Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T14:43:22.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Small-scale effect of intertidal seagrass (Zostera muelleri) on meiofaunal abundance, biomass, and nematode community structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2010

Daniel Leduc  and
P. Keith Probert
Daniel Leduc*
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
P. Keith Probert
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: D. Leduc, Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand email: daniel.leduc@otago.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seagrass beds are common features of coastal ecosystems worldwide, and their associated infauna are often more productive and diverse than in unvegetated habitats. Little is known, however, about the ecology of meiofaunal communities living in seagrass sediments. We compared the abundance and biomass of sediment meiofauna inside and outside an intertidal Zostera muelleri bed in southern New Zealand to assess the impact of seagrass cover on meiofaunal distribution. Nematode community structure, diversity, and feeding groups were also compared between habitats and sediment depths (0–2, 2–5 and 5–10 cm) to evaluate the effect of seagrass on nematode communities. Meiofaunal biomass was significantly higher inside than outside the Z. muelleri bed, but secondary productivity inside the bed is likely to have been limited by the availability of labile organic matter. There were significant differences in nematode community structure between unvegetated, sparsely vegetated, and densely vegetated sites (102 m scale), as well as between sediment depths (cm scale). No significant differences were found in depth-integrated (0–10 cm) nematode diversity between sites, but vertical gradients in diversity differed between vegetated and unvegetated sites. Epistrate feeders were the most common feeding group in unvegetated sediments whereas most feeding groups were common inside the seagrass bed. Findings from this study indicate that seagrass beds can have a marked impact on infaunal structure and function over small spatial scales through their effect on sediment characteristics and organic matter input. Some unexpected trends observed in the present study, i.e. low meiofaunal biomass at the vegetated sites, and lower abundance of copepods inside than outside the seagrass bed, suggest that the nature of seagrass–invertebrate interactions may depend on habitat characteristics and the identity and ecology of species considered.

Keywords

meiofaunanematodesParastenhelia megarostrumseagrassbiomasssediment benthostrophic groupsNew Zealand
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 91 , Issue 3 , May 2011 , pp. 579 - 591
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albrecht, N. and Vennell, R. (2007) Tides in two constricted New Zealand lagoons. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 41, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansari, Z.A. and Parulekar, A.H. (1994) Meiobenthos in the sediment of seagrass meadows of Lakshadweep atolls, Arabian Sea. Vie et Milieu 44, 185–190.Google Scholar
Atilla, N., Fleeger, J.W. and Finelli, C.M. (2005) Effects of habitat complexity and hydrodynamics on the abundance and diversity of small invertebrates colonizing artificial substrates. Journal of Marine Research 63, 1151–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen, M.C., Widdicombe, S. and Villano-Pitacco, N. (1998) Effects of biological disturbance on diversity and structure of meiobenthic nematode communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series 174, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bale, A.J. and Kenny, A.J. (2005) Sediment analysis and seabed characterisation. In Eleftheriou, A. and McIntyre, A. (eds) Methods for the study of marine benthos. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 43–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, C., Marbaa, N., Terrados, J., Kennedy, H. and Duarte, C.M. (2004) Community metabolism and carbon budget along a gradient of seagrass (Cymodocea nodosa) colonization. Limnology and Oceanography 49, 1642–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, S.S., Walters, K. and Kern, J.C. (1984) Meiofauna from seagrass habitats—a review and prospectus for future research. Estuaries 7, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongers, T. and Ferris, H. (1999) Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14, 224–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bos, A.R., Bouma, T.J., de Kort, G.L.J. and van Katwijk, M.M. (2007) Ecosystem engineering by annual intertidal seagrass beds: Sediment accretion and modification. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 74, 344–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castel, J., Labourg, P.J., Escaravage, V., Auby, I. and Garcia, M.E. (1989) Influence of seagrass beds and oyster parks on the abundance and biomass patterns of meiobenthos and macrobenthos in tidal flats. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 28, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R. (1993) Nonparametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coull, B.C. and Bell, S.S. (1979) Perspectives of marine meiofaunal ecology. In Livingston, R.J. (ed.) Ecological processes in coastal and marine sediments. New York: Plenum Publishing, pp. 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Rocha, C.M.C., Venekey, V., Bezerra, T.N.C. and Souza, J.R.B. (2006) Phytal marine nematode assemblages and their relation with the macrophytes structural complexity in a Brazilian tropical rocky beach. Hydrobiologia 553, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danovaro, R. (1996) Detritus–bacteria–meiofauna interactions in a seagrass bed (Posidonia oceanica) of the NW Mediterranean. Marine Biology 127, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danovaro, R. and Gambi, C. (2002) Biodiversity and trophic structure of nematode assemblages in seagrass systems: evidence for a coupling with changes in food availability. Marine Biology 141, 667–677.Google Scholar
Danovaro, R., Gambi, C. and Mirto, S. (2002) Meiofaunal production and energy transfer efficiency in a seagrass Posidonia oceanica bed in the western Mediterranean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 234, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Troch, M., Fiers, F. and Vincx, M. (2001a) Alpha and beta diversity of harpacticoid copepods in a tropical seagrass bed: the relation between diversity and species' range size distribution. Marine Ecology Progress Series 215, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Troch, M., Gurdebeke, S., Fiers, F. and Vincx, M. (2001b) Zonation and structuring factors of meiofauna communities in a tropical seagrass bed (Gazi Bay, Kenya). Journal of Sea Research 45, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decho, A.W., Hummon, W.D. and Fleeger, J.W. (1985) Meiofauna–sediment interactions around subtropical seagrass sediments using factor analysis. Journal of Marine Research 43, 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbinson, S.J., Barker, M.F. and Jillett, J.B. (1989) Experimental shore level transplantation of the New Zealand cockle Chione stutchburyi. Journal of Shellfish Research 8, 197–212.Google Scholar
Duarte, C.M. and Chiscano, C.L. (1999) Seagrass biomass and production: a reassessment. Aquatic Botany 65, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, G.J. (1999) Experimental analysis of structural versus trophic importance of seagrass beds. I. Effects on macrofaunal and meiofaunal invertebrates. Vie et Milieu 49, 239–248.Google Scholar
Feller, R.J. (1980) Quantitative cohort analysis of a sand-dwelling meiobenthic harpacticoid copepod. Estuarine, and Coastal Marine Science 11, 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, R.J. and Warwick, R.M. (1988) Energetics. In Higgins, R.P and Thiel, H. (eds) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 181–196.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. (2003) Spatial and temporal variations in nematode assemblages in tropical seagrass sediments. Hydrobiologia 493, 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. and Sheaves, M.J. (2003) Community structure and spatial variability of marine nematodes in tropical Australian pioneer seagrass meadows. Hydrobiologia 495, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, M.S., Fisher, J.S., Zieman, J.C. and Thayer, G.W. (1982) Influence of the seagrass, Zostera marina L, on current flow. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 15, 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gacia, E., Duarte, C.M., Marba, N., Terrados, J., Kennedy, H., Fortes, M.D. and Tri, N.H. (2003) Sediment deposition and production in SE-Asia seagrass meadows. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 56, 909–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallucci, F., Steyaert, M. and Moens, T. (2005) Can field distributions of marine predacious nematodes be explained by sediment constraints on their foraging success? Marine Ecology Progress Series 304, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giere, O. (2009) Meiobenthology: the microscopic motile fauna of aquatic sediments. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Grove, S.L., Probert, P.K., Berkenbusch, K. and Nodder, S.D. (2006) Distribution of bathyal meiofauna in the region of the Subtropical Front, Chatham Rise, south-west Pacific. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 330, 342–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrini, A., Colangelo, M.A. and Ceccherelli, V.U. (1998) Recolonization patterns of meiobenthic communities in brackish vegetated and unvegetated habitats after induced hypoxia/anoxia. Hydrobiologia 376, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M.O. and Bell, S.S. (1993) Meiofauna on the seagrass Thalassia testudinum—population characteristics of harpacticoid copepods and associations with algal epiphytes. Marine Biology 116, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heip, C., Vincx, M. and Vranken, G. (1985) The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 23, 399–489.Google Scholar
Heiss, W.M., Smith, A.M. and Probert, P.K. (2000) Influence of the small intertidal seagrass Zostera novazelandica on linear water flow and sediment texture. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 34, 689–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemminga, M.A. and Duarte, C.M. (2000) Seagrass ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendelberg, M. and Jensen, P. (1993) Vertical distribution of the nematode fauna in a coastal sediment influenced by seasonal hypoxia in the bottom water. Ophelia 37, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, G.R.F. (1984) Spatio-temporal dynamics of a meiobenthic copepod and the impact of predation-disturbance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 81, 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, G.R.F. (1985) Biomass and production estimates for an estuarine meiobenthic copepod, with an instantaneous assessment of exploitation by flatfish predators. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 8, 125–127.Google Scholar
Hicks, G.R.F. (1986) Distribution and behavior of meiofaunal copepods inside and outside seagrass beds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 31, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, B.E. and Meyers, S.P. (1967) Population studies on benthic nematodes within a subtropical seagrass community. Marine Biology 1, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail, N.B., (2001) Ecology of eelgrass, Zostera novazelandica Setchell, in Otago Harbour, Dunedin, New Zealand. PhD thesis. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, N. (1993) Distribution of meiobenthic copepods from various habitats in Pauatahanui Inlet, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 27, 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, W.J., Wyllie-Echeverria, S., Coles, R.G., Pergent, G. and Pergent-Martini, C. (2006) Seagrass conservation biology: an interdisciplinary science for protection of the seagrass biome. In Larkum, A.W.D, Orth, R.J. and Duarte, C.M. (eds) Seagrasses: biology, ecology and conservation. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 595–623.Google Scholar
Kharlamenko, V.I., Kiyashko, S.I., Imbs, A.B. and Vyshkvartzev, D.I. (2001) Identification of food sources of invertebrates from the seagrass Zostera marina community using carbon and sulfur stable isotope ratio and fatty acid analyses. Marine Ecology Progress Series 220, 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikuchi, T. (1980) Faunal relationships in temperate seagrass beds. In Phillips, R.C. and McRoy, C.P. (eds) Handbook of seagrass biology. New York: Garland STPM Press, pp. 153–172.Google Scholar
Koller, H., Dworschak, P.C. and Abed-Navandi, D. (2006) Burrows of Pestarella tyrrhena (Decapoda: Thalassinidea): hot spots for Nematoda, Foraminifera and bacterial densities. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 86, 1113–1122.Google Scholar
Larcombe, M.F. (1971) The ecology, population dynamics, and energetics of some soft shore molluscs. PhD thesis. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Leduc, D. and Wharton, D.A. (2008) Three new species of free-living nematodes from inter-tidal sediments in southern New Zealand. Nematology 10, 743–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leduc, D. (2009) Description of Oncholaimus moanae sp. nov. (Nematoda: Oncholaimidae), with notes on feeding ecology based on isotopic and fatty acid composition. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89, 337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leduc, D., Probert, P.K. and Duncan, A. (2009) A multi-method approach for identifying meiofaunal trophic connections. Marine Ecology Progress Series 383, 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.Y., Kim, J.B. and Lee, S.M. (2006) Temporal dynamics of subtidal Zostera marina and intertidal Zostera japonica on the southern coast of Korea. Marine Ecology: an Evolutionary Perspective 27, 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinton, J.S. (1995) Marine biology: function, biodiversity, ecology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marba, N., Holmer, M., Gacia, E. and Barron, C. (2006) Seagrass beds and coastal biogeochemistry. In Larkum, A.W.D, Orth, R.J. and Duarte, C.M. (eds) Seagrasses: biology, ecology and conservation. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 135–157.Google Scholar
Mateo, M.A., Cebrian, J., Dunton, K.H. and Mutchler, T. (2006) Carbon flux in seagrass ecosystems. In Larkum, A.W.D, Orth, R.J. and Duarte, C.M. (eds) Seagrasses: biology, ecology and conservation. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 159–192.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A., Erasmus, T. and Furstenberg, J.P. (1977) Migrations of sandy beach meiofauna. Zoologica Africana 12, 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, V.S. and Berkenbusch, K. (2009) Seagrass (Zostera muelleri) patch size and spatial location influence infaunal macroinvertebrate assemblages. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 81, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moens, T. and Vincx, M. (1997) Observations on the feeding ecology of estuarine nematodes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 77, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, M., Vezzulli, L., Marin, V., Laconi, P., Albertelli, G. and Fabiano, M. (2008) The use of meiofauna diversity as an indicator of pollution in harbours. ICES Journal of Marine Science 65, 1428–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndaro, S.G.M. and Olafsson, E. (1999) Soft-bottom fauna with emphasis on nematode assemblage structure in a tropical intertidal lagoon in Zanzibar, eastern Africa: I. spatial variability. Hydrobiologia 405, 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, R. (1982) Spatial and seasonal distribution of the meiofauna in the seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 16, 380–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osenga, G.A. and Coull, B.C. (1983) Spartina alterniflora Loisel root structure and meiofaunal abundance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 67, 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, H.M. and Warwick, R.M. (1983) Free-living marine nematodes. Part I. British enoplids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Platt, H.M. and Warwick, R.M. (1988) Free-living marine nematodes. Part II. British chromadorids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portnova, D. (2009) Free-living marine nematodes from the deep-sea Hakon Mosby Mud Volcano, including the description of two new and three known species. Zootaxa 2096, 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, P.Q. and Keough, M.J. (2009) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ralph, P.J., Tomasko, D., Moore, K., Seddon, S. and Macinnis-Ng, C.M.O. (2006) Human impacts on seagrasses: eutrophication, sedimentation, and contamination. In Larkum, A.W.D, Orth, R.J. and Duarte, C.M. (eds) Seagrasses: biology, ecology and conservation. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 567–593.Google Scholar
Ricciardi, A. and Bourget, E. (1999) Global patterns of macroinvertebrate biomass in marine intertidal communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series 185, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartory, D. (1982) Spectrophotometric analysis of chlorophyll-a in freshwater phytoplankton. Pretoria: Hydrological Research Institute.Google Scholar
Schratzberger, M. and Warwick, R.M. (1998) Effects of the intensity and frequency of organic enrichment on two estuarine nematode communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series 164, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schratzberger, M., Warr, K. and Rogers, S.I. (2006) Patterns of nematode population in the south-western North Sea and their link to other components of the benthic fauna. Journal of Sea Research 55, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soetaert, K., Vincx, M., Wittoeck, J. and Tulkens, M. (1995) Meiobenthic distribution and nematode community structure in five European estuaries. Hydrobiologia 311, 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sogard, S.M. (1984) Utilization of meiofauna as a food source by a grassbed fish, the spotted dragonet Callionymus pauciradiatus. Marine Ecology Progress Series 17, 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somerfield, P.J. and Warwick, R.M. (1996) Meiofauna in marine pollution monitoring programmes: a laboratory manual. Lowestoft: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Steyaert, M., Garner, N., van Gansbeke, D. and Vincx, M. (1999) Nematode communities from the North Sea: environmental controls on species diversity and vertical distribution within the sediment. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 79, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steyaert, M., Vanaverbeke, J., Vanreusel, A., Barranguet, C., Lucas, C. and Vincx, M. (2003) The importance of fine-scale, vertical profiles in characterising nematode community structure. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 58, 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steyaert, M., Moodley, L., Nadong, T., Moens, T., Soetaert, K. and Vincx, M. (2007) Responses of intertidal nematodes to short-term anoxic events. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 345, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietjen, J.H. (1969) The ecology of shallow water meiofauna in two New England estuaries. Oecologia 2, 251–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turpeenniemi, T.A. and Hyvarinen, H. (1996) Structure and role of the renette cell and caudal glands in the nematode Sphaerolaimus gracilis (Monhysterida). Journal of Nematology 28, 318–327.Google Scholar
Villano, N. and Warwick, R.M. (1995) Meiobenthic communities associated with the seasonal cycle of growth and decay of Ulva rigida Agardh in the Palude della Rosa, Lagoon of Venice. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 41, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, A.R. (1975) Studies on the sublittoral free-living nematodes of Liverpool Bay. II. Influence of sediment composition on the distribution of marine nematodes. Marine Biology 30, 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, R.M., Joint, I.R. and Radford, P.J. (1979) Secondary production of the benthos in an estuarine environment. In Jeffries, R.L. and Davy, A.J. (eds) Ecological processes in coastal environments. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 429–450.Google Scholar
Warwick, R.M., Platt, H.M. and Somerfield, P.J. (1998) Free-living marine nematodes. Part III. Monhysterids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, P.J., Rowden, A.A. and Attrill, M.J. (1998) Effect of shoot density on the infaunal macro-invertebrate community within a Zostera marina seagrass bed. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 47, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzel, M.A., Jensen, P. and Giere, O. (1995) Oxygen/sulfide regime and nematode fauna associated with Arenicola marina burrows: new insights in the thiobios case. Marine Biology 124, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzel, M.A, Fleeger, J.W. and Powers, S.P. (2001) Effects of hypoxia and anoxia on meiofauna: A review with new data from the Gulf of Mexico. In Rabalais, N.N. (ed.) Coastal hypoxia: consequences for living resources and ecosystems, Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, pp. 165–184. [Coastal and Estuarine Sciences Series, Volume 58.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieser, W. (1953) Die beziehung zwischen mundhohlengestalt, ernahrungweise un vorkommen bei freilebenden marinen nematoden. Arkiv für Zoologie 2, 439–484.Google Scholar
Witte, J.I.J. and Zijlstra, J.J. (1984) The meiofauna of a tidal flat in the western part of the Wadden Sea and its role in the benthic ecosystem. Marine Ecology Progress Series 14, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar