Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:04:21.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ASPECT HYPOTHESIS AND THE ACQUISITION OF L2 PAST MORPHOLOGY IN THE LAST 20 YEARS

A STATE-OF-THE-SCHOLARSHIP REVIEW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2020

Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig Open the ORCID record for Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig [Opens in a new window]  and
Llorenç Comajoan-Colomé Open the ORCID record for Llorenç Comajoan-Colomé [Opens in a new window]
Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Llorenç Comajoan-Colomé
Affiliation:
University of Vic – Central University of Catalonia
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig, Department of Second Language Studies, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405. Email: bardovi@indiana.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Twenty years ago, a state-of-the-art review in SSLA marked the coming of age of the study of temporality in second language acquisition. This was followed by three monographs on tense and aspect the next year. This article presents a state-of-the-scholarship review of the last 20 years of research addressing the aspect hypothesis (AH) (Andersen, 1991, 2002; Andersen & Shirai, 1994, 1996), the most tested hypothesis in L2 temporality research. The first section of the article gives an overview of the AH and examines its central tenets, and then explores the results of empirical studies that test the hypothesis. The second section considers studies that have investigated four crucial variables in the acquisition of temporality and the testing of the AH. The third section discusses theoretically motivated areas of future research within the framework of the hypothesis.

Type
State of the Scholarship
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 42 , Issue 5 , December 2020 , pp. 1137 - 1167
Check for updates
Open Practices
Open materials
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The review in this article earned an Open Materials badge for transparent practices. The materials are available at https://www.iris-database.org/iris/app/home/detail?id=york%3a937808&ref=search An earlier version of Section 3 was presented as “The Aspect Hypothesis Revisited: Theoretically Motivated Versus General Questions” at TAML2 (Tense, Aspect, Mood in L2) at the University of Huelva, November 2019.

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, R. W. (1986). El desarollo de la morfología verbal en el Español como segundo idioma [The development of verbal morphology in Spanish as a second language]. In Meisel, J. M. (Ed.), Adquisición de lenguaje/Aquisição da linguagem [Acquisition of language] (pp. 115–138). Vervuert.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1990). Models, processes, principles and strategies: Second language acquisition inside and outside the classroom. In VanPatten, B. & Lee, J. F. (Eds.), Second language acquisition–Foreign language learning (pp. 45–78). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In Huebner, T. & Ferguson, C. A. (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 305–324). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (2002). Dimensions of “pastness.” In Salaberry, R. & Shirai, Y. (Eds.), Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition (pp. 79–105). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y. (1996). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 527–570). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Antinucci, F., & Miller, R. (1976). How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language, 3, 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoun, D., & Salaberry, M. R. (2008). Acquisition of English tense-aspect morphology by advanced French instructed learners. Language Learning, 58, 555–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). The use of adverbials and natural order in the development of temporal expression. IRAL, 30, 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994). Anecdote or evidence? Evaluating support for hypotheses concerning the development of tense and aspect. In Tarone, E., Gass, S. M., & Cohen, A. D. (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 41–60). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1998). Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 471–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). From morpheme studies to temporal semantics: Tense-aspect research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 341–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2002). Analyzing aspect. In Salaberry, R. & Shirai, Y. (Eds.), Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition (pp. 129–154). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2005). Tracking the elusive imperfect in adult second language acquisition: Refining the hunt. In Kempchinsky, P. & Slabakova, R. (Eds.), Aspectual inquiries (pp. 397–419). Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2012). After process, then what? A longitudinal investigation of the progressive prototype in L2 English. In Labeau, E. & Saddour, I. (Eds.), Development of tense, aspect and mood in L1 and L2 (pp. 135–155). Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Research design: From text to task. In M. Salaberry, R. & Comajoan, L. (Eds.), Research design and methodology in studies on second language tense and aspect (pp. 219–269). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Reynolds, D. W. (1995). The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binnick, R. I. (1991). Time and the verb: A guide to tense and aspect. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Binnick, R. I. (Ed.). (2012). The handbook of tense and aspect. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., Lifter, K., & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and development of verb inflection in child language. Language, 56, 386–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, C. L. (2013). Tense or aspect? A review of initial past tense marking and task conditions for beginning classroom learners of Spanish. Hispania, 96, 624–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckart, J.-P., & Sinclair, H. (1973). Time, tense and aspect. Cognition, 2, 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camps, J. (2005). The emergence of the imperfect in Spanish as a foreign language: The association between imperfective a morphology and state verbs. IRAL, 43, 163–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C. (2003). Typology and information organisation: Perspective taking and language-specific effects in the construal of events. In Ramat, A. G. (Ed.), Typology and second language acquisition (pp. 365–402). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chan, H. L., Finberg, J., Costello, W., & Shirai, Y. (2012). L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: Lexical aspect, morphological regularity, and transfer. In Filipović, L. & Jaszczolt, K. (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures (pp. 181–204). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L. (2002). The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning, 52, 43–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L. (2004). The particulars on universals: A comparison of the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology among Japanese- and French-speaking learners of English. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L. (2005). Accessing second language learners’ understanding of temporal morphology. Language Awareness, 14, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L., White, J., Trofimovich, P., Cardoso, W., & Horst, M. (2012). When comprehensible input is not comprehensive input: A multi-dimensional analysis of past tense in classroom input. In Muñoz, C. (Ed.), Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning (pp. 66–87). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comajoan, L. (2005a). The acquisition of perfective and imperfective morphology and the marking of discourse grounding in Catalan. In Ayoun, D. & Salaberry, M. R. (Eds.), Tense and aspect in Romance languages (pp. 35-78). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comajoan, L. (2005b). The emergence of L2 imperfective morphology in narrative retellings and conversations. Catalan Review, 19, 79–108.Google Scholar
Comajoan, L. (2006). The aspect hypothesis: Development of morphology and appropriateness of use. Language Learning, 56, 201–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comajoan, L. (2013). Defining and coding data: Narrative discourse grounding in L2 studies. In Salaberry, M. R. & Comajoan, L. (Eds.), Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect (pp. 309–356). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Comajoan, L., & Pérez-Saldanya, M. (2005). Grammaticalization and language acquisition: Interaction of lexical aspect and discourse. In Eddington, D. (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 44–55). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1984). Temporal distance: Remoteness distinctions in tense-aspect systems. In Butterworth, B., Comrie, B., & Dahl, Ö. (Eds.), Explanations for language universals (pp. 105–122). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Daidone, D. (2019). Preterite and imperfect in Spanish instructor oral input and Spanish language corpora. Hispania, 102, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2002). Corpus del Español. https://www.corpusdelespanol.org/Google Scholar
Deo, A. (2012). Morphology. In Binnick, R. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect (pp. 155–183). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deshors, S. C. (2018). Does the passé composé influence L2 learners’ use of English past tenses? A semantic exploration of the present perfect in French-English interlanguage. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 4, 23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Swart, H. (2012). Verbal aspect. In Binnick, R. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect (pp. 752–780). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diaubalick, T., & Guijarro Fuentes, P. (2017). L1 effects as manifestations of individual differences in the L2 acquisition of the Spanish tense-aspect-system. In Bellamy, K., Child, M. W., González, P., & Muntendam, A. (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone world (pp. 9–40). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, R., Klein, W., & Noyau, C. (1995). The acquisition of temporality in a second language. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, L., Tracy-Ventura, N., Arche, M. J., Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2013). The role of dynamic contrasts in the L2 acquisition of Spanish past tense morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 558–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dry, H. (1981). Sentence aspect and the movement of narrative time. Text, 1, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dry, H. (1983). The movement of narrative time. Journal of Literary Semantics, 12, 19–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2018). Meta-analysis in second language acquisition research: A critical appraisal Journal of Second Language Studies, 1, 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EPPI-Centre. (2006). EPPI-Centre methods for conducting systematic reviews. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
Fessi, I. (2016). Cross-linguistic influence in tense-aspect Spanish L3 acquisition: A study of Arabic Tunisian learners of L3 Spanish. Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada, 10, 82–99.Google Scholar
Fleischman, S. (1985). Discourse functions of tense-aspect oppositions in narrative: Toward a theory of grounding. Linguistics, 23, 851–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, R., & Werner, V. (2018). The use of stative progressives by school-age learners of English and the importance of the variable context: Myth vs. (corpus) reality. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 4, 195–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A. (1997). Progressive periphrases, markedness and second language data. In Eliasson, S. & Jahr, E. H. (Eds.), Language and its ecology: Essays in memory of Einar Haugen (pp. 261–285). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A. (2002). How do learners acquire the classical three categories of temporality? In Salaberry, R. & Shirai, Y. (Eds.), Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition (pp. 221–247). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, P., & Quintana, H. L. (2018). Inherent aspect and L1 transfer in the L2 acquisition of Spanish grammatical aspect. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 611–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Givón, T. (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Discourse and syntax (pp. 213–241). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Howard, M. (2004). On the interactional effect of linguistic constraints on interlanguage variation: The case of past time marking. IRAL, 42, 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishida, M. (2004). The effect of recasts on acquisition of aspect in Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54, 311–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izquierdo, J. (2009). L’aspect lexical et le développement du passé composé et de l’imparfait en français L2: une étude quantitative auprès d’apprenants hispanophones. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 65, 587–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izquierdo, J., & Collins, L. (2008). The facilitative role of L1 influence in tense–aspect marking: A comparison of Hispanophone and Anglophone learners of French. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 350–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izquierdo, J., & Kihlstedt, M. (2019). L2 imperfective functions with verb types in written narratives: A cross-sectional study with instructed Hispanophone learners of French. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2000). Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning, 50, 245–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, M. A. (1987). Developmental patterns of past tense acquisition among foreign language learners of French. In VanPatten, B., Dvorak, T. R., & Lee, J. F. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective (pp. 52–60). Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. (1963). Action, emotion, and will. Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kim, H.-J. (2012). A case study of tense-aspect marking by L2 learners of Korean. In Labeau, E. & Saddour, I. (Eds.), Tense, aspect and mood in first and second language acquisition (pp. 153–177). Rodopi/Cahiers Chronos.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (2009). How time is encoded. In Klein, W. & Ping, L. (Eds.), The expression of time (pp. 39–82). Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labeau, E. (2005). Beyond the aspect hypothesis: Tense-aspect development in advanced L2 French. EuroSLA Yearbook, 5, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakshmanan, U., & Selinker, L. (2001). Analyzing interlanguage: How do we know what learners know? Second Language Research, 17, 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2003). Revisiting the comparative fallacy: A reply to Lakshmanan and Selinker 2001. Second Language Research, 19, 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, E. H., & Kim, H. Y. (2007). On cross-linguistic variations in imperfective aspect: The case of L2 Korean. Language Learning, 57, 651–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, G. (2004). Theory construction in second language acquisition. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, K. (2013). Prototypical influence in second language acquisition: What now for the Aspect Hypothesis? IRAL, 51, 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C., & Gilabert, R. (2011). More evidence concerning the aspect hypothesis: The acquisition of English progressive aspect by Catalan-Spanish instructed learners. IRAL, 49, 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyau, C. (1990). The development of means for temporality in the unguided acquisition of L2: Cross-linguistic perspectives. In Dechert, H. W. (Ed.), Current trends in European second language acquisition research (pp. 143–170). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rastelli, S. (2019). The imperfective paradox in a second language: A dynamic completion entailment test. Lingua, 231, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastelli, S., & Vernice, M. (2013). Developing actional competence and the building blocks of telicity in L2 Italian. IRAL, 51, 55–75.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1984). Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics, 22, 779–809.Google Scholar
Robison, R. E. (1990). The primacy of aspect: Aspectual marking in English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, R. E. (1995). The aspect hypothesis revisited: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics, 16, 344–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, A. (1996). The aspect hypothesis and emergence of tense distinction in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Linguistics, 34, 1115–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryu, J.-Y., Horie, K., & Shirai, Y. (2015). Acquisition of the Korean imperfective aspect markers –ko iss– and –a iss– by Japanese learners: A multiple-factor account. Language Learning, 65, 791–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M. R. (1999). The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 20, 151–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M. R. (2000). The development of past tense morphology in L2 Spanish. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Salaberry, M. R. (2002). Tense and aspect in the selection of Spanish verbal morphology. In Salaberry, R. & Shirai, Y. (Eds.), Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition (pp. 371–415). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M. R. (2005). Evidence for transfer of knowledge of aspect from L2 Spanish to L3 Portuguese. In Ayoun, D. & Salaberry, M. R. (Eds.), Tense and aspect in Romance languages: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 179–210). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M. R. (2008). Marking past tense in second language acquisition. Continuum.Google Scholar
Salaberry, M. R. (2011). Assessing the effect of lexical aspect and grounding on the acquisition of L2 Spanish preterite and imperfect among L1 English speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M. R., & Comajoan, L. (Eds.). (2013). Research design and methodology in studies on second language tense and aspect. Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M. R., & Shirai, Y., Y. (Eds.). (2002). The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (1991). Primacy of aspect in language acquisition: Simplified input and prototype. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (2002a). The prototype hypothesis of tense-aspect acquisition in second language. In Salaberry, M. R. & Shirai, Y. (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 455–478). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. (2002b). The aspect hypothesis in SLA and the acquisition of Japanese. Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language, 5, 42–61.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (2004). A multiple-factor account for the form-meaning connections in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. In VanPatten, B., Williams, J., Rott, S., & Overstreet, M. (Eds.), Form meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 91–112). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (2007). The aspect hypothesis, the comparative fallacy and the validity of obligatory context analysis: A reply to Lardiere. Second Language Research, 23, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. (2013). Defining and coding data: Lexical aspect in L2 studies. In Salaberry, M. R. & Comajoan, L. (Eds.). Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect (pp. 271–308). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. C., Briggs, S. L., Ovens, J., & Swales, J. M. (2002). The Michigan corpus of academic spoken English. The Regents of the University of Michigan. quod.lib.umich.edu/m/micase/Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2002). Recent research on the acquisition of aspect: An embarrassment of riches? Second Language Research, 18, 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2003). Semantic evidence for functional categories in interlanguage grammars. Second Language Research, 19, 42–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. S. (1983). A theory of aspectual class. Language, 59, 479–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. (1997). The parameter of aspect (2nd ed.). Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. (2003). Modes of discourse: The local structure of texts. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugaya, N., & Shirai, Y. (2007). The acquisition of resultative and progressive meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese: Transfer, universals, or multiple factors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, X., & Shirai, Y. (2016). L2 acquisition of Mandarin zai and –le. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 5, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N., & Cuesta-Medina, J. A. (2018). Can native-speaker corpora help explain L2 acquisition of tense and aspect? A study of the “input.” International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 4, 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uno, M. (2014). Lexical aspect in the use of the present perfect by Japanese EFL learners. IRAL, 52, 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (Eds.) (2015). Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Verkuyl, H. J. (1993). A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1967). Verbs and times. In Vendler, Z. (Ed.), Linguistics and philosophy (pp. 97–121). Cornell University Press. (Reprinted from Philosophical Review, 1957, 66, 143–160.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., & Klein, W. (1989). Referential movement in descriptive and narrative discourse. In Dietrich, R. & Graumann, C. F. (Eds.), Language processing in social context (pp. 39–76). Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. (1991). Narrative and description: Temporal reference in second language acquisition. In Huebner, T. & Ferguson, C. A. (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 385–403). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., & Lambert, M. (2005). Cross-linguistic analysis of temporal perspectives in text production. In Hendricks, H. (Ed.), The structure of learner varieties (pp. 203–230). Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vraciu, A. (2013). Exploring the upper limits of the aspect hypothesis: Tense-aspect morphology in the advanced English L2 variety. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 4, 256–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weist, R. M., Wysocka, H., Witkowska-Stadnik, K., Buczowska, E., & Konieczna, E. (1984). The defective tense hypothesis: On the emergence of tense and aspect in child Polish. Journal of Child Language, 11, 347–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wulff, S., Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., & LeBlanc, C. (2009). The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 354–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, H., & Shirai, Y. (2018). Arabic learners’ acquisition of English past tense morphology: Lexical aspect and phonological saliency. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 4, 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bardovi-Harlig and Comajoan-Colomé supplementary material

Bardovi-Harlig and Comajoan-Colomé supplementary material

Download Bardovi-Harlig and Comajoan-Colomé supplementary material(File)
File 64.9 KB