Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T06:16:26.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gallstones in a Danish population: familial occurrence and social factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Torben Jørgensen
Torben Jørgensen
Affiliation:
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology D, Herlev Hospital, and Glostrup Population Studies, Department of Internal Medicine C, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a cross-sectional study of gallstone disease, ascertained by ultrasonography, the prevalence was assessed in relation to clinically diagnosed gallstones in first degree relatives by selected socioeconomic factors. In both sexes, clinically diagnosed gallstones among first degree relatives occurred significantly more frequently among subjects with than among those without gallstone disease. None of the socioeconomic variables was significantly associated with gallstone disease in females. In males gallstone disease was positively associated with longer school education, living alone, and duration of residence in the municipality of Copenhagen.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 111 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, D. J. P., Gardner, M. J., Power, C. & Hutt, M. S. R. (1979) Prevalence of gall stones at necropsy in nine British towns: a collaborative study. Br. med. J. 2, 1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, L. G. & Ury, H. K. (1978) An improper use of statistical significance testing in studying co-variables. Int. J. Epidemiol. 7, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danzinger, R. G. (1972) Lithogenic bile in siblings of young women with cholelithiasis. Mayo Clin. Proc. 47, 762.Google ScholarPubMed
Diehl, A. K., Rosenthal, M., Hazuda, H. P., Comeaux, P. J. & Stern, M. P. (1985) Socioeconomic status and the prevalence of clinical gallbladder disease. J. chron. Dis. 38, 1019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, G. D., Kannel, W. B. & Dawber, T. R. (1966) The epidemiology of gallbladder disease: observations in the Framingham study. J. chron. Dis. 19, 273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilat, T., Feldman, C., Halpern, Z., Dan, M. & Bar-Meir, S. (1983) An increased familial frequency of gallstones. Gastroenterology, 84, 242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giunchi, G. (1984) Findings on gallstone disease in the ISTAT investigation. In: Epidemiology andPrevention of Gallstone Disease, pp. 5–8. Edited by Capocaccia, L., Ricci, G., Angelico, F., Angelico, M. & Attili, A. F.. MTP, Lancaster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grepco (1984) Prevalence of gallstone disease in an Italian adult female population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 119, 796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halperin, N., Blackwelder, C. E. & Verter, J. I. (1971) Estimation of the multi variate logistic risk function: a comparison of the discriminant function and maximum likelihood approaches. J. chron. Dis., 24, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanis, C. L., Ferrell, R. E., Tulloch, B. R. & Schull, W. J. (1985) Gallbladder disease epidemiology in Mexican Americans in Starr County, Texas. Am. J. Epidemiol. 122, 820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, H. (1984) Living Conditions in Denmark. Compendium of Statistics. Danmarks Statistik, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Horn, G. (1956) Observations on the aetiology of cholelithiasis. Br. med. J. 2, 732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jørgensen, T. (1987) Prevalence of gallstones in a Danish population. Am. J. Epidemiol. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layde, P. M., Vessey, M. P. & Yeates, D. (1982) Risk factors for gall-bladder disease: a cohort study of young women attending family planning clinics. J. Epidemiol. comm. Hlth, 36, 274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mantel, N. & Haenszel, W. (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 22, 719.Google ScholarPubMed
Milner, J. & Hewitt, D. (1972) The occurrence and treatment of gallbladder disease in Ontario. J. chron. Dis. 25, 73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, J. D., Scutchfield, F. D., Proudfoot, W. H. & Benenson, A. S. (1973) Epidemiology of gallbladder disease in an Appalachian community. Hlth Serv. Rep. 88, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, D. L. (1979) Bias in analytic research. J. chron. Dis. 32, 51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, S. H. & Duncan, D. B. (1967) Estimation of the probability of an event as a function of several independent variables. Biometrika, 54, 167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Der Linden, W. (1961) Some biological traits in female gallstone-disease patients. Acta chir. scand. Suppl269.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Der Linden, W. & Lindelof, G. (1965) The familial occurrence of gallstone disease. Ac ta genet. statist, med. 15, 159.Google Scholar
Van Der Linden, W. & Westlin, N. (1966) The familial occurrence of gallstone disease. II. Occurrence in husbands and wives. Acta genet, statist, med. 16, 377.Google ScholarPubMed