Adams, Marilyn McCord. ‘Aristotle and the Sacrament of the Altar: A Crisis in Medieval Aristotelianism’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (1991): 195–249.Google Scholar

Adams, Marilyn McCord. ‘Biting and Chomping Our Salvation! Eucharistic Presence, Radically Understood’. In Redemptive Transformation in Practical Theology: Essays in Honor of James E. Loder, Jr, edited by Wright, Dana R. and Kuentzel, John D., 69–94. Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar

Adams, Marilyn McCord. Christ and Horrors: The Coherence of Christology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Marilyn McCord. Some Later Medieval Theories of the Eucharist: Thomas Aquinas, Gilles of Rome, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, William P. Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Anglican Church in North America. ‘The Order for the Administration of The Lord’s Supper or Holy Communion, commonly called The Holy Eucharist, Standard Text’. 2013. anglicanchurch.net/?/main/texts_for_common_prayer.Google Scholar

Arcadi, James M. ‘“And Feed on Him in Thy Heart”: The Development of Thomas Cranmer’s View of Christ’s Presence in the Eucharist’. Master’s dissertation. South Hamilton, MA: Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, 2010.Google Scholar

Arcadi, James M. ‘God Is Where God Acts: Reconceiving Divine Omnipresence’. Topoi 36.4 (2017): 631–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arcadi, James M. ‘Idealism and Participating in the Body of Christ’. In Idealism and Christian Theology, edited by Farris, Joshua R. and Hamilton, S. Mark, Idealism and Christianity vol. 1, 197–216. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016.Google Scholar

Arcadi, James M. ‘Impanation, Incarnation, and Enabling Externalism’. Religious Studies 51.1 (2015): 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arcadi, James M. ‘An Instrumental Explication of George Hunsinger’s Eucharistic Real Predication’. In Marking the Church: Essays in Ecclesiology, edited by Greg Peters and Matt Jenson, 138–150. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016.Google Scholar

Arcadi, James M. ‘Kryptic or Cryptic? The Divine Preconscious Model of the Incarnation as a Concrete-nature Christology’. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionphilosophie 58.2 (2016): 229–243.Google Scholar

Arcadi, James M. ‘Recent Philosophical Work on the Doctrine of the Eucharist’. Philosophy Compass 11.7 (2016): 402–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arcadi, James M. ‘A Theory of Consecration: A Philosophical Exposition of a Biblical Phenomenon’. Heythrop Journal 54.6 (2013): 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arndt, William, F., Wilbur Gingrich, Frederick W. Danker, and Walter, Bauer. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Augustine, . ‘Sermon 234’. In Luke. Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture: New Testament, edited by Thomas, Oden. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2003, pp. 378–379.Google Scholar

Augustine, . The Works of Saint Augustine: Sermons 230–272b on the Liturgical Seasons. Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Baber, H. E. ‘Eucharist: Metaphysical Miracle or Institutional Fact?’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74.3 (2013): 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Marilyn McCord. ‘The Real Presence’. Religious Studies, 49.1 (2013): 19–33.Google Scholar

Bock, Darrell L. Luke. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1994.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Paul F. and Johnson, Maxwell E.. The Eucharistic Liturgies: Their Evolution and Interpretation. London: SPCK, 2012.Google Scholar

Brooks, Peter Newman. Thomas Cranmer’s Doctrine of the Eucharist: An Essay in Historical Development. New York: Seabury Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Brown, Stephen F. ‘Declarative Theology after Durandus: Its Re-presentation and Defense by Peter Aureoli’. In Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century, edited by Brown, Stephen F., Dewender, Thomas, and Kobusch, Theo, 401–421. Leiden: Brill, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Stephen F. ‘Medieval Theology’. In The Blackwell Companion to Modern Theology, edited by Jones, Gareth, 133–146. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar

Brown, Stephen F. ‘Peter of Candia’s Hundred-Year “History” of the Theologian’s Role’. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1 (1991): 156–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buckareff, Andrei A. and Nagasawa, Yujin, eds. Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bulgakov, Sergei. The Holy Grail and the Eucharist. Hudson, NY: Lindisfarne, 1997.Google Scholar

Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion, translated by Ford Lewis Battles and edited by McNeill, John T., The Library of Christian Classics, vol. 21. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Carson, D. A. The Gospel According to John. Leicester: InterVarsity Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Cassidy, D.C. ‘Is Transubstantiation without Substance?’ Religious Studies 30.2 (1994): 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Andy. ‘Memento’s Revenge: The Extended Mind Extended’. In The Extended Mind, edited by Menary, Richard, 43–66. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Clark, Andy and Chalmers, David J.. ‘The Extended Mind’. Analysis 58 (1998): 7–19.Google Scholar

Clayton, Philip. Panentheism: The Other God of the Philosophers. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006.Google Scholar

Clement of Alexandria, . ‘Stromata’. In The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers down to AD 325, vol. 2: Hermas, Tatian, Athenagoras, Theophilus, Clement of Alexandria. Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 1979, pp. 299–505.Google Scholar

Coakley, Sarah. ‘What Does Chalcedon Solve and What Does It Not? Some Reflections on the Status and Meaning of the Chalcedonian “Definition”’. In The Incarnation: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Incarnation of the Son of God, edited by Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel and O’Collins, Gerald, 143–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Cockayne, Joshua, Efird, David, Haynes, Gordon, et al. ‘Experiencing the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist’. Journal of Analytic Theology 5 (2017): 175–196.Google Scholar

Cranmer, Thomas. The Remains of Thomas Cranmer, Archbishop of Canterbury. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1833.Google Scholar

Cranmer, Thomas. Writings of the Rev. Dr. Thomas Cranmer. London: Religious Tract Society, 1831.Google Scholar

Crisp, Oliver D. ‘Compositional Christology without Nestorianism’. In The Metaphysics of the Incarnation, edited by Marmodoro, Anna and Hill, Jonathan, 45–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisp, Oliver D. Divinity and Humanity: The Incarnation Reconsidered, Current Issues in Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Marilyn McCord. God Incarnate: Explorations in Christology. London: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar

Crisp, Oliver D Revisioning Christology: Theology in the Reformed Tradition. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Adams, Marilyn McCord. The Word Enfleshed: Exploring the Person and Work of Christ. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2016.Google Scholar

Cross, Richard. ‘Catholic, Calvinist, and Lutheran Doctrines of Eucharistic Presence: A Brief Note towards a Rapprochement’. International Journal of Systematic Theology 4.3 (2002): 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cross, Richard. ‘The Incarnation’. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology, edited by Flint, Thomas P. and Rea, Michael C., 452–475. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Cross, Richard. ‘Incarnation, Omnipresence, and Action at a Distance’. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 45.3 (2003): 293–312.Google Scholar

Cross, Richard. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation: Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cross, Richard. ‘Some Varieties of Semantic Externalism in Duns Scotus’s Cognitive Psychology’. Vivarium 46 (2008): 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cross, Richard. ‘Vehicle Externalism and the Metaphysics of the Incarnation: A Medieval Contribution’. In The Metaphysics of the Incarnation, edited by Marmodoro, Anna and Hill, Jonathan, 186–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culpepper, R. Alan. Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Alexandria, Cyril. On the Unity of Christ. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Davis, John Jefferson. ‘How Personal Agents Are Located in Space: Implications for Worship, Eucharist, and Union with Christ’. Philosophia Christi 13 (2011): 437–444.Google Scholar

Stephen T., Davis, Kendall, Daniel, and O’Collins, Gerald, eds. The Incarnation: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Incarnation of the Son of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

De Preester, Helena and Manos, Tsakiris. ‘Body-Extension versus Body-Incorporation: Is There a Need for a Body-Model?’. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (2009): 321–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donnellan, Keith S. ‘Proper Names and Identifying Descriptions’. Synthese 21 (1970): 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dummett, Michael. ‘The Intelligibility of Eucharistic Doctrine’. In The Rationality of Religious Belief: Essays in Honour of Basil Mitchell, edited by Abraham, William and Holtzer, Stephen, 231–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D. The First Epistle to the Corinthians. Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 1987.Google Scholar

Flint, Thomas P. ‘Should Concretists Part with Mereological Models of the Incarnation?’. In The Metaphysics of the Incarnation, edited by Marmodoro, Anna and Hill, Jonathan, 67–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, , Bishop of the Arab Tribes and Moses Bār Kēphā. Two Commentaries on the Jacobite Liturgy, edited and translated by Connolly, R. H. and Codrington, H. W.. London: Williams and Norgate, 1913.Google Scholar

Gerrish, B. A. Grace and Gratitude: The Eucharistic Theology of John Calvin. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Adams, Marilyn McCord. ‘Lord’s Supper in the Reformed Confessions’, Theology Today 23 (1966): 224–243.Google Scholar

Goodman, Lenn E. The God of Abraham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Grumett, David. Material Eucharist. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Hebblethwaite, Brian. ‘The Impossibility of Multiple Incarnations’. Theology 104 (2001): 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Jonathan. ‘Aquinas and the Unity of Christ: A Defence of Compositionalism’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (2012): 117–135.Google Scholar

Hill, Jonathan. Introduction to The Metaphysics of the Incarnation, edited by Marmodoro, Anna and Hill, Jonathan, 1–11. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Hudson, Hud. The Metaphysics of Hyperspace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, Hud. ‘Omnipresence’. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology, edited by Thomas P. Flint and Michael C. Rea, 199–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Hunsinger, George. The Eucharist and Ecumenism: Let Us Keep the Feast. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunsinger, George. ‘Widening the Circle of Acceptable Diversity: A Reply to My Ecumenical Friends’. Pro Ecclesia 19 (2010): 273–284.Google Scholar

Hunsinger, George. ‘A Yawning Chasm Not Easily Closed’. Syndicate (2014), syndicate.network/symposia/theology/saving-karl-barth/Google Scholar

Hurley, Susan L. ‘Varieties of Externalism’. In The Extended Mind, edited by Menary, Richard, 101–153. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Inman, Ross. ‘Omnipresence and the Location of the Immaterial’. In Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, edited by Kvanvig, Jonathan, vol. 8. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Irenaeus, . ‘Adversus haereses’. In The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers Down to AD 325 Vol 1: the Apostolic Fathers – Justin Martyr – Irenaeus, edited by Roberts., Alexander Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 1979.Google Scholar

Martyr., Justin ‘First Apology’. The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers Down to AD 325 Vol 1: the Apostolic Fathers – Justin Martyr – Irenaeus, edited by Roberts, Alexander. Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 1979.Google Scholar

Kittel, Gerhard, Bromiley, Geoffrey William, and Gerhard, Friedrich. Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, vol. 3. Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 1964.Google Scholar

Köstenberger, Andreas. ‘Was the Last Supper a Passover Meal?’. In The Lord’s Supper: Remembering and Proclaiming Christ until He Comes, edited by Schreiner, Thomas R. and Crawford, Matthew R., 6–30. Nashville, TN: B&H Academic, 2010.Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul A. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Le Poidevin, Robin. ‘Multiple Incarnations and Distributed Persons’. In The Metaphysics of the Incarnation, edited by Marmodoro, Anna and Hill, Jonathan, 228–241. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leftow, Brian. ‘The Humanity of God’. In The Metaphysics of the Incarnation, edited by Anna Marmodoro and Jonathan Hill, 20–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Leftow, Brian. ‘A Timeless God Incarnate’. In The Incarnation: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Incarnation of the Son of God, edited by Stephen T. Davis, Daniel Kendall and Gerald O’Collins, 273–299. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 202.Google Scholar

Loux, Michael J. Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction, 2nd edition. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Adams, Marilyn McCord. A Survey of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Luther, Martin. Works. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1955.Google Scholar

Luz, Ulrich. Matthew 21–28: A Commentary. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Lycan, William G. Philosophy of Language: A Contemporary Introduction, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Marmodoro, Anna. ‘The Extended Mind in Ontological Entanglements’. In The Metaphysics of the Incarnation, edited by Marmodoro, Anna and Hill, Jonathan, 205–227. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marmodoro, Anna and Hill, Jonathan. ‘Composition Models of the Incarnation: Unity and Unifying Relations’. Religious Studies 46 (2010): 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marmodoro, Anna and Hill, Jonathan. eds. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marmodoro, Anna and Hill, Jonathan. ‘Modeling the Metaphysics of the Incarnation’. Philosophy and Theology 20 (2008): 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, I. Howard. The Gospel of Luke: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Exeter: Paternoster Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Martin, John Hilary. ‘The Eucharistic Treatise of John Quidort of Paris’. Viator 6 (1975): 195–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Michael. ‘The Incarnation Doctrine Is Incoherent and Unlikely’. In Debating Christian Theism, edited by Moreland, J. P., Meister, Chad, and Sweis, Khaldoun A., 404–413. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Mathison, Keith A. Given for You: Reclaiming Calvin’s Doctrine of the Lord’s Supper. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 2002.Google Scholar

McCue, James F. ‘The Doctrine of Transubstantiation from Berengar through Trent: The Point at Issue’. Harvard Theological Review 61.3 (1968): 385–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGinnis, Andrew M. The Son of God beyond the Flesh: A Historical and Theological Study of the Extra Calvinisticum. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar

Merricks, Trenton. ‘The Word Made Flesh: Dualism, Physicalism, and the Incarnation’. In Persons: Human and Divine, edited by van Inwagen, Peter and Zimmerman, Dean, 281–301. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Moreland, James Porter. Universals. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Moreland, James Porter and William, Lane Craig. Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Morris, Thomas V. The Logic of God Incarnate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Niehaus, Jeffrey. God at Sinai: Covenant and Theophany in the Bible and Ancient Near East. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1995.Google Scholar

Nolland, John. Luke. 18:35–24:53. Dallas, TX: Word Books, 1993.Google Scholar

Norris, Richard. ‘Chalcedon Revisited: A Historical and Theological Reflection’. In New Perspectives on Historical Theology: Essays in Memory of John Meyendorff, edited by Nassif, Bradley, 140–158. Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 1996.Google Scholar

Parsons, Josh. ‘Entension, or How It Could Happen Than an Object Is Wholly Located in Each of Many Places’. St. Andrews: University of St. Andrews, 2003.Google Scholar

Parsons, Josh. ‘Theories of Location’. In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, edited by Zimmerman, Dean, 201–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pawl, Timothy. ‘Brian Hebblethwaite’s Arguments against Multiple Incarnations’. Religious Studies 52.1 (2016): 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pawl, Timothy. In Defense of Conciliar Christology: A Philosophical Essay. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pawl, Timothy. ‘Transubstantiation, Tropes and Truthmakers’. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (2012): 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pickup, Martin. ‘Real Presence in the Eucharist and Time-Travel’. Religious Studies 51.3 (2015): 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. ‘The Boethian Compromise’. In Essays on the Metaphysics of Modality, edited by Davidson, Matthew, 122–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. ‘On Heresy, Mind, and Truth’. Faith and Philosophy 16 (1999): 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Plato, . The Dialogues of Plato, translated by Benjamin Jowett. New York: Random House, 1937.Google Scholar

Pruss, Alexander R. ‘The Eucharist: Real Presence and Real Absence’. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology, edited by Thomas P. Flint and Michael C. Rea, 512–540. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Pruss, Alexander R. ‘Omnipresence, Multilocation, the Real Presence and Time Travel’. In Journal of Analytic Theology 1 (2013): 60–73.Google Scholar

Pusey, E. B. A Letter to the Right Hon. and the Right Rev. the Lord Bishop of London in Explanation of Some Statements Contained in a Letter by the Rev. W. Dodsworth. Oxford: John Henry Parker, 1851.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. Methods of Logic, revised edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc., 1959.Google Scholar

Rea, Michael. ‘Hylomorphism and the Incarnation’. In The Metaphysics of the Incarnation, edited by Marmodoro, Anna and Hill, Jonathan, 134–152, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, Katherin A. ‘An Anselmian Defense of the Incarnation’. In Debating Christian Theism, edited by Moreland, J. P., Meister, Chad, and Sweis, Khaldoun A., 393–403. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Rogers, Katherin A. ‘Incarnation’. In The Cambridge Companion to Christian Philosophical Theology, edited by Taliaferro, Charles and Meister, Chad V., 95–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Rogers, Katherin A. ‘The Incarnation as Action Composite’. Faith and Philosophy 30 (2013): 251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sasse, Hermann. This Is My Body: Luther’s Contention for the Real Presence in the Sacrament of the Altar. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Publishing House, 1959.Google Scholar

Schillebeeckx, Edward. The Eucharist. London: Burns & Oates, 2005.Google Scholar

Schmemann, Alexander. For the Life of the World: Sacraments and Orthodoxy. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Schumm, George F. ‘Singular Term’. In The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, edited by Audi., Robert Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. ‘Austin on Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts’. Philosophical Review 77.4 (1968): 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Senor, Thomas D. ‘The Compositional Account of the Incarnation’. Faith and Philosophy 24 (2007): 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Barry. ‘Towards a History of Speech Act Theory’. In Speech Acts, Meanings, and Intentions: Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle, edited by Burkhardt, Armin, 29–61. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, David. Reformers in the Wings: From Geiler Von Kaysersberg to Theodore Beza, 2nd edition Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Stephens, W. P. The Theology of Huldrych Zwingli. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Stone, Darwell. A History of the Doctrine of the Holy Eucharist, 2 volumes. London: Longmans, Green, 1909.Google Scholar

Stump, Eleonore. ‘Aquinas’ Metaphysics of the Incarnation’. In The Incarnation: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Incarnation of the Son of God, edited by Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, and O’Collins, Gerald, 197–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swinburne, Richard. The Christian God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swinburne, Richard. The Coherence of Theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Taliaferro, Charles. ‘Incorporeality’. In A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, edited by Taliaferro, Charles, Draper, Paul, and Quinn, Philip L., 271–278. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Theophilus, . ‘To Autolycus’. In The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers down to AD 325, vol. 2: Hermas, Tatian, Athenagoras, Theophilus, Clement of Alexandria. Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 1979.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestio disputata de unione Verbi incarnate. Turin: Marietti, 1953, corpusthomisticum.org/qdi.html.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa contra Gentiles, edited by Kenny, Joseph, O.P. New York, NY: Hanover House, 1955–1957, dhspriory.org/thomas/ContraGentiles4.htm.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province, 1920, newadvent.org.Google Scholar

Thompson, Marianne Meye. John: A Commentary. Louisville, KY: Wesminster John Knox Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Van Inwagen, Peter. Metaphysics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Wainwright, William J. ‘God’s Body’. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 42.3 (1974): 470–481.Google Scholar

Wallace, Daniel B. Greek Grammar beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996.Google Scholar

Wright, Elizabeth. ‘My Prosthetic and I: Identity Representation in Bodily Extension’. Forum: University of Edinburgh Journal of Culture and the Arts 8 (2009): 1–14.Google Scholar

Zizioulas, John D. The Eucharistic Communion and the World, edited by Luke Ben, Tallon. London: T&T Clark, 2011.Google Scholar

Zwingli, Ulrich, and Heinrich, Bullinger. Zwingli and Bullinger: Selected Translations with Introductions and Notes. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1953.Google Scholar