Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:48:02.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of the age, growth rate and burrowing behaviour of the razor clams, Ensis siliqua and E. ensis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2019

S.M. Henderson  and
C.A. Richardson
S.M. Henderson
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, University of Wales Bangor, Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd, LL59 5EY.
C.A. Richardson
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, University of Wales Bangor, Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd, LL59 5EY.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two razor clam populations from two shores in North Wales were identified on morphological grounds as Ensis siliqua (L.) and E. ensis (L.). Ensis siliqua occurs in fine sand on the exposed south-westerly facing shore of Newborough beach, whilst E. ensis inhabits the coarser sediment of Penmon beach, a sheltered north-easterly facing shore in the Menai Strait. At Penmon smaller E. ensis (<100 mm) inhabited sediments at mean low water of spring fides, whereas larger individuals (>100 mm) occurred almost subtidally at extreme low water springs. No small E. siliqua (<110 mm) were found on Newborough beach, where there has been a noticeable decline between 1990 and 1992 in the number of individuals larger than 175 mm. Growth of the two species was different. The von Bertalanffy growth constant, k, was similar in the two species, but E. siliqua had a larger asymptotic length than E. ensis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , November 1994 , pp. 939 - 954
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, H., 1990. ‘Razor fish make £1600 a tonne’. Fishing News, November, 28–30.Google Scholar
Allen, K.R., 1966. A method of fitting growth curves of the von Bertalanffy type to observed data. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 23, 163–179.Google Scholar
Anwar, N.A., Richardson, C.A. & Seed, R., 1990. Age determination, growth rate and population structure of the horse mussel Modiolus modiolus . Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 70, 441–457.Google Scholar
Bourne, N., 1969. Razor clam, Siliqua patula Dixon, breeding and recruitment at Masset, British Columbia. Proceedings. National Shellfisheries Association, 69, 21–29.Google Scholar
Brousseau, D.J. & Baglivo, J.A., 1987. A comparative study of age and growth in Mya arenaria (soft-shell clam) from three populations in Long Island Sound. Journal of Shellfish Research, 6, 17–24.Google Scholar
Chelazzi, G. & Vannini, M., 1988. Behavioural adaptation to intertidal life. London: Plenum Press. [NATO ASI Series A: Life Sciences, vol. 151.]Google Scholar
Hirschörn, G., 1962. Growth and mortality rates of the razor clam (Siliqua patula) on Clatsop beaches, Oregon. Contributions. Fish Commission of Oregon, 27, 5–55.Google Scholar
Holme, N.A., 1951. The identification of British species of the genus Ensis Schumacher (Lamellibranchiata). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 29, 639–647.Google Scholar
Newell, C.R., 1982. The effects of sediment type on growth rate and shell allometry in the soft shelled clam Mya arenaria L. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 65, 285–295.Google Scholar
Porter, R.G., 1974. Reproductive cycle of the soft-shell clam, Mya arenaria, at Skagit Bay, Washington. Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Washington, DC, 72, 648–656.Google Scholar
Quayle, D.B., 1962. The Pacific razor clam. Trade News, 14(9), 8–9.Google Scholar
Quayle, D.B. & Bourne, N., 1972. The clam fisheries of British Columbia. Bulletin. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, no. 179, pp. 48–56.Google Scholar
Ramón, M. & Richardson, C.A., 1992. Age determination and shell growth of Chamelea gallina (Bivalvia: Veneridae) in the western Mediterranean. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 89, 15–23.Google Scholar
Reading, C.J., 1979. Changes in the downshore distribution of Macoma balthica (L.) in relation to shell length. Estuarine Coastal and Marine Science, 8, 1–13.Google Scholar
Richardson, C.A., 1989. An analysis of the growth bands in the shell of the common mussel Mytilus edulis . Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 69, 477–491.Google Scholar
Richardson, C.A., Crisp, D.J. & Runham, N.W., 1979. Tidally deposited growth bands in the shell of the common cockle, Cerastoderma edule (L.). Malacologia, 18, 277–290.Google Scholar
Richardson, C.A., Seed, R. & Naylor, E., 1990. Use of internal growth bands for measuring individual and population growth rates in Mytilus edulis from offshore production platforms. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 66, 259–265.Google Scholar
Richardson, C.A. & Walker, P., 1991. The age structure of a population of the hard-shell clam, Mercenaria mercenaria from Southampton water, England, derived from acetate peel replicas of shell sections. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 48, 229–236.Google Scholar
Ropes, J.W. & Stickney, A.P., 1965. Reproductive cycle of Mya arenaria in New England. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 128, 315–327.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W.J., 1982. Spatial variation in the predation of cockles by oystercatchers at Traeth Melynog, Anglesey. I. The cockle population. Journal of Animal Ecology, 51, 481–489.Google Scholar
Swennen, C., Leopold, M.F. & Stock, M., 1985. Notes on growth and behaviour of the American razor clam Ensis directus in the Wadden Sea and the predation on it by birds. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen, 39, 255–261.Google Scholar
Tebble, N. 1976. British bivalve seashells: a handbook for identification, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
Tegelberg, H.C. & Magoon, C.D., 1969. Growth, survival and some effects of a dense razor clam set in Washington. Proceedings. National Shellfisheries Association, 59, 126–135.Google Scholar