Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:34:37.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - ‘Their own media in their own language’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Catharine Lumby
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Elspeth Probyn
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

Part A – Journalism and the Indigenous polity

Indigenous peoples have the right to establish their own media in their own language. They also have the right to equal access to all forms of non-Indigenous media.

States shall take effective measures to ensure that State-owned media duly reflect Indigenous cultural diversity.

United Nations Draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Part IV, Article 17, 1994 (still not ratified).

IN THE COURSE OF RESEARCHING OUR BOOK ON THE REPORTING AND reception of Indigenous issues in the Australian media, Alan McKee and I became keenly aware of a standard liberal approach to the subject of Aboriginal people, ethics and the media. It goes like this: you round up the ‘usual suspects’, which comprise hostile reporting, racial prejudice, the stereotyping of Aboriginal people, and their sacrifice at the altar of a good story (also known as a fast buck). You offer a quick critique of the corporate greed and insensitivity that drive the media. And you make a plea for ethical behaviour by individual journalists. Everyone then goes home, none the wiser.

Our own three-year study, which was supported by an Australian Research Council Large Grant, was an attempt to broaden the framework for thinking about the way Aboriginal affairs are reported in the media and how Indigenous people are represented both as media professionals and as subjects in the media. Where previous work in this field has concentrated on finding examples of racist and ‘negative’ coverage, we set out to put questions of media, racist and Indigenous representation into a larger context. In concrete terms, this meant studying a much broader range of media coverage than is normally included in research of this kind – we looked beyond news and current affairs reporting to entertainment and life-style media.

Type
Chapter
Information
Remote Control
New Media, New Ethics
, pp. 42 - 66
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×