Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:21:29.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrating principal component score strategy with power core method for development of core collection in Indian soybean germplasm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2015

C. Gireesh*
Affiliation:
ICAR-Directorate of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
S. M. Husain
Affiliation:
ICAR-Directorate of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
M. Shivakumar
Affiliation:
ICAR-Directorate of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
G. K. Satpute
Affiliation:
ICAR-Directorate of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
Giriraj Kumawat
Affiliation:
ICAR-Directorate of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
Mamta Arya
Affiliation:
ICAR-Directorate of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
D. K. Agarwal
Affiliation:
ICAR-Directorate of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
V. S. Bhatia
Affiliation:
ICAR-Directorate of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: giri09@gmail.com

Abstract

Soybean is a leading oilseed crop in India, which contains about 40% of protein and 20% of oil. Core collection will accelerate the management and utilization of soybean genetic resources in breeding programmes. In the present study, eight agromorphological traits of 3443 soybean germplasm were analysed for the development of core collection using the principal component score (PCS) strategy and the power core method. The PCS strategy yielded core collection (CC1) of 576 accessions, which accounted for 16.72% of the entire collection (EC). The analysis based on the power core programme resulted in CC2 of 402 accessions, which accounted for 11.67% of the EC. Statistical analysis showed similar trends for the mean and range estimated in both core collections and EC. In addition, the variance, standard deviation and coefficient of variance were in general higher in core collections than in the EC. The correlations observed in the EC in general were preserved in core collections. A total of 311 and 137 unique accessions were found in CC1 and CC2 in addition to 265 accessions that were found to be common in both core collections. These 265 common accessions were the most diverse core sets, which accounted for 7.64% of the EC. We proposed to constitute an integrated core collection (ICC) by integrating both common and unique accessions. The ICC comprised 713 accessions, which accounted for about 20.62% of the EC. Statistical analysis indicated that the ICC captured maximum variation than CC1 and CC2. Therefore, the ICC can be extensively evaluated for a large number of economically important traits for the identification of desirable genotypes and for the development of mini core collection in soybean.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Present address: ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad, India.

References

Bisht, IS, Mahajan, RK and Patel, DP (1998) The use of characterisation data to establish the Indian mungbean core collection and assessment of genetic diversity. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 45: 127133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, AHD (1989a) Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31: 818824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, AHD (1989b) The case for core collections. In: Brown, AHD, Frankel, OH, Marshall, DR and Williams, JT (eds) The Use of Plant Genetic Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 136155.Google Scholar
Chandrashekhar, H, Gowda, J and Ugalat, J (2012) Formation of core set in Indian and African finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn] germplasm accessions. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 72: 358363.Google Scholar
Cho, GT, Yoon, M-S, Lee, J, Baek, H-J, Kang, J-H, Kim, T-S and Paek, N-C (2008) Development of a core set of Korean soybean landraces [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Journal of Crop Science Biotechnology 11: 157162.Google Scholar
Frankel, OH (1984) Genetic perspectives of germplasm conservation. In: Arber, WK, Llimensee, K, Peacock, WJ and Starlinger, P (eds) Genetic Manipulation: Impact on Man and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 161170.Google Scholar
Guo, Y, Li, Y, Hong, H and Qiu, L-J (2014) Establishment of the integrated applied core collection and its comparison with mini core collection in soybean (Glycine max). The Crop Journal 2: 3845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamon, S, Noirot, D and Anthony, F (1995) Developing a coffee core collection using the principal components score strategy with quantitative data. In: Hodgkin, T, Brown, AHD, van Hintum, TJL and Morales, EAV (eds) Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources. Chichester, UK: IPGRI-Wiley & Sons, pp. 117126.Google Scholar
Jayarame Gowda, , Bharathi, S, Somu, G, Krishnappa, M and Rekha, D (2009) Formation of core set in barnyard millet [Echinochloa frumentacea (Roxb.) Link] germplasm using data on twenty four morpho-agronomic traits. International Journal of Plant Sciences 4: 15.Google Scholar
Kim, KW, Chung, HK, Cho, GT, Ma, KH, Chandrabalan, D, Gwag, JG, Kim, TS, Cho, EG and Park, YJ (2007) PowerCore: a program applying the advanced M strategy with a heuristic search for establishing core sets. Bioinformatics 23: 21552162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebart, L, Morineau, A and Tabart, N (1977) Techniques de la Description Statistique: Méthodes et Logiciels pour l'Analyse des Grands Tableaux. Paris, France: Dunod.Google Scholar
Mahajan, RK, Bisht, IS and Dhillon, BS (2007) Establishment of a core collection of world sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) germplasm accessions. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics 39: 5364.Google Scholar
Noirot, M, Hamon, S and Anthony, F (1996) The principal component scoring: a new method of constituting a core collection using quantitative data. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43: 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odong, TL, Jansen, J, van Eeuwijk, FA and van Hintum, TJL (2013) Quality of core collections for effective utilisation of genetic resources review, discussion and interpretation. Theory and Applied Genetics 126: 289305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, MF, Nelson, RL, Geraldi, IO, Cruz, CD and de Toledo, JFF (2010) Establishing a soybean germplasm core collection. Field Crops Research 119: 277289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, R, Ruiz-Tapia, EN and Mujica-Sanchez, A (1998) Sampling strategy for a core collection of Peruvian quinoa germplasm. Theory and Applied Genetics 96: 475483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qiu, L-J, Xing, L-L, Guo, Y, Wang, J, Jackson, SA and Chang, RZ (2013) A platform for soybean molecular breeding: the utilization of core collections for food security. Plant Molecular Biology 83: 4150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, DZ, Bauchan, GR, Auricht, G and Hughes, S (1999) A method for the efficient management and utilization of large germplasm collections. Crop Science 39: 12371242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Gowda, CLL, Pundir, RPS, Gopal Reddy, V and Singh, S (2006) Development of core subset of finger millet germplasm using geographical origin and data on 14 quantitative traits. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53: 679685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Ortiz, R, Bramel, PJ and Singh, S (2003) Development of a groundnut core collection using taxonomical, geographical and morphological descriptors. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50: 139148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hintum, TJL, Brown, AHD, Spillane, C and Hodgkin, T (2000) Core collections of plant genetic resources . IPGRI Technical Bulletin No. 3 . Rome, Italy: International Plant genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Zhang, B, Qiu, L and Chang, R (2003) Advance on genetic diversity and core collection establishment for soybean. Crop Journal 3: 4648.Google Scholar