SJ, Paulson, GW, Shuttleworth, EC, et al. (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging correlates of dementia in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology, 44, 732–736.Google Scholar
Jacobs, JW, Bernhard, MR, Delgado, A, Strain, JJ. (1977) Screening for organic mental symptoms in the medically ill. Annals of Internal Medicine, 86, 40–46.Google Scholar
Jonsson, A, Korfitzen, EM, Heltberg, A, Ravnborg, MH, Byskoz-Ottosen, E. (1993) Effects of neuropsychological treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 88, 394–400.Google Scholar
Keenan, PA, Jacobson, MW, Soleymani, RM, et al. (1996) The effect on memory of chronic prednisone treatment in patients with systemic disease. Neurology 47, 1396–1402.Google Scholar
Knight, RG, Devereux, RC, Godfrey, HP. (1997) Psychosocial consequences of caring for a spouse with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 7–19.Google Scholar
Krupp, LB, Elkins, , Scott, SR, et al. (1999) Donepezil for the treatment of memory impairments in multiple sclerosis. Neurology, 52(Suppl. 2), A137.Google Scholar
Krupp, LB, Christodoulou, C, Melville, P, et al. (2004) Donepezil improved memory in multiple sclerosis in a randomized clinical trial. Neurology, 63, 1579–1585.Google Scholar
Kurtzke, JF. (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale. Neurology (Cleveland), 33, 1444–1452.Google Scholar
Langdon, DW, Thompson, AJ. (1999) Multiple sclerosis: a preliminary study of selected variables affecting rehabilitation outcome. Multiple Sclerosis, 5, 94–100.Google Scholar
LaRocca N. (1990) Management of neurobehavioral dysfunction. A rehabilitation perspective. In Neurobehavioral Aspects of Multiple Sclerosis, ed. Rao, SM. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–229.
Leo, GJ, Rao, SM. (1988) Effects of intravenous physostigmine and lecithin on memory loss in multiple sclerosis: report of a pilot study. Journal of Neurological Rehabilitation, 2, 123–129.Google Scholar
Lincoln, NB, Dent, J, Hardig, N, et al. (2002) Evaluations of cognitive assessment and cognitive intervention for people with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 72, 93–98.Google Scholar
Minden S, Moes E. (1990) Management of neurobehavioral dysfunction. A psychiatric perspective. In Neurobehavioral Aspects of Multiple Sclerosis, ed. Rao, SM. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 230–250.
Oliveri, RL, Sibilia, G, Valentino, P, et al. (1998), Pulsed methylprednisolone induces a reversible impairment of memory in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 97, 366–369.Google Scholar
Parry, AMM, Scott, RB, Palace, J, Smith, S, Mathews, PM. (2003) Potentially adaptive functional changes in cognitive processing for patients with multiple sclerosis and their acute modulation by rivastigmine. Brain, 126, 2750–2760.Google Scholar
Peyser, JM, Edwards, KR, Poser, CM, Filskov, SB. (1980) Cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology, 37, 577–579.Google Scholar
Peyser, JMRao, SM, LaRocca, NG, Kaplan, E. (1990) Guidelines for neuropsychological research in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology, 47, 94–97.Google Scholar
Rao, SM, for the Cognitive Function Study Group of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. (1990) A Manual for the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests in Multiple Sclerosis. New York: National Multiple Sclerosis Society.
Rao, SM, Leo, GJ, Haughton, VM, Aubin-Faubert, St. P, Bernardin, L. (1989) Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging with neuropsychological testing in multiple sclerosis. Neurology, 39, 161–166.Google Scholar
Rao, SM, Leo, GJ, Bernardin, L, Unverzagt, F. (1991a) Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. 1. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology, 41, 685–691.Google Scholar
Rao, SM, Leo, GJ, Ellington, L, et al. (1991b) Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. 11. Impact on employment and social functioning. Neurology, 41, 692–696.Google Scholar
Rorie, KD, Stump, DA, Jeffery, DR,. Winston-Salem, NC. (2001) Effects of donepezil on cognitive function in patients with multiple slcerosis. Neurology, 56(Suppl. 3), A99.Google Scholar
Rossini, PM, Pasqualetti, P, Pozzilli, C, et al. (2001) Fatigue in progressive multiple sclerosis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of oral 4-aminopyridine. Multiple Sclerosis, 7, 354–358.Google Scholar
Rozewicz, L, Langdon, DW, Davie, CA, Thompson, AJ, Ron, MA. (1996) Resolution of left hemisphere cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis with magnetic resonance correlates: a case report. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 1, 17–25.Google Scholar
Sailer, M, Heinze, H-J, Schoenfeld, MA, Hauser, U, Smid, HGOM. (2000) Amantadine influences cognitive processing in patients with multiple sclerosis. Pharmacopsychiatry, 33, 28–37.Google Scholar
Schultheis, MT, Garay, E, DeLuca, J. (2001) The influence of cognitive impairment on driving performance in multiple sclerosis. Neurology, 56, 1089–1094.Google Scholar
Schultheis, MT, Garay, E, Millis, SR, DeLuca, J. (2002) Motor vehicle creashes and violations among drivers with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 1175–1178.Google Scholar
Sipe, JC, Knobler, RL, Breheny, SL, et al. (1984) A neurologic rating scale (NRS) for use in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 34, 1368–1372.Google Scholar
Smits, RCF, Emmen, HH, Bertelsmann, FW, et al. (1994) The effects of 4-aminopyridine on cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Neurology, 44, 1701–1705.Google Scholar
Sohlberg, M, Mateer, C. (1989) Introduction to cognitive rehabilitation. Theory and Practice. New York: Guildford.
Solari, A, Mancuso, L, Motta, A, Mendozzi, L, Serrati, C. (2002) Comparison of two brief neuropsychological batteries in people with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 8, 169–176.Google Scholar
Solari, A, Motta, L, Mendozzi, E, et al. (2004) CRIMS trial: Computer-aided retraining of memory and attention in people with multiple sclerosis: randomized double-blind controlled trial. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 222, 99–104.Google Scholar
Sullivan, MJL, Dehoux, E, Buchanan, DC. (1989) An approach to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 3, 77–85.Google Scholar
Sullivan, MJL, Edgley, K, Dehoux, E. (1990) A survey of multiple sclerosis. Part 1: perceived cognitive problems and compensatory strategy use. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 4, 99–105.Google Scholar
Swirsky-Sacchetti, T, Field, HL, Mitchell, DR, et al. (1992) The sensitivity of the Mini-Mental State Examination in the white matter dementia of multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 779–786.Google Scholar
Unverzagt, FW, Rao, SM, Antuono, PG. (1991) Oral physostigmine in the treatment of memory loss in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuroppsychology, 13, 74.Google Scholar
Uttner, I, Muller, S, Zinser, C, et al. (2005) Reversible impaired memory induced my pulsed methylprednisolone in patients with MS. Neurology, 64, 1971–1973.Google Scholar
Diemen, HAM, Polman, CH, Dongen, TMMM, et al. (1992) The effect of 4-aminopyridine on clinical signs in multiple sclerosis: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study. Annals of Neurology, 32, 123–130.Google Scholar
Zéphir, H, Seze, J, Dujardin, K, et al. (2005) One-year cyclophosphamide treatment combined with methylprednisolone improves cognitive function in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 11, 360–363.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×