Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:39:31.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of the complete nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences of Eurytrema pancreaticum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2017

X. Su
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing, Heilongjiang Province 163319, PR China
Y. Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing, Heilongjiang Province 163319, PR China
X. Zheng
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing, Heilongjiang Province 163319, PR China
X.X. Wang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing, Heilongjiang Province 163319, PR China
Y. Li
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing, Heilongjiang Province 163319, PR China
Q. Li
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing, Heilongjiang Province 163319, PR China
C.R. Wang*
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing, Heilongjiang Province 163319, PR China
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eurytrema pancreaticum is one of the most common trematodes of cattle and sheep, and also infects humans occasionally, causing great economic losses and medical costs. In this study, the sequences of the complete nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeat units of five E. pancreaticum individuals were determined for the first time. They were 8306–8310 bp in length, including the small subunit (18S) rDNA, internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), 5.8S rDNA, internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2), large subunit (28S) rDNA and intergenic spacer (IGS). There were no length variations in any of the investigated 18S (1996 bp), ITS1 (1103 bp), 5.8S (160 bp), ITS2 (231 bp) or 28S (3669 bp) rDNA sequences, whereas the IGS rDNA sequences of E. pancreaticum had a 4-bp length variation, ranging from 1147 to 1151 bp. The intraspecific variations within E. pancreaticum were 0–0.2% for 18S rDNA, 0–0.5% for ITS1, 0% for 5.8S rDNA and ITS2, 0–0.2% for 28S rDNA and 2.9–20.2% for IGS. There were nine types of repeat sequences in ITS1, two types in 28S rDNA, but none in IGS. A phylogenetic analysis based on the 18S rDNA sequences classified E. pancreaticum in the family Dicrocoeliidae of Plagiorchiata, closely related to the suborder Opisthorchiata. These results provide useful information for the further study of Dicrocoeliidae trematodes.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Introduction

Eurytrema pancreaticum, also known as the pancreatic fluke, is one of the most common trematodes, living predominantly in the pancreatic and bile ducts of ruminants, such as cattle, sheep, camels and deer, and accidentally infecting humans (Sakamoto & Oikawa, Reference Sakamoto and Oikawa2007). Eurytremiasis is endemic to many countries throughout the world, causing serious losses in the livestock industry. Its symptoms include rapid weight loss, oedema, reduced performance and even death from heavy infections (Graydon et al., Reference Graydon, Carmichael, Sanchez, Weidosari and Widjayanti1992). In recent years, several studies of E. pancreaticum have focused on its epidemiology, and the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of eurytremiasis (Graydon et al., Reference Graydon, Carmichael, Sanchez, Weidosari and Widjayanti1992; Sakamoto & Oikawa, Reference Sakamoto and Oikawa2007). Despite a few molecular-level studies of E. pancreaticum (Chang et al., Reference Chang, Liu, Gao, Zheng, Zhang, Duan, Yue, Fu, Su, Gao and Wang2016; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Xu, Song, Wang and Zhu2016), little molecular research has addressed its complete ribosomal DNA sequence.

The nuclear ribosomal DNAs (rDNAs) of eukaryotes are arranged into tandem repeats. The transcriptional unit contains three genes (18S, 5.8S and 28S rRNA) with two internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) separating the genes and an intergenic spacer (IGS) between the transcriptional units of each repeat (Long & Dawid, Reference Long and Dawid1980). The IGS region can be further divided into two external transcribed spacers (ETSs) and a non-transcribed spacer (NTS). The two ETSs are located at the 5′-end of the 18S rDNA and the 3′-end of the 28S rDNA. The NTS is located between the two ETSs. Different rDNA regions have evolved at different rates, so they can be used as genetic markers for phylogenetic studies at different taxonomic levels (Orosová et al., Reference Orosová, Ivica, Eva and Marta2010; Yamada et al., Reference Yamada, Yoshida, Yoshida, Kuraishi, Hattori, Kai, Nagai, Sakoda, Tatara, Abe and Fukumoto2011; Dai et al., Reference Dai, Liu, Song, Lin, Yuan, Li, Huang, Liu and Zhu2012; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Gao, Zhu and Zhao2012). The IGS rDNA contains repeat sequences that contribute considerable amounts of the intraspecific and interspecific variations in parasites (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Blair, Li, Li, Lin, Zou, Sugiyama, Mo, Yuan, Song and Zhu2011). However, the IGS region of parasites is relatively poorly characterized (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014). Many incomplete ribosomal sequences have been reported, most of which lie between the 18S and 28S rDNAs, and form part of 28S sequences. Therefore, we determined the complete rDNA sequence of E. pancreaticum and analysed its characteristics.

Materials and methods

Parasites and DNA extraction

Adult E. pancreaticum flukes were collected from the pancreases of naturally infected beef cattle in Qiqihaer, Heilongjiang Province, China. The five adult flukes were washed thoroughly with physiological saline and identified to the species level based on their morphological features, as described previously (Olsen, Reference Olsen1974). The total genomic DNAs were extracted from the five individual adult flukes with the TIANamp Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China), according to the manufacturer's instructions, and eluted into 50 μl of double-distilled water. The DNA samples were then stored at −20°C until use.

Amplification, sequencing and assembling of complete rDNA sequences

Five pairs of primers were designed based on the corresponding rDNA sequences available in GenBank. The primer sequences and related information are listed in table 1. The polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed in a total volume of 25 μl, which contained 1 μl of DNA template, 2.5 μl of 10× Ex Taq buffer, 2 μl of deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) mixture (2.5 mm each dNTP), 0.5 μl of each primer (25 mm), 0.2 μl of Ex Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μl) and 18.3 μl of distilled water. The reactions were performed in a thermocycler under the following conditions: 95°C for 2 min (initial denaturation); followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min (denaturation), 54.6–58.8°C for 1 min (annealing) and 72°C for 1 min/kb (extension); with a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. Each amplicon was examined in a 1.0% (w/v) agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and photographed with transillumination. The DL2000 marker was used to estimate the sizes of the rDNA amplicons. Representative PCR products were sent to Life Technology Company (Beijing, China) for sequencing with the same primers used for their amplifications. The five complete rDNA sequences of E. pancreaticum were assembled using the DNASTAR software (Burland, Reference Burland2000).

Table 1. Primers used to amplify the complete rDNA sequence of Eurytrema pancreaticum.

F, forward primer; R, reverse primer.

Sequence analyses of complete rDNA of E. pancreaticum

The complete 18S rDNA sequence of E. pancreaticum was determined by comparing it with those of Paramphistomum cervi (GenBank accession numbers: KJ459934–KJ459938) (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014), Paragonimus kellicotti (HQ900670) and Echinostoma revolutum (GQ463130). The IGS region was determined by comparing it with those of Schistosoma japonicum (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Blair, Li, Li, Lin, Zou, Sugiyama, Mo, Yuan, Song and Zhu2011) and P. cervi (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014). The sequences of these rDNA regions from the individual adult flukes were aligned separately with Clustal X 1.83 (Thompson et al., Reference Thompson, Gibson, Plewniak, Jeanmougin and Higgins1997). The intraspecies sequence variations were determined with a pairwise comparison of the aligned sequences using the MegAlign procedure in DNASTAR (Burland, Reference Burland2000). The base compositions, transitions and transversions were calculated with Mega 5.0 (Tamura et al., Reference Tamura, Peterson, Peterson, Stecher, Nei and Kumar2011). The characteristics of the six regions of the E. pancreaticum rDNA were examined with REPFIND (Betley et al., Reference Betley, Frith, Graber, Choo and Deshler2002; http://cagt.bu.edu/page/REPFINDsubmit) to identify the direct repeats and EMBOSS (Rice et al., Reference Rice, Longden and Bleasby2000; http://www.bioinformatics.nl/emboss-explorer/) to find inverted repeats, using the criteria: nuclearmatches ≥ 10 bp and a mismatches ≤ 1.

Results and discussion

Complete rDNA sequences

The five complete rDNA sequences of E. pancreaticum were 8310 bp, 8309 bp, 8310 bp, 8306 bp and 8309 bp in size, similar to, or slightly shorter than, those of S. japonicum (8271–8857 bp) (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Blair, Li, Li, Lin, Zou, Sugiyama, Mo, Yuan, Song and Zhu2011) and P. cervi (8493–10,221 bp) (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014). The sequences have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers KY490000–KY490004. The complete ribosomal transcription units consisted of the 18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, 28S and IGS regions, and the length of each region is shown in table 2. The A + T content was 47.71–47.85%, slightly lower than that of P. cervi (49.25–49.86%) (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014).

Table 2. Positions and lengths of the ribosomal gene sequences of five specimens of Eurytrema pancreaticum and the published E. pancreaticum sequences.

18S, 5.8S and ITS2 rDNA sequences

The length range of the 18S rDNA sequences of trematodes is usually 1836–1994 bp, whereas the length for all 18S rDNA sequences in the five pancreatic flukes analysed here was 1996 bp, which is longer than the corresponding E. pancreaticum sequence available in GenBank (KJ767631). The intraspecific variations in 18S rDNA were 0–0.2%, which are consistent with those of P. cervi. The A + T contents of 18S rDNA sequences were 49.00–49.10%, which lie within the ranges in the suborders Plagiorchiata (48.18–49.23%) and Echinostomata (48.91–49.42%) (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014), but lower than those in the suborder Strigeata (50.05–51.09%) (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Blair, Li, Li, Lin, Zou, Sugiyama, Mo, Yuan, Song and Zhu2011).

The previously published 5.8S sequence of E. pancreaticum in GenBank (KJ767631) is only 70 bp in length, and the length of 5.8S rDNA sequences have slight differences in parasites, with a range of 150–176 bp (Lin et al., Reference Lin, Chen, Weng, Wu, Zou, Li, Song and Zhu2005; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Jiang, Dong and Nie2012); even so, there are individual exceptions – the length of the 5.8S rDNA sequences of Rhipicephalus microplus (JX974346) is 1151 bp, which is the longest reported. However, the length of the 5.8S rDNA sequences of E. pancreaticum determined in this study was 160 bp, which lies within the range given above, and is the same as those of Clonorchis sinensis, E. revolutum and Echinostoma caproni. There were no intraspecific variations within the E. pancreaticum 5.8S rDNA sequence in the present study. The 5.8S rDNA is highly conserved throughout parasites. For example, a previous study found 98% similarity among the 5.8S sequences of three Moniezia species (Maiko et al., Reference Maiko, Mikiko and Tadashi2015). In the present study, the A + T content of the 5.8S rDNA sequences of E. pancreaticum was 46.25%, which is similar to that of the majority of flukes, including Dicrocoelium dendriticum (KC774524) (46.58%) and E. revolutum (U58102) (46.88%).

The length range of the ITS2 rDNA sequences of trematodes is 234–432 bp, whereas that of invertebrates is 100–1300 bp (Odorico & Miller, Reference Odorico and Miller1997; Harris & Crandall, Reference Harris and Crandall2000). Encephalitozoon cuniculi is a special case in that it lacks the ITS2 rDNA sequence (Peyretaillade et al., Reference Peyretaillade, Biderre, Peyret, Duffieux, Méténier, Gouy, Michot and Vivarès1998). In the present study, the length of ITS2 of E. pancreaticum was 231 bp, which is the shortest among those reported for flukes. The ITS2 rDNA sequences of the five samples of E. pancreaticum in this study were identical to the published E. pancreaticum sequence (KC535543). The A + T content of the ITS2 rDNA sequences was 46.75%, which is lower than that of D. dendriticum (KC774524) (52.14%), in the same family.

ITS1 and 28S rDNA sequences

Previously, data have shown that the length range of the ITS1 rDNA sequences of trematodes is 384–1428 bp (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014). In the present study, in the five samples investigated, the ITS1 rDNA sequence was 1103 bp, which is shorter than that of Trichobilharzia regenti (HM439497.1), but longer than those of other flukes (Karamian et al., Reference Karamian, Aldhoun, Maraghi, Hatam, Farhangmehr and Sadjjadi2011). The intraspecific variation within E. pancreaticum was 0–0.5%. The A + T content of ITS1 in our samples was 45.97–46.15%, which is higher than that in P. kellicotti (HQ900670) or C. sinensis (JQ048601), but lower than that in other trematodes.

We identified nine types of repeat sequence (types A–I) in the ITS1 of E. pancreaticum, with the following characteristics: four copies of an 11-nt complete direct repeat, A, located at 71 nt upstream of the ITS1 sequence; three copies of a 10-nt complete direct repeat, B, separated by 1 nt, which occurred after repeat A; three copies of a 13-nt nearly complete direct repeat, C, separated by 1 nt, which occurred after repeat B; four copies of a 14-nt complete direct repeat, D; four copies of a 12-nt direct repeat, E; four copies of a 19-nt direct repeat, F; four copies of an 11-nt direct repeat, G; four copies of a 19-nt direct repeat, H; and two copies of a 14-nt direct repeat, I, which contained repeat F and overlapped the third repeat B by 4 nt (fig. 1). In this study, the repeat of ITS sequence was shorter than that previously reported in P. cervi (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014). Previous studies have shown that ITS1 rDNA is less conserved than ITS2 rDNA (Luton et al., Reference Luton, Walker and Blair1992), which may be attributable to the numbers and types of repeats present (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014). Long and short repeats causing size variations have been found across a range of helminths, including trematodes (Herwerden et al., Reference Herwerden, Blair and Agatsuma1998, Reference Herwerden, Blair and Agatsuma1999; Warberg et al., Reference Warberg, Jensen and Frydenberg2005), cestodes (Bowles et al., Reference Bowles, Blair and McManus1995) and nematodes (Subbotin et al., Reference Subbotin, Deimi, Zheng and Chizhov2011), but we detected no length variations in this study.

Fig. 1. Alignment of the ITS1 rDNA region of the five samples of Eurytrema pancreaticum.

The previously published 28S rDNA sequence of E. pancreaticum is a partial sequence, only 1160 bp in length (KC602456), whereas the complete 28S sequence amplified in this study had a length of 3669 bp, shorter than those of other flukes, such as S. japonicum (3897 bp) and P. cervi (4186 bp) (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Blair, Li, Li, Lin, Zou, Sugiyama, Mo, Yuan, Song and Zhu2011; Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014). This is the first report of the complete 28S rDNA of E. pancreaticum. The intraspecific variations within E. pancreaticum 28S rDNA were 0–0.2%, which is lower than variations in that of P. cervi (0–0.5%). The A + T content was 47.23–47.32%, which is higher than that of P. cervi (45.86%) (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014), but lower than that of S. japonicum (Z46504.4) (50.24%). The 28S rDNA sequences had only two types of repeats (J and K), which were both 11 nt long and occurred in two copies (fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Alignment of the 28S rDNA sequences of the five individual Eurytrema pancreaticum specimens.

Analyses of IGS rDNA sequences

The length variation in the published IGS sequences of trematodes ranges from 527 to 3035 bp, whereas the IGS of the five E. pancreaticum specimens analysed in this study ranged from 1147 to 1151 bp in length. This length variation of only 4 bp differs markedly from the previously reported length variation in P. cervi (577–2305 bp) (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014), but is similar to that reported previously for S. j aponicum, in which the length range in samples from different sites were 1252–1838 bp, although there was no variation among samples from the same sites (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Blair, Li, Li, Lin, Zou, Sugiyama, Mo, Yuan, Song and Zhu2011).

In the present study, the intraspecific variations in the IGS rDNA sequences of E. pancreaticum were 2.9–20.2%, higher than those in S. japonicum (0–2.3%) (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Blair, Li, Li, Lin, Zou, Sugiyama, Mo, Yuan, Song and Zhu2011), but similar to the results reported for P. cervi (0.2–46.3%) (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014). The IGS region usually contains some repeat sequences (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Blair, Li, Li, Lin, Zou, Sugiyama, Mo, Yuan, Song and Zhu2011; Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014), but no repeat sequence was found in this study. The A + T content in E. pancreaticum was 48.74–49.83%, which is lower than that in other trematodes, including P. cervi (49.74–25.02%) (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhu2014) and S. japonicum (56.79–58.29%) (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Blair, Li, Li, Lin, Zou, Sugiyama, Mo, Yuan, Song and Zhu2011).

Phylogenetic relationships

The 18S rRNA sequence is useful for studying the phylogeny of members of the subclass Digenea (Otranto et al., Reference Otranto, Rehbein, Weigl, Cantacessi, Parisi, Lia and Olson2007). Therefore, the phylogenetic position of E. pancreaticum was determined using 18S rRNA sequences. Using maximum parsimony (MP), Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses, the phylogenetic relationships among members of class Trematoda were determined based on 18S rDNA sequences available in GenBank, with no gaps at either end, and with Schistosoma turkestanicum (AF442499) as the outgroup. Three trees all placed E. pancreaticum within the family Dicrocoeliidae, as shown in fig. 3. Two main clades were observed. All the trematodes in suborders Opisthorchiata and Plagiorchiata clustered together in the larger clade, and members of the suborder Echinostomata clustered alone in the other clade, in accordance with the morphological classification. In the clade including Opisthorchiata and Plagiorchiata, each suborder formed an independent cluster. The five complete 18S rDNA sequences of E. pancreaticum determined in this study (EP1, EP2, EP3, EP4 and EP5) and the E. pancreaticum 18S rDNA sequences published by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) all clustered with Plagiorchiata. It can be seen from the tree that E. pancreaticum is more closely related to Opisthorchiata. These results are consistent with the traditional morphological classification.

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of E. pancreaticum and other trematodes constructed from 18S rDNA sequences using MP/ML/BI methods.

In conclusion, in this study we determined and characterized the complete rDNA sequences of five individual E. pancreaticum specimens for the first time. The 18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 and 28S rDNA regions were all quite strongly conserved, with no length variations, and the length variation in the IGS rDNA region was only 4 bp. A phylogenetic analysis based on the 18S rDNA sequences showed that E. pancreaticum, within the family Dicrocoeliidae of Plagiorchiata, is closely related to the suborder Opisthorchiata. These results provide information upon which to base future studies of the rDNA sequences of the Dicrocoeliidae trematodes.

Financial support

This work was supported, in part, by the Scientific Research Fund of Heilongjiang Provincial Science and Technology Department (GZ13B001), grants from the General Bureau of Land Reclamation of Heilongjiang Province (HNK125B-11-4) and Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University Graduate Innovative Research Project (YJSCX2016-Y17).

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

Flukes were collected from the pancreases of naturally infected beef cattle in accordance with the Animal Ethics Procedures and Guidelines of the People's Republic of China. The performance of this study was strictly according to the recommendations of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Ministry of Health, China, and our protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University.

References

Betley, J.N., Frith, M.C., Graber, J.H., Choo, S. & Deshler, J.O. (2002) A ubiquitous and conserved signal for RNA localization in chordates. Current Biology 12, 17561761.Google Scholar
Bowles, J., Blair, D. & McManus, D.P. (1995) A molecular phylogeny of the genus Echinococcus. Parasitology 110, 317328.Google Scholar
Burland, T.G. (2000) DNASTAR's Lasergene sequence analysis software. Methods in Molecular Biology 132, 71.Google Scholar
Chang, Q.C., Liu, G.H., Gao, J.F., Zheng, X., Zhang, Y., Duan, H., Yue, D.M., Fu, X., Su, X., Gao, Y. & Wang, C.R. (2016) Sequencing and characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome from the pancreatic fluke Eurytrema pancreaticum (Trematoda: Dicrocoeliidae). Gene 576, 160165.Google Scholar
Dai, R.S., Liu, G.H., Song, H.Q., Lin, R.Q., Yuan, Z.G., Li, M.W., Huang, S.Y., Liu, W. & Zhu, X.Q. (2012) Sequence variability in two mitochondrial DNA regions and internal transcribed spacer among three cestodes infecting animals and humans from China. Journal of Helminthology 86, 245251.Google Scholar
Ghatani, S., Shylla, J.A., Roy, B. & Tandon, V. (2014) Multilocus sequence evaluation for differentiating species of the trematode Family Gastrothylacidae, with a note on the utility of mitochondrial COI motifs in species identification. Gene 548, 277284.Google Scholar
Graydon, R.J., Carmichael, I.H., Sanchez, M.D., Weidosari, E. & Widjayanti, S. (1992) Mortalities and wasting in Indonesian sheep associated with the trematode Eurytrema pancreaticum. Veterinary Record 131, 443.Google Scholar
Harris, D.J. & Crandall, K.A. (2000) Intragenomic variation within ITS1 and ITS2 of freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae): implications for phylogenetic and microsatellite studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17, 284291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herwerden, L.V., Blair, D. & Agatsuma, T. (1998) Intra- and interspecific variation in nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 of the Schistosoma japonicum species complex. Parasitology 116, 311317.Google Scholar
Herwerden, L.V., Blair, D. & Agatsuma, T. (1999) Intra- and interindividual variation in ITS1 of Paragonimus westermani (Trematoda: Digenea) and related species: implications for phylogenetic studies. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12, 6773.Google Scholar
Karamian, M., Aldhoun, J.A., Maraghi, S., Hatam, G., Farhangmehr, B. & Sadjjadi, S.M. (2011) Parasitological and molecular study of the furcocercariae from Melanoides tuberculata as a probable agent of cercarial dermatitis. Parasitology Research 108, 955962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, R.Q., Chen, L.S., Weng, Y.B., Wu, S.Q., Zou, F.C., Li, M.W., Song, H.Q. & Zhu, X.Q. (2005) PCR amplification, cloning and sequence analysis of the ITS and 5.8S rDNA of Oesophagostomum isolates. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 38, 639642 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Liu, G.H., Xu, M.J., Song, H.Q., Wang, C.R. & Zhu, X.Q. (2016) De novo assembly and characterization of the transcriptome of the pancreatic fluke Eurytrema pancreaticum (Trematoda: Dicrocoeliidae) using Illumina paired-end sequencing. Gene 576, 333338.Google Scholar
Lockyer, A.E., Olson, P.D., Ostergaard, P., Rollinson, D., Johnston, D.A., Attwood, S.W., Southgate, V.R., Horak, P., Snyder, S.D, Le, T.H., Agatsuma, T., McManus, D.P., Carmichael, A.C., Naem, S. & Littlewood, D.T. (2003) The phylogeny of the Schistosomatidae based on three genes with emphasis on the interrelationships of Schistosoma Weinland, 1858. Parasitology 126, 203224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, E.O. & Dawid, I.B. (1980) Repeated genes in eukaryotes. Annual Review of Biochemistry 49, 727764.Google Scholar
Luton, K., Walker, D. & Blair, D. (1992) Comparisons of ribosomal internal transcribed spacers from two congeneric species of flukes (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda: Digenea). Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 56, 323327.Google Scholar
Maiko, O., Mikiko, A. & Tadashi, I. (2015) Sequence differences in the internal transcribed spacer 1 and 5.8S ribosomal RNA among three Moniezia species isolated from ruminants in Japan. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 77, 105107.Google Scholar
Odorico, D.M. & Miller, D.J. (1997) Variation in the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S rDNA among five species of Acropora (Cnidaria; Scleractinia): patterns of variation consistent with reticulate evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14, 465473.Google Scholar
Olsen, O.W. (1974) Animal parasites: Their life cycles and ecology. 3rd edn. Baltimore, Maryland, USA, University Park Press.Google Scholar
Orosová, M., Ivica, K., Eva, B. & Marta, Š. (2010) Karyotype, chromosomal characteristics of multiple rDNA clusters and intragenomic variability of ribosomal ITS2 in Caryophyllaeides fennica (Cestoda). Parasitology International 59, 351357.Google Scholar
Otranto, D., Rehbein, S., Weigl, S., Cantacessi, C., Parisi, A., Lia, R.P. & Olson, P. D. (2007) Morphological and molecular differentiation between Dicrocoelium dendriticum (Rudolphi, 1819) and Dicrocoelium chinensis (Sudarikov and Ryjikov, 1951) Tang and Tang, 1978 (Platyhelminthes: Digenea). Acta Tropica 104, 9198.Google Scholar
Peyretaillade, E., Biderre, C., Peyret, P., Duffieux, F., Méténier, G., Gouy, M., Michot, B. & Vivarès, C.P. (1998) Microsporidian Encephalitozoon cuniculi, a unicellular eukaryote with an unusual chromosomal dispersion of ribosomal genes and a LSU rRNA reduced to the universal core. Nucleic Acids Research 26, 35133520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protasio, A.V., Tsai, I.J., Babbage, A. et al. (2012) A systematically improved high quality genome and transcriptome of the human blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6, e1455.Google Scholar
Rice, P., Longden, L. & Bleasby, A. (2000) EMBOSS: The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends in Genetics 16, 276277.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, T. & Oikawa, T. (2007) Cubic crystal protein inclusions in the neodermis of the pancreatic fluke, Eurytrema pancreaticum, and Eurytrema coelomaticum. Parasitology Research 101, 13931399.Google Scholar
Subbotin, S.A., Deimi, A.M., Zheng, J. & Chizhov, V.N. (2011) Length variation and repetitive sequences of internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal RNA gene, diagnostics and relationships of populations of potato rot nematode, Ditylenchus destructor Thorne, 1945 (Tylenchida: Anguinidae). Nematology 13, 773785.Google Scholar
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28, 27312739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D.G. (1997) The CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25, 48764882.Google Scholar
Wang, C.R., Gao, J.F., Zhu, X.Q. & Zhao, Q. (2012) Characterization of Bunostomum trigonocephalum and Bunostomum phlebotomum from sheep and cattle by internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Research in Veterinary Science 92, 99102.Google Scholar
Warberg, R., Jensen, K.T. & Frydenberg, J. (2005) Repetitive sequences in the ITS1 region of ribosomal DNA in congeneric microphallid species (Trematoda: Digenea). Parasitology Research 97, 420423.Google Scholar
Yamada, S., Yoshida, A., Yoshida, K., Kuraishi, T., Hattori, S., Kai, C., Nagai, Y., Sakoda, T., Tatara, M., Abe, S. & Fukumoto, S. (2011) Phylogenetic relationships of three species within the family Heligmonellidae (Nematoda; Heligmosomoidea) from Japanese rodents and a lagomorph based on the sequences of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers, ITS-1 and ITS-2. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research 60, 1521.Google Scholar
Zhao, G.H., Blair, D., Li, X.Y., Li, J., Lin, R.Q., Zou, F.C., Sugiyama, H., Mo, X.H., Yuan, Z.G., Song, H.Q. & Zhu, X.Q. (2011) The ribosomal intergenic spacer (IGS) region in Schistosoma japonicum: structure and comparisons with related species. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 11, 610617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, Q.P., Jiang, M.S., Dong, H.F. & Nie, P. (2012) Diversification of Schistosoma japonicum in mainland China revealed by mitochondrial DNA. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6, e1503.Google Scholar
Zheng, X., Chang, Q.C., Zhang, Y., Tian, S.Q., Lou, Y., Duan, H., Guo, D.H., Wang, C.R. & Zhu, X.Q. (2014) Characterization of the complete nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences of Paramphistomum cervi. The Scientific World Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/751907.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Primers used to amplify the complete rDNA sequence of Eurytrema pancreaticum.

Figure 1

Table 2. Positions and lengths of the ribosomal gene sequences of five specimens of Eurytrema pancreaticum and the published E. pancreaticum sequences.

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Alignment of the ITS1 rDNA region of the five samples of Eurytrema pancreaticum.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Alignment of the 28S rDNA sequences of the five individual Eurytrema pancreaticum specimens.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of E. pancreaticum and other trematodes constructed from 18S rDNA sequences using MP/ML/BI methods.