Book contents
- Shakespeare in the Marketplace of Words
- Shakespeare in the Marketplace of Words
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Note on the Text
- Chapter 1 Shakespeare’s Writing Practice: Value, Exchange, and the Work of Form
- Chapter 2 The Stylistic Self in Richard II
- Chapter 3 Portia’s Laboratory: The Merchant of Venice and the New Science
- Chapter 4 The Medium and the Message: As You Like It
- Chapter 5 Hamlet’s Parenthesis
- Chapter 6 Shakespeare Rewords Chaucer: Troilus and Cressida
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2017
Book contents
- Shakespeare in the Marketplace of Words
- Shakespeare in the Marketplace of Words
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Note on the Text
- Chapter 1 Shakespeare’s Writing Practice: Value, Exchange, and the Work of Form
- Chapter 2 The Stylistic Self in Richard II
- Chapter 3 Portia’s Laboratory: The Merchant of Venice and the New Science
- Chapter 4 The Medium and the Message: As You Like It
- Chapter 5 Hamlet’s Parenthesis
- Chapter 6 Shakespeare Rewords Chaucer: Troilus and Cressida
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare in the Marketplace of Words , pp. 216 - 238Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Abbott, Edwin. A Shakespearian Grammar. An Attempt to Illustrate Some of the Differences between Elizabethan and Modern English. For the Use of Schools. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1901.Google Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia. “Questions of Identity in Renaissance Drama: New Historicism Meets Old Philology.” Shakespeare Quarterly 61, no. 1 (Spring 2010): 56–77.Google Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia, Hunter, Lynette, Magnusson, Lynne, Thompson, Ann, and Wales, Katie, eds. Reading Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language: A Guide. The Arden Shakespeare. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2001.Google Scholar
Adelman, Janet. Blood Relations: Christian and Jew in The Merchant of Venice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, Theodor. “On Lyric Poetry and Society.” In Notes to Literature, edited by Tiedemann, Rolf, translated by Shierry Weber Nicholsen, vol. 1, 37–54. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Aers, David. “A Whisper in the Ear of Early Modernists; Or, Reflections on Literary Critics Writing the ‘History of the Subject.’” In Culture and History, 1350–1600: Essays on English Communities, Identities, and Writing, 177–202. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. Idea of Prose. Intersections: Philosophy and Critical Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Agnew, Jean-Christophe. Worlds Apart: The Market and the Theater in Anglo-American Thought, 1550–1750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Ajzenstat, Samuel. “Contract in The Merchant of Venice.” Philosophy and Literature 21, no. 2 (October 1997): 262–78.Google Scholar
Alexander, Catherine M. S., ed. Shakespeare and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Andrewes, Lancelot. The Wonderfull Combate (for Gods Glorie and Mans Saluation) Betweene Christ and Satan. London, 1592.Google Scholar
Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Edited by Barnes, Jonathan. Translated by I. Bywater. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Artese, Charlotte. “‘You Shall Not Know’: Portia, Power and the Folktale Sources of The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare 5, no. 4 (2009): 325.Google Scholar
Axton, Marie. The Queen’s Two Bodies: Drama and the Elizabethan Succession. London: Royal Historical Society, 1977.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. Francis Bacon: The Major Works. Edited by Vickers, Brian. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The Letters and the Life of Francis Bacon. Edited by Spedding, James. 7 vols. London: Longman, 1861.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. Of the Proficience and Aduancement of Learning, Diuine and Humane. London, 1605.Google Scholar
Baker, David J. On Demand: Writing for the Market in Early Modern England. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Edited by Holquist, Michael. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. W. William Shakspere’s Small Latine & Lesse Greeke. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Bale, John. The Pageant of Popes Contayninge the Lyues of All the Bishops of Rome. London, 1574.Google Scholar
Barker, Francis. The Tremulous Private Body: Essays on Subjection. London: Methuen, 1984.Google Scholar
Barnaby, Andrew. “The Political Conscious of Shakespeare’s As You Like It.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 36, no. 2 (1996): 373–95.Google Scholar
Barnaby, Andrew, and Schnell, Lisa. Literate Experience: The Work of Knowing in Seventeenth-Century English Writing. New York: Palgrave, 2002.Google Scholar
Barroll, J. Leeds. “A New History for Shakespeare and His Time.” Shakespeare Quarterly 39, no. 4 (Winter 1988): 441–64.Google Scholar
Barroll, J. Leeds. Politics, Plague, and Shakespeare’s Theater: The Stuart Years. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Elements of Semiology. 1st American ed. New York: Hill and Wang, 1968.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. Translated by Annette Lavers. New York: Hill and Wang, 1972.Google Scholar
Barton, Anne. “Shakespeare and the Limits of Language.” Shakespeare Survey 24 (1971): 19–30.Google Scholar
Bednarz, James P. Shakespeare & the Poets’ War. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Belsey, Catherine. The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama. London: Methuen, 1985.Google Scholar
Bennett, H. S. English Books & Readers, 1558–1603: Being a Study in the History of the Book Trade in the Reign of Elizabeth I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Bennett, H. S. English Books & Readers 1603–1640: Being a Study in the History of the Book Trade in the Reigns of James I and Charles I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. Problems in General Linguistics. Miami Linguistics Series, no. 8. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Berger, Harry. Harrying: Skills of Offense in Shakespeare’s Henriad. New York: Fordham University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Berger, Harry. Imaginary Audition: Shakespeare on Stage and Page. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Bergeron, David M. “The Deposition Scene in Richard II.” Renaissance Papers, 1974, 31–37.Google Scholar
Bergeron, David M. Textual Patronage in English Drama, 1570–1640. Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Black, Joseph, ed. The Martin Marprelate Tracts: A Modernized and Annotated Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. A Grammar of Shakespeare’s Language. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave, 2002.Google Scholar
Blake, Ralph M. Theories of Scientific Method: The Renaissance through the Nineteenth Century. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Blank, Paula. Shakespeare and the Mismeasure of Renaissance Man. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Blayney, Peter W. M. “The Alleged Popularity of Playbooks.” Shakespeare Quarterly 56, no. 1 (2005): 33–50.Google Scholar
Bodenham, John, Boecius de Consolacione Philosophie. Westminster: William Caxton, 1478.Google Scholar
Boose, Lynda E. “The 1599 Bishops’ Ban, Elizabethan Pornography, and the Sexualization of the Jacobean Stage.” In Enclosure Acts: Sexuality, Property, and Culture in Early Modern England, edited by Burt, Richard and Archer, John Michael, 185–200. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Booth, Stephen. “On the Value of Hamlet.” In Critical Essays on Shakespeare’s Hamlet, edited by Kastan, David Scott, 19–42. New York: G. K. Hall, 1995.Google Scholar
Booth, Stephen. “Shakespeare’s Language and the Language of Shakespeare’s Time.” In Shakespeare and Language, edited by Alexander, Catherine M. S., 18–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Economics of Linguistic Exchanges.” Social Science Information 16, no. 6 (1977): 645–68.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Translated by Randal Johnson. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bowers, Fredson. Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy, 1587–1642. Gloucester, MA: P. Smith, 1959.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. Tragic Seneca: An Essay in the Theatrical Tradition. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Braden, Gordon. Renaissance Tragedy and the Senecan Tradition: Anger’s Privilege. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Bridges, John. The Supremacie of Christian Princes Ouer All Persons throughout Theor Dominions. London, 1573.Google Scholar
Brooks, Douglas A. From Playhouse to Printing House: Drama and Authorship in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Brownlow, F. W. “Richard II and the Testing of Legitimacy.” In Critical Essays on Shakespeare’s Richard II, edited by Farrell, Kirby, 58–80. Critical Essays on British Literature. New York: G. K. Hall, 1999.Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas. “Christopher Marlowe and the Verse/Prose Bilingual System.” Marlowe Studies, no. 1 (2011): 141–65.Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas. Drama and the Market in the Age of Shakespeare. Cambridge Studies in Renaissance Literature and Culture 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruster, Douglas. “The Politics of Shakespeare’s Prose.” In Rematerializing Shakespeare: Authority and Representation on the Early Modern English Stage, edited by Reynolds, Bryan and West, William N., 95–114. New York: Palgrave, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruster, Douglas. Quoting Shakespeare: Form and Culture in Early Modern Drama. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas. “The Representation Market of Early Modern England.” Renaissance Drama 41, no. 1/2 (2013): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruster, Douglas. Shakespeare and the Question of Culture: Early Modern Literature and the Cultural Turn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas. “Shakespeare the Stationer.” In Shakespeare’s Stationers: Studies in Cultural Bibliography, edited by Straznicky, Marta, 112–31. Material Texts. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas. “The Structural Transformation of Print in Late Elizabethan England.” In Print, Manuscript, and Performance: The Changing Relations of the Media in Early Modern England, 49–89. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas, and Smith, Geneviève. “A New Chronology for Shakespeare’s Plays.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, December 4, 2014.Google Scholar
Bullough, Geoffrey. Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1957.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, Jacob. The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy. Translated by S. G. C. Middlemore. New York: Harper, 1958.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Burrow, Colin. “Shakespeare and Humanistic Culture.” In Shakespeare and the Classics, edited by Martindale, Charles and Taylor, A. B., 9–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Cadman, Daniel. Sovereigns and Subjects in Early Modern Neo-Senecan Drama: Republicanism, Stoicism and Authority. Studies in Performance and Early Modern Drama. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Calvo, Clara. “In Defence of Celia: Discourse Analysis and Women’s Discourse in As You Like It.” Essays and Studies 47 (1994): 91–115.Google Scholar
Cannon, Christopher. The Making of Chaucer’s English: A Study of Words. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Chalk, Darryl. “Contagious Emulation: Antitheatricality and Theatre as Plague in Troilus and Cressida.” In “This Earthly Stage”: World and Stage in Late Medieval and Early Modern England, edited by Hirsch, Brett D. and Wortham, Christopher, 75–101. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 2010.Google Scholar
Charlton, H. B. The Senecan Tradition in Renaissance Tragedy: A Re-issue of an Essay Published in 1921. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1946.Google Scholar
Charnes, Linda. “‘So Unsecret to Ourselves’: Notorious Identity and the Material Subject in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida.” Shakespeare Quarterly 40, no. 4 (1989): 413–40.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. Troilus and Criseyde. Edited by Windeatt, B. A.. London: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Workes of Our Antient and Learned English Poet, Geffrey Chaucer. London, 1598.Google Scholar
Cheney, Patrick. Shakespeare, National Poet-Playwright. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Cheney, Patrick. Shakespeare’s Literary Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Clare, Janet. “Art Made Tongue-Tied by Authority”: Elizabethan and Jacobean Dramatic Censorship. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Clare, Janet. Shakespeare’s Stage Traffic: Imitation, Borrowing and Competition in Renaissance Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Thomas, ed. The Hamlet First Published (Q1, 1603): Origins, Form, Intertextualities. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Clegg, Cyndia Susan. “‘By the Choise and Inuitation of Al the Realme’: Richard II and Elizabethan Press Censorship.” Shakespeare Quarterly 48 (1997): 432–48.Google Scholar
Clegg, Cyndia Susan. Press Censorship in Elizabethan England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Cohen, Stephen, ed. Shakespeare and Historical Formalism. Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Cohen, Walter. “The Merchant of Venice and the Possibilities of Historical Criticism.” ELH 49, no. 4 (Winter 1982): 765–89.Google Scholar
Coldiron, A. E. B. “The Mediated ‘Medieval’ and Shakespeare.” In Medieval Shakespeare: Pasts and Presents, edited by Morse, Ruth, Cooper, Helen, and Holland, Peter, 55–77. Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie Littell. The Resources of Kind: Genre-Theory in the Renaissance. Una’s Lectures 1. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie Littell. Shakespeare’s Living Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Cook, Megan L. “How Francis Thynne Read His Chaucer.” Journal of the Early Book Society for the Study of Manuscripts and Printing History 15 (2012): 215–43.Google Scholar
Cook, Megan L. “Making and Managing the Past: Lexical Commentary in Spenser’s Shepheardes Calender (1579) and Chaucer’s Works (1598/1602).” Spenser Studies: A Renaissance Poetry Annual 26 (2011): 179–222.Google Scholar
Copernicus, Nicolaus. De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium. New York: Johnson Reprint Corp, 1965.Google Scholar
Corbin, Peter, and Sedge, Douglas, eds. Thomas of Woodstock, Or, Richard the Second, Part One. The Revels Plays. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Craig, Hugh. “Shakespeare’s Vocabulary: Myth and Reality.” Shakespeare Quarterly 62, no. 1 (2011): 53–74.Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas. Framing Authority: Sayings, Self, and Society in Sixteenth-Century England. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Crocker, Holly A. “‘As False as Cressid’: Virtue Trouble from Chaucer to Shakespeare.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 43, no. 2 (2013): 303–34.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. Think on My Words: Exploring Shakespeare’s Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, John William. The Influence of Seneca on Elizabethan Tragedy. Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1965.Google Scholar
De Grazia, Margreta. Hamlet Without Hamlet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta. “Shakespeare in Quotation Marks.” In The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Works and the Myth, edited by Marsden, Jean I., 57–71. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991.Google Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta. Shakespeare Verbatim: The Reproduction of Authenticity and the 1790 Apparatus. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta. “Soliloquies and Wages in the Age of Emergent Consciousness.” Textual Practice 9, no. 1 (1995): 67–92.Google Scholar
De Grazia, Margreta, and Stallybrass, Peter. “The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text.” Shakespeare Quarterly 44, no. 3 (1993): 255–83.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Signature Event Context.” In Margins of Philosophy, translated by Alan Bass, 309–30. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Desroches, Dennis. Francis Bacon and the Limits of Scientific Knowledge. London: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar
Deutermann, Allison K., and András, Kiséry, eds. Formal Matters: Reading the Materials of English Renaissance Literature. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Dickson, Vernon Guy. Emulation on the Shakespearean Stage. Studies in Performance and Early Modern Drama. Farnham Surrrey: Ashgate, 2013.Google Scholar
Dollimore, Jonathan. “Subjectivity, Sexuality, and Transgression: The Jacobean Connection.” Renaissance Drama 17 (1986): 53–81.Google Scholar
Donawerth, Jane. Shakespeare and the Sixteenth-Century Study of Language. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Donne, John. John Donne: The Major Works. Edited by Carey, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Doran, Madeleine. Endeavors of Art: A Study of Form in Elizabethan Drama. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Doran, Madeleine. Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Du Bartas, Guillaume. Du Bartas His Deuine Weekes and Workes. Translated by Joshua Sylvester. London, 1611.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Katherine. Shakespeare: Upstart Crow to Sweet Swan, 1592–1623. Arden Shakespeare Library. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2011.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Katherine. Ungentle Shakespeare: Scenes from His Life. London: Arden, 2001.Google Scholar
Dusinberre, Juliet. “Pancakes and a Date for As You Like It.” Shakespeare Quarterly 54, no. 4 (2003): 371–405.Google Scholar
Dusinberre, Juliet. “Rival Poets in the Forest of Arden.” Shakespeare-Jahrbuch 139 (2003): 71–83.Google Scholar
Dusinberre, Juliet. Shakespeare and the Nature of Women. 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Dusinberre, Juliet. “Topical Forest: Kemp and Mar-Text in Arden.” In In Arden: Editing Shakespeare: Essays in Honour of Richard Proudfoot, edited by Thompson, Ann and McMullan, Gordon, 239–51. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2003.Google Scholar
Dusinberre, Juliet. “Touchstone and Kemp in As You Like It.” Shakespeare Newsletter 52, no. 4 (Winter 2002): 93.Google Scholar
Dutton, Richard. Licensing, Censorship, and Authorship in Early Modern England: Buggeswords. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2000.Google Scholar
Dzelzainis, Martin. “Shakespeare and Political Thought.” In A Companion to Shakespeare, edited by Kastan, David Scott, 100–16. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.Google Scholar
Egan, Gabriel. The Struggle for Shakespeare’s Text: Twentieth-Century Editorial Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Ellinghausen, Laurie. “The Individualist Project of John Taylor ‘The Water Poet.’” Ben Jonson Journal 9 (2002): 147–69.Google Scholar
Ellrodt, Robert. Montaigne and Shakespeare: The Emergence of Modern Self-Consciousness. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Elsky, Martin. Authorizing Words: Speech, Writing, and Print in the English Renaissance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Elton, William R. Shakespeare’s “Troilus and Cressida,” and the Inns of Court Revels. Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar
Empson, William. Argufying: Essays on Literature and Culture. London: Chatto & Windus, 1987.Google Scholar
Engle, Lars. Shakespearean Pragmatism: Market of His Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Enterline, Lynn. Shakespeare’s Schoolroom: Rhetoric, Discipline, Emotion. 1st ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Erne, Lukas. Shakespeare and the Book Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Erne, Lukas. Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Farmer, Alan B. “Shakespeare as Leading Playwright in Print, 1598–1608/9.” In Shakespeare and Textual Studies, edited by Kidnie, Margaret Jane and Massai, Sonia, 87–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ferry, Anne. The “Inward” Language: Sonnets of Wyatt, Sidney, Shakespeare, Donne. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Fineman, Joel. Shakespeare’s Perjured Eye: The Invention of Poetic Subjectivity in the Sonnets. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Fischer, Sandra K. Econolingua: A Glossary of Coins and Economic Language in Renaissance Drama. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. Self-Consuming Artifacts: The Experience of Seventeenth-Century Literature. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Fletcher, John, and Shakespeare, William. The Two Noble Kinsmen. Edited by Potter, Lois. Arden Shakespeare. Walton: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1997.Google Scholar
Forker, Charles R. “Unstable Identity in Shakespeare’s Richard II.” Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature 54, no. 1 (Fall 2001): 3–21.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “What Is an Author?” In The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by Rabinow, Paul and Faubion, James D, vol. 2, 205–22. New York: New Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Freund, Elizabeth. “‘Ariachne’s Broken Woof’: The Rhetoric of Citation in Troilus and Cressida.” In Shakespeare and the Question of Theory, edited by Parker, Patricia and Hartman, Geoffrey, 19–36. London: Methuen, 1985.Google Scholar
Frye, Roland. The Renaissance Hamlet: Issues and Responses in 1600. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Fumerton, Patricia. Cultural Aesthetics: Renaissance Literature and the Practice of Social Ornament. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Gadd, Ian. “The Use and Misuse of Early English Books Online.” Literature Compass 6, no. 3 (2009): 680–92.Google Scholar
Gajda, Alexandra. The Earl of Essex and Late Elizabethan Political Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Brian. Shakespeare and Multiplicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Alexandra. “The History of the Book.” New Medieval Literatures 9 (2007): 245–77.Google Scholar
Girard, René. “The Politics of Desire in Troilus and Cressida.” In Shakespeare and the Question of Theory, edited by Parker, Patricia and Hartman, Geoffrey, 188–209. London: Methuen, 1985.Google Scholar
Gold, Matthew K., and Klein, Lauren F., eds. Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1976.Google Scholar
Goux, Jean-Joseph. Symbolic Economies: After Marx and Freud. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Goux, Jean-Joseph. The Coiners of Language. Oklahoma Project for Discourse and Theory 16. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Gower, Barry. Scientific Method: An Historical and Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Grady, Hugh. Shakespeare, Machiavelli, and Montaigne: Power and Subjectivity from Richard II to Hamlet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. Commerce with the Classics: Ancient Books and Renaissance Readers. Jerome Lectures 20. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Gray, Richard T. “Buying into Signs: Money and Semiosis in Eighteenth-Century German Language Theory.” In The New Economic Criticism: Studies at the Intersection of Literature and Economics, edited by Woodmansee, Martha and Osteen, Mark, 95–113. Economics as Social Theory. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Greene, Gayle. “Language and Value in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 21, no. 2 (1981): 271–85.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hallett, Charles A. The Revenger’s Madness: A Study of Revenge Tragedy Motifs. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Halpern, Richard. “The King’s Two Buckets: Kantorowicz, Richard II, and Fiscal Trauerspiel.” Representations 106 (2009): 67–76.Google Scholar
Hammer, Paul E. J. “Shakespeare’s Richard II, the Play of 7 February 1601, and the Essex Rising.” Shakespeare Quarterly 59, no. 1 (Spring 2008): 1–35.Google Scholar
Hanson, Elizabeth. Discovering the Subject in Renaissance England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Harbage, Alfred. Shakespeare and the Rival Traditions. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Harkness, Deborah E. The Jewel House: Elizabethan London and the Scientific Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hart, Alfred. “The Growth of Shakespeare’s Vocabulary.” The Review of English Studies 19, no. 75 (1943): 242–54.Google Scholar
Hart, Alfred. “Vocabularies of Shakespeare’s Plays.” The Review of English Studies 19, no. 74 (1943): 128–40.Google Scholar
Hattaway, Michael. “Dating As You Like It, Epilogues and Prayers, and the Problems of ‘As the Dial Hand Tells O’er.’” Shakespeare Quarterly 60, no. 2 (2009): 154–67.Google Scholar
Haverkamp, Anselm. “Richard II, Bracton, and the End of Political Theology.” Law and Literature 16, no. 3 (Autumn 2004): 313–26.Google Scholar
Hawkes, Terence. Shakespeare’s Talking Animals: Language and Drama in Society. London: Edward Arnold, 1973.Google Scholar
Heinzelman, Kurt. The Economics of the Imagination. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Hillman, David. Shakespeare’s Entrails: Belief, Scepticism and the Interior of the Body. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Hillman, Richard. Self-Speaking in Medieval and Early Modern English Drama: Subjectivity, Discourse, and the Stage. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Heather. “‘We All Expect a Gentle Answer, Jew’: The Merchant of Venice and the Psychotheology of Conversion.” ELH 73, no. 1 (Spring 2006): 61–81.Google Scholar
Hirsh, James E. Shakespeare and the History of Soliloquies. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Homer. Seauen Bookes of the Iliades of Homere, Prince of Poets. Translated by George Chapman. London, 1598.Google Scholar
Hooks, Adam G. Selling Shakespeare: Biography, Bibliography, and the Book Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hope, Jonathan. Shakespeare and Language: Reason, Eloquence and Artifice in the Renaissance. Arden Shakespeare Library. London: Arden, 2010.Google Scholar
Hope, Jonathan, and Witmore, Michael. “‘Après Le Déluge, More Criticism’: Philology, Literary History, and Ancestral Reading in the Coming Posttranscription World.” Renaissance Drama 40, no. 1 (2012): 135–50.Google Scholar
Hope, Jonathan, and Witmore, Michael. “The Hundredth Psalm to the Tune of ‘Green Sleeves’: Digital Approaches to Shakespeare’s Language of Genre.” Shakespeare Quarterly 61, no. 3 (2010): 357–90.Google Scholar
Horace. A Medicinable Morall, That Is, the Two Bookes of Horace His Satyres. Translated by Thomas Drant. London, 1566.Google Scholar
Howard, Jean E. “Crossdressing, the Theatre, and Gender Struggle in Early Modern England.” Shakespeare Quarterly 39, no. 4 (1988): 418–40.Google Scholar
Hozjusz, Stanislaw. The Hatchet of Heresies. Translated by Richard Shacklock. Antwerp, 1565.Google Scholar
Hunt, Maurice A. Shakespeare’s “As You Like It”: Late Elizabethan Culture and Literary Representation. New York: Palgrave, 2008.Google Scholar
Hunt, Maurice A. “Ways of Knowing in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 30, no. 1 (Winter 1979): 89–93.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. K. “The Marking of Sententiae in Elizabethan Printed Plays, Poems, and Romances.” The Library 6 (1951): 171–88.Google Scholar
Hutson, Lorna. “Imagining Justice: Kantorowicz and Shakespeare.” Representations 106 (2009): 118–42.Google Scholar
Hutson, Lorna. The Invention of Suspicion: Law and Mimesis in Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ingram, William. The Business of Playing: The Beginnings of the Adult Professional Theater in Elizabethan London. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. Language in Literature. Translated by Krystyna Pomorska and Stephen Rudy. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa. Francis Bacon: Discovery and the Art of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Johns, Adrian. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Johnson, Barbara. The Critical Difference: Essays in the Contemporary Rhetoric of Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Johnson, Randal. “Introduction.” In The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Johnston, Andrew James, West-Pavlov, Russell, and Kempf, Elisabeth, eds. Love, History and Emotion in Chaucer and Shakespeare: Troilus and Criseyde and Troilus and Cressida. Manchester Medieval Literature and Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kaplan, M. Lindsay. “Jessica’s Mother: Medieval Constructions of Jewish Race and Gender in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 58, no. 1 (Spring 2007): 1–30.Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott. “Proud Majesty Made a Subject: Shakespeare and the Spectacle of Rule.” Shakespeare Quarterly 37, no. 4 (Winter 1986): 459–75.Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott. Shakespeare and the Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kernan, Alvin B. The Cankered Muse: Satire of the English Renaissance. Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1976.Google Scholar
Kerrigan, William. “The Personal Shakespeare: Three Clues.” In Shakespeare’s Personality, edited by Holland, Norman N., Homan, Sidney, and Paris, Bernard J., 175–90. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Kichuk, Diana. “Metamorphosis: Remediation in Early English Books Online (EEBO).” Literary and Linguistic Computing, June 18, 2007.Google Scholar
Kidnie, Margaret Jane, and Massai, Sonia, eds. Shakespeare and Textual Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Kinney, Clare R. “Feigning Female Faining: Spenser, Lodge, Shakespeare, and Rosalind.” Modern Philology 95, no. 3 (February 1998): 291–315.Google Scholar
Kintgen, Eugene R. Reading in Tudor England. Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kitch, Aaron. “Shylock’s Sacred Nation.” Shakespeare Quarterly 59, no. 2 (Summer 2008): 131–55.Google Scholar
Korda, Natasha. “Dame Usury: Gender, Credit, and (Ac)counting in the Sonnets and The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 60, no. 2 (2009): 129–53.Google Scholar
Koritz, Amy, and Koritz, Douglas. “Symbolic Economics: Adventures in the Metaphorical Marketplace.” In The New Economic Criticism: Studies at the Intersection of Literature and Economics, edited by Woodmansee, Martha and Osteen, Mark, 408–19. Economics as Social Theory. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Maura Slattery. “Much Virtue in If.” Shakespeare Quarterly 28, no. 1 (Winter 1977): 40–50.Google Scholar
Kuskin, William. “At Hector’s Tomb: Fifteenth-Century Literary History and Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida.” In Renaissance Retrospections: Tudor Views of the Middle Ages, edited by Kelen, Sarah A., 141–73. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute, Western Michigan University, 2013.Google Scholar
Kuskin, William. “‘The Loadstarre of the English Language’: Spenser’s Shepheardes Calender and the Construction of Modernity.” Textual Cultures: Texts, Contexts, Interpretation 2, no. 2 (2007): 9–33.Google Scholar
Kuskin, William. Recursive Origins: Writing at the Transition to Modernity. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Lamb, Jonathan P. “Parentheses and Privacy in Philip Sidney’s Arcadia.” Studies in Philology 107, no. 3 (2010): 310–35.Google Scholar
Landreth, David. The Face of Mammon: The Matter of Money in English Renaissance Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard A. The Motives of Eloquence: Literary Rhetoric in the Renaissance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry. Science and Hypothesis: Historical Essays on Scientific Methodology. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1981.Google Scholar
Leech, John. Certaine Grammar Questions for the Exercise of Young Schollers in the Learning of the Accidence. London, 1590.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, Raoul. The Auncient Historie, of the Destruction of Troy. Translated by William Caxton. London, 1597.Google Scholar
Leinwand, Theodore B. Theatre, Finance, and Society in Early Modern England. Cambridge Studies in Renaissance Literature and Culture 31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Leishman, J. B., ed. The Three Parnassus Plays (1598–1601). London: Nicholson & Watson, 1949.Google Scholar
Lennard, John. But I Digress: Parentheses in English Printed Verse. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary. Hamlet after Q1: An Uncanny History of the Shakespearean Text. Material Texts. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary. Renaissance Drama and the Politics of Publication: Readings in the English Book Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary, and Farmer, Alan B.. “The Popularity of Playbooks Revisited.” Shakespeare Quarterly 56, no. 1 (2005): 1–32.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary, and Farmer, Alan B.. “Structures of Popularity in the Early Modern Book Trade.” Shakespeare Quarterly 56, no. 2 (2005): 206–13.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary, and Stallybrass, Peter. “The First Literary Hamlet and the Commonplacing of Professional Plays.” Shakespeare Quarterly 59, no. 4 (2008): 371–420.Google Scholar
Lever, Ralph. The Arte of Reason, Rightly Termed, Witcraft Teaching a Perfect Way to Argue and Dispute. London, 1573.Google Scholar
Levin, Richard. “Hamlet’s Dramatic Soliloquies.” In Style: Essays on Renaissance and Restoration Literature and Culture in Memory of Harriett Hawkins, edited by Michie, Allen and Buckley, Eric, 113–34. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. “Strategic Formalism: Toward a New Method in Cultural Studies.” Victorian Studies 48, no. 4 (July 1, 2006): 625–57.Google Scholar
Lipking, Lawrence. What Galileo Saw: Imagining the Scientific Revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus. Sixe Bookes of Politickes or Ciuil Doctrine. Translated by Jones, William. London, 1594.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus. Two Bookes of Constancie. Translated by John Stradling. London, 1594.Google Scholar
Liu, Alan. “The Power of Formalism: The New Historicism.” ELH 56, no. 4 (December 1, 1989): 721–71.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, Joseph. The Author’s Due: Printing and the Prehistory of Copyright. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, Joseph. Ben Jonson and Possessive Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Lopez, Jeremy. “Introduction.” In Richard II: New Critical Essays. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Lupton, Julia Reinhard. Citizen-Saints: Shakespeare and Political Theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Machan, Tim William. “Speght’s ‘Works’ and the Invention of Chaucer.” Text 8 (1995): 145–70.Google Scholar
Mack, Peter. Elizabethan Rhetoric: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Lynne. Shakespeare and Social Dialogue: Dramatic Language and Elizabethan Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Michel. “Bacon’s Method of Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Bacon, edited by Peltonen, Markku, 75–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Mallin, Eric S. “Emulous Factions and the Collapse of Chivalry: Troilus and Cressida.” Representations, no. 29 (January 1, 1990): 145–79.Google Scholar
Mallin, Eric S. “‘You Kilt My Foddah’; or Arnold, Prince of Denmark.” Shakespeare Quarterly 50, no. 2 (1999): 127–51.Google Scholar
Mann, Jenny C. Outlaw Rhetoric: Figuring Vernacular Eloquence in Shakespeare’s England. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah. “Anti-Conquest and As You Like It.” Shakespeare Studies 42 (2014): 170–95.Google Scholar
Marino, James J. Owning William Shakespeare: The King’s Men and Their Intellectual Property. Material Texts. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Marlowe, Christopher. The Troublesome Raigne and Lamentable Death of Edward the Second. London, 1594.Google Scholar
Massai, Sonia. Shakespeare and the Rise of the Editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Matthews, David. “Public Ambition, Private Desire and the Last Tudor Chaucer.” In Reading the Medieval in Early Modern England, edited by McMullan, Gordon and Matthews, David, 74–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Maus, Katharine Eisaman. Inwardness and Theater in the English Renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
McCabe, Richard A. “Elizabethan Satire and the Bishops’ Ban of 1599.” Yearbook of English Studies 11 (1981): 188–93.Google Scholar
McCombie, Frank. “Medium and Message in As You Like It and King Lear.” Shakespeare Survey 33 (1981): 67–80.Google Scholar
McCrea, Adriana Alice Norma. Constant Minds: Political Virtue and the Lipsian Paradigm in England, 1584–1650. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997.Google Scholar
McDonald, Russ. Shakespeare and the Arts of Language. Oxford Shakespeare Topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome J. Radiant Textuality: Literature after the World Wide Web. New York: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar
Bergeron, David M. ed. Textual Criticism and Literary Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan. “Conceptions of Science in the Scientific Revolution.” In Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, edited by Lindberg, David C. and Westman, Robert S., 27–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Mead, Stephen X. “‘Thou Art Chang’d’: Public Value and Personal Identity in Troilus and Cressida.” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 22, no. 2 (1992): 237–59.Google Scholar
Mentz, Steve. Romance for Sale in Early Modern England: The Rise of Prose Fiction. Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Menzer, Paul. The Hamlets: Cues, Qs, and Remembered Texts. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. “Ariachne’s Broken Woof.” The Georgia Review 31, no. 1 (1977): 44–60.Google Scholar
Miola, Robert. Shakespeare and Classical Tragedy: The Influence of Seneca. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T. “The Commitment to Form; Or, Still Crazy after All These Years.” PMLA 118, no. 2 (March 1, 2003): 321–25.Google Scholar
Monsarrat, Gilles D. Light from the Porch: Stoicism and English Renaissance Literature. 86. Paris: Didier-Erudition, 1984.Google Scholar
Mowat, Barbara A. “The Theater and Literary Culture.” In A New History of Early English Drama, edited by Cox, John D. and Kastan, David Scott, 213–30. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Munro, Lucy. Archaic Style in English Literature, 1590–1674. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Murphy, James Jerome, ed. Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Navitsky, Joseph. “Scurrilous Jests and Retaliatory Abuse in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida.” English Literary Renaissance 42, no. 1 (2012): 3–31.Google Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander. “Writer, Text, Work, Author.” In Literature and the Question of Philosophy, edited by Cascardi, Anthony J., 265–91. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Newcomb, Lori Humphrey. Reading Popular Romance in Early Modern England. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Newell, Alex. The Soliloquies in Hamlet: The Structural Design. Rutherford, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Newman, Karen. “Portia’s Ring: Unruly Women and Structures of Exchange in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 38, no. 1 (1987): 19–33.Google Scholar
Norbrook, David. “The Emperor’s New Body? Richard II, Ernst Kantorowicz, and the Politics of Shakespeare Criticism.” Textual Practice 10, no. 2 (Summer 1996): 329–57.Google Scholar
Oestreich, Gerhard. Neostoicism and the Early Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Oz, Avraham. “Sadness and Knowledge: The Exposition of The Merchant of Venice.” Assaph: Studies in the Theatre 2 (1985): 56–72.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Simon. Late Shakespeare: A New World of Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia. “Othello and Hamlet: Dilation, Spying, and the ‘Secret Place’ of Woman.” Representations 44 (1993): 60–95.Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia. Shakespeare from the Margins: Language, Culture, Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Pearsall, Derek. “Thomas Speght.” In Editing Chaucer: The Great Tradition, edited by Ruggiers, Paul G.. Norman, OK: Pilgrim Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Penuel, Suzanne. “Castrating the Creditor in The Merchant of Venice.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 44, no. 2 (Spring 2004): 255–75.Google Scholar
Pérez-Ramos, Antonio. “Bacon’s Legacy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Bacon, edited by Peltonen, Markku, 311–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Pérez-Ramos, Antonio. Francis Bacon’s Idea of Science and the Maker’s Knowledge Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Picciotto, Joanna. Labors of Innocence in Early Modern England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Pincombe, Michael. Elizabethan Humanism: Literature and Learning in the Later Sixteenth Century. Harlow, England: Longman, 2001.Google Scholar
Pitcher, John. “Daniel, Samuel (1562/3–1619).” Edited by Matthew, H. C. G. and Harrison, Brian. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/7120.Google Scholar
Porter, Joseph Ashby. The Drama of Speech Acts: Shakespeare’s Lancastrian Tetralogy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Puttenham, George. The Art of English Poesy. Edited by Whigham, Frank and Rebhorn, Wayne A.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Pye, Christopher. “The Betrayal of the Gaze: Theatricality and Power in Shakespeare’s Richard II.” ELH 55, no. 3 (Fall 1988): 575–98.Google Scholar
Pye, Christopher. The Vanishing: Shakespeare, the Subject, and Early Modern Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Ranald, Margaret Loftus. “The Degradation of Richard II: An Inquiry into the Ritual Backgrounds.” English Literary Renaissance 7 (1977): 170–96.Google Scholar
Rastell, John. A Treatise Intitled, Beware of M. Iewel. By Iohn Rastel Master of Arte and Student of Diuinitie. Antwerp, 1566.Google Scholar
Ravassat, Mireille, and Culpeper, Jonathan, eds. Stylistics and Shakespeare’s Language: Transdisciplinary Approaches. Advances in Stylistics. London: Continuum, 2011.Google Scholar
Rebhorn, Wayne A. The Emperor of Men’s Minds: Literature and the Renaissance Discourse of Rhetoric. Rhetoric & Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Rebhorn, Wayne A. Renaissance Debates on Rhetoric. Edited by Rebhorn, Wayne A.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Neil. “Hamlet and Humanism.” In Early Modern English Drama: A Critical Companion, edited by Sullivan, Garrett A., Cheney, Patrick, and Hadfield, Andrew, 120–29. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Neil. The Power of Eloquence and English Renaissance Literature. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Robinson, John. A Defence of the Doctrine Propounded by the Synode at Dort against Iohn Murton and His Associates. Amsterdam, 1624.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, Thomas G. Senecan Drama and Stoic Cosmology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Rossi, Paolo. “Bacon’s Idea of Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Bacon, edited by Peltonen, Markku, 25–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rossi, Paolo. Francis Bacon: From Magic to Science. Translated by Rabinovitch, Sacha. London: Routledge, 1968.Google Scholar
Rossi, Paolo. Philosophy, Technology, and the Arts in the Early Modern Era. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.Google Scholar
Ryner, Bradley D. Performing Economic Thought: English Drama and Mercantile Writing, 1600–1642. Edinburgh Critical Studies in Renaissance Culture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Salmon, J. H. M. “Seneca and Tacitus in Jacobean England.” In The Mental World of the Jacobean Court, edited by Peck, Linda Levy, 169–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Saunders, Jason Lewis. Justus Lipsius: The Philosophy of Renaissance Stoicism. New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Sawday, Jonathan. The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Schoenbaum, S. William Shakespeare: A Documentary Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Scott, William O. “Conditional Bonds, Forfeitures, and Vows in The Merchant of Venice.” English Literary Renaissance 34, no. 3 (November 2004): 286–305.Google Scholar
Scott, William O. “Risk, Distrust, and Ingratitude in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida.” SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900 52, no. 2 (2012): 345–62.Google Scholar
Scott-Baumann, Elizabeth, and Ben, Burton, eds. The Work of Form: Poetics and Materiality in Early Modern Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Seigel, Jerrold. The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. Epistles. Translated by Richard M. Gummere. Vol. 4. Loeb Classical Library 75. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1917.Google Scholar
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. Moral Essays, with an English Translation. Translated by John W. Basore. 3 vols. Loeb Classical Library. London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1928.Google Scholar
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. The Workes of Lucius Annaeus Seneca. Translated by Thomas Lodge. London, 1614.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. As You Like It. Edited by Brissenden, Alan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. As You Like It. Edited by Dusinberre, Juliet. 3rd ed. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2006.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. As You Like It. Edited by Hattaway, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. As You Like It. Edited by Knowles, Richard. New York: MLA, 1977.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. As You Like It. Edited by Quiller-Couch, Arthur Thomas and Wilson, John Dover. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Complete Sonnets and Poems. The Oxford Shakespeare. Edited by Burrow, Colin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The First Folio of Shakespeare: A Transcript of Contemporary Marginalia in a Copy of the Kodama Memorial Library of Meisei University. Edited by Yamada, Akihiro. Tokyo: Yushodo Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Edited by Thompson, Ann and Taylor, Neil. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2006.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet: The Texts of 1603 and 1623. Edited by Thompson, Ann and Taylor, Neil. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2006.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. King Richard II. Edited by Forker, Charles R.. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2002.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Merchant of Venice. Edited by Mahood, M. M.. Updated edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Mr. William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies. London, 1623.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Richard II. Edited by Werstine, Paul and Mowat, Barbara. Washington DC: Washington Square Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Riverside Shakespeare. Edited by Evans, G. Blakemore. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1974.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Sonnets. Edited by Evans, G. Blakemore. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Troilus and Cressida. Edited by Bevington, David M.. London: Arden Shakespeare, 1998.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Troilus and Cressida. Edited by Dawson, Anthony B.. New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Troilus and Cressida. Edited by Hillebrand, Harold Newcomb. New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare, vol. 26. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1953.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. William Shakespeare: Complete Works. Edited by Bate, Jonathan and Rasmussen, Eric. New York: Modern Library, 2007.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life: Including a Translation of Thomas Hobbes, Dialogus Physicus de Natura Aeris by Simon Schaffer. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara J. A Culture of Fact: England, 1550–1720. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara J. Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England: A Study of the Relationships Between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Shapiro, James. 1599: A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare. New York: HarperCollins, 2005.Google Scholar
Shell, Marc. The Economy of Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Shell, Marc. Money, Language, and Thought: Literary and Philosophical Economies from the Medieval to the Modern Era. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Shell, Marc. “The Wether and the Ewe: Verbal Usury in The Merchant of Venice.” The Kenyon Review, New Series, 1, no. 4 (October 1, 1979): 65–92.Google Scholar
Sherman, Anita Gilman. “Disowning Knowledge of Jessica, or Shylock’s Skepticism.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 44, no. 2 (Spring 2004): 277–95.Google Scholar
Sherman, William H. Used Books: Marking Readers in Renaissance England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Sherry, Richard. A Treatise of Schemes and Tropes (1550): And His Translation of The Education of Children by Desiderius Erasmus. Gainesville, FL: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints, 1961.Google Scholar
Shore, Daniel. “Shakespeare’s Constructicon.” Shakespeare Quarterly 66, no. 2 (2015): 113–36.Google Scholar
Shore, Daniel. “WWJD? The Genealogy of a Syntactic Form.” Critical Inquiry 37, no. 1 (September 1, 2010): 1–25.Google Scholar
Siemon, James. “Dead Men Talking: Elegiac Utterance, Monarchical Republicanism and Richard II.” In Richard II: New Critical Essays, edited by Lopez, Jeremy, 51–73. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Siemon, James. Word Against Word: Shakespearean Utterance. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Vol. 2. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Small, Roscoe Addison. The Stage-Quarrel between Ben Jonson and the So-Called Poetasters. Edited by Kittredge, George Lyman. Forschungen Zur Englischen Sprache Und Litteratur. Breslau: M. and H. Marcus, 1899.Google Scholar
Some, Robert. A Godly Treatise Containing and Deciding Certaine Questions. London, 1588.Google Scholar
Spiller, Elizabeth. Science, Reading, and Renaissance Literature: The Art of Making Knowledge, 1580–1670. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Spiller, Elizabeth. “Shakespeare and the Making of Early Modern Science: Resituating Prospero’s Art.” South Central Review 26, no. 1 (2009): 24–41.Google Scholar
Stein, Elizabeth. “Caxton’s Recuyell and Shakespeare’s Troilus.” Modern Language Notes 45, no. 3 (March 1, 1930): 144–46.Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany. Documents of Performance in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany. “Sermons, Plays, and Note-Takers: Hamlet Q1 as a ‘Noted’ Text.” Shakespeare Survey 66 (2013): 1–23.Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany. “Was Totus Mundus Agit Histrionem Ever the Motto of the Globe Theatre.” Theatre Notebook 51, no. 3 (1997): 122–27.Google Scholar
Stirm, Jan. “‘For Solace a Twinne-Like Sister’: Teaching Themes of Sisterhood in As You Like It and Beyond.” Shakespeare Quarterly 47, no. 4 (1996): 374–86.Google Scholar
Straznicky, Marta, ed. The Book of the Play: Playwrights, Stationers, and Readers in Early Modern England. Massachusetts Studies in Early Modern Culture. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Straznicky, Marta, ed. Shakespeare’s Stationers: Studies in Cultural Bibliography. Material Texts. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Strier, Richard. “How Formalism Became a Dirty Word, and Why We Can’t Do Without It.” In Renaissance Literature and Its Formal Engagements, edited by Rasmussen, Mark David, 207–15. New York: Palgrave, 2002.Google Scholar
Syme, Holger Schott. “‘But, What Euer You Do, Buy’: Richard II as Popular Commodity.” In Richard II: New Critical Essays, edited by Lopez, Jeremy, 223–44. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Tarlinskaja, Marina. Shakespeare and the Versification of English Drama, 1561–1642. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Taylor, John. The Life and Death of the Most Blessed among Women, the Virgin Mary. London, 1620.Google Scholar
Teramura, Misha. “The Anxiety of Auctoritas: Chaucer and The Two Noble Kinsmen.” Shakespeare Quarterly 63, no. 4 (2012): 544–76.Google Scholar
Thompson, Ann. Shakespeare’s Chaucer: A Study in Literary Origins. Liverpool English Texts and Studies. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Tiffany, Grace. “Law and Self-Interest in The Merchant of Venice.” Papers on Language and Literature: A Journal for Scholars and Critics of Language and Literature 42, no. 4 (Fall 2006): 384–400.Google Scholar
Tiffany, Grace. “‘That Reason Wonder May Diminish’: As You Like It, Androgyny, and the Theater Wars.” Huntington Library Quarterly 57, no. 3 (1994): 213–39.Google Scholar
Traversi, Derek. Shakespeare, from Richard II to Henry V. London: Hollis & Carter, 1958.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Tucker, Herbert F. “Tactical Formalism: A Response to Caroline Levine.” Victorian Studies 49, no. 1 (October 1, 2006): 85–93.Google Scholar
Turner, Henry S. “Lessons from Literature for the Historian of Science (and Vice Versa): Reflections on ‘Form.’” Isis 101, no. 3 (September 1, 2010): 578–89.Google Scholar
Turner, Henry S. The English Renaissance Stage: Geometry, Poetics, and the Practical Spatial Arts 1580–1630. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Turnovsky, Geoffrey. The Literary Market: Authorship and Modernity in the Old Regime. Material Texts. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Urbach, Peter. “Francis Bacon as a Precursor to Popper.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33, no. 2 (June 1982): 113–32.Google Scholar
Urbach, Peter. Francis Bacon’s Philosophy of Science: An Account and a Reappraisal. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1987.Google Scholar
Van Gelderen, Elly. A History of English Reflexive Pronouns: Person, Self, and Interpretability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2000.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. “Bacon and Rhetoric.” In The Cambridge Companion to Bacon, edited by Peltonen, Markku, 200–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. Francis Bacon and Renaissance Prose. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Watson, Robert N. “Coining Words on the Elizabethan and Jacobean Stage.” Philological Quarterly 88 (Spring 2009): 49–75.Google Scholar
Weimann, Robert, and Bruster, Douglas. Shakespeare and the Power of Performance: Stage and Page in the Elizabethan Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Wells, Stanley, and Taylor, Gary. William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
West, William N. Theatres and Encyclopedias in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Whigham, Frank. Ambition and Privilege: The Social Tropes of Elizabethan Courtesy Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Wiggins, Martin, and Richardson, Catherine. British Drama, 1533–1642: A Catalogue. 6 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers, 1973–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard. “‘Like the Old Robin Hood’: As You Like It and the Enclosure Riots.” Shakespeare Quarterly 43, no. 1 (1992): 1–19.Google Scholar
Wilson-Lee, Edward. “Shakespeare by Numbers: Mathematical Crisis in Troilus and Cressida.” Shakespeare Quarterly 64, no. 4 (2013): 449–72.Google Scholar
Winston, Jessica. “Seneca in Early Elizabethan England.” Renaissance Quarterly 59, no. 1 (March 1, 2006): 29–58.Google Scholar
Wojciehowski, Hannah Chapelle. Group Identity in the Renaissance World. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J. Formal Charges: The Shaping of Poetry in British Romanticism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J., and Brown, Marshall, eds. Reading for Form. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Woodbridge, Linda, ed. Money and the Age of Shakespeare Essays in New Economic Criticism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar
Bergeron, David M. “Resistance Theory Meets Drama: Tudor Seneca.” Renaissance Drama 38, no. 1 (2010): 115–39.Google Scholar
Woodmansee, Martha, and Mark, Osteen, eds. The New Economic Criticism: Studies at the Intersection of Literature and Economics. Economics as Social Theory. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Wright, George T. Shakespeare’s Metrical Art. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Yachnin, Paul Edward, ed. Shakespeare’s World of Words. Arden Shakespeare Library. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2015.Google Scholar
Bergeron, David M. Stage-Wrights: Shakespeare, Jonson, Middleton, and the Making of Theatrical Value. New Cultural Studies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Yachnin, Paul Edward. “‘The Perfection of Ten’: Populuxe Art and Artisanal Value in Troilus and Cressida.” Shakespeare Quarterly 56, no. 3 (2005): 306–27.Google Scholar
Zitner, Sheldon P. “Aumerle’s Conspiracy.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 14, no. 2 (Spring 1974): 239–57.Google Scholar