Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T15:41:33.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relative Suitability of Sheep and Cattle as Hosts for the Liver Fluke, Fasciola hepatica L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

K. E. Dixon
K. E. Dixon
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Health, C.S.I.R.O., Veterinary Parasitology Laboratory, Yeerongpilly, Queensland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The suitability of sheep and cattle as hosts for Fasciola hepatica was compared after infection with metacercariae of ovine or bovine origin. It was found that, irrespective of the host of origin, the prepatent periods and the infectivity in both hosts were similar. The flukes in the sheep grew faster, more uniformly and to a greater size, but the individual parasites in the cattle produced approximately twice as many eggs per day as those in the sheep.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 38 , Issue 3-4 , December 1964 , pp. 203 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boray, J. C., and Pearson, I. G., 1960.—“The anthelmintic efficiency of tetra-chlorodifluoroethane in sheep infested with Fasciola hepatica”. Aust. Vet. J., 36, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davtyan, E. A., 1956.—“Pathogenicity of different Fasciola species, and its variability as a result of the conditions of development of their parthenogenetic stages”. Zool. Zh., 35, 1617.Google Scholar
Dawes, B., 1962.—“On the growth and maturation of Fasciola hepatica L. in the mouse”. J. Helminth., 36, 11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durbin, C. G., 1952.—“Longevity of the liver fluke, Fasciola sp. in sheep”. Proc. helm. Soc. Wash., 19, 120.Google Scholar
Faust, E. C., 1924.—“The reactions of the miracidia of Schislosoma japonicum and S. haematobium in the presence of their intermediate hosts”. J. Parasit., 10, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, H. F., 1939.—“Studies on the food and digestive systems of certain parasites. V. On the food of liver flukes”. Chin. med. J., 56, 122.Google Scholar
Kendall, S. B., 1954.—“Fascioliasis in Pakistan”. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 48, 307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, S. B., 1960.—“Epidemiology and control of fascioliasis”. Ada Vet. Acad. Sci. Hun. 10 1.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W., 1947.—“Physiological and histochemical observations on the adult liver fluke Fasciola hepatica L. II. Feeding”. Parasitology, 38, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. L., 1951.—Cited in Lapage, G. (1956). Veterinary Parasitology, p. 269. Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Urquhart, G. M., 1954.—“The rabbit as host in experimental fascioliasis”. Exp. Parasit., 3, 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, C. A., 1959.—“Host location by trematode miracidia”. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 53, 288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed