Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:09:33.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Changing with the Times: Success, Failure, and Inertia in Canadian Federal Arrangements, 1945–2002

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2009

Richard M. Bird
Affiliation:
Director, International Tax Program, Professor of Economics, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto; Petro-Canada Fellow C.D. Howe Institute
François Vaillancourt
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics and Fellow CRDE, Université de Montréal
Jessica Wallack
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
T. N. Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Canada is one of the oldest and, from most perspectives, one of the most successful federal countries in the world. But success has not come easily. Over the 135 years of its existence, Canada has changed in many ways. As the decades rolled by, its territory expanded greatly, the number of provinces (and territories) included in the union grew, its degree of political independence from Britain increased, and, from 1976 to 1985 and from 1994 to 2003, a political party whose explicit objective is separation of one of its provinces gained control of a major province while at the same time Canada's degree of economic dependence on the United States rose to new levels. These and other major changes in the nature of both the country and its environment have required equally major changes in the institutions of Canadian federalism. The union continues to endure, but not without a good deal of effort and not without continuing pressures and strains.

We examine three aspects of Canada's federal arrangements over the past half century. The marked change that has taken place in the sharing of the personal income tax between the federal and the provincial governments is a success story: Successful changes were gradually made over time to accommodate new economic and political circumstances. The unsuccessful attempt to amend the Constitution Act of 1982 to satisfy the demands of Québec, the majority francophone province in Canada, was a failure in spite of great political effort.

Type
Chapter
Information
Federalism and Economic Reform
International Perspectives
, pp. 189 - 248
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anisman P., and P. W. Hogg (1979). “Constitutional Aspects of Federal Securities Legislation,” in Proposals for a Securities Market Law for Canada, Background Papers, vol. 3, pp. 135–200. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services.
Banwell, P. T. (1969). “Proposals for a National Securities Commission,” Queen's Intramural Law Journal 1(3): 3–35.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, M. C., and Bellemare, G. (2000). “Canadian Stock Market and North American Integration” Isuma 1(1). Available online at http://www.isuma.net/vo/n01/beaulieu/beaulieu-e.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Bird, R. M. (1970a). The Growth of Government Spending in Canada. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
Bird, R. M. (1970b). “The Tax Kaleidoscope: Perspectives on Tax Reform in Canada,” Canadian Tax Journal 18: 444–478.Google Scholar
Bird, R. M. (1978). “Canada's Vanishing Death Taxes,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 16: 133–145.Google Scholar
Bird, R. M. (1979). Financing Canadian Government: A Quantitative OverviewToronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
Bird, R. M. (1986). Federal Finance in Comparative Perspective. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
Bird, R. M. (2000). “Rethinking Subnational Taxes: A New Look at Tax Assignment,” Tax Notes International 20 (19): 2069–96.Google Scholar
Bird, R. M., and Gendron, P.-P. (1998). “Dual VATs and Cross-Border Trade: Two Problems, One Solution?,” International Tax and Public Finance 5 (3): 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, R. M., and , K. J. McKenzie (2001). Taxing Business: A Provincial Affair? Commentary No. 154. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.Google Scholar
Bird, R. M., and Tassonyi, A. (2001). “Constraints on Provincial and Municipal Borrowing in Canada: Markets, Rules, and Norms,” Canadian Public Administration, 44 (1): 84–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, R. M., and Vaillancourt, F. (2001). “Fiscal Arrangements for Maintaining an Effective State in CanadaEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19(2): 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, R. M., D. B. Perry, and T. A. Wilson (1998). “Canada,” in Messere, K., ed., Tax Systems in Industrialized Countries pp. 39–92. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boadway, R., and Hobson, P. (1998). Equalization: Its Contribution to Canada's Economic and Fiscal ProgressKingston: John Deustch Institute.Google Scholar
Breton, A. (1996). Competitive Governments.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, R. M. (1980). The Acceptable Mean: The Tax Rental Agreements, 1941–62.Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
Canadian Tax Foundation (1999). Finances of the Nation 1999. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.
Courchene, T. J. (1986). Economic Management and the Division of Powers.Toronto: University of Toronto Press for Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada (McDonald Comission).Google Scholar
Dufour, C. (2002). Restoring the Federal Principle: The Place of Québec in the Canadian Social Union, Policy Matters, vol. 3, no. 1, IRPP.Google Scholar
Durocher, R. (1996). “Quiet Revolution,” in Canadian Encyclopedia Plus.Toronto: McClelland and Stewart. CD-RomGoogle Scholar
Erard, B., and F. Vaillancourt (1993). “The Compliance Costs of a Separate Personal Income Tax system for Ontario: Simulations for 1991,” in Maslove, A., ed., Taxation in a Subnational Jurisdiction, pp. 137–170. Toronto: University from Toronto Press (Fair Tax Commission).Google Scholar
Granatstein, J. L. (1975). Canada's War: The Politics of the Mackenzie King Government, 1939–1945.Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lachance, R., and F. Vaillancourt (2001). “Québec's Tax on Income: Evolution, Status and Evaluation,” in Brown, Douglas, ed., Tax Competition and the Fiscal Union: Balancing Competition and Harmonization in Canada, pp. 39–47. Kingston: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. (1968). The Policy-Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
McRoberts, K. (1988). Québec: Social Change and Political Crisis, 3rd edition. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Meisel, J., and Rocher, G. (1999). Si je me souviens bien/As I recall: Regards sur l'histoire.Montreal: L'Institut de Recherche en Politiques Publiques.Google Scholar
Mintz, J., and Smart, M. (2002). “Why Québec's Tax-Point Transfers Are a Good Idea,” The National Post, March 25.Google Scholar
Mohindra, N. (2002). Securities Market Regulations in Canada. Vancouver: Fraser Institute Critical Issues Bulletin.Google Scholar
Moore, A. M., Perry, J. H., and Beach, D. I. (1966). The Financing of Canadian Federation: The First Hundred Years. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
Ontario Economic Council (1983). A Separate Personal Income Tax for Ontario. Toronto: Ontario Economic Council.
Ontario Securities Commission LLP (2002). Five Year Review Committee Draft Report Reviewing the Securities Act.
Perry, D. B. (1977). Financing the Canadian Federation, 1867–1995: Setting the Stage for Change. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
Perry, J. H. (1989). A Fiscal History of Canada – The Postwar Years. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1957). The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Porter Commission (1966). Report of the Royal Commission on Banking and Finance (Ottawa).
Richards, J. (2002). The Paradox of the Social Union Framework Agreement, Backgrounder No. 59. Toronto: C.D. Howe Research Institute.Google Scholar
Russell, P. H. (1993). Constitutional Odyssey: Can Canadians Become a Sovereign People?Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Séguin Commission (2002). Commission on Fiscal Imbalance, A New Division of Canada's Financial Resources (Québec).
Simeon, R. (1978). Federal-Provincial Diplomacy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1956). Administrative Behavior, 2nd edition. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Smith, E. H. (1998). Federal-Provincial Tax Sharing and Centralized Tax Collection in Canada, Special Studies in Taxation and Public Finance No. 1. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
Tindal, C. R., and Tindal, S. N. (2000). Local Government in Canada, 5th edition. Scarborough, ON: Nelson Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M., and Schwanen, D., eds. (1995). Getting There: An Assessment of the Agreement on Internal Trade. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M., Pritchard, J., Whalley, J., and Courchene, T. (1983). Federalism and the Canadian Economic Union. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Tse, D. (1994). “Establishing a Federal Securities Commission,” Saskatchewan Law Review 58 (1): 427–440.Google Scholar
Turgeon, M., and Vaillancourt, F. (2002). “The Provision of Highways in Canada and the Federal Government,” Publius 32(1): 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaillancourt, F. (1996). “Language and Socioeconomic Status in Québec: Measurement, Findings, Determinants and Policy Costs,” International Journal of the Sociology of Language, Special Issue on Economic Approaches to Language and Language Planning, 121: 69–92.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, F. (1997). “Labour Sponsored Venture Capital Funds in Canada: Institutional Aspects Tax Expenditures and Employment Creation”, in Halpern, P., ed., Financing Growth in Canada, pp. 571–592. Calgary: University of Calgary Press (Industry Canada).Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, F. (2000a). “Federal-Provincial Small Transfer Programs in Canada, 1957–1998: Importance, Composition and Evaluation,” in Lazar, H., ed., Canada: The State of the Federation 1999/2000, pp. 189–212. Kingston: IIGR, Queen's University.
Vaillancourt, F. (2000b). “The Québec Pension Plan,” in P, Boothe, ed., A Separate Pension Plan for Alberta, pp. 23–40 Western Studies in Economic Policy No. 5. Edmonton: Institute for Public Economics, University of Alberta Press.
Vaillancourt, F., and Rault, S. (2003). “The Regional Dimension of Federal Intergovernmental and Interpersonal Transfers in Canada, 1981–2001,” Regional and Federal Studies 13(4): 130–152.CrossRef
Vander Ploeg, C. (2000). Canadian Intergovernmental Agreements on Immigration, Background Paper 2, A National Conference on Canadian Immigration, Canada West Foundation.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. (1995). “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11: 1–31.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×