Arnason, Jóhann P. (n.d. [1982]), Rationalisation and Modernity: Towards a Culturalist Reading of Max Weber, Melbourne: La Trobe University.Google Scholar

Arnason, Jóhann P. (2003), Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asad, Talal (1993), The Concept of Cultural Translation in British Social Anthropology, in Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, ed. Clifford, James and Marcus, George E., Berkeley: University of California Press: 141–164.Google Scholar

Asad, Talal (1993), Genealogies of Religion. Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Babb, Lawrence A (1983), Destiny and Responsibility: Karma in Popular Hinduism, in Karma. An Anthropological Inquiry, ed. Keyes, Charles F and Daniel, Valentine E, Berkeley: University of California Press: 163–181.Google Scholar

Bachmann-Medick, Doris (ed.) (1997), Übersetzung als Repräsentation fremder Kulturen, Göttinger Beiträge zur Internationalen Übersetzungsforschung, Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar

Badrinath, Chaturvedi (1986), Max Weber’s Wrong Understanding of Indian Civilization, in Recent Research on Max Weber’s Studies of Hinduism. Papers Submitted to a Conference Held in New Delhi 1–3.3.1984, ed. Kantowsky, Detlef, Munich: Weltforum: 45–58.Google Scholar

Bayly, Susan (1999), The New Cambridge History of India 3: Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bechert, Heinz (1984), Max Webers Darstellung der Geschichte des Buddhismus in Süd- und Südostasien, in Max Webers Studie über Hinduismus und Buddhismus. Interpretation und Kritik, ed. Schluchter, Wolfgang, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp: 274–292.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter (1977), Die Aufgabe des Übersetzers, in Illuminationen. Ausgewählte Schriften, ed. Benjamin, Walter, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp: 50–62.Google Scholar

Berreman, Gerald D. (1967), Concomitants of Caste Organization, in Japan’s Invisible Race: Caste in Culture and Personality, 2nd edn, ed. de Vos, George and Wagatsuma, Hiroshi, Berkeley: University of California Press: 308–324.Google Scholar

Bhargava, Rajeev (ed.) (1998), Secularism and Its Critics, Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Biardeau, Madeleine (1965), Ahamkara, the Ego Principle in the Upanishads, Contributions to Indian Sociology 8: 62–84.Google Scholar

Cappai, Gabriele (2007), Vergleichen, in Handbuch interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kompetenz. Grundbegriffe—Theorien— Anwendungsfelder, ed. Straub, Jürgen, Weidemann, Arne and Weidemann, Doris, Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler: 94–101.Google Scholar

Charsley, Simon (1996), “Untouchable”: What is in a Name?, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohn, Bernard S. (1959), Changing Traditions of a Low Caste, in Traditional India. Structure and Change, ed. Singer, Milton, Philadelphia: American Folklore Society: 207–215.Google Scholar

Cohn, Bernard S. (1968), Notes on the History of the Study of Indian Society and Culture, in Structure and Change in Indian Society, ed. Singer, Milton and Cohn, Bernard S., Chicago: Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology: 3–28.Google Scholar

Conrad, Dieter (1986), Max Weber’s Conception of Hindu Dharma as a Paradigm, in Recent Research on Max Weber’s Studies of Hinduism. Papers Submitted to a Conference Held in New Delhi 1–3.3.1984, ed. Kantowsky, Detlef, Munich: Weltforum: 169–192.Google Scholar

Daniel, E. Valentine (1983), Conclusion: Karma, the Uses of an Idea, in Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry, ed. Keyes, Charles F and Daniel, Valentine E., Berkeley: University of California Press: 287–300.Google Scholar

Daniel, Sheryl B. (1983), The Tool Box Approach of the Tamil to the Issues of Moral Responsibility and Human Destiny, in Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry, ed. Keyes, Charles F and Daniel, Valentine E., Berkeley: University of California Press: 27–62.Google Scholar

Derrett, J. Duncan M. (1976), Rajadharma, Journal of Asian Studies 35(4): 597–609.Google Scholar

Dirks, Nicholas B. (2001), Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India, Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar

Dumont, Louis (1980), Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Complete Revised English Edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gingrich, Andre and Fox, Richard G. (eds.) (2002), Anthropology, by Comparison, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Martin (1987), Fremde Kultur und soziales Handeln. Max Webers Analyse der indischen Zivilisation, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 39(4): 669–692.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Martin (1988), Theorie und Verfremdung. Max Weber, Louis Dumont und die Analyse der indischen Gesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Martin (2005), Interkulturelle Hermeneutik statt Kulturvergleich. Zur sozialen Reflexivität der Deutungsperspektiven, in Kulturen vergleichen. Sozial- und kulturwissenschaftliche Grundlagen und Kontroversen, ed. Srubar, Ilja, Wenzel, Ulrich and Renn, Joachim, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 112–150.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Martin (2007), Repräsentation, in Handbuch Interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kompetenz. Grundbegriffe—Theorien—Anwendungsfelder, ed. Straub, Jürgen, Weidemann, Doris and Weidemann, Arne, Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler: 101–110.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Martin (2009), Reaching out; or Nobody Exists in One Context Only: Society as Translation, Translation Studies 2(1): 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, Martin (2017, forthcoming), Imbroglios: Bhakti Neglected, or: the Missed Opportunities for a New Approach to a Comparative Analysis of Civilizational Diversity, in Anthropology and Civilizational Analysis. Eurasian Exploration, ed. Johann Arnason and Chris Hann, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Martin and Berg, Eberhard (eds.) (1993), Kultur, soziale Praxis, Text: Die Krise der ethnographischen Repräsentation, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Fuller, Chris J. (1979), Gods, Priests and Purity: On the Relation between Hinduism and the Caste System, Man 14(3): 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1975), Truth and Method, London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures. Selected Essays, New York: Basic.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1981), Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Bd.1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung, Bd. 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (English: Habermas, Jürgen (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols, vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Boston: Beacon.)Google Scholar

Halbfass, Wilhelm (1980), Karma, Apurva, and ‘Natural’ Causes. Observations on the Growth and Limits of the Theory of Samsara, in Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions, ed. O’Flaherty, Wendy Doniger, Berkeley: University of California Press: 268–302.Google Scholar

Hardy, Friedhelm (1983), Viraha-bhakti: The Early History of Krsna Devotion in South India, Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heesterman, Jan C. (1984), Kaste und Karma: Max Webers Analyse der indischen Sozialstruktur, in Max Webers Studie über Hinduismus und Buddhismus. Interpretation und Kritik, ed. Schluchter, Wolfgang, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp: 72–86.Google Scholar

Heesterman, Jan C. (1985), Brahmin, Ritual, and Renouncer, in The Inner Conflict of Tradition. Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 26–44.Google Scholar

Hiebert, Paul G. (1983), Karma and Other Explanation Traditions in a South Indian Village, in Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry, ed. Keyes, Charles F. and Daniel, Valentine E, Berkeley: University of California Press: 119–130.Google Scholar

Holy, Ladislav (1987), Description, Generalization and Comparison, in Comparative Anthropology, ed. Holy, Ladislav, Oxford: Blackwell: 1–21.Google Scholar

Joas, Hans (2012), The Axial Age Debate as Religious Discourse, in The Axial Age and its Consequences, ed. Bellah, Robert and Joas, Hans, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juergensmeyer, Mark (1980), What if the Untouchables Don’t Believe in Untouchability?, Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 12(1): 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kane, Pandurang Vaman (1953), History of Dharmasastra (Ancient and Medieval Religious and Civil Law in India, 5 vols.), vol. 4, Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.Google Scholar

Keyes, Charles F. (1983a), Introduction: The Study of Popular Ideas of Karma, in Karma. An Anthropological Inquiry, ed. Keyes, Charles F and Daniel, Valentine E., Berkeley: University of California Press: 1–24.Google Scholar

Keyes, Charles F. (1983b), Merit-Transference in the Kammic Theory of Popular Theravada Buddhism, in Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry, ed. Keyes, Charles F and Daniel, Valentine E, Berkeley: University of California Press: 261–286.Google Scholar

Kolenda, Pauline Mahar (1964), Religious Anxiety and Hindu Fate, Journal of Asian Studies 23: 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kulke, Hermann (1993), Kings and Cults. State Formation and Legitimation in India and Southeast Asia, New Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar

Hollis, Martin and Lukes, Steven (eds.) (1982), Rationality and Relativism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Hartmut and Roth, Guenther (eds.) (1993), Weber’s Protestant Ethic: Origins, Evidence, Contexts, Washington: German Historical Institute and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lévinas, Emmanuel (1972), Humanisme de l’autre homme, Paris: Fata Morgana.Google Scholar

Matthes, Joachim (1992), The Operation Called ‘Vergleichen’, in Zwischen den Kulturen? Die Sozialwissenschaften vor dem Problem des Kulturvergleichs, ed. Matthes, Joachim, Göttingen: Otto Schwartz: 75–99.Google Scholar

Nohl, Arnd-Michael (2007), Komparative Analyse als qualitative Forschungsstrategie, in Handbuch interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kompetenz. Grundbegriffe—Theorien—Anwendungsfelder, ed. Straub, Jürgen, Weidemann, Arne and Weidemann, Doris, Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler: 391–402.Google Scholar

Obeyesekere, Gananath (1984), Exemplarische Prophetie oder ethisch geleitete Askese? Überlegungen zur frühbuddhistischen Reform, in Max Webers Studie über Hinduismus und Buddhismus. Interpretation und Kritik, ed. Schluchter, Wolfgang, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp: 247–273.Google Scholar

Oddie, Geoffrey A. (2006), Imagined Hinduism: British Protestant Missionary Constructions of Hinduism, 1793–1900, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar

O’Flaherty, Wendy Doniger (1980), Karma and Rebirth in the Vedas and Puranas, in Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions, ed. O’Flaherty, Wendy Doniger, Berkeley: University of California Press: 3–37.Google Scholar

Renn, Joachim, Straub, Jürgen and Shimada, Shingo (2002), Übersetzung als Medium des Kulturverstehens und sozialer Integration, Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar

Rösel, Jakob (1975), Über die soziale Gewalt von Wirklichkeitsbildern. Das sanskritistische Indienbild und seine koloniale Verwirklichung. Am Beispiel der Indien-Studie Max Webers, Internationales Jahrbuch für Wissens- und Religionssoziologie 9: 45–76.Google Scholar

Rösel, Jakob (1982), Die Hinduismusthese Max Webers: Folgen eines kolonialen Indienbildes in einem religionssoziologischen Gedankengang, Munich: Weltforum.Google Scholar

Schluchter, Wolfgang (1979), Die Entwicklung des okzidentalen Rationalismus. Eine Analyse von Max Webers Gesellschaftsgeschichte, Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar

Schluchter, Wolfgang (ed.) (1984), Max Webers Studie über Hinduismus und Buddhismus. Interpretation und Kritik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Sharma, Ursula (1973), Theodicy and the Doctrine of Karma, Man 8(3): 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shulman, David (1984), Die Integration der hinduistischen Kultur durch die Brahmanen. “Große,” “mittlere” und “kleine” Versionen des Parasurama-Mythos, in Max Webers Studie über Hinduismus und Buddhismus. Interpretation und Kritik, ed. Schluchter, Wolfgang, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp: 104–148.Google Scholar

Srubar, Ilja, Wenzel, Ulrich and Renn, Joachim (2005), Kulturen vergleichen. Sozial- und kulturwissenschaftliche Grundlagen und Kontroversen, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, Sanjay (1997), Connected Histories: Notes towards a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia, Modern Asian Studies 31(3): 735–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tambiah, Stanley J. (1984), Max Webers Untersuchung des frühen Buddhismus. Eine Kritik, in Max Webers Studie über Hinduismus und Buddhismus. Interpretation und Kritik, ed. Schluchter, Wolfgang, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp: 202–246.Google Scholar

Tenbruck, Friedrich H (1975), Das Werk Max Webers, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 27(4): 663–702.Google Scholar

Thapar, Romila (1978), Ancient Indian Social History: Some Interpretations, New Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar

Wadley, Susan S. (1983), Vrats: Transformers of Destiny, in Karma. An Anthropological Inquiry, ed. Keyes, Charles F and Daniel, Valentine E, Berkeley: University of California Press: 147–162.Google Scholar

Wagner, Peter (2001), Theorizing Modernity: Inescapability and Attainability in Social Theory, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldenfels, Bernhard (1999), Vielstimmigkeit der Rede. Studien zur Phänomenologie des Fremden 4, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Weber, Max (1958), The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism, ed. Gerth, Hans H. and Martindale, Don, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Weber, Max (1968 [1904]), Die “Objektivität” sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis, in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, 3rd edn, ed. Winckelmann, Johannes, Tübingen: Mohr: 146–214.Google Scholar

Weber, Max (1972 [1920]), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Vol. 1, Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar

Weber, Max (1978a), Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, 2 vols, ed. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Weber, Max (1978b [1921]), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Vol. 2: Hinduismus und Buddhismus, Tübingen: Mohr (RS II).Google Scholar

Weber, Max (1980), Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie, 5., revidierte Auflage, Studienausgabe, ed. Winckelmann, Johannes, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Weber, Max (1996 [1921]), Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen—Hinduismus und Buddhismus: 1916–1920, ed. Schmidt-Glintzer, Helwig in collaboration with Karl-Heinz Golzio, Vol. 20, Max Weber Gesamtausgabe, ed. Baier, Horst, Lepsius, M. Rainer, Mommsen, Wolfgang J., Schluchter, Wolfgang and Winckelmann, Johannes, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Weber, Max (2004a), Prefatory Remarks to the Collected Essays in the Sociology of Religion, in The Essential Weber. A Reader, ed. Whimster, Sam, London: Routledge: 101–112.Google Scholar

Weber, Max (2004b), Introduction to the Economic Ethic of the World Religions, in The Essential Weber. A Reader, ed. Whimster, Sam, London: Routledge: 55–80.Google Scholar

Weber, Max (2004c), Intermediate Reflection on the Economic Ethic of the World Religions, in The Essential Weber. A Reader, ed. Whimster, Sam, London: Routledge: 215–244.Google Scholar

Weber, Max (2004d), The “Objectivity” of Knowledge in Social Science and Social Policy, in The Essential Weber. A Reader, ed. Whimster, Sam, London: Routledge: 359–404.Google Scholar

Weber, Max (2009), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism with Other Writings on the Rise of the West, 4th edn, ed. Kalberg, Stephen, New York: Oxford University Press (PESC).Google Scholar

Wilson, Bryan R. (ed.) (1986 [1970]), Rationality, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar