Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T22:13:11.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecclesiastical politics and the dismantling of the penal laws in Ireland, 1774–82

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Eamon O’Flaherty
Eamon O’Flaherty*
Affiliation:
Department of Modern History, University College, Dublin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The repeal of much of the penal code in the final decades of the eighteenth century has often been seen as falling neatly into two phases — an initial series of moderate relief acts between 1774 and 1782 and a more radical and controversial phase in the 1790s, halted by the failure of Fitzwilliam’s attempt at a fundamental restructuring of the Irish system of government in 1795. The cautious and limited relief measures of the earlier phase of legislation possess a beguiling symmetry and simplicity when seen as finished pieces of legislation forming part of a series. The provision of an oath of loyalty designed for catholics in 1774 and the removal of the most restrictive parts of the laws preventing catholics from acquiring landed property in 1778 were complemented by the removal, in 1782, of most of the laws restricting catholic worship, education and the clergy. It is easy to establish a division between the removal of obsolete and almost unenforceable economic and religious restrictions in the first phase of relief and the much wider issues involved in challenging the exclusion of catholics from the legal profession, the army, the university, corporations, the franchise and parliament. Yet it would be a mistake to see the first phase of catholic relief as in any way inevitable in the period 1774–82. It is often argued — with considerable justice — that the Irish government’s conversion to catholic relief in the late 1770s was a direct result of decisions taken in Great Britain to reward and encourage the loyalty of English catholics at a time of crisis. An examination of the domestic politics surrounding the relief acts passed between 1774 and 1782 modifies this view considerably. Although the Irish government was decisively influenced by policies formed in London during the first phase of relief legislation, this was not true of the Irish parliament. Irish perspectives on the place of catholics in the state and on the extent of relief were very different from the British government’s viewpoint. This disparity had a considerable effect on the shape of the legislation which finally emerged, and even more on the proposals drawn up by Irish members of parliament actively involved in drafting the legislation affecting catholics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Irish Historical Studies , Volume 26 , Issue 101 , May 1988 , pp. 33 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Corish, P.J., The catholic community in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (Dublin, 1981), pp 130–31 Google Scholar; Dickson, David, New foundations: Ireland, 1660–1800 (Dublin, 1987), pp 147–8 Google Scholar.

2 Dickson, New foundations, p. 147.

3 E.g. McDowell, R.B., ‘Colonial nationalism, 1760–82’ in Moody, T.W. and Vaughan, W.E. (eds), A new history of Ireland, iv (Oxford, 1986), pp 202-3Google Scholar.

4 Wall, Maureen (née MacGeehin), ‘The catholics of the towns and the quarterage dispute in eighteenth-century Ireland’ in I.H.S., viii, no. 30 (Sept. 1952), pp 91–114 Google Scholar; idem, ‘The activities and personnel of the general committee of the Roman Catholics of Ireland, 1757–84’ (unpublished M.A. thesis, University College, Dublin, 1952).

5 Edwards, R. Dudley (ed.), ‘The minute-book of the Catholic Association, 1773–92’ in Archiv. Hib., no. 9 (1942), pp 86-7Google Scholar.

6 Corish, Catholic community, pp 119–20.

7 Hervey to Lord Kenmare, 31 Oct. 1767 (P.R.O.N.I., Babington and Croasdaile papers, D1514/1/5/2).

8 Hervey to Edmond Sexton Pery, 21 July 1778 (H.M.C., rep. 8, app. i, Emly, pp 197–9).

9 Maureen Wall, ‘Catholics of the towns’, pp 91–5.

10 O’Conor to bp of Derry, c. 2 Mar. 1774 (P.R.O.N.I., Babington and Croasdaile papers, D1514/1/5/12). On the bishop’s role, see also Walsh, J.R., ’Le bienfaiteur des catholiques’: Frederick Hervey, 1730–1803, 4th earl of Bristol (Maynooth, 1973)Google Scholar, passim.

11 Catholic Association minute-bk’, pp 16–19.

12 O’Conor to bp of Derry, 5 Mar. 1774 (P.R.O.N.I., Bruce papers, D2798/5/8), but Cf.Coleman, Ambrose, ‘Thomas De Burgo, author of the Hibernia Dominicana and bishop of Ossory’ in Irish Ecclesiastical Record, 3rd ser., xiii (1892), p. 1013 Google Scholar.

13 Coleman, ‘Thomas De Burgo’, p. 1010.

14 Ibid., pp 1012–14.

15 Power, T.R., ‘The Most Rev. James Butler, D.D., archbishop of Cashel, 1774–91’ in Irish Ecclesiastical Record, 3rd ser., xiii (1892), p. 304 Google Scholar.

16 Ibid., pp 311–12.

17 O’Leary, Arthur, Loyalty asserted, or the test oath vindicated and proved by the principles of the canon and civil laws, . . . with an enquiry into the pope’s deposing power and the groundless claims of the Stuarts, in a letter to a protestant gentleman (Dublin, 1777)Google Scholar.

18 Butler to [Cardinal Antoneili], 4 Oct. 1776; Butler to Cardinal Marefoschi, 28 Oct. 1776 (Dublin Diocesan Archives, Linegar-Carpenter papers, MSS 116/2, 147, 149).

19 Chadwick, Owen, The popes and the European revolution (Oxford, 1981), pp 408–11 Google Scholar.

20 Ibid., pp 411–17.

21 17 & 18 Geo. III, c.4.

22 Donovan, R.K., ‘The military origins of the Roman Catholic relief programme of 1778’ in Historical Journal, xxviii (1985), pp 79–102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 On the passage of the bill, see Burns, R.E., ‘The catholic relief act in Ireland, 1778’ in Church History, xxxii (1963), pp 181–206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and O’Flaherty, Eamon, ‘The catholic quesiton in Irish politics, 1774–93 (unpublished M.A. thesis, University College, Dublin, 1981), pp 14–29 Google Scholar.

24 Levacke, A. Paul, ‘Edmund Burke, his friends and the dawn of catholic emancipation in Ireland’ in Cath. Hist. Rev., xxxvii (1952), pp 392–409 Google Scholar; O’Flaherty, ‘Catholic question’, pp 30–32.

25 Sir Henry Cavendish’s reports on debates in the Irish parliament (Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., MS 62–4531, xii, 110; N.L.I, microfilm, pos. 7002–12).

26 Buckinghamshire to North, 21 June 1778 (N.L.I., Heron papers, MS 13306/12).

27 Cavendish reports, xii, 1–5.

28 Buckinghamshire to Weymouth, 4 Mar. 1778 (P.R.O., S.P. 63/459/109-111).

29 ‘Catholic Association minute-bk’, pp 28–30.

30 A copy of the address is in P.R.O., S.P. 63/460/54-6.

31 Troy to Bp Fallon of Elphin, 10 Jan. 1778 (Dublin Diocesan Archives, Troy letter-book, p. 13).

32 Troy to Abp Blake of Armagh, 18 Feb. 1778 (ibid., p. 19).

33 Troy to Fallon, 15 Mar. 1778 (ibid., pp 23–4).

34 ’Catholic Association minute-bk’, pp 30–33.

35 Carpenter’s pastoral, 19 Aug. 1778 (Linegar-Carpenter papers, MS 186).

36 Burke to Nagle, 25 Aug. 1778 ( Correspondence of Edmund Burke, ed. Copeland, T.W., iii (Cambridge, 1961), pp 18–20)Google Scholar.

37 Troy to Fallon, 14 Sept. 1778 (Troy letter-bk, p. 30).

38 Troy to Fallon, 31 Mar. 1779 (ibid., p. 47).

39 ‘Catholic Association minute-bk’, pp 31–2.

40 Kenmare to Bp Moylan, 16 Dec. 1779 ( England, T.R., Life of Rev. Arthur O’Leary (London, 1822), pp 273–4 Google Scholar).

41 Moylan to James Butler, 2 May 1779 ( Bolster, Evelyn (ed.), ‘Moylan correspondence’ in Collect. Hib., xiv (1971), pp 91–2)Google Scholar.

42 Troy to Bp Egan of Waterford, 9 Sept. 1779 (Troy letter-bk, p. 56).

43 Troy to Bps Butler, Egan, McMahon and Fallon, 5–9 Sept. 1779 (ibid., p. 53).

44 Ibid.

45 Egan to Troy, [Sept. 1779]; Troy to Butler, 2 Oct. 1779; Butler to Troy, 11 Oct. 1779 (Linegar-Carpenter papers, MSS 194–6).

46 Troy to Butler, 27 Oct. 1779 (Troy letter-bk, p. 56).

47 Troy to Bp McMahon of Killaloe, 27 Oct. 1779 (ibid., p. 57).

48 Troy to McMahon, 27 Nov. 1779 (ibid., pp 58–9).

49 Butler to Bp Plunket of Meath, n.d. [Aug. 1781 ] and 24 Aug. 1781 ( Cogan, Anthony, The diocese of Meath (3 vols, Dublin, 1862-70), iii, 58-9, 59–60)Google Scholar.

50 Troy to McMahon, 27 Nov. 1779 (Troy letter-bk, p. 59).

51 Troy to Bp Sweetman of Ferns, 5 Dec. 1779 (ibid., pp 60–61).

52 Ibid.

53 Troy to [rector of Irish College, Rome], 30 Mar. 1780 (Troy-Carpenter papers).

54 Kenmare to Burke, 18 Feb. 1780 (Burke corresp., iv, 203–4).

55 As above, n. 53.

56 Ibid. See also Troy to James Butler, 19 Mar. 1780 (Troy letter-bk, p. 69).

57 Troy to Fallon, 10 Feb. 1780 (ibid., p. 67).

58 Burke to Pery, 18 July 1778 (Burke corresp., iv, 7).

59 Freeman’s Journal, 15, 20 June 1780.

60 Hillsborough to Buckinghamshire, 11 June 1780 [Report on the MSS of the marquess of Lothian (H.M.C., London, 1905), p. 368).

61 ‘Catholic Association minute-bk’, pp 51–4.

62 Lord North to Burke, [18 June 1780] (Burke corresp., iv, 248–51).

63 Power, ‘James Butler, abp of Cashel’, pp 302–4.

64 Troy to Carpenter, 23 July 1780 (Troy letter-bk, p. 84).

65 See, for example, Murphy, N., ‘Dr Troy as bishop of Ossory’, 1776-1786 in I.E.R., 4th ser., ii (1897), pp 419-21Google Scholar.

66 Busca to Carpenter, 30 Jan. 1781; Antonelli to Troy, 28 Apr. 1781 (Carpenter-Troy papers, MSS 48, 50).

67 Ibid.

68 Troy to Antonelli, 18 June 1781 (ibid., MS 74).

69 Moylan to Plunket, 10 Nov. 1781 ( Cogan, , Diocese of Meath, iii, 69)Google Scholar.

70 Cardinal Salviati to Butler, 17 Nov. 1781 (ibid., pp 63–4).

71 See above, n. 69. The eventual appointment of Richard O’Reilly, parish priest of Kilcock in the diocese of Kildare, meant that a member of the secular clergy had been appointed to Armagh, but it signalled the defeat of Butler’s hopes and a victory for Troy’s candidate.

72 Eden to Butler, 24 Nov. 1780 (Thurles, Cashel Diocesan Archives (C.D.A.), Butler papers).

73 Plunket to Butler, 16 Dec. 1781 (ibid.).

74 See Pari. reg. Ire., i, 286, 292–3 (27 Feb. 1782).

75 Commons’ jn. Ire., xx, 283, 304.

76 Parl. reg. Ire., i, 15–16 (13 Dec. 1781). For a comment, see Charlemont, to Flood, , 1 Jan. 1782 (Original letters . . . to the Right Hon. Henry Flood, ed. R[udd], T[homas] (London, 1820), pp 107-9)Google Scholar.

77 Heads of a bill enclosed in Carlisle to Hillsborough, 4 Jan. 1782 (P.R.O., S.P. 63/480/22-3).

78 Hillsborough to Carlisle, 24 Jan. 1782 (ibid., ff 86–7).

79 Eden to Hillsborough, 29 Jan. 1782 (B.L., Add. MS 34418/310).

80 Carlisle to Hillsborough, 23 Feb. 1782 (P.R.O., S.P. 63/480/253).

81 Burke to Kenmare, 21 Feb. 1782 (Burke corresp., iv, 401).

82 ‘Catholic Association minute-bk’, pp 64–5.

83 ‘To the members of the Irish senate . . .: considerations . . . submitted on behalf of the regular clergy of this kingdom’ (copy in C.D.A., Butler papers).

84 21 & 22 Geo. III, c.24, s. vi.

85 Parl. reg. Ire., i, 294 (27 Feb. 1782).

86 Troy to Busca, 5 Mar. 1782 (Troy-Carpenter papers, MS 79).

87 Parl. reg. Ire., i, 207 (5 Feb. 1782).

88 Kenmare to Burke, 4 Feb. 1782 (Burke corresp., iv, 401).

89 Butler to Burke, 21 Feb. 1782 (England, Life of O’Leary, p. 278).

90 Butler to Plunket, 24 Apr. 1782 (Cogan, Diocese of Meath, iii, 71).

91 Troy to Busca, 5 Mar. 1782 (Carpenter-Troy papers, MS 79).

92 Butler to Burke, 21 Feb. 1782 (England, Life of O’Leary, p. 278).

93 Ibid.

94 McMahon to Troy, 15 Mar. 1782 (Carpenter-Troy papers, MS 84).

95 Burke to Kenmare, 21 Feb. 1782 (Burke corresp., iv, 400–11).

96 Troy to McMahon, 19 Mar. 1782 (Carpenter-Troy papers, MS 85).

97 Ibid.

98 Busca to Carpenter, 9 Apr. 1782 (ibid., MS 111).

99 Busca to Carpenter, 19 Apr. 1782 (ibid., MS 109).

100 Commons’jn. Ire., xx, 350; 21 & 22 Geo. III, c. 62.