No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Ahmad Bey's 1846 Istiftāʾ: Its Dual Legislative Framework and Religio-Political Context
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 November 2023
Abstract
On April 26, 1846, Ahmad Bey signed a historic emancipation decree making the Regency of Tunis the first in the modern Islamic world to formally abolish the longstanding institution of slavery. While the decree marked the first of such unprecedented measures, attracting a barrage of compliments from anti-slavery societies around the globe, it conflicted with the local notions of enslaving practices and thus prompted an earnest process of legitimation for the formal abolition of slavery before the Majlis al Shari (Sharia Council for Judicial Ordinance), without which abolition would have remained culturally and politically contentious. The paper will assess the socio-cultural context and the plural Islamic legal framework that informed both Ahmad Bey's argument favoring abolition and the divergent responses and attitudes of the religious establishment toward the abolition decree.
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Law and History Review , Volume 42 , Special Issue 1: African Legal Abolitions , February 2024 , pp. 31 - 48
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Society for Legal History
References
1 On slavery in North Africa see, Wright, John, The Trans-Saharan Slave Trade (London and New York: Routledge, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ennaji, Mohammed, Serving the Master: Slavery and Society in Nineteenth-Century Morocco (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Austen, Ralph A., “The Mediterranean Islamic Slave Trade out of Africa: A Tentative census,” in The Human Commodity. Perspectives on the Trans-Saharan Slave Trade, ed. Savage, Elizabeth (London: Frank Cass, 1992)Google Scholar; and Gall, Michel Le, “The End of the Trans-Saharan Slave Trade to Tripoli: A Reassessment,” Princeton Papers in Near Eastern Studies 2, no. 2 (1993): 25–56Google Scholar.
2 See Benedetta Rossi, “Global Abolitionist Movements,” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History. Published July 19, 2023, retrieved October 5, 2023, from https://oxfordre.com/africanhistory/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277734-e-945.
3 Exmouth to Earl of Bathurst, April 20 and May 5, 1816, Henry Bathurst Papers, NRA 20925, Manuscript Collections, British Library. See also, Ismael M. Montana, The Abolition of Slavery in Ottoman Tunisia (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2013). For an account of Exmouth's expedition to North Africa, see also, Salamé, Abraham V., Narrative of the Expedition to Algiers in the Year 1816, under the Command of the Right Hon. Admiral Lord Viscount Exmouth (London: John Murray, 1819)Google Scholar.
4 See Montana, The Abolition of Slavery in Ottoman Tunisia, 52–53.
5 Exmouth to Earl of Bathurst, April 20 and May 5, 1816, Henry Bathurst Papers, NRA 20925, Manuscript Collections, British Library.
6 For continuation of Christian slavery, see Bennet, Norman Robert, “Christian and Negro Slavery in Eighteenth-Century North Africa,” Journal of African History I, no. 1 (1960): 65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Oualdi, M'hamed, A Slave between Empires: A Transimperial History of North Africa (New York: Columbia University Press, 2020), 25Google Scholar.
8 See for instance, Dali, Inès Mrad, “The Influences and Impact of British Abolitionist Movement on Anti-Slavery in Tunisia from the 1840s to the End of the 1890s,” in Distant Ripple of the British Abolitionist Wave: Africa, Asia and the Americas, eds. Myriam Cottias and Marie-Jeanne Rossignol (Trenton, New Jersey: Africa World Press, 2017), 37–64Google Scholar; Montana, Ismael M., “The Abolition of Slavery: Between Islamic Law and the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society's Influence in Tunisia,” in Distant Ripple of the British Abolitionist Wave: Africa, Asia and the Americas, eds. Myriam Cottias and Marie-Jeanne Rossignol (Trenton, New Jersey: Africa World Press, 2017), 19–35Google Scholar.
9 Baynes to Aberdeen, July 2, 1853, FO 84/919, NA, Kew; Baynes to Aberdeen, October 14, 1853, FO 84/919, NA, Kew.
10 Ibn Abi Diyaf, Ithaf, 4: 266.
11 Ibn Abi Diyaf, Ithaf, 4: 266. See also, Nasr, Abun, History of the Maghrib in the Islamic Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 276Google Scholar.
12 Larguèche, Abdelhamid, “The Abolition of Slavery in Tunisia: Towards a History of the Black Community,” in The Abolitions of Slavery: from L.F. Sonthonax to Victor Schoecher; 1793, 1794, 1848, ed. Marcel, Dorigny (New York; Oxford; Paris: Berghahn Book & UNESCO Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar.
13 Robert Brunschvig, “ʿAbd”, in Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, Edited by: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W.P. Heinrichs. Consulted online on 25 October 2023.
14 See Brown, The Tunisia of Ahmad Bey, 1837–1855 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1971).
15 Brown, Tunisia of Ahmad Bey, 241; Perkins, Kenneth, Tunisia: Crossroads of the Islamic and European World (Bolder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1986), 72Google Scholar.
16 Abdelhamid Larguèche, L'abolition de l'esclavage en Tunisie à travers les archives, 1841–1846, Collection Savoir ([Tunis]: Alif: Société tunisienne d’étude du XVIIIème siècle, 1990); Khalifa Chater, “Le Réformes d'Ahmed Bey et l'abolition de l'esclavage,” in La Tunisie D'Henry, ed. Roger Durand (Tunis: Société Henry Dunant et Association Suisse-Tunisie, 2000).
17 Abun-Nasr, Jamil M., “The Beylicate in Seventeenth-Century Tunisia,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 6, no. 1 (1975): 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18 Abun-Nasr, “The Beylicate in Seventeenth-Century Tunisia,” 71.
19 Abun-Nasr, “The Beylicate in Seventeenth-Century Tunisia,” 71. See also Mohamed El Aziz Ben Achour, Catégories de la société tunisoise dans la deuxième moitié du XIXème siècle: les élites musulmanes (Tunis: Ministère des affaires culturelles, 1989).
20 See Ben Achour, Catégories de la société tunisoise. See also Abun-Nasr, Jamil M., “The Tunisian State in the Eighteenth Century,” Revue de l'Occident Musulman et de la Méditerranée 33 (1982): 33-66CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Green, Arnold H., The Tunisian Ulama 1873–1915: Social Structure and Response to Ideological Currents, Social, Economic and Political Studies of the Middle East (Leiden: Brill, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
21 Thomas Naff, “Introduction,” in Studies in Eighteenth Century Islamic History, eds. Thomas Naff and Roger Owen (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977), 3–14.
22 Naff, “Introduction,” 5–6; Thomas Naff, “The Linkage of History and Reform in Islam: An Ottoman Model,” in Quest of An Islamic Humanism: Arabic and Islamic Studies, In Memory of Mohamed al-Nowaihi, ed. Arnold H. Green (Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press, 1984), 123–24.
23 Naff, “The Linkage of History and Reform in Islam,” 123–24.
24 Lucette Valensi, “Is Religion Always Relevant? The Case of Tunisia (First Half of the 19th century),” in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam in the Course of History: Exchange and Conflicts, eds. Lothar Gall and Dietmar Willoweit (Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2011), 416.
25 Abun-Nasr, “The Tunisian State in the Eighteenth Century,” 40–41.
26 Abun-Nasr, “The Tunisian State in the Eighteenth Century.”
27 A.G.T Série Historiques, “Dossier 421 Carton 230, Ahmad Bey to the Majlis al-Sharʿī, [The Sharia Council for Judicial Ordinance], (Doc. 16a), Muharam 1262H/January 26, 1846.”
28 Humphreys, Stephen R., Islamic History: A Framework of Inquiry (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991), 217Google Scholar. See also Powers, Davis S., Law, Society, and Culture in the Maghreb, 1300–1500 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 7–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
29 Ibn Abī Diyaf, Ithāf, vol. 4, 87.
30 A.G.T Série Historiques, “Dossier 421 Carton 230, Ahmad Bey to the Majlis al-Sharʿī, [The Sharia Council for Judicial Ordinance], (Doc. 16a), Muharam 1262H/January 26, 1846.” See also Ibn Abī Diyaf, Ithāf, 4: 87.
31 Ibn Abī Diyaf, Ithāf, 4: 87.
32 Ibn Abī Diyaf, Ithāf, 4: 87.
33 Elizabeth Van Der Haven, “The Abolition of Slavery in Tunisia (1846),” Revue d'Histoire Maghrebine 27, 990100 (2000), 349–61. See also, Elizabeth Van Der Haven, “The Bey, the Mufti and Scattered Pearls: Sharia and Political Leadership in the Age of Reform, 1800–1864” (PhD diss., Leiden University, 2006).
34 Ibn Abi Diyaf, Ithāf, 4: 90.
35 Ibn Abī Diyaf, Ithāf, 4: 87.
36 Brunschvig, “ʿAbd,” 37.
37 A.G.T Série Historiques, “Dossier 421 Carton 230, Ahmad Bey to the Majlis al-Sharʿī, [The Sharia Council for Judicial Ordinance], (Doc. 16a), Muharam 1262H/January 26, 1846.”
38 Ibid. See also Ibn Abī Diyaf, Ithāf, 4: 87–88.
39 Ibn Abī Diyaf, Ithāf, 7: 77–72.
40 Mohammed, Serving the Master, 45.
41 James Richardson to John Scoble, January 21, 1845, The British Foreign and Anti-Slavery Reporter 6 (1845), 27.
42 A.G.T Série Historiques, “Dossier 421 Carton 230, Ahmad Bey to the Austrian Consul, (Doc. 11), 24 Shawwāl 1258H/29 September, 1842.” See also A.G.T Série Historiques, “Dossier 421 Carton 230, Ahmad Bey to Austrian Consul, (Doc. 10), 20 Shawwāl 1258H/23 November, 1842.”
43 A.G.T Série Historiques, “Dossier 421 Carton 230, Ahmad Bey to the Austrian Consul, (Doc. 11), 24 Shawwāl 1258H/29 September, 1842.” See also A.G.T Série Historiques, “Dossier 421 Carton 230, Ahmad Bey to Austrian Consul, (Doc. 10), 20 Shawwāl 1258H/23 November, 1842.”
44 Windler, Christian, “Representing a State in a Segmentary Society: French Consuls in Tunis from the Ancient Regime to the Restoration,” Journal of Modern History 73 (2001): 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
45 Mantran, Robert, “Transformation of Trade in the Ottoman Empire,” in Studies in Eighteenth Century Islamic History, eds. Thomas Naff and Roger Owen (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977), 217Google Scholar.
46 See Valensi, “Is Religion Always Relevant?,” 418.
47 The translation herein is reproduced with from Hunwick, John and Powell, Eve Troutt, eds., The African Diaspora in the Mediterranean Lands of Islam (Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers, 2002), 195–96Google Scholar. I thank Markus Wiener for the permission to reproduce the translation of this text.