Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Preface
- Organization of This Handbook
- How to Work with This Handbook
- Part I Background and Theory
- Part II Application Areas of Interaction Analysis
- Part III Methodology and Procedures of Interaction Analysis
- Part IV Data Analysis and Data Presentation
- Part V Coding Schemes for Interaction Research
- General Group Process Systems
- Argument, Conflict, and Negotiations
- 25 ARGUMENT
- 26 Group Working Relationships Coding System
- 27 Micro-Conflict Coding Scheme
- 28 OFFER
- 29 VTCS
- Coordination and Coherence
- Cognition and Metacognition
- Personality and Team Behavior
- Roles and Relationships
- Appendix
- Index
- References
25 - ARGUMENT
A Category System for Analyzing Argumentation in Group Discussions
from Argument, Conflict, and Negotiations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Preface
- Organization of This Handbook
- How to Work with This Handbook
- Part I Background and Theory
- Part II Application Areas of Interaction Analysis
- Part III Methodology and Procedures of Interaction Analysis
- Part IV Data Analysis and Data Presentation
- Part V Coding Schemes for Interaction Research
- General Group Process Systems
- Argument, Conflict, and Negotiations
- 25 ARGUMENT
- 26 Group Working Relationships Coding System
- 27 Micro-Conflict Coding Scheme
- 28 OFFER
- 29 VTCS
- Coordination and Coherence
- Cognition and Metacognition
- Personality and Team Behavior
- Roles and Relationships
- Appendix
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 460 - 466Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Primary Sources
Sommer, C., Boos, M., Conradi, E., Biller-Andorno, N., & Wiesemann, C. (2011). Care and justice arguments in the ethical reasoning of medical students. Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics, 2, 9–32.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Bergmann, J., & Luckmann, T. (Eds.), (1999). Die kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral [The communicative construction of morality]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding (pp. 181–209). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In Farr, R. & Moscovici, S. (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sommer, C. (2004). Fürsorge- und Gerechtigkeitsmoral: Eine interpersonelle Perspektive [Care and Justice Morality: An Interpersonal Perspective]. Hamburg: Kovač.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Voss, J. F., Tyler, S. W., & Yengo, L. A. (1983). Individual differences in the solving of social science problems. In Dillon, R. F. & Schmeck, R. R. (Eds.), Individual differences in cognition (pp. 205–232). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by