Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:49:37.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two- and three-dimensional locomotion of the nematode Nippostrongylus brasiliensis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

D. L. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
W. D. Biggs
Affiliation:
Department of Building Science, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading

Extract

Locomotion of adult Nippostrongylus brasiliensis has been studied in saline, in 0.6% agar, in sodium alginate of different viscosities and amongst sand grains in these media. In saline the nematode formed two-dimensional waves but there was little forward progression. Amongst sand grains in saline the nematode moved forwards by thrusting against sand grains, but thigmokinetic behaviour later resulted in quiescence. In 0.6% agar and in alginates of weak viscosity the nematode produced two-dimensional waves and sometimes a three-dimensional helical wave which resulted in forward movement. The formation of three-dimensional waves and the distance travelled increased with increasing viscosity up to 4% sodium alginate and also amongst sand gains in these media. In 8% sodium alginate the nematode became coiled like a spring but remained almost stationary. The three-dimensional wave is formed with torsion and obtains thrust from the viscous medium. In the intestine of the host thrust will be obtained from the mucus and villi of the intestinal mucosa. The ability of this nematode to move by two-and three-dimensional undulatory propulsion is probably related to its complex ridged cuticle. Attention is drawn to the role that increased viscosity of mucus may play in entrapping nematodes during their immune rejection.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. M. R. (1987). Bending of cylindrical animals with helical fibres in their skin or cuticle. Journal of Theoretical Biology 124, 97110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bone, L. W. (1985). Response of adult Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nematoda) to fluid velocity. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 52, 244–6.Google Scholar
Clark, R. B. (1964). Dynamics in Metazoan Evolution. The Origin of the Coelom and Segments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Crofton, H. D. (1971). Form, function and behaviour. In Plant Parasitic Nematodes, Vol. 1 (ed. Zuckerman, B. M., Mai, W. R. & Rohde, R. A.), pp. 83113. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glassberg, G. H. R., Zalisko, E. & Bone, L. W. (1981). In vivo pheromone activity in Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nematoda). Journal of Parasitology 67, 898905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. (1953). Undulatory propulsion. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 94, 551–78.Google Scholar
Gray, J. & Lissman, H. W. (1964). The locomotion of nematodes. Journal of Experimental Biology 41, 135–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, J. E. & Crofton, H. D. (1957). Structure and function in the nematodes: internal pressure and cuticular structure in Ascaris. Journal of Experimental Biology 34, 116–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. L. (1965 a). The Physiology of Nematodes. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Lee, D. L. (1965 b). The cuticle of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. Parasitology 55, 173–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, D. L. & Nicholls, C. D. (1983). The use of plasma etching to reveal the internal structure of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nematoda). Parasitology 86, 477–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, G. B. & Oglivie, B. E. (1981). The mucus layer of the small intestine–its protective effect in rats immune to Trichinella spiralis. In Trichinellosis. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Trichinellosis (ed. Kim, C. W., Ruitenberg, E. J. & Teppema, J. S.), pp. 9195. Chertsey, Surrey: Reedbooks Ltd.Google Scholar
Martin, J. & Lee, D. L. (1980). Nematodirus battus: scanning electron microscope studies of the duodenal mucosa of infected lambs. Parasitology 81, 573–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, H. R. P., Huntley, J. F. & Wallace, G. R. (1981). Immune exclusion and mucus trapping during the rapid expulsion of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis from primed rats. Immunology 44, 419–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Wallace, H. R. (1959). The movement of eelworms in water films. Annals of Applied Biology 48, 107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, H. R. (1963). The Biology of Plant Parasitic Nematodes. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Wallace, H. R. (1968 a). Undulatory locomotion of the plant parasitic nematode Meloidogyne javanica. Parasitology 58, 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, H. R. (1968 b). Dynamics of nematode movement. Annual Reviews in Phytopathology 6, 91114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, H., Lee, D. L. & Hudson, P. J. (1988). Primary and secondary infections of the domestic chicken with Trichostrongylus tenuis (Nematoda), a parasite of red grouse, with observations on the effect on the caecal mucosa. Parasitology 97, 8999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed