Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:18:34.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing language dominance in Mandarin–English bilinguals: Convergence and divergence between subjective and objective measures*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2013

LI SHENG ,
YING LU  and
TAMAR H. GOLLAN
LI SHENG*
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin
YING LU
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin
TAMAR H. GOLLAN
Affiliation:
University of California San Diego
*
Address for correspondence: Li Sheng, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin, 2504-A Whitis Ave., Austin, TX 78705, USAli.sheng@utexas.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the convergence and divergence between subjective and objective measures of language proficiency for assessing language dominance in Mandarin–English bilinguals. Sixty-two young adults (Experiment 1) and 27 children (Experiment 2) provided self-ratings of proficiency level (or were rated by their parents), were interviewed for spoken proficiency, and named pictures in the Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) and (in Experiment 1 only) the Boston Naming Test. In Experiment 1, the four measures converged in the number of people classified into different dominance groups but both naming tests indicated greater English dominance than self-report and interview measures. In Experiment 2, parent report and interview measures converged in dominance classifications but the MINT indicated higher degrees of English dominance. To a large extent bilinguals were able to classify themselves (or their children) into dominance groups but some mismatches between measures in dominance classification were observed for all age and dominance groups. These results, together with previous findings with Spanish–English bilingual adults (Gollan et al., 2012), suggest that bilinguals may shift to English dominance in confrontation naming before they do so in conversational fluency, and that dominance shifts persist throughout the lifespan but may be relatively more pronounced in children. These findings caution against the use of self-reports as the sole means of classifying bilinguals into dominance groups and support a multi-measure approach including direct assessment of the relevant linguistic domain.

Keywords

language dominanceproficiencyMandarinEnglishpicture naming
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 364 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors thank Brooke Lauper for assistance with data collection and Arthur Samuel and Angel Chan for comments on an earlier draft. This research was supported by R01 grants (NIDCD 011492, NICHD 050287 and NICHD 051030).

References

Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Summers, C. L., Boerger, K., Resendiz, M. D., Greene, K., Bohman, T., & Gillam, R. B. (2012). The measure matters: Language dominance profiles across measures in Spanish–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 616–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 290–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Luk, G., Peets, K. F., & Yang, S. (2010). Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 525–531.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2006). Age and second language acquisition. Language Learning, 56 (Supplement 1), 9–49.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphical system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavioral Research Methods, Instrumentation and Computation, 25, 257–271.Google Scholar
Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modern-day “wild child”. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Daller, M. H., Yıldız, C., de Jong, N. H., Kan, S., & Başbaĝi, R. (2011). Language dominance in Turkish–German bilinguals: Methodological aspects of measurements in structurally different languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 215–236.Google Scholar
Dunn, A., & Fox Tree, J. (2009). A quick and gradient Bilingual Dominance Scale. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., McKay, I. R. A., & Piske, T. (2002). Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 567–598.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., & Thomas, E. M. (2009). Bilingual first-language development: Dominant language takeover, threatened minority language take-up. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F., Paradis, J., & Crago, M. B. (2004). Dual language development and disorders. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Golberg, H., Paradis, J., & Crago, M. B. (2008). Lexical acquisition over time in minority first language children learning English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 41–65.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Salmon, D. P., Montoya, R. I., & Galasko, D. R. (2011). Degree of bilingualism predicts age of diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in low-education but not in highly educated Hispanics. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3826–3830.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Weissberger, G. H., Runnqvist, E., Montoya, R. I., & Cera, C. M. (2012). Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: A Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 594–615.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131–149.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., & Kreiter, J. (2003). Understanding child bilingual acquisition usingparent and teacher reports. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 267–288.Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998). The relation of birth order and socioeconomic status to children's language experience and language development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 603–629.Google Scholar
Jackson-Maldonado, D., Thal, D. J., Marchman, V., Newton, T., Fenson, L., & Conboy, B. (2003). El Inventario del Desarrollo de Habilidades Comunicativas: User's guide and technical manual (MacArthur Foundation: Communicative Development Inventory). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test – Second Edition. Circle Pine, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Kohnert, K. (2008). Language disorders in bilingual children and adults. San Diego, CA: Plural.Google Scholar
Kohnert, K. (2010). Bilingual children with primary language impairment: Issues, evidence and implications for clinical actions. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 456–473.Google Scholar
Kohnert, K., Kan, P. F., & Conboy, B. (2010). Links between words and grammar in sequential bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 684–698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, P., Sepanski, S., & Zhao, X. (2006). Language history questionnaire: A Web-based interfacefor bilingual research. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 202–210.Google Scholar
Lim, V., Rickard Liow, S., Lincoln, M., Chan, Y. H., & Onslow, M. (2008). Determining languagedominance in English–Mandarin bilinguals: Development of a self-report classification tool for clinical use. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 389–412.Google Scholar
MacSwan, J., & Rolstad, K. (2006). How language proficiency tests mislead us about ability: Implications for English language learner placement in special education. Teachers College Record, 108, 2304–2328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 940–967.Google Scholar
Marinova-Todd, S. H., & Uchikoshi, Y. (2011). The role of first language in oral language development in English: The case of both alphabetic and nonalphabetic languages. In Durgunoğlu, A. Y. & Goldenberg, C. (eds.), Language and literacy development in bilingual settings, pp. 29–60. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 703–704.Google Scholar
Neville, H. J., Mills, D. L., & Lawson, D. S. (1992). Fractionating language: Different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 244–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 232–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pray, L. (2005). How well do commonly used language instruments measure English oral language proficiency? Bilingual Research Journal, 29, 387–409.Google Scholar
Restrepo, M. A. (1998). Identifiers of predominantly Spanish-speaking children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1398–1411.Google Scholar
Sheng, L., Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., & Fiestas, C. E. (2013). Semantic development in Spanish–English bilingual children: Effects of age and language experience. Child Development, 84, 1034–1045.Google Scholar
Sheng, L., Lu, Y., & Kan, P. (2011). Lexical development in Mandarin–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 579–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, W. C. (1946). Institute of Living Scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Thal, D. J., Jackson-Maldonado, D., & Acosta, D. (2000). Validity of a parent-report measure of vocabulary and grammar for Spanish-speaking toddlers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1087–1100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
To, C. K.-S., Stokes, S. F., Cheung, H.-T., & T'sou, B. (2010). Narrative assessment for Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 648–669.Google Scholar
Treffers-Daller, J. (2011). Operationalizing and measuring language dominance. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 147–163.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Learning and Cognition, 4, 105–122.Google Scholar
Windsor, J., Kohnert, K., Lobitz, K., & Pham, G. (2010). Cross-language nonword repetition by bilingual and monolingual children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 298–310.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Jin, X., Shen, X., Zhang, J., & Hoff, E. (2008). Correlates of early language development in Chinese children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 145–151.Google Scholar
Zied, K. M., Phillipe, A., Karine, P., Valerie, H.-T., Ghislaine, A., Arnaud, R., & Didier, L. G. (2004). Bilingualism and adult differences in inhibitory mechanisms: Evidence from a bilingual Stroop task. Brain and Cognition, 54, 254–256.Google Scholar