Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:53:57.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Evolutionary theorizing on economic growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Gerald Silverberg
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT), Maastricht, the Netherlands
Bart Verspagen
Affiliation:
Research Fellow Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies ECIS Eindhoven University of Technology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
Kurt Dopfer
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

While an evolutionary perspective has been urged upon economists since at least the time of Alfred Marshall (1890; see Hodgson, 1993, for a contemporary reiteration), what has been lacking until recently, at least for a large portion of the economics profession, has been a body of formal theory and quantitative analysis on an explicitly evolutionary basis. This has changed since the work of Richard Nelson and Sidney Winter in the 1960s and 1970s (summarized in Nelson and Winter, 1982), which operationalized and extended many of the concepts going back to Joseph Schumpeter (1934, 1942), Armen Alchian (1950), Jack Downie (1955), Josef Steindl (1952) and others. Since then a number of authors have been enlarging on this foundation and systematically extending the evolutionary economics paradigm in a number of directions. A survey of some of these can be found in Nelson, 1995.

In this chapter we intend to deal with the basics of a formal evolutionary approach to technical change, economic dynamics and growth. In so doing we will leave out for the most part the burgeoning new areas of application of evolutionary ideas to game theory, learning dynamics and bounded rationality, organization theory, financial markets, industrial organization and the interface between economics, law and culture – most of which are dealt with elsewhere in this volume.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H. (1919), The Degradation of the Democratic Dogma, reprinted 1969, New York: Harper & Row
Aghion, P., and Howitt, P. (1992), ‘A model of growth through creative destruction’, Econometrica 60(2): 323–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, A. A. (1950), ‘Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory’, Journal of Political Economy 58(3): 211–21. [Reprinted in U. Witt (ed.) (1993), Evolutionary Economics, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, E. S. (2001), ‘Satiation in an evolutionary model of structural economic dynamics’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 11(1): 134–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1962), ‘The economic implications of learning by doing’, Review of Economic Studies 29: 155–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (1988), ‘Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics’, in P. W. Anderson, K. J. Arrow and D. Pines (eds.), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 9–33
Arthur, W. B. (1994), Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press
Axtell, R., and Epstein, J. M. (1995), ‘Agent-based modeling: understanding our creations’, Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute (winter): 28–32Google Scholar
Ballot, G., and Taymaz, E. (2001), ‘Training policies and economic growth in an evolutionary world’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 12: 311–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (1986), ‘Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long-run data show’, American Economic Review 76(5): 1072–85Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. von (1932), Theoretische Biologie, vol. Ⅰ, Berlin: Borntraeger
Booker, L., D. Goldberg and J. Holland (1989), ‘Classifier systems and genetic algorithms’, in J. Carbonell (ed.), Machine Learning: Paradigms and Methods, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Boulding, K. E. (1978), Ecodynamics: A New Theory of Societal Evolution, Beverly Hills and London: Sage
Boulding, K. E. (1981), Evolutionary Economics, Beverly Hills and London: Sage
Bruckner, E., W. Ebeling, M. A. Jiménez Montaño and A. Scharnhorst (1994), ‘Hyperselection and innovation described by a stochastic model of technological evolution’, in L. Leydesdorff and P. van den Besselaar (eds.), Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory, London: Pinter, 79–90
Chiaromonte, F., and Dosi, G. (1993), ‘Heterogeneity, competition and macroeconomic dynamics’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 4: 39–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlisk, J. (1989), ‘An aggregate model of technical change’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 787–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawid, H. (1999), Adaptive Learning by Genetic Algorithms: Analytical Results and Applications to Economic Models, revised 2nd edn., Berlin: Springer-Verlag
DeLong, J. B. (1988), ‘Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: comment’, American Economic Review 78(5): 1138–54Google Scholar
Dosi, G., Fabiani, S., Aversi, R. and Meacci, M. (1994), ‘The dynamics of international differentiation: a multi-country evolutionary model’, Industrial and Corporate Change 3: 225–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downie, J. (1955), The Competitve Process, London: Duckworth
Ebeling, W., and R. Feistel (1982), Physik der Selbstorganisation und Evolution, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag
Edelman, G. M. (1987), Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection, New York: Basic Books
Eliasson, G. (1977), ‘Competition and market processes in a simulation model of the Swedish economy’, American Economic Review 67(1): 277–81Google Scholar
Eliasson, G. (1991), ‘Modelling the experimentally organized economy’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 16: 163–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, J. M., and R. Axtell (1996), Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom up, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution
Fagiolo, G., and Dosi, G. (2003), ‘Exploitation, exploration and innovation in a model of endogenous growth with locally interacting agents’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14(3): 237–73Google Scholar
Feistel, R., and W. Ebeling (1989), Evolution of Complex Systems, Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften
Fisher, R. A. (1930), The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Oxford: Clarendon Press
Fontana, W., and Buss, L. W. (1994), ‘What would be conserved if “the tape were played twice”’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91: 757–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, D., and Young, H. P. (1990), ‘Stochastic evolutionary game dynamics’, Theoretical Population Biology 38: 219–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerybadze, A. (1982), Innovation, Wettbewerb und Evolution, Tübingen, Germany: Mohr
Goldberg, D. (1989), Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Goodwin, R. M. (1967), ‘A growth cycle’, in C. H. Feinstein (ed.), Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth, London: Macmillan, 54–58
Grübler, A. (1990), The Rise and Decline of Infrastructures: Dynamics of Evolution and Technological Change in Transport, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag
Henkin, G. M., and Polterovich, V. M. (1991), ‘Schumpeterian dynamics as a non-linear wave theory’, Journal of Mathematical Economics 20: 551–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (1993), Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics, Cambridge: Polity Press
Hofbauer, J., and K. Sigmund (1988), The Theory of Evolution and Dynamical Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Holland, J. H., and Miller, J. H. (1991), ‘Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory’, American Economic Review 81(2): 363–70Google Scholar
Horgan, J. (1995), ‘From complexity to perplexity’, Scientific American (June): 74–79Google Scholar
Houthakker, H. S. (1956), ‘The Pareto distribution and the Cobb-Douglas production function in activity analysis’, Review of Economic Studies 23: 27–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwai, K. (1984a), ‘Schumpeterian dynamics Ⅰ: an evolutionary model of innovation and imitation’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5: 159–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwai, K. (1984b), ‘Schumpeterian dynamics Ⅱ: technological progress, firm growth and “Economic Selection”’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5: 321–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez Montaño, M. A., and Ebeling, W. (1980), ‘A stochastic evolutionary model of technological change’, Collective Phenomena 3: 107–14Google Scholar
Kaldor, N., and Mirrlees, J. A. (1962), ‘A new model of economic growth’, Review of Economic Studies 29: 174–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandori, M., Mailath, G. J. and Rob, R. (1993), ‘Learning, mutations, and long-run equilibrium in games’, Econometrica 61(1): 29–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwasnicki, W., and Kwasnicka, H. (1992), ‘Market, innovation, competition: an evolutionary model of industrial dynamics’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 19: 343–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, D. (1993a), ‘Artificial worlds in economics: part Ⅰ’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 3(2): 89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, D. (1993b), ‘Artificial worlds in economics: part Ⅱ’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 3(3): 177–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, C. G. (ed.) (1989), Artificial Life, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Langton, C. G., C. Taylor, J. D. Farmer and S. Rasmussen (eds.) (1992), Artificial Life Ⅱ, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Lotka, A. J. (1924), Elements of Mathematical Biology, reprinted 1956, New York: Dover
Lotka, A. J. (1945), ‘The law of evolution as a maximal principle’, Human Biology 17: 167–94Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (1991), Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development: A Long-Run Comparative View, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Marchetti, C., and N. Nakicenovic (1979), The Dynamics of Energy Systems and the Logistic Substitution Model, Research Report 79–13, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
Marshall, A. (1890), Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan (8th edn., 1920, London: Macmillan; 9th variorum edn., 1961, London: Macmillan)
McCombie, J. S. L. (1987), ‘Does the aggregate production function imply anything about the laws of production? A note on the Simon and Shaikh critiques’, Applied Economics 19: 1121–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, J. S. (1988), Trade Technology and Evolutionary Change, mimeo, University of Manchester
Metcalfe, J. S. (2001), ‘Consumption, preferences and the evolutionary agenda’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 11(1): 37–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monod, J. L. (1970), Le Hasard et la Nécessité, Paris: Seuil
Montroll, E. W. (1978), ‘Social dynamics and the quantifying of social forces’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 75: 4633–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakicenovic, N. (1987), ‘Technological substitution and long waves in the USA’, in T. Vasko (ed.), The Long-Wave Debate, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 76–103CrossRef
Nelson, R. R. (1995), ‘Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change’, Journal of Economic Literature 33: 48–90Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R., and S. G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G. and Schuette, H. L. (1976), ‘Technical change in an evolutionary model’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 90: 90–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolis, G., and I. Prigogine (1977), Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems, New York: Wiley-Interscience
Phelps-Brown, E. H. (1957), ‘The meaning of the fitted Cobb-Douglas function’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 71: 546–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P. M. (1986), ‘Increasing returns and long-run growth’, Journal of Political Economy, 94(5): 1002–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, W. E. G. (1960), Productivity and Technical Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Saviotti, P. P. (2001), ‘Variety, growth and demand’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 11(1): 119–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödinger, E., 1945, What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (translated by R. Opie from the German edition of 1912), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Reprinted in 1989 with a new introduction by J. E. Elliott, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.]
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper & Row
Schwefel, H. P. (1995), Evolution and Optimum Seeking, New York: Wiley
Shaikh, A. (1974), ‘Laws of production and laws of algebra. The humbug production function: a comment’, Review of Economics and Statistics 56: 115–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaikh, A. (1980), ‘Laws of production and laws of algebra: humbug Ⅱ’, in E. J. Nell (ed.), Growth, Profits, and Property: Essays on the Revival of Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 80–95CrossRef
Shaikh, A. (1990), ‘Humbug production function’, in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds.), The New Palgrave: Capital Theory, London: Macmillan, 191–94CrossRef
Sigmund, K. (1986), ‘A survey of replicator equations’, in J. L. Casti and A. Karlqvist (eds.), Complexity, Language and Life: Mathematical Approaches, Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Silverberg, G., G.Dosi, and Orsenigo, L. (1988), ‘Innovation, diversity and diffusion: a self-organisation model’, Economic Journal 393: 1032–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverberg, G. and Lehnert, D. (1993), ‘Long waves and “evolutionary chaos” in a simple Schumpeterian model of embodied technical change’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 4: 9–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverberg, G., and D. Lehnert (1996), ‘Evolutionary chaos: growth fluctuations in a Schumpeterian model of creative destruction’, in W. A. Barnett, A. Kirman and M. Salmon (eds.), Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45–74
Silverberg, G., and Verspagen, B. (1994a), ‘Learning, innovation and economic growth: a long-run model of industrial dynamics’, Industrial and Corporate Change 3: 199–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverberg, G., and Verspagen, B. (1994b), ‘Collective learning, innovation and growth in a boundedly rational, evolutionary world’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 4(3): 207–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverberg, G., and Verspagen, B. (1995), ‘An evolutionary model of long-term cyclical variations of catching up and falling behind’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 5(3): 209–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverberg, G., and B. Verspagen (1996), ‘From the artificial to the endogenous: modelling evolutionary adaptation and economic growth’, in E. Helmstädter and M. Perlman (eds.), Behavorial Norms, Technological Progress and Economic Dynamics: Studies in Schumpeterian Economics, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 331–71
Simon, H. A. (1979), ‘On parsimonious explanations of production relations’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 81: 459–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A., and Levy, F. K. (1963), ‘A note on the Cobb—Douglas production function’, Review of Economic Studies 30: 93–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1957), ‘Technical change and the aggregate production function’, Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1960), ‘Investment and technical progress’, in K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin and P. Suppes (eds.), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 89–104
Steindl, J. (1952), Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism, New York: Monthly Review Press
Tesfatsion, L. (2002), ‘Agent-based computational economics: growing economics from the bottom up’, Artificial Life 8: 55–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verspagen, B. (1993), Uneven Growth between Interdependent Economies: An Evolutionary View on Technology Gaps, Trade and Growth, Aldershot: Avebury
Verspagen, B. (1995), ‘Convergence in the world economy: a broad historical overview’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 6: 143–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verspagen, B. (2001), ‘Evolutionary macroeconomics: a synthesis between neo-Schumpeterian and post-Keynesian lines of thought’, Electronic Journal of Evolutionary Modeling and Economic Dynamics, http://www.e-jemed.org/1007/index.phpGoogle Scholar
Winter, S. G. (1984), ‘Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5: 137–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, U. (2001), ‘Learning to consume – a theory of wants and the growth of demand’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 11(1): 23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, H. P. (1993), ‘The evolution of conventions’, Econometrica 61(1): 57–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Evolutionary theorizing on economic growth
    • By Gerald Silverberg, Professor of Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT), Maastricht, the Netherlands, Bart Verspagen, Research Fellow Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies ECIS Eindhoven University of Technology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  • Edited by Kurt Dopfer, Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
  • Book: The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492297.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Evolutionary theorizing on economic growth
    • By Gerald Silverberg, Professor of Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT), Maastricht, the Netherlands, Bart Verspagen, Research Fellow Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies ECIS Eindhoven University of Technology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  • Edited by Kurt Dopfer, Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
  • Book: The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492297.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Evolutionary theorizing on economic growth
    • By Gerald Silverberg, Professor of Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT), Maastricht, the Netherlands, Bart Verspagen, Research Fellow Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies ECIS Eindhoven University of Technology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  • Edited by Kurt Dopfer, Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
  • Book: The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492297.016
Available formats
×