Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:41:18.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Designing In-Class Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Elizabeth T. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Mark A. Boyer
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1996

Footnotes

1.

Boyer would like to thank Jonathan Wilkenfeld, director of Project ICONS at the University of Maryland and his Pew Fellowship colleagues for their help in clarifying many of the ideas contained in this article. Sheilah Mann and two anonymous reviewers also provided very helpful and instructive comments on an earlier draft.

References

Boehrer, John and Linsky, Martin. 1990. “Teaching with Cases: Learning to Question.” In The Changing Face of College Teaching, ed. Svinicki, M.. New Direction for Teaching and Learning 42 (Summer). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cantor, Nathaniel. 1953. The Teaching-Learning Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Crookall, David and Wilkenfeld, Jonathan. 1985. “ICONS: Communications Technologies and International Relations.” System 13(3):253258.Google Scholar
Fratantuono, Michael J. 1994. “Evaluating the Case Method.” International Studies Notes 19(2):3444.Google Scholar
Raiffa, Howard. 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stice, James E. 1987. “Using Kolb's Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning.” Engineering Education 77(5):291296.Google Scholar
Woodworth, James R. and Gump, W. Robert. 1994. Camelot: A Role Playing Simulation for Political Decision Making, 3rd ed. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar