Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T11:23:24.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Palaeolithic Industry of Kota Tampan, Perak, Malaya1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

D. Walker  and
Ann de G. Sieveking
D. Walker
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Perak River rises on the Siamese border and flows southward to meet the sea near Teluk Anson in Perak. At Chenderoh, 70 miles north of the estuary, the valley has been dammed since 1930 and a large lake formed upstream. The Kota Tampan estate lies in the main valley about 4 miles north of the northern end of Chenderoh Lake (fig. 4 inset).

At Kota Tampan (fig. 1) the Perak River is incised in the bottom of a valley between two and three miles wide, the floor of which lies between the 200- and 250-foot contours. The surfaces of the narrow modern flood terraces lie just below the 200-foot contour. Small hills of granite, rising to about 330 feet m.s.l., project above the general level of the valley floor which is also cut by steep-sided ravines running out into the modern river. These ravines are usually dry, or slightly swampy, except at the mouths where the artificial raising of the water-level by the Chenderoh dam has flooded them. The residual parts of the valley floor form long, almost flat-topped, ridges between the ravines and the hills, covered by a skin of soil washed from the neighbouring higher land.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 28 , December 1962 , pp. 103 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ingham, F. T. 1939. Report of the Geological Survey Department for the year 1938, Kuala Lumpur: Government Press.Google Scholar
Scrivenor, J. B. 1930. ‘A Recent Rhyolitic-ash with Sponge-spicules and Diatoms in Malaya’, Geol. Mag., LXXXI.Google Scholar
Scrivenor, J. B. 1943. ‘A Further Examination of Organic Remains in Rhyolite-ash in Malaya’, Geol. Mag., XCIV.Google Scholar
Willbourn, E. S. 1938. Report of the Geological Survey Department for the year 1937, Kuala Lumpur: Government Press.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, C. A. and Birdsell, J. B. 1953. ‘Ecology and the Proto-Hominids’, Amer. Anth., LV, pp. 481–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biberson, P. 1961. ‘Le Cadre Paléogéographique de la Préhistoire du Maroc Atlantique’, and ‘Le Paléolithique Inférieur du Maroc Atlantique’, Pub. du Serv. des Ant. du Maroc Fasc., 16 et 17.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1950. ‘L'Évolution Buissonnante des industries en Europe occidentale’, Anth., LIV, pp. 393–420.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1953. ‘C.R. of The Clacton Flint Industry by H. Warren’, Anth., LVII, nos. 3–4, pp. 298–301.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. and Fitte, P. ‘L'Atelier Commont’, Anth., LVII, pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
Clark, W. E. Le Gros. (1950). ‘The Ape Men of South Africa’, Antiquity, XXIV, pp. 179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, S. 1954. ‘The Prehistory of East Africa’, Amer. Anth., LVI, pp. 1026–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collings, H. D. 1938. ‘A Pleistocene Site in the Malay Peninsula’, Nature, CXLII, p. 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, E. J. H. 1940. Wayside Trees of Malaya, Singapore, Government Printer.Google Scholar
De Terra, H. and Movius, H. L. 1943. ‘Research on Early Man in Burma’, Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc., XXXII, Pt. III.Google Scholar
De Terra, H. and Paterson, T. T. 1939. Studies on the Ice Age in India and Associated Human Cultures, p. 493, Washington, Carnegie Inst.Google Scholar
Garrod, D. A. E. and Bate, D. 1937. The Stone Age of Mount Carmel, 1, Oxford.Google Scholar
Henri-Martin, G. 1954. Le Tayacien. In ‘Les Grandes Civilizations Prehistoriques de la France’, BSPF, Jubilee issue, pp. 27–31.Google Scholar
Howell, F. C. 1954. ‘Hominids, pebble tools and the African Villafranchian’, Amer. Anth., LVI, no. 3, pp. 378–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leakey, L. S. B. 1951. Olduvai Gorge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, C. van Riet. 1937. ‘The Archaeology of the Vaal River Basin’, Mem. Geol. Sur. Un. S. Afr., XXXV, p. 2.Google Scholar
Lowe, C. van Riet. 1952. ‘The Pleistocene Geology and Prehistory of Uganda’, Part II, ‘Prehistory’, Mem. Geol. Surv. Uganda, VI.Google Scholar
Montagu, M. F. Ashley. 1955. ‘Time, Morphology and Neoteny in the Evolution of Man’, Amer. Anth., LVII, pp. 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Movius, H. L. 1944. ‘Early Man and Pleistocene Stratigraphy in Southern and Eastern Asia’, Papers, Peabody Museum, XIX, p. 3.Google Scholar
Movius, H. L. 1948. ‘The Lower Paleolithic Cultures of Southern and Eastern Asia.’ Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc., XXXVIII, p. 4.Google Scholar
Movius, H. L. 1953. ‘Old World Prehistory-Paleolithic’. In Kroeber, , Anthropology Today, pp. 163–92.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. 1952. ‘Swanscombe Man’, Proc. Geol. Ass., LXIII, no. 4, pp. 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, K. P. 1959. Tools Makyth Man, Smithsonian Report for 1958, pp. 431–45Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. and Leakey, M. 1937. Report on Excavations at Jaywick Sands 1934’, PPS, III, no. 2, pp. 217–60.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1944. Tempo and Mode in Evolution, Columbia University Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
Stekelis, M. et al. 1960. ‘Villefranchian deposits near Ubeidiya in the Central Jordan Valley’, Bull. of the Research Council of Israel, Vol. 9g, no. 4, pp. 175–85. Nov. 1960.Google Scholar
Vaufrey, R. 1951. ‘Pierres taillées villafranchiennes et synchronisms glacières’, Anth., LV, pp. 162–6.Google Scholar
Walker, D. 1956. ‘Studies in the Quaternary of the Malay Peninsula, I. Alluvial deposits of Perak and the Relative Levels of Land and Sea’, Federation Mus. J., 1 and 11, pp. 19–34.Google Scholar