Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T18:59:48.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The cellular basis for suppressive rod–cone interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Thomas E. Frumkes  and
Thor Eysteinsson
Thomas E. Frumkes
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Queens College of CUNY, Flushing
Thor Eysteinsson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Queens College of CUNY, Flushing
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The response to spatially focal flicker is enhanced by dim, spatially diffuse, rod-stimulating backgrounds. This effect is called suppressive rod-cone interaction (SRCI) as it reflects a tonic, suppressive influence of dark-adapted rods upon cone pathways which is removed by selective rod-light adaptation. SRCI is observed in amphibian retina with intracellular recordings from most cone-driven cells including the cones themselves, and is most obvious using stimuli flickering at frequencies too rapid for rods to follow. SRCI is blocked by glutamate analogs which selectively block the photic response of horizontal cells (HCs). In the presence of these agents, flicker responses from bipolar cells and cones are enhanced to levels normally seen only with selective rod-light adaptation. In the HCs themselves, SRCI is similarly blocked by lead chloride which blocks rod-, but not cone-related activity.

In amphibian and cat HCs and in human observers, SRCI is limited by a space constant of very similar value (between 100 and 150 μm). We suggest that SRCI in all three species is mediated by HCs: in amphibians, SRCI must at least partially reflect rod-modulation of HC feedback onto cones.

Keywords

ConesRodsBipolar cellsHorizontal cellsFlicker responses
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , May 1988 , pp. 263 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, K.R. & Fishman, G.A. (1984). Rod-cone interaction in flicker perimetry. British Journal of Ophthalmology 68, 303–309.Google Scholar
Arden, G.B. & Frumkes, T.E. (1986). Stimulation of rods can increase cone flicker ERGs in man. Vision Research 26, 711–721.Google Scholar
Arden, G.B. & Hogg, C.R. (1985). Rod-cone interactions and analysis of retinal disease. British Journal of Ophthalmology 69, 405–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Attwell, D. (1986). Ion channels and signal processing in the outer retina. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 71, 497–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauer, G.M., Frumkes, T.E. & Nygaard, R.W. (1983). The signal-to-noise characteristics of rod-cone interaction. Journal of Physiology 337, 101–119.Google Scholar
Boynton, R.M. (1966). Vision. In ed. Sidowski, J.B., Experimental Methods and Instrumentation in Psychology, pp. 273–330. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, D.A. (1974). Sensitization and center-surround antagonism in Necturus retina. Journal of Physiology 236, 593–610.Google Scholar
Chappell, R.L., Naka, K.-I., Ripps, H., Sakuranaga, M. (1986). Dynamic properties of horizontal cells in an all-rod retina. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 27, 284.Google Scholar
Chappell, R.L., Naka, K.-I. & Sakuranaga, M. (1985). Dynamics of turtle horizontal cell responses. Journal of General Physiology 86, 423–453.Google Scholar
Coletta, N.J. & Adams, A.J. (1984). Rod-cone interaction in flicker detection. Vision Research 24, 1330–1340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dacheux, R. & Raviola, E. (1982). Horizontal cells in the retina of the rabbit. Journal of Neuroscience 2, 1486–1493.Google Scholar
Eysteinsson, T. (1988). The synaptic basis for rod-cone interaction. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation from the City University of New York.Google Scholar
Eysteinsson, T. & Frumkes, T.E. (1986). Neuropharmacological analysis of rod suppression of cone pathways in distal amphibian retina. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 12, 402.Google Scholar
Eysteinsson, T., Frumkes, T.E. & Denny, N. (1987). The importance of horizontal cell coupling for rod-cone interaction. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 21, 403.Google Scholar
Fox, D.A. & Sillman, A.J. (1979). Heavy metals affect rod, but not cone photoreceptors. Science 206, 78–80.Google Scholar
Frumkes, T.E., Denny, N., Sliwinski, M., Eysteinsson, T. (1987). The role of horizontal cell coupling for suppressive rod-cone interaction. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 13, 26.Google Scholar
Frumkes, T.E. & Eysteinsson, T. (1987). Suppressive rod-cone interaction in distal vertebrate retina: intracellular records from Xenopus and Necturus. Journal of Neurophysiology 57, 1361–1383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frumkes, T.E., Naarendorp, F. & Goldberg, S.H. (1986). The influence of cone stimulation upon flicker sensitivity mediated by adjacent rods. Vision Research 26, 1167–1176.Google Scholar
Frumkes, T.E., Sekuler, M.D., Barris, M.C., Reiss, E.H. & Chalupa, L.M. (1973). Rod-cone interaction in human scotopic vision, I: Temporal analysis. Vision Research 13, 1269–1282.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S.H., Frumkes, T.E. & Nygaard, R.W. (1983). Inhibitory influence of unstimulated rods in the human retina: evidence provided by examining cone flicker. Science 221, 180–182.Google Scholar
Green, D.G. & Siegel, I.M. (1975). Double-branched flicker fusion curves from the all-rod skate retina. Science 188, 1120–1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itzhaki, A. & Perlman, I. (1987). Light adaptation of red cones and L1-horizontal cells in the turtle retina: effect of the background spatial pattern. Vision Research 27, 685–696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, D.H. (1972). Flicker. In Handbook of Sensory Physiology, VII/4, pp. 273–302. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Lamb, T. (1976). Spatial properties of horizontal cell responses in turtle retina. Journal of Physiology 263, 239–255.Google Scholar
Lukasiewicz, P.D. & McReynolds, J.S. (1985). Synaptic transmission at N-Methyl-d-Aspartate receptors in the proximal retina of the mudpuppy. Journal of Physiology 367, 99–115.Google Scholar
MacLeod, D.I.A. (1972). Rods cancel cones in flicker. Nature 235, 173–174.Google Scholar
Mangel, S.C. & Dowling, J.E. (1987). The interplexiform-horizontal cell system of the fish retina: effects of dopamine, light stimulation, and time in the dark. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B231, 91–121.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, R.F. & Coleman, P.A. (1987). Kainate receptors are the primary mediators of excitatory synaptic transmission among third-order neurons in the amphibian retina. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 28, 239.Google Scholar
Miller, R.F., Frumkes, T.E., Slaughter, M.M. & Dacheux, R.F. (1981). Physiological and pharmacological basis of Gaba and glycine action on neurons of mudpuppy retina. I. Receptors, horizontal cells, bipolars, and G-cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 45, 743–783.Google Scholar
Miller, R.F., Slaughter, M.M., Coleman, P.A. & Massey, S. (1986). Amino-acid receptors in the vertebrate retina. In Retinal Signal Systems, Degenerations, and Transplants, ed. Agardh, E. & Ehinger, B., pp. 3–20. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Naarendorp, F., Denny, N. & Frumkes, T.E. (1988). Rod light and dark adaptation influence cone-mediated spatial acuity. Vision Research 28, 67–74.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. (1977). Cat cones have rod input: a comparison of the response properties of cones and horizontal cell bodies in the retina of the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 172, 109–135.Google Scholar
Nygaard, R.W. & Frumkes, T.E. (1985). Frequency dependence in scotopic flicker sensitivity. Vision Research 25, 115–127.Google Scholar
Pflug, R. & Nelson, R. (1986). Enhancement of red cone flicker by rod selective backgrounds in cat horizontal cells. Neuroscience Abstracts 16, 402.Google Scholar
Rodieck, R.W. & Rushton, W.A.H. (1976). Cancellation of rod signals by cones, and cone signals by rods in the cat retina. Journal of Physiology 254, 775–785.Google Scholar
Slaughter, M.M. & Miller, R.F. (1981). 2-Amino-4-phosphono-butyric acid: a new pharmacological tool for retina research. Science 211, 182–185.Google Scholar
Slaughter, M.M. & Miller, R.F. (1983 a). An excitatory amino-acid antagonist blocks cone input to sign-conserving second-order retinal neurons. Science 219, 1230–1232.Google Scholar
Slaughter, M.M. & Miller, R.F. (1983 b). The role of excitatory amino-acid transmitters in the mudpuppy retina: an analysis with kainic acid and N-methyl aspartate. Journal of Neuroscience 3, 1701–1711.Google Scholar
Slaughter, M.M. & Miller, R.F. (1985). Identification of a distinct synaptic glutamate receptor on horizontal cells in mudpuppy retina. Nature 314, 96–97.Google Scholar
Stone, S. & Witkovsky, P. (1987). Center-surround organization of Xenopus horizontal cells and its modification by Gamma-aminobutyric acid and strontium.Google Scholar
Tessier-Lavigne, M., Mobbs, P. & Attwell, D. (1985). Lead and mercury toxicity and the rod light response. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 26, 1117–1123.Google Scholar
van den Berg, T.J.T.P. & Spekreuse, H. (1977). Interaction between rod and cone signals studied with temporal sine wave stimulation. Journal of the Optical Society America 67, 1210–1217.Google Scholar
Witkovsky, P. & Stone, S. (1983). Rod and cone inputs to bipolar and horizontal cells of the Xenopus retina. Vision Research 23, 1251–1258.Google Scholar
Witkovsky, P. & Stone, S. (1987). Gaba and glycine modify the balance of rod and cone inputs to horizontal cells in the Xenopus retina. Experimental Biology (in press).Google Scholar
Wysecki, G. & Stiles, W.S. (1967). Color Science. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar