Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T18:53:57.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The treatment of experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis with liposome-entrapped Pentostam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. R. C. New
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX
M. L. Chance
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA
S. Heath
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA

Summary

Treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis by antimonial compounds when administered by various routes to mice infected with Leishmania major or L. mexicana amazonensis is enhanced, relative to the free drug, by entrapment of these compounds within liposomes. The efficacy of the liposome treatment is dependent on the time and route of administration, and upon the phospholipid composition of the liposomes themselves. Drug-loaded liposomes administered intravenously (i.v.) are more effective at reducing the growth of a cutaneous lesion if they are administered after the nodule has begun to develop, rather than at the time of inoculation of the parasites. In contrast to the i.v. route, liposomes administered subcutaneously (s.c.) at the inoculation site are only effective if given at the time of infection.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alving, C. R., Steck, E. A., Chapman, W. L. Jr, Waits, V. B., Hendricks, L. D., Swartz, G. M. Jr & Manson, W. L. (1978). Therapy of leishmaniasis: Superior efficacies of liposome-encapsulated drugs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 75, 2959–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bangham, A. D. & Horne, R. W. (1964). Negative staining of phospholipids and their structural modification by surface-active agents as observed in the electron microscope. Journal of Molecular Biology 8, 660–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, C. D. V., Watson, G. J. & Ward, R. J. (1977). The use of Pentostam liposomes in the chemotherapy of experimental leishmaniasis. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 71, 550–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregoriadis, G. & Ryman, B. E. (1972). Fate of protein-containing liposomes injected into rats. An approach to treatment of storage diseases. European Journal of Biochemistry 24, 485–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregoriadis, G. & Senior, J. (1980). The phospholipid component of small unilamellar liposomes controls the rate of clearance of entrapped solutes from the circulation. FEBS Letters 119, 43–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juliano, R. L. & Stamp, D. (1975). The effect of particle size and charge on the clearance rates of liposomes and liposome encapsulated drugs. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 63, 651–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
New, R. R. C., Chance, M. L. & Critchley, M. (1981). The distribution of radiolabelled drug in animals infected with cutaneous leishmaniasis. Comparison of free and liposome-bound Pentostam. In Radionuclide Imaging in Drug Research (ed. Wilson, C. G., Hardy, J. G., Davis, S. S. and Frier, M.). Croom and Helm Ltd.Google Scholar
New, R. R. C., Chance, M. L., Thomas, S. C. & Peters, W. (1978). Antileishmanial activity of antimonials entrapped in liposomes. Nature, London 272, 55–6.Google Scholar
Preston, P. K., Carter, R. L., Leuchars, E., Davies, A. J. S. & Dumonde, D. C. (1972). Experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis. III Effects of thymectomy on the course of infection of CBA mice with Leishmania tropica. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 10, 337–57.Google Scholar
Schnur, L. F. (1976). The dissemination of American slow and fast leishmanias in Syrian hamsters. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 70, 277–8.Google Scholar