Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T07:14:48.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strong reciprocity and accountability: behavioural analysis of patients’ legal responses to medical injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2007

Edward A. Dauer
Edward A. Dauer*
Affiliation:
Dean Emeritus and Professor of Law, University of Denver and Visiting Professor of Law, California Western School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is a remarkable resonance between recent findings about medical malpractice litigation and theories about the evolution of co-operation and reciprocity among humans. This should not be altogether surprising: theories of reciprocity seek to explain the behaviours we exhibit when we interact to punish or confer benefits on each other; while civil liability litigation may be just one of modern society’s ways of compelling otherwise unrequited reciprocity. The link between the two fields of study is worth exploring nonetheless. Just as behavioural economics and evolutionary theory offer useful insights for those of us who study legal phenomena, data about the behaviour of people accessing legal institutions may be useful to those who build behavioral theories. This essay is therefore, in a way, a lawyer’s effort to return the favour.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 257 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton, Robert and Dunbar, Robin (1997) ‘Evolution of the Social Brain’ in Whiten, Andrew and Byrne, Richard (eds.) Machiavellian Intelligence II: Extensions and Evaluations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 240.Google Scholar
Beckham, J. Daniel (1997) ‘The Accountability Crisis in Healthcare’, Healthcare Forum Journal 40: 34–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Bell, Graham (1996) Selection: The Mechanism of Evolution. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Bismark, Marie and Dauer, Edward A. (2006) ‘Motivations for Medico-legal Action: Lessons from New Zealand’, Journal of Legal Medicine 27(1) 55–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bismark, Marie et al. (2006) ‘Accountability Sought by Patients Following Adverse Events from Medical Care: The New Zealand Experience’, Canadian Medical Association Journal 175: 889–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohrer, Robert A. (2006) Personal correspondence.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel et al. (2003) ‘The Cultural and Genetic Evolution of Human Cooperation’ in Hammerstein, Peter (ed.) The Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 445.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel and Gintis, Herbert (2000) The Evolution of Reciprocal Preferences. Santa Fe, New Mexico: Santa Fe Institute.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel et al. (2003) ‘Strong Reciprocity and the Conditions for the Evolution of Altruism’ [Internet paper].Google Scholar
Charles, Sarah (1984) ‘Physicians’ Self-Reports of Reactions to Malpractice Litigation’, American Journal of Psychiatry 141: 563-5.Google ScholarPubMed
Charles, Sarah (1985) ‘Sued and Nonsued Physicians’ Self-Reported Reactions to Malpractice Litigation’, American Journal of Psychiatry 142: 437–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Charles, Sarah (1988) ‘Physicians on Trial – Self-Reported Reactions to Malpractice Trials’, Western Journal of Medicine 148: 358–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Conrad, Douglas et al. (1998) ‘The Incentive Effects of Malpractice Liability Rules on Practitioner Behavior’, Medical Care 36: 706–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, Lera (1989) ‘The Logic of Social Exchange: Has Natural Selection Shaped How Humans Reason? Studies With the Wason Selection Task’, Cognition 31: 187–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dauer, Edward A. and Marcus, Leonard J. (1997) ‘Adapting Mediation to Link Resolution of Medical Malpractice Disputes With Health Care Quality Improvement’, Law and Contemporary Problems 60: 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauer, Edward A. (2004) ‘Ethical Misfits: Mediation and Medical Malpractice Litigation’ in Sharpe, Virginia A. (ed.) Accountability: Patient Safety and Policy Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, p. 185.Google Scholar
Dauer, Edward A., Marcus, Leonard J. and Payne, Susan (2000) ‘Prometheus and the Litigators: A Mediation Odyssey’, Journal of Legal Medicine 21: 159–86.Google ScholarPubMed
De Waal, Frans (2005) ‘How Animals do Business’, Scientific American 292: 73–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durham, William (1974) ‘Resource Competition and Human Aggression, Part I: A Review of Primitive War’, Quarterly Review of Biology 51: 385–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, Ernst et al. (2002) ‘Strong Reciprocity, Human Cooperation and the Enforcement of Social Norms’, Human Nature 13: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, Ernst and Henrich, Joseph (2003) ‘Is Strong Reciprocity a Maladaptation? On the Evolutionary Foundations of Human Altruism’ in Hammerstein, Peter (ed.) The Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 55.Google Scholar
Fessler, Daniel and Haley, Kevin (2003) ‘The Strategy of Affect: Emotions in Human Cooperation’ in Hammerstein, Peter (ed.) The Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 9 and 21–2.Google Scholar
Gelfand, Michael and Realo, Anu (1999) ‘Individualism – Collectivism and Accountability in Intergroup Negotiations’, Journal of Applied Psychology 84: 721–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, Herbert (2006) ‘Behavioral Ethics Meets Natural Justice’, Politics Philosophy Economics 5: 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, Herbert (1998) Cultural Darwinism. Boston Review [Internet], Feb/Mar. Available at: http://www.bostonreview.net/br23.1/gintis.html.Google Scholar
Hagen, Edward and Hammerstein, Peter (2006) ‘Game Theory and Human Evolution: A Critique of Some Recent Interpretations of Experimental Games’, Theoretical Population Biology (article in press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haines, Nicholas (1955) ‘Responsibility and Accountability’, Philosophy 30: 141–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickson, Gerald et al. (1992) ‘Factors That Prompted Families to File Medical Malpractice Claims Following Perinatal Injuries’, Journal of the American Medical Association 267: 1359–63: http://www.csindy.com/csindy/2003-12-18/news2.html (last accessed 4 May 2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, Owen (2001) ‘Time-Shifted Rationality and the Law of Law’s Leverage: Behavioral Economics Meets Behavioral Biology’, Northwestern University Law Review 95: 1141–205.Google Scholar
Jones, Owen and Goldsmith, Timothy (2005) ‘Law and Behavioral Biology’, Columbia Law Review 105: 405–502.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Hillard and Gurven, Michael (2001) ‘The Natural History of Human Food Sharing and Cooperation: A Review and a New Multi-Individual Approach to the Negotiation of Norms’ in The Conference on the Structure and Evolution of Strong Reciprocity, March 2001, Santa Fe USA. Santa Fe Institute.Google Scholar
Kraman, Steve and Hamm, Ginny (1999) ‘Risk management: Extreme Honesty May be the Best Policy’, Annals of Internal Medicine 131: 963–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruk, Menno (2004) ‘Fast Positive Feedback Between the Adrenocortical Stress Response and a Brain Mechanism Involved in Aggressive Behavior’, Behavioral Neuroscience 118: 1062–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loyd-Bostock, Sally (1991) ‘Propensity to Sue in England and the United States of America: the Role of the Attribution Process’, Journal of Law and Society 18: 428–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, John (1978) ‘The Evolution of Behavior’, Scientific American 239: 176–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazor, Kathleen et al. (2004) ‘Health plan Members’ Views About Disclosure of Medical Errors’, Annals of Internal Medicine 140: 409–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCord, R. S. et al. (2002) ‘Responding Effectively to Patient Anger Directed at the Physician’, Family Medicine 34: 331–6.Google ScholarPubMed
McElreath, Richard et al. (2003) ‘The Role of Cognition and Emotion in Cooperation’ in Hammerstein, Peter (ed.) The Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 125.Google Scholar
Mello, Michelle and Brennan, Troyen (2002) ‘Deterrence of Medical Errors: Theory and Evidence for Malpractice Reform’, Texas Law Review 80: 1595–637.Google Scholar
Nelson, Phillip and Greene, Kenneth (2003) Signaling Goodness: Social Rules and Public Choice. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’hara, Erin and Yarn, Douglas (2002) ‘Apology and Consilience’, Washington Law Review 77: 1121–119 and 1136.Google Scholar
Paterson, Ron (2002) ‘The Patients’ Complaints System in New Zealand’, Health Affairs 21: 70–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, Peter (2003) ‘Cultural Evolution of Human Cooperation’ in Hammerstein, Peter (ed.) Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 357.Google Scholar
Ridley, Matthew (1997) The Origins of Virtue. London: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, Jennifer (2003) ‘Apologies and Legal Settlement: An Empirical Examination’, Michigan Law Review 102: 460–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Karen and Travathan, Wenda (2001) ‘The Evolution of Human Birth’, Scentific American 285: 72–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, Colin (2000) ‘Accountability in the Regulatory State’, Journal of Law and Society 27: 38–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethi, Rajiv and Somanthan, E. (2003) ‘Norm Compliance and Strong Reciprocity’ in Gintis, Herbert et al. (eds.) Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: On the Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 229.Google Scholar
Shane, Peter (1995) ‘Political Accountability in a System of Checks and Balances: The Case of Presidential Review of Rulemaking’, Arkansas Law Review 48: 161–214.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Robyn S. (1989) ‘A Survey of Sued and Nonsued Physicians and Suing Patients’, Archives of Internal Medicine 149: 2190–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skyrms, Brian (2004) The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Eric (2003) ‘Human Cooperation: Perspectives From Behavioral Ecology’ in Hammerstein, Peter (ed.) The Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 401.Google Scholar
Studdert, David et al. (2000) ‘Beyond Dead Reckoning: Measures of Medical Injury Burden, Malpractice Litigation, and Alternative Compensation Models From Utah and Colorado’, Industrial Law Review 33: 1643–86.Google Scholar
Trivers, Robert (1985) Social Evolution. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Vincent, Charles et al. (1994) ‘Why do People Sue Doctors? A Study of Patients and Relatives Taking Legal Action’, Lancet 343: 1609–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, Peter (2002) ‘Understanding Accountability: Theoretical Models and Their Implications for Social Services Organizations’, Social Policy and Administration 36: 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. (1975) Sociobiology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Witman, A. B., et al. (1996) ‘How do Patients Want Physicians to Handle Mistakes?’, Archives of Internal Medicine 156: 2565–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed