Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T02:12:53.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Statistics for Poisson Models of Overlapping Spheres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2016

Daniel Hug*
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Günter Last*
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Zbyněk Pawlas*
Affiliation:
Charles University in Prague
Wolfgang Weil*
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
*
Postal address: Department of Mathematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Postal address: Department of Mathematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany.
∗∗∗∗ Postal address: Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Sokolovská 83, 18675 Praha 8, Czech Republic. Email address: zbynek.pawlas@mff.cuni.cz
Postal address: Department of Mathematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we consider the stationary Poisson Boolean model with spherical grains and propose a family of nonparametric estimators for the radius distribution. These estimators are based on observed distances and radii, weighted in an appropriate way. They are ratio unbiased and asymptotically consistent for a growing observation window. We show that the asymptotic variance exists and is given by a fairly explicit integral expression. Asymptotic normality is established under a suitable integrability assumption on the weight function. We also provide a short discussion of related estimators as well as a simulation study.

Type
Stochastic Geometry and Statistical Applications
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Ballani, F. (2006). On second-order characteristics of germ-grain models with convex grains. Mathematika 53, 255285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billingsley, P. (1999). Convergence of Probability Measures, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, S. N., Stoyan, D., Kendall, W. S. and Mecke, J. (2013). Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications, 3rd edn. John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Emery, X., Kracht, W., Egaña, Á. and Garrido, F. (2012). Using two-point set statistics to estimate the diameter distribution in Boolean models with circular grains. Math. Geosci. 44, 805822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gille, W. (1995). Diameter distribution of spherical primary grains in the Boolean model from small-angle scattering. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 12, 123131.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (1988). Introduction to the Theory of Coverage Processes. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Hanisch, K.-H. (1984). Some remarks on estimators of the distribution function of nearest neighbour distance in stationary spatial point processes. Math. Operationsforsch. Statist. Ser. Statist. 15, 409412.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. B., Baddeley, A. J. and Gill, R. D. (1999). First contact distributions for spatial patterns: regularity and estimation. Adv. Appl. Prob. 31, 1533.Google Scholar
Heinrich, L. (1993). Asymptotic properties of minimum contrast estimators for parameters of Boolean models. Metrika 40, 6794.Google Scholar
Heinrich, L. (2013). Asymptotic methods in statistics of random point processes. In Stochastic Geometry, Spatial Statistics and Random Fields (Lecture Notes Math. 2068), Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 115150.Google Scholar
Heinrich, L. and Molchanov, I. S. (1999). Central limit theorem for a class of random measures associated with germ-grain models. Adv. Appl. Prob. 31, 283314.Google Scholar
Heinrich, L. and Werner, M. (2000). Kernel estimation of the diameter distribution in Boolean models with spherical grains. J. Nonparametr. Statist. 12, 147176.Google Scholar
Hug, D. and Last, G. (2000). On support measures in Minkowski spaces and contact distributions in stochastic geometry. Ann. Prob. 28, 796850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, D., Last, G. and Weil, W. (2002). Generalized contact distributions of inhomogeneous Boolean models. Adv. Appl. Prob. 34, 2147.Google Scholar
Hug, D., Last, G., Pawlas, Z. and Weil, W. (2013). Statistics for Poisson models of overlapping spheres. Preprint. Available at http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/1301.1499v1.Google Scholar
Kallenberg, O. (2002). Foundations of Modern Probability, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Kiderlen, M. and Weil, W. (1999). Measure-valued valuations and mixed curvature measures of convex bodies. Geom. Dedicata 76, 291329.Google Scholar
Last, G. and Penrose, M. D. (2011). Poisson process Fock space representation, chaos expansion and covariance inequalities. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 150, 663690.Google Scholar
Molchanov, I. S. (1990). Estimation of the size distribution of spherical grains in the Boolean model. Biometrical J.. 32, 877886.Google Scholar
Molchanov, I. S. (1997). Statistics of the Boolean Model for Practitioners and Mathematicians. John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Molchanov, I. and Stoyan, D. (1994). Asymptotic properties of estimators for parameters of the Boolean model. Adv. Appl. Prob. 26, 301323.Google Scholar
Rosén, B. (1969). A note on asymptotic normality of sums of higher-dimensionally indexed random variables. Ark. Mat. 8, 3343.Google Scholar
Schneider, R. (2013). Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, R. and Weil, W. (2008). Stochastic and Integral Geometry. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Thovert, J.-F. and Adler, P. M. (2011). Grain reconstruction of porous media: application to a Bentheim sandstone. Phys. Rev. E 83, 056116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thovert, J.-F. et al. (2001). Grain reconstruction of porous media: application to a low-porosity Fontainebleau sandstone. Phys. Rev. E 63, 061307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed