Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:50:36.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Substantive Representation of Women and PR: Some Reflections on the Role of Surrogate Representation and Critical Mass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2006

Manon Tremblay
Manon Tremblay
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Yesterday's suffragists and today's female activists who call for more women to be elected to parliament share some ideological grounds: They believe that women exercising the rights of citizenship, whether by voting or by being elected to office, can make a difference in politics. This reasoning was fed by the notion of critical mass, introduced in the political debates in 1988 by Drude Dahlerup. Elevated to lawlike status (or should I say dogma?), the concept of critical mass was quickly made the object of abusive interpretations, becoming synonymous with a relationship of cause and effect between presence and ideas (or between representation and responsiveness), and thus leading one to believe in the existence of a sisterhood among political women and a dialogue on their representational activities. Taking a leaf from the politicians' book, political scientists lost all prudence, abandoning themselves to blind generalizations with the powers that frame female politicians' words and acts. One of these forces is the electoral system. Although it plays a very important role in women's access to parliament, it was completely ignored by those who believe that in greater number, women will change politics.

Type
CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON GENDER AND POLITICS
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 502 - 511
Copyright
© 2006 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowler, Shaun, and David Farrell. 1993. “Legislator Shirking and Voter Monitoring: Impacts of European Parliament Electoral Systems upon Legislator-Voter Relationships.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (1): 45–69.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 2002. “Representing Women: Congresswomen's Perceptions of Their Representational Role.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Cindy Simon Rosenthal. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 50–68.
Chaney, Paul. 2006. “Women and Constitutional Reform: Gender Parity in the National Assembly for Wales.” In Representing Women in Parliament, ed. Marian Sawer, Manon Tremblay, and Linda Trimble. London: Routledge, 188–203.
Childs, Sarah. 2002. “Hitting the Target: Are Labour Women MPs ‘Acting for’ Women?” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 143–53.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Julie Withey. 2006. “The Substantive Representation of Women: The Case of the Reduction of VAT on Sanitary Products.” Parliamentary Affairs 59 (1): 10–23.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–99.Google Scholar
Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?” American Political Science Review 96 (4): 729–43.Google Scholar
Golan, Galia, and Tamar Hermann. 2005. “Une alliance des groupes des femmes et des femmes élues à la Knesset.” In Femmes et parlements: un regard international, ed. Manon Tremblay. Montreal: Remue-ménage, 251–74.
Grey, Sandra. 2002. “Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand's Women MPs.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 19–29.Google Scholar
IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 2000. Politics: Women's Insight. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2001. “The Descriptive Political Representation of Gender: An Anti-Essentialist Argument.” In Has Liberalism Failed Women? ed. Jytte Klausen and Charles S. Maier. New York: Palgrave, 19–38.
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E. 1998. “Enhancing Women's Political Participation: Legislative Recruitment and Electoral Systems.” In Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, ed. Azza Karam et al. Stockholm: International IDEA, 65–88.
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rule, Wilma. 1987. “Electoral Systems, Contextual Factors and Women's Opportunity for Election to Parliament in Twenty-Three Democracies.” Western Political Quarterly 40 (3): 477–98.Google Scholar
Rule, Wilma. 1994. “Parliaments of, by, and for the People: Except for Women?” In Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities, ed. Wilma Rule and Joseph F. Zimmerman. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press: 15–30.
Sawer, Marian. 1998. “Loading the Dice: The Impact of Electoral Systems on Women.” In Here We Come, Ready or Not! ed. Women Into Politics. North Sydney: Women Into Politics, 46–53.
Schreiber, Ronnee. 2002. “Injecting a Woman's Voice: Conservative Women's Organizations, Gender Consciousness, and the Expression of Women's Policy Preferences.” Sex Roles 47 (7/8): 331–42.Google Scholar
Sineau, Mariette. 2001. Profession: femme politique. Sexe et pouvoir sous la Cinquième République. Paris: Presses de sciences po.
Skjeie, Hege. 1991. “The Rhetoric of Difference: On Women's Inclusion into Political Elites.” Politics & Society 19 (2): 233–63.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Manon. 2003. “Women's Representational Role in Australia and Canada: The Impact of Political Context.” Australian Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 215–38.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Manon, and Réjean Pelletier. 2003. “Feminist Women in Canadian Politics: A Group Ideologically Divided?” Atlantis: A Women's Studies Journal 28 (1): 80–90.Google Scholar
Wängnerud, Lena. 2000. “Testing the Politics of Presence: Women's Representation in the Swedish Riksdag.” Scandinavian Political Studies 23 (1): 67–91.Google Scholar
Williams, Melissa S. 1998. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Young, Iris M. 1989. “Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship.” Ethics 99 (2): 250–74.Google Scholar